• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Christian morality as presented in Anse`s main character in William Faulkner`S as I Lay Dying

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Christian morality as presented in Anse`s main character in William Faulkner`S as I Lay Dying"

Copied!
80
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

N

I

A

M

S

E

S

N

A

N

I

D

E

T

N

E

S

E

R

P

S

A

Y

T

I

L

A

R

O

M

N

A

I

T

S

I

R

H

C

S

R

E

N

K

L

U

A

F

M

A

I

L

L

I

W

N

I

R

E

T

C

A

R

A

H

C

A

S

I

L

A

Y

D

Y

I

N

G

A

S

A

R

J

A

N

A

P

E

N

D

I

D

I

K

A

N

T

H

E

S

I

S

s t n e m i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P e h t n i a t b O o

t SarjanaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i

y

B

n

a

it

s

il

u

Y

s

i

v

e

D

:

r

e

b

m

u

N

t

n

e

d

u

t

S

0

7

1

2

1

4

1

3

4

E G A U G N A L H S I L G N

E EDUCATIONSTUDYPROGRAM

N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M T R A P E D H C A E T F O Y T L U C A

F E RSTRAININGANDEDUCATION Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S A T R A K A Y G O Y 1 0 2 4

N

I

A

M

S

E

S

N

A

N

I

D

E

T

N

E

S

E

R

P

S

A

Y

T

I

L

A

R

O

M

N

A

I

T

S

I

R

H

C

S

R

E

N

K

L

U

A

F

M

A

I

L

L

I

W

N

I

R

E

T

C

A

R

A

H

C

A

S

I

L

A

Y

D

Y

I

N

G

A

S

A

R

J

A

N

A

P

E

N

D

I

D

I

K

A

N

T

H

E

S

I

S

s t n e m i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P e h t n i a t b O o

t SarjanaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i

y

B

n

a

it

s

il

u

Y

s

i

v

e

D

:

r

e

b

m

u

N

t

n

e

d

u

t

S

0

7

1

2

1

4

1

3

4

E G A U G N A L H S I L G N

E EDUCATIONSTUDYPROGRAM

N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M T R A P E D H C A E T F O Y T L U C A

F E RSTRAININGANDEDUCATION Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S A T R A K A Y G O Y 1 0 2 4

N

I

A

M

S

E

S

N

A

N

I

D

E

T

N

E

S

E

R

P

S

A

Y

T

I

L

A

R

O

M

N

A

I

T

S

I

R

H

C

S

R

E

N

K

L

U

A

F

M

A

I

L

L

I

W

N

I

R

E

T

C

A

R

A

H

C

A

S

I

L

A

Y

D

Y

I

N

G

A

S

A

R

J

A

N

A

P

E

N

D

I

D

I

K

A

N

T

H

E

S

I

S

s t n e m i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P e h t n i a t b O o

t Sa jranaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i

y

B

n

a

it

s

il

u

Y

s

i

v

e

D

:

r

e

b

m

u

N

t

n

e

d

u

t

S

0

7

1

2

1

4

1

3

4

E G A U G N A L H S I L G N

E EDUCATIONSTUDYPROGRAM

N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M T R A P E D H C A E T F O Y T L U C A

(2)

i

N

I

A

M

S

E

S

N

A

N

I

D

E

T

N

E

S

E

R

P

S

A

Y

T

I

L

A

R

O

M

N

A

I

T

S

I

R

H

C

S

R

E

N

K

L

U

A

F

M

A

I

L

L

I

W

N

I

R

E

T

C

A

R

A

H

C

A

S

I

L

A

Y

D

Y

I

N

G

A

S

A

R

J

A

N

A

P

E

N

D

I

D

I

K

A

N

T

H

E

S

I

S

s t n e m i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P e h t n i a t b O o

t SarjanaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i

y

B

n

a

it

s

il

u

Y

s

i

v

e

D

:

r

e

b

m

u

N

t

n

e

d

u

t

S

0

7

1

2

1

4

1

3

4

E G A U G N A L H S I L G N

E EDUCATIONSTUDYPROGRAM

N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M T R A P E D H C A E T F O Y T L U C A

F E RSTRAININGANDEDUCATION Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S A T R A K A Y G O Y 1 0 2 4 i

N

I

A

M

S

E

S

N

A

N

I

D

E

T

N

E

S

E

R

P

S

A

Y

T

I

L

A

R

O

M

N

A

I

T

S

I

R

H

C

S

R

E

N

K

L

U

A

F

M

A

I

L

L

I

W

N

I

R

E

T

C

A

R

A

H

C

A

S

I

L

A

Y

D

Y

I

N

G

A

S

A

R

J

A

N

A

P

E

N

D

I

D

I

K

A

N

T

H

E

S

I

S

s t n e m i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P e h t n i a t b O o

t SarjanaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i

y

B

n

a

it

s

il

u

Y

s

i

v

e

D

:

r

e

b

m

u

N

t

n

e

d

u

t

S

0

7

1

2

1

4

1

3

4

E G A U G N A L H S I L G N

E EDUCATIONSTUDYPROGRAM

N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M T R A P E D H C A E T F O Y T L U C A

F E RSTRAININGANDEDUCATION Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S A T R A K A Y G O Y 1 0 2 4 i

N

I

A

M

S

E

S

N

A

N

I

D

E

T

N

E

S

E

R

P

S

A

Y

T

I

L

A

R

O

M

N

A

I

T

S

I

R

H

C

S

R

E

N

K

L

U

A

F

M

A

I

L

L

I

W

N

I

R

E

T

C

A

R

A

H

C

A

S

I

L

A

Y

D

Y

I

N

G

A

S

A

R

J

A

N

A

P

E

N

D

I

D

I

K

A

N

T

H

E

S

I

S

s t n e m i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P e h t n i a t b O o

t Sa jranaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i

y

B

n

a

it

s

il

u

Y

s

i

v

e

D

:

r

e

b

m

u

N

t

n

e

d

u

t

S

0

7

1

2

1

4

1

3

4

E G A U G N A L H S I L G N

E EDUCATIONSTUDYPROGRAM

N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M T R A P E D H C A E T F O Y T L U C A

(3)
(4)
(5)

v i

Y T I L A N I G I R O S K R O W F O T N E M E T A T S

n i a t n o c t o n s e o d , n e tt ir w e v a h I h c i h w , s i s e h t e h t t a h t d e r a l c e d y lt s e n o h I

e h t d n a s n o it a t o u q e h t n i d e ti c e s o h t t p e c x e , k r o w s ’ e l p o e p t r a p r e h t o r o k r o w e h t

