Challenges on Sustainable Coal Supply and Proposed Policy
HELE Coal Technology Workshop World Coal Association
Disclaimer
The materials in this presentation have been prepared by APBI-ICMA (“APBI”).
These materials may contain statements that constitute forward-looking statements. These statements include descriptions regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of either APBI, or those of other third-party entities whose data sources have been published for public use, hence used in this presentation. These statements can be recognized by the use of words such as “expects,” “plan,” “will,”
“estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” or words of similar meaning. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors and assumptions. APBI has no obligation and does not undertake to revise forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.
These materials are for information purposes only and do not constitute or form part of an offer, solicitation or invitation of any offer, in any jurisdiction, nor should it or any part of it form the basis of, or be relied upon in any connection with, any contract, commitment or investment decision whatsoever.
Agenda
1
Need for Electricity in Indonesia
2
35 GW Program & Coal’s Important Role
3
Coal Industry Overview & Challenges Faced
Agenda
1
Need for Electricity in Indonesia
2
3
5.5% 7.1%
7.5% 8.0%
6.4% 6.4% 6.4% 6.4% 6.4% 6.4% 217 244 268 292 315 340 366 394 425 457 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0 5 1 5 2 5 3
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 839 932 1,011 1,089 1,162 1,241 1,322 1,409 1,506 1,604
6.2% 6.0% 5.6%
5.0% 4.8% 156 172
186 196 200
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 646
702
746 779 784
Indonesian Economy & Energy Demand
Source: PLN Business Plan (RUPTL) 2016 – 2025; Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS); Note: PLN is State Electricity Utility
Energy plays fundamental part in economic growth process. Economic growth needs to be supported by sufficient Electrification Ratio (ER)
Power consumption is related to productivity level of its population. As countries switch to manufacturing-based economies, power consumption per capita increases
GDP Growth (%)
Electricity Consumption (TWh)
Electricity Consumption per Capita (KWh)
SAIDI = System Average Interruption Duration Index
Deficit Alert Normal
As can be seen in graph above,
only small parts of Indonesia actually have sufficient supply of electricity
PLN has traditionally been having problems in providing electricity to its customers, as shown by SAIDI and SAIFI numbers
Sources: PELAYANAN TERPADU SATU PINTU (PTSP) PUSAT KETENAGALISTRIKAN, Jakarta, 28January 2015, PLN 2015 Annual Report
Current Electricity Condition
6.96
4.71
3.85
5.76 5.81 5.31
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
6.82
4.9
4.22 7.26
5.58 5.97
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 SAIFI = System Average
Growing Power Demand
As government pushes for infrastructure & industrial development, low electricity consumption and installed capacity levels create significant upside potentials in electricity demand
Indonesia is behind its ASEAN peers in Electrification Ratio (ER)
Developed countries tend to have larger electricity consumption per capita
ASEAN Electrification Ratio Comparables Target 2019: >95%
Energy Consumption per Capita (KWh)
Source: PLN Investor Presentation May 2015, RUPTL 2016-2025, MEMR, World Bank, Indexmundi
