• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

vol18_pp693-699. 96KB Jun 04 2011 12:06:05 AM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "vol18_pp693-699. 96KB Jun 04 2011 12:06:05 AM"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

EXPLICIT POLAR DECOMPOSITIONS OF COMPLEX MATRICES∗

ROGER A. HORN†, GIUSEPPE PIAZZA, AND TIZIANO POLITI§

Abstract. In [F. Uhlig, Explicit polar decomposition and a near-characteristic polynomial: The 2×2 case, Linear Algebra Appl., 38:239–249, 1981], the author gives a representation for the

factors of the polar decomposition of a nonsingular real square matrix of order 2. Uhlig’s formulae are generalized to encompass all nonzero complex matrices of order 2 as well as all orderncomplex

matrices with rank at leastn−1.

Key words. Polar decomposition.

AMS subject classifications.15A23.

1. Introduction and notation. A polar decomposition of ACn×n is a fac-torization

A=U H (1.1)

in whichU ∈Cn×n is unitary andH Cn×n is positive semidefinite (and therefore also Hermitian). The factor H is always uniquely determined as the unique positive semidefinite square root ofA∗A: H = (AA)1/2

.IfAis nonsingular, then the unitary factor is also unique: U =AH−1. The polar factors of Acan be found by exploiting

its singular value decomposition, even ifA is singular.

In the literature [1, 2], it has been considered whether it is possible to compute the polar factors of a complex matrix using only arithmetic operations and extraction of radicals of integer degree. In [1], the authors note that this can be done if the largest and smallest singular values are known, e.g., the class of singular real symmetric stochastic matrices and the class of companion matrices. In [4, 6], explicit formulae are given for polar factors of companion and block companion matrices. In this note, we generalize the explicit formulae in [5] for the polar factors of nonsingular real square matrices of order 2, and obtain explicit formulae for polar factors ofn−by−n complex matrices with rank at leastn−1.

Received by the editors April 10, 2009. Accepted for publication September 21, 2009. Handling Editor: Ravindra B. Bapat.

Mathematics Department, University of Utah, 155 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0090, USA (rhorn@math.utah.edu).

Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Bari, Via Orabona 4, I–70125 Bari, Italy. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Professor Giovanni Di Lena.

§Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Bari, Via Orabona 4, I–70125 Bari, Italy (politi@poliba.it).

(2)

A singular value decomposition ofA∈Cn×n is a factorization

A=VΣW∗,

in whichV, W ∈Cn×n are unitary and Σ = diag(σ

1, . . . , σn) is a real diagonal matrix

whose diagonal entries are σ1 ≥ σ2 ≥ · · · ≥ σn ≥ 0, the non-increasingly ordered

singular values of A. The matrices H =WΣW∗ and U =V Ware corresponding

polar factors ofA: H is positive semidefinite and H = (A∗A)1/2

(always unique), U is unitary (unique only ifAis nonsingular), andA=U H.

We let adjAdenote the adjugate ofA, that is, the transposed matrix of cofactors ofA(see [3], p. 20). IfAis nonsingular, then

adjA= detA·A−1

.

In general,

adjA∗= (adjA)∗,

adjAB= adjB adjA,

and

adjΣ = diag

j=1

σj, j=2

σj, . . . , j=n

σj

.

Moreover,

adjA∗= adj(WΣV∗) = (adjV∗)(adjΣ)(adjW) = det(V∗W)V(adjΣ)W∗.

IfAis nonsingular, theneiθ: = (detA)/|detA|is a well-defined complex number with unit modulus and

adjA∗=e−iθV(adjΣ)W.

2. Orders 2and 3. In this section, we exhibit an explicit formula for the polar

(3)

Theorem 2.1. LetAC2×2 be nonzero and let θ be any real number such that

detA=eiθ|detA|. ThenA=U H,in which

U =

det(A+eiθadjA∗)

−1/2

(A+eiθadjA∗)

is unitary and H =U∗A is positive semidefinite. If A is real, then H is real and U may be chosen to be real.

