iii
THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL TYPE GROUP
INVESTIGATION ON STUDENT’S ACHIEVEMENT OF
STATIC FLUID IN CLASS XI OF SMA NEGERI 1
PERBAUNGAN A.Y. 2013/2014
Rikcy Almeda (Reg. Number : 4103322018)
ABSTRACT
The objectives of this research is To find out the effect of Cooperative Learning Model Group Investigation Type on student’s learning outcomes in subject static fluid in class XI SMA Negeri 1 Perbaungan A.Y. 2013/2014.
The research method was quasi experimental. The populations were all XI IPA grade students in semester II that consist of 8 classes SMA Negeri 1 Perbaungan. The samples of this research conduct two classes and consist of 62 students, 31 from experiment class and 31 from control class and define by random cluster sampling. The results that were obtained: pre-test mean value of experiment class was 42.26 and 40.16 for control class and then post-test mean value of the experiment class was 80.32 and 62.90 was the mean value for control class. Standard deviation in pre-test were 7.62 in experiment class and 7.80 in control class and standard deviation in post-test for two classes were 6.94 and 8.64. Normality of the test result from the both samples was normal and homogenous. In the testing of hypothesis for pre-test, the criteria is: H0 is accepted if tcount < ttable and H0 is rejected if tcount has another score, where ttable obtained from list of distribution t. From the calculation of test t for concept mastery using α = 0.05, obtained tcount = 1.07, where ttable = 2.00. It means, experiment class and control class have same ability. And for post-test, the criteria is : Ha is accepted if tcount > ttable and is rejected if tcount has another score. From the calculation of t-test one side for α = 0.05, obtained tcount = 8.75, where ttable = 1.67. So, there was the Effect of Cooperative Learning Model Type Group Investigation on Student’s Achievement of Static Fluid in class XI of SMA Negeri 1 Perbaungan A.Y. 2013/2014. Based on observation that done by observers with using observation sheet of student character, the character’s value on last meeting of experiment and control class are 86.73 and 74.55. Its conclude that the character of students in experiment class better than control class.
vi
CONTENT
Page
Legitimation Sheet i
Biography ii
Abstract iii
Preface iv
Content vi
List of Figure ix
List of Table x
List of Appendix xi
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1
1.1. Background 1
1.2. Problem Identification 4
1.3. Problem Limitation 4
1.4. Problem Formulation 5
1.5. Research Objectives 5
1.6. Research Benefits 5
1.7. Operational Definition 6
CHAPTER II LITERATUR REVIEW 7
2.1. Understanding Learning 7
2.2. Learning Outcomes 9
2.3. Definition of Education 10
2.4. Character Education 11
2.5. Learning Model 14
2.6. Conventional Learning Model 14
2.6.1 Advantage and Disadvantage of Conventional Learning 15
2.7. Cooperative Learning 15
2.7.1. Group Investigation Cooperative Learning Model 16 2.7.2. Advantages and Disadvantages of Group Investigation 18
2.8. Material 19
vii
2.10. Hypothesis 27
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD 28
3.1. Research Location and Time 28
3.2. Research Population and Sample 28
3.2.1. Research Population 28
3.2.2. Research Sample 28
3.3. Research Variables 28
3.3.1. Independent Variable 28
3.3.2. Dependent Variable 28
3.4. Research Type and Design 28
3.4.1. Research Type 28
3.4.2. Research Design 28
3.5. Research Procedure 29
3.6. Research Instrument 31
3.6.1. Learning Outcomes 31
3.6.2. Character Assessment Instrument 32
3.6.3. Validity 34
3.7. Data Analysis Techniques 34
3.7.1. Determine the Average Value 34