. e b d l u o h s s a r e p a p c if it n e i c s a s a , s e c n e r e f e r

4 2 , a tr a k a y g o

Y July2014

r e ti r w e h T

n a it s il u Y s i v e D

(6)

v

H A I M L I A Y R A K I S A K I L B U P N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E L

S I M E D A K A N A G N I T N E P E K K U T N U

s a ti s r e v i n U a w s i s a h a m a y a s ,i n i h a w a b i d n a g n a t a d n a tr e b g n a

Y SanataDharma :

a m a

N :DEVISYULISTIAN a

w s i s a h a M r o m o

N :071214134

a d a p e k n a k u h a ti r e b m e m a y a s , n a u h a t e g n e p u m li n a g n a b m e g n e p n a g n e D

:l u d u jr e b g n a y a y a s h a i m li a y r a k a w h a b a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U n a a k a t s u p r e P

S E S N A N I D E T N E S E R P S A Y T I L A R O M N A I T S I R H

C MAIN

S R E N K L U A F M A I L L I W N I R E T C A R A H

C AS ILAYDYING

n a k ir e b m e m a y a s n a i k i m e d n a g n e D . ) a d a a li b ( n a k u lr e p i d g n a y t a k g n a r e p a tr e s e B

a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e

k hakuntukmenyimpan ,

, a t a d k u t n e b m a l a d a l o l e g n e m , n i a l a i d e m k u t n e b m a l a d n a k h il a g n e m

a p n a t s i m e d a k a n a g n it n e p e k k u t n u n i a l a i d e m u a t a t e n r e t n i i d n a k i s u b ir t s i d n e m

p a t e t a m a l e s it l a y o r n a k ir e b m e m n u p u a t a a y a s a d a p e k n i z i a t n i m e m u lr e p

s a m a n n a k m u t n a c n e

m ayas ebaga ipenuil .s

. n i a l k a h i p i r a d n a a s k a p a d a a p n a t t a u b a y a s i n i n a a t a y n r e p n a i k i m e D

a tr a k a y g o Y i d t a u b i D

4 1 0 2 y l u J 4 2 : l a g g n a t a d a P

, n a k a t a y n e m g n a Y

n a it s il u Y s i v e D

(7)

i v

Y

o

u

k

n

o

w

,

t

h

e

rt

u

t

,h

E

v

re

y

t

ih

n

g

I

ti

o

d

I

,

o

d

y

o

n

l

f

ro

y

o

u

.

s

m

a

d

A

n

a

y

r

B

t

u

o

h

ti

w

g

n

i

h

t

y

n

a

o

d

t

n

a

c

I

t

a

h

t

w

o

n

k

I

Y

o

u

o t d e t a ci d e d s i si s e h t e h

T : Myl ateFather YY. JukrimanS. r

e h t o

M :DetlaDT. :r

e t si

S DeilanaYulsi itna n a h o Y y d u R : e lc n U

r e h t o m d n a r G d n a r e h t a f d n a r

(8)

ii v

T

C

A

R

T

S

B

A

n i a M s e s n A n i d e t n e s e r P s a y ti l a r o M n a it s i r h C . 4 1 0 2 . s i v e D , n a it s il u Y s r e n k l u a F m a il li W n i r e t c a r a h

C A s ILayDying .Yogyakatra :Depatrmen to f a t a n a S , n a it a c u d E d n a g n i n i a r T s r e h c a e T f o y tl u c a F , n o it a c u d E s tr A d n a e g a u g n a L y ti s r e v i n U a m r a h D . l e v o n e h t d e z y l a n a y d u t s e h

T A s ILayDyingbyWliilamFaulkner .Ansei s . l e v o n e h t n i r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h

t He i sa fathe ro fDalr ,Vardaman ,Tu ll ,Dewey e c a l p l a ir u b e h t o t g n i y d s i o h w e fi w r e h d e s i m o r p s a h e H . l e w e J d n a , h s a C , ll e D n i g n il g g u rt s e h t g n ir u d s e l c a t s b o y n a m o s e r e h T . n o s r e ff e J , e c a l p h tr i b r e h t a A , r e v e w o H . r e h t o m d n a e fi w d e v o l e b r i e h t g n i g n ir

b nse ha shi sown inteniton

.s n o it c a s i h d n i h e b t s ri f e h T . y d u t s s i h t n i d e s s u c s i d s n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r p o w t e r a e r e h T s i m e l b o r p d n o c e s e h T . l e v o n e h t n i d e b ir c s e d r e t c a r a h c s ’ e s n A w o h s i m e l b o r p t c a r a h c s ’ e s n A n i d e t c e lf e r s a y ti l a r o m n a it s ir h C e h t s i t a h

w e .r

e h t s i e c r u o s y r a m ir p e h T . y d u t s y r a r b il s i y d u t s s i h t n i d e s u d o h t e m e h T , l e v o

n A s ILay Dying by Wliilam Faulkner .Thesecondary source swere book s e ti l f o y r o e h t e h t o t d e t a l e

r rature, t heory o fmoral-phliosophica lapproach, t heory . y ti l a r o m n a it s ir h C f o y r o e h t d n a , n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c f o s i o h w e s n A s i t s ri f e h T . h c r a e s e r s i h t f o t u o g n i m o c s tl u s e r o w t e r a e r e h T n o i s i c e d a s a d e b ir c s e

d -make,r r eilableperson,l oya lCh irsitan ,cairng, r especftul , h c i h w s e u l a v y ti l a r o m n a it s ir h C t u o b a s i t l u s e r d n o c e s e h T . n a m c it s i m it p o d n a e r a t a h t s e u l a v y ti l a r o m n a it s ir h C e h T . l e v o n e h t n i e s n A h g u o r h t n w o h s e r a e h t : s e u l a v n i a m e e r h t o t n i d e if i s s a l c e r a l e v o n s i h t n i e s n A h g u o r h t n w o h s e s r u o c e

r to the death o fCh irst ,the atttiude o ffatih and the belonging to God . d n o c e s e h t g n ir e w s n a n i n o s a e r n i a m e h t s e m o c e b y ti l a r o m n a it s ir h C , e r o f e r e h T . n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r p m o