8,023
7,765
3,724
2,501
1,113
780 528 358 166 109
23 GW
14 GW
4 GW
2 GW
2 GW
- 5 10 15 20 25
Coal-fired
Gas-fired
Hydro
Diesel
Others
Installed Capacity* 46 GW
Indonesian Electricity Development Progress
Coal and gas are largest sources of energy for electricity generation with highest total installed capacity and at most economical price
* Per 2015, excluding rental from 3rd party sources ~4 GW
Installed capacity of power plants increased slowly at 6% CAGR over 2010-2015. PLN installed capacity increased at 5% CAGR, while
IPP increased at 11% CAGR
Installed Capacity 2010 - 2015 Installed Capacity excluding Rental Power as of December 2015
Source: RUPTL 2016 – 2025; Note: IPP is Independent Power Producer
31GW 34GW
37GW
41GW 43GW
46GW
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Agenda
1
2
35 GW Program & Coal’s Important Role
3
35 GW Electricity Plan
35 GW Power Projects
Coal Fired Power Plant (CFPP)
Gas & Steam
Power Others
~20 GW ~7.5 GW ~6.5 GW
PLN
2 GW
IPP
18 GW
Project Costs US$ 27 – 36 bln
60% 21% 19%
DEBT (Proj. Financing)
US$ 19 – 25 bln
EQUITY US$ 8 –11 bln
President Jokowi ‘s Administration committed to adding 35 GW new capacity to current installed capacity of 46 GW to increase ER from currently ~88% to >95% by after 2019
~60% of total 35 GW power projects will come from CFPP & this 35 GW require significant participation from private (IPP) at ~53% of project costs vs PLN’s portion of ~47% (inc. transmission)
35 GW Electricity Development Progress
Government’s 35 GW Program
Only 0.2 GW operational and 8.2 GW under construction out of 35 GW planned 18 GW of power plant projects have not
secured PPA PPA Signed COD Tender Process ~0.2 GW ~10.8 GW
Planning Process ~7.7 GW
35 GW Progress
Source: RUPTL 2016-2025, PLN presentation
Under
Construction ~8.2 GW
Have Not Started Construction
~9.8 GW
31 GW 34 GW
37 GW 41 GW
43 GW 46 GW
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Installed Capacity Additional Capacity
30 GW additional capacity planned
15 GW realized additional capacity
RUPTL 2010 – 2019
51 % realized
Based on RUPTL 2010 – 2019, PLN
planned additional capacity of approx 30 GW for 2010 - 2015 but only realized 15 GW
CFPP Will Drive National Electricity
Planned Year-End Capacity 2025 Installed Capacity Composition
Total installed capacity will grow by 10% CAGR in next 10 years. CFPP installed capacity will grow by 11 % in same period
By 2025, CFPP will make up 46% of all power plants in Indonesia
Source: RUPTL 2016-2025
13%
30%
46%
11%
Renewables Gas Coal Others 35 GW Electricity Program Future Electricity Programs
27 GW 28 GW 31 GW 48 GW 53 GW 55 GW 55 GW 56 GW 56 GW 58 GW
50 GW 54 GW
67 GW
88 GW 94 GW 97 GW
100 GW104 GW
113 GW
126 GW
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
34 45
53 55 70
88
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
93 95 109
166 168 170 171 173 175 177
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
11 GW
15 GW 16 GW
20 GW 22 GW 23 GW
26 GW 27 GW
31 GW
48 GW
53 GW 54 GW 55 GW 55 GW 56 GW
58 GW
Coal Requirement for CFPP
Coal requirements for power (million tons)
Installed coal-fired power plants (GW)
CAGR: 21% CAGR: 21%
Coal consumption has increased by 21% CAGR in past five years
It is expected to continue to increase by another 21% CAGR from 2016 until 2019, if 20 GW of new CFPP capacity from 35 GW program is installed according to plan
This assumes each MW requires 3500 - 4000 tons of coal p.a.