3.7.2. Determine Standard Deviation 35
3.7.3. Homogeneity Test 35
3.7.4. Normality Test 35
3.7.5. Similarity Test of Pretest Average 36
3.7.5. Hypothesis Test 37
CHAPTER IV RESULT AND DISCUSSION 39
4.1. Research Result 39
4.1.1. Pre-Test Score 39
4.1.2. Data Analysis of Pre-Test 41
viii
4.1.3. Post Test Score 42
4.1.4. Data Analysis of Post-Test 43
4.1.4.1. Normality Test of Post-Test 44 4.1.4.2. Homogeneity Test of Post-Test 44 4.1.4.3. Hypothesis Test of Post-Test 44
4.1.5. Observation 45
4.2. Discussion 47
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 49
5.1. Conclution 49
5.2. Suggestion 49
x
LIST OF TABLE
Page
Table 2.1. 18 Characters Value 12
Table 2.2. Density of Substances 19
Table 3.1. Research Design 29
Table 3.2. Lattice of Learning Test Results 31
Table 3.3. Guideline of Student Character Observation 32
Table 3.4. Scoring Observation of Character 33
Table 3.5. Criteria of Student Assessment 33
Table 3.6. Table Interpretations Normalized Gain Value 34
Table 4.1. Pretest Score and Post Test Score 39
Table 4.2. Pre test score in Experiment and Control class 40
Table 4.3. Normality test of pre-test data 41
Table 4.4. Homogeneity Test of Pre-Test Data 41
Table 4.5. Hypothesis Test of Pre-Test Data 42
Table 4.6. Post-Test Data in Experiment Class and Control Class 43
Table 4.7. Normality Test of Post-Test Data 44
Table 4.8. Homogeneity Test of Post Test Data 44
Table 4.9. Hypothesis Test of Post-Test Data 45
Table 4.10. The average of student’s Character 46
xi
LIST OF APPENDIX
Page
Appendix 1 First Lesson Plan 52
Appendix 2 Second Lesson Plan 66
Appendix 3 Third Lesson Plan 81
Appendix 4 Student Work Sheet 1 94
Appendix 5 Student Work Sheet 2 99
Appendix 6 Student Work Sheet 3 104
Appendix 7 Lattice 108
Appendix 8 Research Instrument 112
Appendix 9 Key Answer 115
Appendix 10 Character Observation Experiment Class 116
Appendix 11 Character Observation Control Class 118
Appendix 12 Pre and Post test Data Experiment Class 120
Appendix 13 Pre and Post test Data Control Class 121
Appendix 14 Average Score and Standard Deviation Calculation 122
Appendix 15 Normality Test 124
Appendix 16 Homogenity Test 128
Appendix 17 Hypothesis Test 130
Appendix 18 Documentation 133
Appendix 19 List of Critical Value for Liliefors 136
Appendix 20 List of Area Under Normal Curve 0 to z 137
Appendix 21 List of Percentile Value for Distribution t 138
Appendix 22 F Distribution Values 139
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
The process of formal classroom teaching and learning is very important to
improve the ability to think, ability to cooperate, self-confidence, attitude and
moral of each student. In the process of teaching and learning in class, something
very important is the interaction between students and teachers. Teachers need to
understand a lot about the material circumstances and conditions including
situation of students. To understand the student teacher should know about the
abilities and character of each student and the teacher must build the character of
students in accordance with the character education.
There are some skills that need to be understood by such teachers understand
the material, students understand and have the teaching skills. The skills that
teachers provide direction not only perform routine activities, but also a dynamic
activity that is able to develop the knowledge, attitudes and morals of each
student.
Low levels of affective and moral students can be marked on the less
character education are applied in teaching and learning. Teacher should
implement character education in accordance with the lesson plan that integrates
character.