S e suggesiton sarepresented f orf uturer esearcher swho arei nterested i n z

y l a n

a ing t henove lA s ILayDying .Futurer esearche rcan ge tabroad i deaabou t h c a e t o t s l a ir e t a m d n a n a l p n o s s e l o s l a e r a e r e h t ,s i s e h t s i h t n I . y ti l a r o m n a it s ir h C e h t f o s tr a p e m o s m o r f d e t c e l e s s i s i h t f o e c r u o s e h T . I I g n i d a e R c i s a

B novelA s I

. g n i y D y a L d r o w y e

(9)

ii i v K A R T S B A n i a M s e s n A n i d e t n e s e r p s a y ti l a r o M n a it s i r h C . 4 1 0 2 . s i v e D , n a it s il u Y ll i W n i r e t c a r a h

C iam Faulkner sA s ILay Dying .Yogyakarta :Program Stud i i r g g n I a s a h a B n a k i d i d n e

P s ,Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni ,Fakutla s . a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U , n a k i d i d n e P u m lI n a d n a u r u g e K l e v o n a s il a n a g n e m i n i i s p i r k

S A s ILayDyingkaryaWliilamFaulkner .Anse , ll u T , n a m a d r a V ,l r a D i r a d h a y a h a l a d a a i D . i n i l e v o n i d a m a t u h o k o t h a l a d a n a d t a r a k e s g n a y a y n i r t s i a d a p e k i j n a j r e b h a l e t a i D . l e w e J d n a h s a C , ll e D y e w e D n a d n a g n a l a h k a y n a b a d A . n o s r e ff e J u ti a y a y n n a r i h a l e k t a p m e t i d a y n r u b u g n e m m m a l a d n a k a l o g r e

p embawai str idan i bumerekakeJefferson .Namun ,dia punya . a y n n a k a d n it k il a b i d i r i d n e s r e t i s n e t n i . i n i i d u t s m a l a d n a k i s u k si d i d g n a y n a h a l a s a m r e p i s a l u m r o f a u d t a p a d r e T e s n A r e t k a r a k a n a m i a g a b h a l a d a a m a tr e p g n a y n a h a l a s a m r e p i s a l u m r o F m a l a d n a k r a b m a g i

d nove lini .Yang kedua adalah apa saja moraltia skrisitan i . a m a t u h o k o t i a g a b e s e s n A i r a d i s k e lf e r e t g n a y . n a a k a ts u p r e p n a it il e n e p h a l a d a i n i i s p ir k s m a l a d n a k a n u g i d g n a y e d o t e M l e v o n h a l a d a i d u t s i r a d a m a t u r e b m u

S A s ILay Dying karya dar iWliilam

n k l u a

F er .Sumbe rlainnya berasa ldar ibuku-buku yang berka tian dengan teor i s a ti l a r o m n a d , is a s i r e t k a r a k i r o e t ,l a r o m t a f a s li f n a t a k e d n e p i r o e t , n a a r ts a s u s e k .i n a it s i r k a m a tr e p g n a y l i s a H . i n i i d u t s i r a d s is il a n a n a k r a s a d r e b l is a h a u d t a p a d r e T l a d a e s n A h a l a d

a ah seorang yang pengambi lkeputusan ,bertanggung jawab , a u d e k g n a y l i s a H . s it s i m it p o n a d , t a m r o h a s a r a y n u p , i n a it si r k g n a r o e s a k e r e m a k it e k e s n a h o k o t m a l a d t a p a d r e t g n a y i n a it s i r k l a r o m n a k u j n u n e m t e r e k n a g n e d t a r a k e s g n a y a y n i r t s i i r a d i t a m i t e p a w a b m e

m a dengan segala

: l a r o m i a li n a g it m a l a d n a k i s a k if i s a l k i d i n a it s ir K s a ti l a r o M . a y n n a ti l u s e k n a i g a b i a g a b e s a i s u n a m , n a m i p a k i s , s u t s i r K t a f a w n a d n a a ti r e d n e p i n a d a l e n e m a m a t u n a s a l a i d a j n e m h a l e t i n a it si r k s a ti l a r o m , u ti i r a d a k a M . s u ts i r K i r a d a j n e m m a l a

d wabf ormulas ipermasalahanyangkedua.

m a l a d k ir a t r e t g n a y a y n t u j n a l e s i ti l e n e p k u t n u n a k ij a s i d n a r a s a p a r e b e B l e v o n a s il a n a g n e

m A s ILay Dying. Penelti iselanjutnya dapa tmeneilit t entang b m e p a n a c n e r t a p a d r e t a g u j i n i i d u t s m a l a d i D . h il a d i a g a b e s l a r o

m elajarandan

i r e t a m i r a d r e b m u S . II g n i d a e r c is a B r a j a g n e m i r e t a

m -mater ipembelajarandiplih

l e v o n i r a d n a i g a b a p a r e b e b i r a

d A s ILayDying.

i c n u K a t a

(10)

x i

S

T

N

E

M

G

D

E

L

W

O

N

K

C

A

t o n d l u o w I g n i s s e l b s i H t u o h ti w e s u a c e b d o G k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w I , t s ri F

e h t f o s m r o f n i g n i s s e l b s i H e s u a c e b s i t I . s i s e h t y m h s i n if o t e l b a n e e b e v a h

e g a r u o c n e d n a e t a v it o m s y a w l a o h w s d n e ir f ,s r e t s i s , s r e h t o r b , y li m a f y m , s r e r u t c e l

f o s s e c c u s e h t o t e

m ifnishingmyt hesi .s

, r o s n o p s y m k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w I , d n o c e

S Gregoriu s Punto A ij ,

m u H . M ,. d P .

S . who paitenlty guide sand encourage sme du irng the ifnishing o f ,

s r e n i m a x e e h t k n a h t o t e k il o s l a d l u o w I . r e p a p l a n if y

m MonicaEllaHarendtia ,

d E . M , . d P .