35 GW Electricity Program
Source: PWC Report - Supplying and Financing Coal-Fired Power Plants in the 35 GW Program, RUPTL 2016 - 2025
Agenda
1
2
3
Coal Industry Overview & Challenges Faced
11.7 8.3 $97 $59 -20 40 60 80 100 120 -1 4 9 14 19 24 2012 2015
Mineable Reserves (billion tons) NEWC Coal Price
Indonesia’s Coal Reserve
Source: MoMER Strategic Plan (Renstra), PWC Report “Supplying and Financing Coal-Fired Power Plants in the 35 GW Program” Coal Type Reserves
(billion ton) % GAR
Low 9.2 28% <4,700
Medium 20.7 64% 4,700 – 5,700
High 1.6 5% 5,700 – 6,700
Very High 0.9 3% >6,700
Total 32.4 100%
MoMER Data
Data from MoMER as of 2012 suggests Indonesia has more than sufficient reserves of 32.4 bn tons
Difficult to validate information, as MoMER does not publish detailed methodology and sources of data
29%
PWC Survey
Based on PWC survey, mineable reserves in 2015 were reported at 8.3 bn tons, contrasting MoMER figure of 32.4 bn tons
This was down by 29% from previously reported JORC of 11.7 bn tons in 2012
Decrease in NEWC coal price has reduced economically mineable reserves
Falling Profitability & Investments
Source: PWC Report “Supplying and Financing Coal-Fired Power Plants in the 35 GW Program”; Bloomberg
EBITDA fell 74% since 2011, from US$ 6.5 bn to US$ 1.6 bn in 2015
Capital expenditure (capex) dropped by 79% since 2012 from US$ 1.9 bn to US$ 0.4 bn by end 2015
Mining industry is expected to decrease capex by further 10-19 % in 2016; this may be approaching the level where investment is not sustaining reserves each year
$121 $97 $85 $71 $59 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
$ b il li o n
Sterilization of Reserves
2011 avg. =
9.6x
2015 avg. =
6.6x
Industry Strip Ratio
Average strip ratio (SR) has plunged from 9.6x in 2011 to around 6.6x in 2015. SR have likely continued to fall in 2016
Mine plans are being modified, setting lower strip ratios and reducing reserves to be able to return to profitability
This is likely to make future reserves more costly to extract, or even uneconomical to extract, which can result in ‘sterilization’ of remaining reserves from mine plan
Source: PWC Report; Annual Reports
-2.0
4.0
6.0 8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
Adaro ITM Bukit Asam Harum Bayan Toba Bara Baramulti Atlas
Coal Consumption Forecast
By end-2019, coal consumption for DMO (power) is expected to reach 166 mn tons
We should see steady increase in coal consumption for DMO (power) going
forward
Coal consumption for 2016 – 2050 is forecasted to be in range of 350 – 400 million tons per annum
Source: PWC Report; RJPMN (National Medium-Term Development Plan)
Switch to imports
Coal Type 2015 2019 2024 2030 2050
DMO
(Power) 88 166 175 185 226 DMO
(Others) 2 74 78 82 101
Exports 313 160 140 116 36
Uncertain Coal Supply
Based on PWC’s March 2016 report, current proven coal reserves are at 8.3 bn tons
Assuming coal reserves of 8.3 billion tons, with annual production forecast of 350-400 mn tons at current coal prices, current coal reserves will run out by 2036
This is less than 20 years into lifecycle of new CFPP (typically 25-30 years from COD)
Agenda
1
2
3
Long-term average
mining cost (approx $30/ton)
Fixed margin (20% - 25%)
Price at which coal procurers
purchase coal (approx $36-38/ton) Long-term cost-based price contracts between coal
procurers (PLN and IPP) and coal miners.
Cost Based Pricing Policy
Provide predictable and stable returns for miners
Example of how it works? Positive effects of policy to miners
Recovery in investments, encourage life-of-mine planning and stabilize economically mineable reserves
Incentive to invest in IPP
*
*
*
Protects against increase in price of coal
Advantages to Government
Avoids domestic reserve crisis and need to import coal and/or switch to more costly alternatives
*
*
On the recent update, the new minister of mines regulation No. 9/2016
sets out 15-25% range of margin that could be used by coal miners in
proposing coal sales price in Mine-Mouth Power Plant
Detail of cost as stipulated in the regulation should be reasonable.
However, PLN has been asking for review of the margin and cost detail,
which they consider too high
Government is working to find the best solution that would ensure the
reasonable margin for miners while benefiting PLN as the user for
sustainable coal supply
Extensive discussions with relevant government institutions on supply
sustainability to meet coal demand in 35 GW program must be
encouraged to create win-win solution for all stakeholders, including on
the viability of adopting cost plus margin method for all CFPP