Under Law No. 20 Year 2003 on National Education System said that
"education is a conscious effort to create the conditions of planned learning and
the learning process so that learners are actively developing the potential for him
to have the spiritual strength of religious, self-control, personality, intelligence,
noble character, and skills needed him, society, nation and state. Recognizing this,
the government is very serious about education, because with a good education
system is expected to appear next generation of qualified and able to adapt to life
in the community, the nation and the country. ". The importance of education as
the capital of the younger generation, to achieve a successful and capable citizens
2
Government always pay attention to education in Indonesia. All government
efforts are characterized by an increase in the National Budget for education,
curriculum change, parenting educator, working with other countries to improve
the quality of education etc. But, the government can not fend for themselves,
which is necessary for the participation of all stakeholders of education include:
the Ministry of Education, Superintendent, Principals, Teachers, Parents, School
Committee, School Board, Community, Business and Industrial World, as well as
all parents concerned agencies directly or indirectly with education activities in
schools. The cooperation is performed to achieve national education goals are
written in the Law is to develop the potential of learners in order to become a man
of faith and fear of God Almighty, noble, healthy, knowledgeable, skilled,
residents creative, independent, and being a responsible and democratic.
School as an institution of learning activities take place. An excellent school
that is able to act as an educational process (the process of education that
emphasizes the education and teaching activities), the process of socialization
(social processes, especially for students), and the transformation process (the
process of behavior change towards the better). At school, teachers are the most
influential on the quality and abilities of learners, as teachers interact and
communicate directly and very close to the learners. Learners are educated by
teachers at school every day. The ability of teachers to educate greatly affect the
success or failure of learning activities at schools. For the teacher must be able to
present a more active learning activities, creative, and fun for the achievement of
the golden generation in the future. Thus, it can be concluded education is very
important and key to the success of the nation.
One of the subjects taught in schools, especially at secondary school is
physics. Physics is the study of natural phenomena. Therefore, physics is one of
the lessons is quite interesting because it deals directly with natural phenomena
and knowledge can be applied in everyday life.
But in fact physics is one of the lessons that have the lowest scores. This is
caused by the large number of students who do not like physics because they think
3
complicated formulas and calculations. This fact is consistent with the
observations made by researchers when implementing the Integrated Field
Experience Program in SMA Negeri 1 Perbaungan. From the above observations,
the researchers concluded that students at SMA Negeri 1 Perbaungan not
interested in learning physics. And this will affect student outcomes in learning
physics and character.
The observation of three physics teachers when they teach in SMA 1
Perbaungan, it was found that all the teachers using conventional learning physics
to explain phenomena in physics class.
Conventional learning used by physics teachers rarely engage students in
working in groups. This resulted in a lack of interaction between students and
teachers as well as students and students so that students who are less able and shy
do not experience improvement in achievement, achievement even decreased.
While the students are classified as smart and not shy getting smarter. This
obviously makes students consider physics is boring lessons as well as lowering
the character of students, especially in the classroom learning. Therefore, an
increase in the intensity of group study is needed to improve the attitude, moral,
mental, ability to interact, as well as student achievement.
(Lickona in Muslich, 2011:35) reveals that there are ten times the signs to
look out for if these signs are already there, meaning a nation to the brink of
destruction. The signs in question are (1) an increase in violence among
adolescents, (2) the use of language and kata0kata deteriorating, (3) peer-group
influence is strong in violence, (4) increase in self-destructive behavior, (5) the
blurring of guidelines morally good and bad, (6) the declining work ethic, (7) the
lower the respect for parents and teachers, (8) lack of a sense of individual
responsibility and citizens, (9) be entrenched dishonesty, and (10) the existence of
mutual suspicion and hatred between fellow him. When examined, the tenth sign
of the times it turns out that already exist in Indonesia.
To solve the above problems, the researchers changed the conventional
learning with cooperative learning model. Cooperative learning model consists of
4
Group is a model that does not require students to memorize facts and formulas,
but the models that guide students to identify a topic, planning investigations in
groups, conduct investigations, make reports, and presented the results of
research. Group cooperative learning model helps students investigate physics to
understand clearly, because the students will learn to their own and find answers
to their team. And it will make the students have a good teamwork ability and can
memorize lessons for a long time.