S . and Drs .Bambang Hendarto ,M.Hum. who paitenlty help me t o o

t d e s s e r p x e s i e d u ti t a r g t x e n y M . s i s e h t s i h t h s i n

if al l Engilsh Language

s r e r u t c e l m a r g o r P y d u t S n o it a c u d

E fo rthe knowledge they have shared wtih e

h t k n a h t o s l a I . e

m staff soft hes ecretariat fo rpaitenlyprovidinghelp .s ,

y li m a f y m o t s i s e h t s i h t e t a c i d e d I , d ri h

T my l atefathe rYYJukirmanS .

r e h t o m , n e v a e h n

i Detla DT ,siste rDeilana Yuils itna, sisters ,brothers ,uncle n

a h o Y i d o

R who suppor tme in doing my thesis . Icould no t ifnish my thesi s ,

o S . s s e n d n i k d n a t r o p p u s ri e h t t u o h ti

w Idedicatet hist hesist othem.

s d n e ir f y m o t e d u ti t a r g y m s s e r p x e o t e k il o s l a d l u o w

I , Menantang

ti g n a

L ,AgusitnaDeiandMar itnu sPranala,who neve rstopencouragingmet o ti

W . s i s e h t s i h t h s i n

if houtt hei rhelp , Iwouldno tbeablet o ifnishmyt hesi .s

,t s a

L Iwli lalsosay t hank you t o PakKoes ,Pak Baril ,MbaDanik who .

s i s e h t y m g n i h s i n if n i e m g n it r o p p u s s y a w l a e r

(11)

x

e m g n it r o p p u s r o f , m e h t f o h c a e n o it n e m t o n d l u o c I o h w , e s o h

t du irngmy itmei n

(12)

i x

S

T

N

E

T

N

O

C

F

O

E

L

B

A

T

e g a P T

I

T LEPAGE………………………………………………………………. i …

S E G A P L A V O R P P

A ..................... ii

E G A P L A N O I T A C I D E

D ............................................................................ vi Y

T I L A N I G I R O S K R O W F O T N E M E T A T

S ........................................... v I

L B U P N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E

P KASI ........................................... iv .. . O T T O

M iiv

T C A R T S B

A …………………………………………………………………. iiv i K

A R T S B

A ……………………………………………………........................ xi

S T N E M E G D E L W O N K C

A ……................................................... iix S

T N E T N O C F O E L B A

T …………………………………………………… vx i

F O T S I

L APPENDICES……………….....………….............................. .... x vii

. I R E T P A H

C INTRODUCTION

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … y d u t S e h t f o d n u o r g k c a B 1 .

1 ... 1

… … s n o it a l u m r o F m e l b o r P 2 .

1 ……….. .. ... 3

… … … … … … … … … … … y d u t S e h t f o e v it c e j b O 3 .

1 ... 3

… … . … … … … … … … … … … … … … … y d u t S e h t f o s ti f e n e B 4 .

1 ... 4

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … s m r e T e h t f o s n o it i n if e D 5 .

(13)

ii x .

I I R E T P A H

C THEORETICALREVIEW

… … … … … … … … … … … … … s e ir o e h T d e t a l e R f o w e i v e R 1 .

2 ………….. 7

1 . 1 .

2 Theoryo fCharacte randCharacteirzaiton…... 7

… … … n o it a z ir e t c a r a h C n o y r o e h T s ’ y h p r u M 2 . 1 .

2 ... 9

… … … … … y ti l a r o M n a it s ir h C 3 . 1 .

2 ………... 01

. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … .. s s e n t h g i R l a r o M 1 . 3 . 1 .

2 11

. … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … y ti l a r o M l a n o s r e P 2 . 3 . 1 .

2 11

… … … … … … … … … … … … t s ir h C f o h t a e d e h t o t e s r u o c e R 3 . 3 . 1 .

2 … …… 21

… … … … .. . … … … … … … … … … … … h ti a F f o s e d u ti tt A 4 . 3 . 1 .

2 ... 3..1

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … t s ir h C o t g n i g n o l e B e h T 5 . 3 . 1 .

2 ... 41

. … … … … … … … … l a r o M d n a e r u t a r e ti L n e e w t e b p i h s n o it a l e R e h T 2 .

2 .. 5....1

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … k r o w e m a r F l a c it e r o e h T 3 .

2 ... 61

. I I I R E T P A H

C METHODOLOGY

… … … … … … … … … … … … y d u t S e h t f o t c e j b O 1 .

3 ………..………... 71

… … … .. . … … … … … … … … … … … … … … y d u t S e h t f o h c a o r p p A 2 .

3 ... 81

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … y d u t S e h t f o d o h t e M 3 .

3 ... 81

. V I R E T P A H

C ANALYSIS

1 .

4 Descirpitono fAnseBundren’ sCharacter………... 02

1 . 1 .

4 Physica lDescirpiton………... 22

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … n o it p ir c s e D y ti l a n o s r e P 2 . 1 .

4 ... 32

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … r e k a m n o i s i c e D 1 . 2 . 1 .

(14)

ii i x

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … n a it s ir h C l a y o L A 2 . 2 . 1 .

4 ... 52

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … l u ft c e p s e R 3 . 2 . 1 .

4 ... 82

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … e l b a il e R 4 . 2 . 1 .

4 ... 92

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … g n ir a C 5 . 2 . 1 .

4 ... 92

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … c it s i m it p O 6 . 2 . 1 .

4 ... 03

… … r e t c a r a h c s ’ n e r d n u B e s n A n i d e t c e lf e r s a y ti l a r o m n a it s ir h C 2 .

4 ... 13

u o c e R 1 . 2 .

4 rset ot heDeatho fCh irs t………... 13

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … h ti a F f o e d u ti tt A 2 . 2 .

4 ... 43

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … t s ir h C o t g n i g n o l e B e h T 3 . 2 .

4 .. ... 73

V R E T P A H

C .CONCLUSIONSANDSUGGESTIONS

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … s n o i s u l c n o C 1 .

5 ... 39

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … s n o it s e g g u S 2 .

5 ... 40

S E C N E R E F E

R ………………………………………………………........... 43 S

E C I D N E P P

A ………………………………………………………………. 45

(15)

v i x

S E C I D N E P P A F O T S I L

s e c i d n e p p

A Page

.

A TheSummaryo fA sLay IDying.................................. 4 6 .

B TheBiographyo fWliilamFaulkner............................ 5 1 .

C CourseOutilne............................................................... 5 8 .

D LessonPlan.................................................................... . 6 0 .