Proof. Suppose thatAis nonsingular, and compute

Zθ :=A+eiθadjA

=VΣW∗+ee−iθV(adjΣ)W

=V(Σ + adjΣ)W∗

=V

σ1 0

0 σ2

+

σ2 0

0 σ1

W∗

=V((σ1+σ2)I)W∗= (σ1+σ2)V W∗,

which is a positive scalar multiple of the unitary factor of A corresponding to the positive definite factorH = (A∗A)1/2

. Moreover,

|det(A+eiθadjA∗)|= (σ1+σ2) 2

.

Now suppose that Ais singular and nonzero, so rankA= 1 and Σ = diag(σ1,0)

with σ1 >0. For any θ∈[0,2π) we must show thatZθ is a positive scalar multiple

of a unitary matrix and thatZ∗

θAis positive semidefinite. Letγ=eiθdet(V∗W) and compute

Zθ =V(Σ + adjΣ)W∗

=V

σ1 0

0 0 +γ

0 0 0 σ1

W∗

=σ1V

1 0 0 γ W

,

which is a positive scalar multiple of a unitary matrix (a product of three unitary matrices). Moreover,

Z∗

θA =σ1W

1 0 0 γ¯ V

·V

σ1 0

0 0 W

=σ

(4)

which is positive semidefinite.

Finally, suppose that A is real. Then so is adjA∗. If A is nonsingular, then

θ∈ {0, π}; ifAis singular, takeθ= 0.

IfAis nonsingular, theneiθ andU in the preceding theorem are uniquely deter-mined. IfAis singular, theneiθmay be any complex number with modulus one, and U is not uniquely determined.

Theorem 2.2. LetAC3×3and suppose thatrankA2. LetH be the positive

semidefinite square root of A∗A, and let θ be any real number such that detA =

eiθ|detA|. Then A=U H,in which

U = 1

tr(adjH)((trH)A−AH+e

adjA)

(2.1)

is unitary. IfA is real, thenH is real and U may be chosen to be real.

Proof. Suppose thatAis nonsingular, and compute

Zθ := (trH)A−AH+eiθadjA∗

= (trΣ)VΣW∗(VΣW)(WΣW) +ee−iθV(adjΣ)W

=V((trΣ)Σ−Σ2

+ adjΣ)W∗

= (σ1σ2+σ1σ3+σ2σ3)V W∗= tr(adjΣ)V W∗,

which is a positive scalar multiple of the unitary polar factor ofA corresponding to the positive definite factorH.

(5)

γ=eiθdet(VW) and compute

Zθ =V

(trΣ)Σ−Σ2

+γadjΣ W∗ =V    

σ1(σ1+σ2) 0 0

0 σ2(σ1+σ2) 0

0 0 0

− 

σ2

1 0 0

0 σ2

2 0

0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 σ1σ2

 

W∗

=σ1σ2V 

1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 γ

W∗,

which is a positive scalar multiple of a unitary matrix. One checks that Z∗

θA = σ1σ2WΣW∗=σ1σ2H.

3. Ordernforn3. LetpH(z) be the characteristic polynomial of then-by-n

positive semidefinite matrixH = (A∗A)1/2:

pH(z) =zn+ n

k=1

pkzn−k. (3.1)

The coefficientspk are elementary symmetric functions of the eigenvalues ofH, which are the singular values ofA:

pk= (−1)k

1≤i1<···<ik≤n

k

j=1

σij, k= 1, . . . , n.

Alternatively, pk = (−1)kEk(H), in which Ek(H) is the sum of the n k

principal minors of H (see [3], pp. 41-42). In particular, pn = pH(0) = (−1)nEn(H) = (−1)ndetH, pn

−1 = p′H(0) = (−1)n−1En−1(H) = (−1)n−1tr(adjH), and pn−2 = 1

2p

′′

H(0) = (−1)n−

2

En−2(H).

Theorem 3.1. Let n3, let ACn×n, and suppose that rankAn1. Let H be the positive semidefinite square root of A∗A,letθ be any real number such that

detA=eiθ|detA|,letpH(z) be the characteristic polynomial (3.1) ofH,and let

qH(z) = (pH(z)−pn−2z2−pn−1z−pn)/z2.