Based on the above writer wants to do a study titled "The Effect of
Cooperative Learning Model Type Group Investigation on Student’s
Achievement of Static Fluid in Class XI of SMA Negeri 1 Perbaungan A.Y.
2013/2014".
1.2. Problem Identification
Based on the background that has been considered, so that the identification
of a problem in this study are:
1. Students' interest in learning physics low
2. Low student Character
3. Students rarely learn in groups
4. Physics teacher still using conventional learning
1.3. Problem Limitations
Based on the identification of the above problems, the authors limit this
problem, namely:
1. Learning model used is the Cooperative Learning Model Group
Investigation Type and Conventional Learning.
2. The characters in the observation is discipline, responsibility and curiosity.
3. Subjects to be studied is Static Fluid
5
1.4. Problem Formulation
Based on the problems above restrictions, the formulation of the problem is:
1. How the achievement of students using Cooperative Learning Model
Group Investigation Type in subject static fluid in class XI SMA Negeri 1
Perbaungan A.Y. 2013/2014?
2. How the achievement of students using Conventional Learning in the
subject static fluid in class XI SMA Negeri 1 Perbaungan A.Y.
2013/2014?
3. How the effect of Cooperative Learning Model Group Investigation Type
on student’s achievement in subject static fluid in class XI SMA Negeri 1
Perbaungan A.Y. 2013/2014?
1.5. Research Objectives
There are several research objectives are:
1. To find out the achievement of students using Cooperative Learning
Model Group Investigation Type in subject static fluid in class XI SMA
Negeri 1 Perbaungan A.Y. 2013/2014.
2. To find out the achievement of students using Conventional Learning in
the subject static fluid in class XI SMA Negeri 1 Perbaungan A.Y.
2013/2014.
3. To find out the effect of Cooperative Learning Model Group Investigation
Type on student’s achievement in subject static fluid in class XI SMA
Negeri 1 Perbaungan A.Y. 2013/2014.
1.6. Research Benefits
Once this study is completed then the expected benefits of this research are:
1. To increase interest, the character and outcomes of student learning in
physics.
2. As input for physics teachers to improve student achievement and
6
1.7. Operational Definitions
Group cooperative learning model integrated investigative learning model
character is used to improve cooperation and to support the improvement of
character. Phase of cooperative learning model investigation group are forming a
group, division of tasks, collect data, create reports, presentations, evaluations.
The characters in the observation are discipline, responsibility and curiosity.
The achievement meant the result of learning gained through achievement
52
REFERENCES
Arends, Richard. (2008). Learning to Teach. California : McGraw-Hill
Companies.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Edisi ke-2.
Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Bruce R, Joyce. (1980). Models Of Teaching. New Jerse y : Pentice-Hall, Inc.
Kesuma, Dharma, dkk. (2012). Pendidikan Karakter : Kajian Teori dan Praktik
Disekolah. Bandung : Rosda.
Lickona, Thomas. (2013). Pendidikan Karakter : Panduan Lengkap Mendidik
Siswa Menjadi Pintar dan Baik. Bandung : Nusa Media
Muslich, Masnur. (2011). Pendidikan Karakter : Menjawab Tantangan Krisis
Multidimensional. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Narwanti, Sri. (2011).Pendidikan Karakter : pengintegrasian 18 Nilai
Pembentuk karakter dalam mata pelajaran. Yogyakarta : Familia
Purwanto. (2011). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Belajar.
Silberman, Melvin L. (2013). Active Learning : 101 Cara Belajar Aktif. Nuansa
Cendekia
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinnya. Jakarta
: Rineka Cipta.
Slavin, Robert E. (2005). Cooperative Learning : teori, riset, dan praktik.
Bandung : Nusa Media.
Sudijono, Anas. (2011). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : PT
RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sudjana. (2008). Metoda Statistika. Bandung : PT Tarsito
Sunardi. (2006). Fisika Bilingual untuk SMA Kelas XI. Bandung: Yrama Widya