(16)

1 I R E T P A H C

N O I T C U D O R T N I

, s n o it a l u m r o f f o m e l b o r p , y d u t s d n u o r g k c a b h ti w s l a e d r e t p a h c s i h T

e v it c e j b

o o f the study , bene if t o f the study , and de ifniiton o f terms . The c

i p o t e h t f o e c n a tr o p m i e h t s e b ir c s e d y d u t s f o d n u o r g k c a

b o fthe study .The s

m e l b o r p e h t e r a s n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r

p tha tbecome t he main idea o fthe study . f

o e v it c e j b o e h

T thestudyi st hepurposeof t hisstudy .Thebenefti soft hestudy y

fi t n e d

i the benefti so fthe study fo rreade rand anothe rfuture researcher .The d n a g n i d n a t s r e d n u s i m d i o v a o t r e d r o n i s m r e t h ti w s l a e d s m r e t f o n o it i n if e d

. n o it a t e r p r e t n i s i m

1 .

1 Backgroundoft heStudy

t c e j b u s g n it s e r e t n i n a s i e r u t a r e ti

L to dea lwtih .I ti sa universa lar ttha t s

n i a t n o

c somekind so fhuman aspects ofl fiesuch a smoral ,history ,psychology , l

a i c o

s ,poilitc and more .Wtih ltierature ,we can ge tmany expeirence sthrough .

y a l p d n a y rt e o p , l e v o n e k il s k r o w y r a r e ti

l We can also learn abou tvairou s s

m e l b o r

p ,which are related t o theaspect so fhuman lfie .Fu trhermore, l tierature d

o o g a e b n a

c teache rfo ru sbecause as t he proverb say ,s expe irence i sa good .r

e h c a e t

n i e fi l n a m u h f o s t c e p s a s u o ir a

V a story are revealed t hrough characters e

l o r ri e h t y a l p h c i h

w s ast hepresentaitons oft heauthor’st hough tandexpeirences . e

h t f o e g a s s e m e h t e z i n g o c e r o s l a n a c e

(17)

e h t ,s r e t c a r a h c e h t h g u o r h T . s r e t c a r a h c e h t f o n o it c

a autho rshares and expresse s s

i

h persona l aspec t such a s hi s mind , hi s feeilng , hi s expeirence s and hi s .

r e d a e r e h t o t n o it a n i g a m

i A characte r tisel fi salso the reailzaiton o fperson’ s l

a r o

m o irentaiton ,which refer sto the fac ttha tmoraltiy i sa way o fvalue sone d

o o g a e m o c e b o t s d e e

n o rakindperson . s

i r e n k l u a F m a il li

W wel lknown a sa drta iitona lCh irsitan morailstin t he d

lr o

w .M ost o fhi swork sdeal wtih mora lvalues in the form o fciritcizing the n

I . e d o c l a r o m d n a e fi l s r e n r e h t u o

S A s ILayDying, Wliilam Faulkne ralso deals r

h t s t c e p s a l a r o m h ti

w ough Anse, t hemain characte roft hi snove .l Therefore, in n a it s ir h C e h t w a r d d n a r e t c a r a h c s ’ e s n A d n if o t s m i a r e ti r w e h t s i s y l a n a s i h t

.l a e v e r o t s t n a w r e n k l u a F t a h t y ti l a r o m

n a it s ir h

C moraltiy( values)i nt henove li sseen ast hemos tvaluablet ot he n

a w r e ti r w e h t e r o f e r e h t ,r e ti r

w tst oshare tit o t her eaders .Anseinhisr olea sthe r

e t c a r a h c n i a

m appear sveryo tfenint henovelthroughspokeno runspokenword s n

i a t n o c t a h

t Ch irsitan moraltiy (values) .Theappearanceo fAnsei snoto nnly o e

b d l u o c t i t u b , n o it a r r a n n w o s i

h nsee ofr manothe rcharacter’ snarraitona swel.l r r a n n e e t h g i e e r a e r e h T . n o it a r r a n h ti w s n i g e b l e v o n e h t f o y r o t s e h

T ators ,

e v a h s r o t a r r a n l a r e v e s t u

b veryi mpo trantr olesi nt henovel .Thes toryoft henove l t

c e f r e p e b t o n l li

w wtihoutt hem. Eachoft hen raratorshast hei rownwayorr ole s . h c r a e s e r e h t f o r e ti r w e h t r o f y ll a i c e p s e s r e d a e r e h t o t s ti a rt r i e h t g n i w o h s n

i Fo r

l e v o n e h t n i , n o it a m r o f n i r e h tr u

f A s ILay Dying ,Anse’ sCh irsitan moraltiy )

s e u l a v

( inhi sspoken o runspoken wordsi sonlyan ailbii n ordert oge thi snew h

t e e

(18)

s w o h s e h h c i h w y s ir c o p y h s ’ e s n A h g u o r h t t a h t s d n if r e ti r w e h t ,r e v e w o H

it s ir h C h ti

w anmoraltiy(values) .Fo rexample :whenheandhi sson sanddaughte r s

a n o s r e f f e J o t ) n e r d n u B e i d d A ( e fi w s i h g n ir

b he rbitrh bu ira lplace, there was a

d e n e p p a

h confilct ,bu tAnse’ ssay s“F orGod”whichmeansi n t henameo fGod . n

a it s ir h C y n a m o s e r a e r e h

T moraltiy valuesin t henove ldu irng Anse’ ssrtuggle. tt

a e h

T tiude o ffatih t o t heGod and t hankfulnes sby Anse i n facing obstacles i n y b l e v o n e h t f o y r o t s e h t e r a h s o t t n a w r e ti r w e h t n o s a e r n i a m e h t e m o c e b e fi l

. h c r a e s e r e h t g n it ir w

,l l a e v o b

A in t his t hesi ,s t he wrtie ranalyze Anse’ shypoc irsy which wa s t

n a e

m to f u flli lhi spersona lneed and desrie ,namely t o ge tanew t eeth and new n i e c a l p l a ir u b h tr i b e h t o t k o o t e h n e h w d e n e p p a h s a w t n e d i c n i s i h T . e fi w

. n o s r e f f e J

2 .

1 ProblemFormula itons m e l b o r p o w t e r a e r e h

T s formulatedtodiscuss: .

1 Howi sAnse’ scharacte rdescirbedi nt henovel? .

2 Wha tkind so fCh irsitanmoraltiy(values) ea r relfectedi nAnse’ scharacter?

3 .

1 Objecitvesoft heStudy

o t s i ,t s ri F . s n o it a l u m r o f m e l b o r p r e w s n a o t e r a h c r a e s e r e h t f o s m i a e h T

n e r d n u B e s n A e b ir c s e

(19)

m e l b o r p f o h t o

B formulaiton sare interconnected to each other .Answeirng the o

d n o c e s e h t f o r e w s n a e h t s l a e v e r e n o t s ri

f n e.