Then A=U H, in which

U = 1

tr(adjH)((−1) npn

−2A+ (−1)nAqH(H) +eiθadjA∗)

(6)

is unitary. IfA is real, thenH is real and U may be chosen to be real.

Proof. Notice thatqH(z) is a monic polynomial of degreen−2 and qH(0) = 0. Suppose thatAis nonsingular, and compute

Zθ : = (−1)npn

−2A+ (−1)nAqH(H) +eiθadjA∗

=V ((−1)npn

−2Σ + (−1)nΣqH(Σ) + adjΣ)W∗.

It suffices to show that

(−1)npn−2Σ + (−1)nΣqH(Σ) + adjΣ = tr(adjΣ)I.

That is, we must show that

σkqH(σk) =−pn−2σk−pn−1−(−1)n

i=k

σi, k= 1,2, . . . , n.

Since eachσk >0 andpH(σk) = 0, we have

σkqH(σk) = (pH(σk)−pn−2σ2k−pn−1σk−pn)/σk

=−pn−2σk−pn−1−pn/σk

=−pn−2σk−pn−1−(−1)n

i=k σi.

Now suppose that rankA =n−1, so Σ = diag(σ1, . . . , σn−1,0) and σ1≥ · · · ≥

σn−1>0. Letγ=eiθdet(V∗W) and compute

Zθ=V ((−1)npn−2Σ + (−1)nΣqH(Σ) +γadjΣ)W∗.

Fork= 1, . . . , n−1, thekthmain diagonal entry ofVZθW is

(−1)npn−2σk+ (−1)n(−pn−2σk−pn−1) = (−1)n−1pn−1= tr(adjH)

becauseσn= 0. Thenthmain diagonal entry ofVZθW isγσ

1· · ·σn−1=γtr(adjH).

Thus, Zθ = tr(adjH)Vdiag(1, . . . ,1, γ)W∗, which is a positive scalar multiple of a

unitary matrix. One checks thatZ∗

θA= tr(adjH)W∗ΣW = tr(adjH)H. Forn= 3, (3.2) becomes

U = 1

tr(adjH)((−(−trH))A−AH+e

adjA),

(3.3)

(7)

REFERENCES

[1] A. George and Kh. Ikramov. Is the polar decomposition finitely computable? SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 17:348–354, 1996.

[2] A. George and Kh. Ikramov. Addendum: Is the polar decomposition finitely computable? SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 18:264, 1997.

[3] R. Horn and C. Johnson. Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985. [4] G. Kalogeropoulos and P. Psarrakos. The polar decomposition of block companion matrices.

Comput. Math. Appl., 50:529–537, 2005.

[5] F. Uhlig. Explicit polar decomposition and a near-characteristic polynomial: The 2×2 case. Linear Algebra Appl., 38:239–249, 1981.

[6] P. van den Driessche and H.K. Wimmer. Explicit polar decomposition of companion matrices.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

[r]

[r]

Dari pengujian beta yang dilakukan yaitu dengan pengujian perhitungan kategori jawaban dari kuesioner yang telah dibagikan, dapat diambil kesimpulan bahwa perangkat

Hasil uji statistik dengan One-Way ANOVA menunjukkan perbedaan diameter tubulus seminiferus yang bermakna pada setiap kelompok uji (p&lt;0,05) dengan hasil kelompok gel

Penelitian Perancangan Sistem Informasi Reservasi pada Hotel Danoufa Berbasis. WEB akan dilaksanakan di Hotel

Pada saat negara-negara teluk lain telah mulai meningkatkan kerjasama ekonomi dengan China, Bahrain masih bertahan sebagai negara sekutu Barat tanpa ada hubungan diplomasi sama

In Malaysia, although the right of land owners are heard through a process called inquiry before the payment of compensation is determined by the Land Administrator (Section 12(1)

Pada hari ini Sabtu tanggal Tiga bulan Juni tahun Dua Ribu Tujuh Belas (Sabtu, 03-06-2017), pada pukul 10.00 WIB s/d 11.00 WIB, kami yang bertandatangan dibawah ini