v ABSTRACT
Acquisition action can lead to a situation where there is a tendency of unfair business competition activities Therefore,in Act No.5 year 1999 concerning the prohibition monopoly and unfair business competition especially article 29 regulated about responsibility to give notification to the commision for acts of merger, consolidation or acquisition of stock. The case raised by the author is acquisition of PT Andalan Satria Lestari by PT Bumi Kencana Eka Sejahtera. PT Bumi Kencana Eka Sejahtera alleged violation of article 29. According to the investigation conducted by the KPPU, PT Bumi Eka Sejahtera is allegedly too late do the notification for 30 days after acquisition. The purpose of this research is to analyze the
KPPU’s judgement that decided regarding the responsibility to give
notification to the commision for the acquisition actions.
This research is conducted with methods of juridical normative which emphasizes on the use of secondary data which consists of primary law materials, secondary, and tertiary either in the form of legislation, legal principles and field research. Specification of research is descriptive analytic that is analyzing the legal basis relied on by tribunal law
considerations the judge’s verdict in judgement No.08/KPPU-M/2012.
The conclusions of this research in the judgement of KPPU No.08/KPPU-M/2012 about the alleged violation of article 29,Act No.5 year 1999 is that First there is a difference in interpretation of effective date by
the the KPPU’s investigator team with bussinessmen and Second, that the