4 .

1 Benefti soft heStudy 1

. 4 .

1 FutureResearcher

s a h l e v o n e h t f o y d u t s e h

T many impacts fort he researche respecially i n o

s n o it c a e h T . s t c e p s a y ti l a r o m n a it s ir h

C ft hecharactersi n t henove laredfiferen t n

i g n i v e il e b f o g n i n if e d n

i God .Character sshow tha tbeileving i n God means a

h u o y l l a g n i v i

g veandgiveal lyours adnessi nf ron to fHisf ee.t

2 . 4 .

1 Reader soft heNovel y

ll u f e p o

H tt ha reader sof t her esearch eg tanewenilghtenmen taboutt he d

o G o t g n i v e il e b n i g n i n a e

m , especially the meaning o f Ch irsitan moraltiy I

. ) s e u l a v

( n t henovel ,characters osh w s that t hedevoiton t o God i sno tonly t he y

a d l l a d o G o t n o it o v e d r u o l l a g n i v i g o s l a t u b , y a d a n i n o it c a l a u t c

a s.

. 4 .

1 3TheOtherResearcherorFutureResearcher

e c n e r e f e r w e n e m o c e b y a m l e v o n e h t f o y d u t s e h

T o fknowledge in e

g a s s e m e h t g n i y fi s s a l c r o g n i n if e

d oft heCh irsitan moraltiybytheauthor fo A s I g

n i y D y a

L tt sha i deilvered i n thenovel .Ther esearch may becomean addiitona l e

h t r o f e g d e l w o n

(20)

5 .

1 Deifniitono fTerms f e r a e r e h

T ou rdeifniitont ermsareusedincasetomaket her esearchmore r

e h t o r o s r e d a e r r o f e l b a d n a t s r e d n

u futureresearchera sbelow:

1 . 5 .

1 Chrisitan o t g n i d r o c c

A Webster’ sDicitonary Unabridged of theEngilsh Language (1983) ,the word “Ch irsitan” mean sa person who beileve sin the teaching so f

t s ir h C s u s e

J .

2 . 5 .

1 Moraltiy o t g n i d r o c c

A Cambridge Advanced Learner’ s Dicitonary the word d n a r o i v a h e b d a b r o d o o g r o f s d r a d n a t s f o t e s l a i c o s r o l a n o s r e p a s i y ti l a r o m

. e l b a t p e c c a r o t s e n o h , t h g ir g n i e b f o y ti l a u q e h t r o , r e t c a r a h c

3 . 5 .

1 Character o t g n i d r o c c

A Abrams(1981: )2 , c0 haracter saretheperson i ndramaitco r r

o w e v it a r r a

n k ,endowedwtihmora landdisposiitonquailitest ha tareexpressedi n .

(21)

4 . 5 .

1 Characteriza iton o t g n i d r o c c

A Mary and Samue lWood (1971: 20) ,characte irzaiton i san ’

r o h t u

a sproces sin creaitng a character .The autho rcan use driec to rdramaitc t

c e ri D . r e t c a r a h c a y fi t n e d i o t d o h t e

m method mean sthe autho rdescirbe sa y

lt c e ri d r e t c a r a h

c bystaitng tii nhi swork. Hecandescirbehow tallt hecharacte r c

t e , s i e h d o o g w o h , s

i .Dramaitcmethodmean stheautho rplaces thecharacteri n r o s e v a h e b e h r o e h s y a w e h t m o r f y ti l a n o s r e p s i h r o r e h w o h s o t s n o it a u ti s

(22)

7 I I R E T P A H C

E R U T A R E T I L D E T A L E R F O W E I V E R

; s tr a p n i a m o w t o t n i d e d i v i d s i r e t p a h c s i h

T t he f srist i review o frelated d

n a s e ir o e h

t the second one is theoreitca lframework .The fris ttheory i sthe l

a r o

m -phliosophica l approach , the second i s the theory o f characte r and o

it a z ir e t c a r a h

c n ,and the thrid theory si the theory o fCh irsitan moraltiy .The d i o v a o t r e d r o n i y s ir c o p y h l a r o m s a h c u s n o it a m r o f n i l a n o it i d d a e m o s s d d a r e ti r w

. g n i d n a t s r e d n u s i m

1 .

2 Reviewo fRelatedTheories

s e ir o e h t d e t a l e r e e r h t s n i a t n o c t r a p s i h

T of t he approaches namely mora l d

n a r e t c a r a h c , s e h c a o r p p a l a c i h p o s o li h p d n

a characteirzaiton , and Ch irsitan y

ti l a r o

m .

1 . 1 .

2 Theoryo fCharacterandCharacteriza iton l

e v o n

A contain s o f such element s ilke plot , dialogue , setitng and r

e t c a r a h

c .Barnettde ifnes tt ha thecharacteri st hecauseoft heeventst ha thappen s h

g u o r h

t characte r rtati sa snd h i response sto the othe rcharacte rtha the o rshe s

t e e

m in t he story of t he nove l(Barnett ,1988: 17 .) Barnet oa ls deifnest ha tthe ’

r e h t

o sopinion abou thimo rhe raddsi nformaitonand clea rdescirpiton abou the r .

o d s r e h t o t a h w , m i h r o

: 1 8 9 1 ( s m a r b

A 20 )divide scharacteri nto t wo meanings and he gives an n

o it a n a l p x

(23)

t u o b

a the character ;f tri s i sa sho tr person and the second i sa witty type o fa .

n o s r e

p Fromthi sexample ,Abram sexplainshowt hepersonarepresented byt he r

o l a r o m s a h n o s r e p e h t r e h t e h w l e v o n e h t f o r e d a e

r disposiitona lquailites .In e

b n a c s r e t c a r a h c e h t ,s d r o w r e h t

o seenf romt heriacitonands peech. o

h t w a H y m e r e

J r n deifne scharacte irzaiton by wha tcharacter sdo ,say, ro t

a h

w other ssay about t hem and by t he setitng. However ,Hawthorn emphasize s t

a h

t characters aredeifnedbyothe rcharactersa swell (Hawthorn ,1992:1 9 .) ,

r e t s r o

F (1974: )4 6 divide scharacterinto lfa tandr ound character .F rlato o

w

t -dimensiona lcharacter si madefrom “asinglei deao rqualtiy”and presented lt

u o n a n

i ine wtihou tdetali ,therefore i tcan be desc irbed as a single phrase o r .

e c n e t n e

s Holman ( 1986 :204 )addstha ta lfa tcharacte rneve rsurp irsest hereader (Holman ,1986: 204). Fla tcharacte ri seasy to recognize by the reader and the

y ll a u s u n a c r e t c a r a h

c be represented by a single sentence. Fu trhermore , he s

n i a l p x

e t hat round characte ri sa characte rtha tha scomplex temperamen tand n

o it a v it o

m .

s r e t c a r a h c r o n i m d n a r o j a m o t n i d e z ir o g e t a c o s l a s i r e t c a r a h

C yb Henkle

(1977: )8 . 8 Henkle explain stha tmajor characters called sa cenrta l o rmain g

n i d r o c c A . r e t c a r a h

c to Abrams (1998:2 1 ,) the autho rfocuseson t hecharacter s y

r o t s e h t f o d n e e h t o t g n i n n i g e b m o r

f . Stanton (1965 :17) on the othe rhand, s

n i a l p x

e tha tcharacter smake some changes toward reader’ sinterpretaiton in y

r o t s e h t g n i d a e

r . Stanton ( 1965 :17 .) Fu trhermore ,according t o Koesnosoebroto 8

9 1

(24)

s e t a e r c r o h t u

a mino rcharacterswtih tisf uncitonst o desc irbehow t hestory lfows l

e v o n e h t n

i .

2 1. 2. Murphy’ sTheoryonCharacteriza iton y

h p r u

M (1972 : 161-173 ) classi ife s nine method s in presen itng the s

a r e t c a r a h c , n o it p ir c s e d l a n o s r e p e r a y e h T . s r e t c a r a h

c i ti sseen by another ,

d n a , t h g u o h t ,t n e m m o c t c e ri d , n o it c a e r , s r e h t o f o s n o it a s r e v n o c , e fi l t s a p , h c e e p s

. m s ir e n n a m

o s r e p s i d o h t e m t s ri f e h

T na ldesc irp iton .Theautho rdescirbes acharacter’ s i

h e k il e c n a r a e p p

a sf ace,s kin ,eyes ,andclothes (Murphy ,1972:161 .)Thesecond r

e t c a r a h c s

i sa seen by another .The autho ruses a person’s characte ra si ti s y

b d e b ir c s e

d theeye sandopinion so fanothe rcharacte r(Murphy ,1972:162 .)The .

h c e e p s s i d ri h

t From the speech o fthe characte,r the autho rdescirbes no e’ s characte rthrough t hewordst ha tcomeoutf romhi so rhe rmouthand thestyleo f

h c e e p s r e h r o s i

h (Murphy ,1972:164).

r o s i h y b d e c n e u lf n i s i r e t c a r a h c s ’ n o s r e p A . e fi l t s a p s i d o h t e m h tr u o f e h T p r e

h astl fie .Theeventt ha tha shappenedi nt hepasti st obeusedtodeterminet he y

r o t s e h t n i r e t c a r a h

c (Murphy ,1972:166 .)The if tfh methodi sconversaiton wtih e

z i n g o c e r n a c r e d a e r e h T . s r e h t

o a person’ scharactert hrough wha tothe rpeople y

a

s abou thimo rher( Murphy ,1972:167). s

n o it c a e r s i h t x i s e h

T .I thappen swhen one’ scharacte rface problems . d

r a w o t n o it c a e r h c a

E s theproblem sshowst hecharacter’ stendencyt hatgives the o

b a n o it p ir c s e d a s r e d a e

(25)

e h t a h t r e t c a r a h c e h t o t y lt c e ri d t n e m m o c d n a n o it p e c e r l a n o s r e p r o s i h s e v i g

( s e t a e r

c Murphy ,1972:170 .) t

h g i e e h

T h method i st hought .By knowing aperson’st hough,t t heautho r t

u o b a g n i k n i h t s i n o s r e p a t a h w f o e g d e l w o n k t c e ri d s u e v i g n a

c (Murphy ,

) 1 7 1 : 2 7 9

1 .The las tmethod i smanneirsm .By using manneirsm ,the autho rcan s

m s ir e n n a m s ’ r e t c a r a h c a e b ir c s e

d . tI used to re lfec t the personaltiy o fthe a

h

c racte r(Murphy ,1972: 317 .) 1

.

2 .3 ChrisitanMoraltiy h c u F o t g n i d r o c c

A in hi sbook Chrisitan Moraltiy :The Word Become s h

s e l

F (1970: ,9) Ratzinge rde ifne st he impo trance i n determining the prope lry f

o g n i n a e

m Ch irsitan tha tthe character o fCh irsitan moraltiy i srelated wtih “reasonandf atih”.

p i h s n o it a l e r r e t n i e h t d n a t s r e d n u o t e r a e w w o h s i e r e h s e s ir a h c i h w m e l b o r p e h T

a f f

o tih wtih reason ,o rwtih though tpattern swhich are human in the genera l e h t d n a s e it il i b i s s o p e h t g n i n r e c n o c s e s ir a n o it s e u q e h t y ll a n if d n a ; e s n e s

n o s a e r f o s e ir a d n u o

b vi savisfatih(Fuch ,1970: .)9

i , e r o m r e h tr u

F n explaining Ch irsitan moraltiy (values) ,the wrtie ro fthe : h ti w g n il a e d e r a h c i h w , y ti l a r o m n a it s ir h C t u o b a n o it i n if e d s ’ h c u F g n i s u , h c r a e s e r

d e t a l e r y ti l a r o m n a it s ir h C ) b ( ,s s e n t h g ir l a r o m h ti w d e t a l e r y ti l a r o m n a it s ir h C ) a (

c e r e h t s n a e m y ti l a r o m n a it s ir h C ) c ( , y ti l a r o m l a n o s r e p h ti

w ourse t o t he death o f

t s ir h

C , (d )Ch irsitan moraltiy a sthe atttiude o ffatih o fperson, (e )Ch irsitan )

s e u l a v ( y ti l a r o m n a it s ir h C s n w o o h w n o s r e p a t a h t s n a e m y ti l a r o

m in him o r

o t s g n o l e b s i fl e s r e

h Ch irs,t asslaveast heGod (Ch irst )arleady becomeaslave .s

(26)

2. 31 1. . MoralRightness h

c u

F (1970:14) de ifnes tha tmoraltiy i sin a person’s free atttiude sand s

i t I . s n o i s i c e

d called mora lgoodness, t th sa i oppostie sto persona limmoraltiy .)

s s e n d a b

( Mora lgoodnes si sexpressed t hrough t hebehavio ro fhuman beingi n ,

y lt n e u q e s n o c , d lr o w e h

t int hef utureacitvaitonands hapingoft hi swo lrd.

3 . 1 .

2 . 2PersonalMoraltiy d l u o c y ti l a r o m n a it s ir h

C no tbeseparated f rommoraltiy i n personal .Fuch :

0 7 9 1

( 20 )state stha tmoraltiy wtih the prope rword can be foretold a sa free .

n o s r e

p Fuch deifne spersona lmoraltiy a sthe oppostie of egoitsm .In othe r ,

s d r o

w persona lmoraltiymeanst heopennes so fone’st oGod,men ,anddeedsand

;t h g

ir which means i ti sthu s“sacir ifcia lg fi tacceptable to God” a si tctied in s

e p S t e m u i d u a

G ( Gaudiume tSpes , 83 inFuch ,1970: 12 .) Fu trhermore ,p ser ona l f

o n o it c a e h t s i y ti l a r o

m inne ropennes sand readines sto do the good o fother s G

( audiume tSpes :3 9inFuch,1970: 12 .)

y ti l a r o m n a it s ir h C t a h t s d d a h c u F , y ti l a r o m n a it s ir h C f o s a e d i r e h tr u f r o F

t h g ir e h t r o f e r a c o t s

i o fshapingt hewo lrdo fman( Gaudiume tSpes :3 9inFuch , :

0 7 9

1 )21 ,o rinothe rwords ,Ch irsitanmoraltiyi sani ncilnaitont ot heprope r“ac t h

t u rt d n

a of l fie” (Gaudium Sp 2es: 4 in Fuch ,1970: 12 .) Ch irsitan moraltiy ,in s

i s d r o w r e h t

o a readines sto be involved fo rthe wo lrd a si tctied Gaudium e t ,s

e p

S 34 as i tdeifned by Fuch ,1970: 22 ) ,fu trhermore ,Fuch adds t ha tCh irsitan s

i y ti l a r o

(27)

n a it s ir h

C moraltiyha smeaning sa Fuchde ifnesi t(1970:22 )a sareadines s o

t eb involvedf ort hesakecorrec tshapingoft hewo lrd.I nothe rwords, Ch irsitan s

i y ti l a r o

m opennes sand readiness to ac tin righteousness ,generostiy , ifdeltiy , r o f s s e n i d a e r d n a s s e n n e p o s a s s e n d o o g l a r o m d e ll a c e b n a c t i e r o f e r e h t , y ti t s a h c

n o o s d n a s ri a f f a l a n o it a n r e t n i , c i m o n o c e , li v i c n i r o i v a h e b t h g

ir (Fuch ,1970: 12

-.) 2 2

h c u

F (1970 :20 )emphasizes t hat Ch irsitan moraltiy ha sa relaiton wtih .

e v o

l Fuch takes Vaitcan Counci lII documents in de ifning Ch irsitan moraltiy )

s e u l a v

( tha tspeaks abou tloveast he fundamenta latttiudeo fpersona lmoraltiy. t

a h t s d d a e

H lovei st ermed“thef undamentall awo fhumanperfeciton”( Gaudium s

e p S t

e 38asi nFuch ,1970:2 2 .)Hedeifnest hatl ovebecomesthebasici nl fie in g

n i w o r

g fruti rf o the wo lrd (Gaudium e tS sp : e 16 i n Fuch ,1970:22) ; t hi salso G

( e c it s u j d n a p l e h e v i e c e r s r e h t o r b t a h t e e s o t s s e n i d a e r e h t s n a e

m audium e t

Sp es: 72 in Fuch 1970: 22 )and t o work together to change the wo lrd . G

( audiume tSpes :38i nFuch ,1970:22) .

3 . 1 .

2 .3 Recourset ot hedeatho fChrist e

n h a R l r a

K r(Fuch ,1970: 73 )wrties “The Ch irsitan – every Ch irsitan g

n it a ti m

i Jesu sby dying wtih him”. Fuch deifnes t ha th e o rshe no tonly dying fl

e s ti o t g n i y d y ll a u n it n o c t u b e fi l e h t g n ir u

d to ge tthe ifna land deifniitvedeath. s

d d a h c u

(28)

o t n i d n a n o it c e r r u s e r e h t o t n i g n ir e t n e , e c n e d if n o c f o t c a e t a m it l

u the

. d o G f o y ti li b i s n e h e r p m o c n

i (Fuch ,1970:73.)

3 . 1 .

2 . 4A tttiude so fFatih u

F ch puts srtes son tha tCh irsitan moraltiy wli lbe unnecessary value s t

u o h ti

w signi ifcant behavior o raciton. Fuch add stha tCh irsitan moraltiy give s n

o s a e r e h t s n a it s ir h

C no tto see t heacceptenceo fdeath and painfu ldying a sa n f

o n o i s s e r p x

e fatailsm .Howeve,rt heyares ignfiyagestureoft hanksgivingf ort he e

v i

g roft hel fie(Fuch ,1970 :78 .) n

i a l p x e h c u

F stha tCh irsitan atttiude make sa les sburdensome in the i

, e r o f e r e h T . g n i y d f o s s e c o r

p t become s a k in

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Then they all (actor) stopped (material) and it (carrier) was (relational attributive) dark (attribute), and [when I (actor) stopped (material) to start again (goal)] (time) I

Then the dark (actor) began (material) to go in smooth, bright shapes (goal), [like it (actor) always does (material)] (attribute), [even when Caddy (sayer) says (verbal) {that

[r]

This study is aimed to explain C atherine Anderson’s thoughts on feminism through the main female character, to examine the patriarchal systems that is faced by

The Awakening is a novel which portrays a life of Edna Pontellier, a woman who struggles to find love and her true identity in a rigid society that expects women to be nothing

Since the main discussion is the critique towards Victorian Morality in the novel The Awakening by Kate Chopin, the extension of the discussion will cover the

ELIE’S MOTIVATION IN ACHIEVING FREEDOM REVEALED IN THE MAIN CHARACTER’S CONFLICTS AS SEEN IN ELIE WIESEL’S NIGHTC. Beserta perangkat yang diperlukan

This analysis conducted to show the findings Language Acquisition of Main Character in the Movie “Marie‟s Story” as Deaf- Blind Child during learnt language