• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

THE SCORE OF STUDENTS WHO USE AND DO NOT USE THE STUDENT WORKSHEET

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "THE SCORE OF STUDENTS WHO USE AND DO NOT USE THE STUDENT WORKSHEET "

Copied!
25
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

41

REFERENCES

Ahmad, Z. A. (2012). Perencanaan Pembelajaran, Cetakan II. Yogyakarta:

Pustaka Insan Madani Pedagogia.

Akcay, A., Butuner, T. F., & Arikan, A. (2015). Reasons behind young learners’

learning of foreign languages. International Journal of Language Academy, 3(2), 56-68.

Rahayu, Y. S., Pratiwi, R., & Indana, S. (2018). Development of biology student worksheets to facilitate science process skills of student. IOP Conferences Series: Material Sciences and Engineering, 296, 1-12.

Azhar. (1991). PBM Pola CBSA dan LKS. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Barus, S., Siagian, S., & Saragih, A. H. (2017). The use of student worksheet to improve writing ability of descriptive text. Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research, 104, 344-347.

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Pusat Bahasa. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Dil, Y., Öğretildiği, O., & Siniflarinda, D. (2015). Developing critical thinking skill in English language teaching through novels. International Journal of Language Academy, 3(2), 76-90. Doi: 10.18033/ijla.222.

Dong, G. & Ren, H. (2013). The role of age in second language acquisition: a psychological perspective. British Journal of English Linguistics, 1(1), 1- 6.

Fitriana, T. K. & Lestari, I. K. (2019). The use of Lembar Kerja Siswa as a learning medium among Indonesian high school students. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 126-134. Doi:

10.18196/ftl.424

Gwet, K. L. (2014). Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability 4th Ed.: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters. USA:

Advanced Analytics, LLC.

Khusna, A. A., Sari Y. A., & Tohir, M. (2019). Developing e-learning worksheet based information technology for English learning. Attractive: Innovative Education Journal, 1(1), 14-39.

Kurniawan, A. E. & Puspitaningtyas, Z. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif.

Yogyakarta: Pandiva Buku.

(2)

42

Nurhidayah, N. H. & Arrasyid, F. I. (2017). Synchronization of English students’

worksheet (LKS) to the curriculum. ELT-Echo: The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 2(1), 1-12.

Prastowo, A. (2011). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif, Menciptakan Metode Pembelajaran yang Menarik dan Menyenangkan.

Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

Purwanto, N. (2006). Ilmu Pendidikan Teoritis dan Praktis. Bandung: Remaja Roskarya.

Samsu. (2017). Metode Penelitian: Teori dan Aplikasi Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Mixed Method, Serta Research and Development. Jambi:

Pusat Studi Agama dan Kemasyarakatan (PUSAKA).

Sudijono, A. (2015). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suralaga, F. (2021). Psikologi Pendidikan: Implikasi dalam Pembelajaran.

Depok: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Ur, P. (1996). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge University Press.

Ur, P. (1999). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge University Press.

Wendel, P. (2011). Adding value to force diagrams: Representing relative force magnitudes. The Physics Teacher, 49(5), 308-311.

Yudha, S. F. A., Yulfikli, Y., & Yohandri, Y. (2019). Validity of student worksheet based on guided inquiry learning model assisted by digital practicum tool. IOP Conference Series: Journal of Physics, 1185, 1-8.

Yulkifli, Ningrum, M. V., & Indrasari, W. (2019). The validity of student worksheet using inquiry-based learning model with science process skill approach for physics learning of high school. JPPPF (Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika), 5(2), 1-8.

Yusuf, A. M. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Penelitian Gabungan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Zaky, Y. K. (2017). Thesis: “An Analysis of Student’s English Worksheet Based on the Aspects of Teaching Material and Indicators (A Study toward the English Lesson Planning and Its Equipment in SMKN 4 Bandung)”.

Bandung: Pasundan University.

(3)

APPENDIX I

PERMISSION LETTER

(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)

APPENDIX II

THE SCORE OF STUDENTS WHO USE AND DO NOT USE THE STUDENT WORKSHEET

(LKS) ON THE

MATERIAL “MY BEST

FRIEND”

(8)

The score of students who use the Student Worksheet (LKS) on the material “My Best Friend”

NO. NAME SCORE

1. ADITYA ARDANA 95

2. AGUNG LASKARI 100

3. ALUNA NADYA 85

4. ARISKA PUTRI 90

5. AURA RASYA 70

6. CHANDRA BUDIAN 95

7. DEA CHAIRUNNISA 85

8. DIMAS PRASETYA 85

9. DWI ANGGRAINI 90

10. FARGHIYOSAR HASIBUAN 100

11. FATHIN HERMAWAN 100

12. FATIMAH AYU 90

13. HABIB TRISNA 75

14. HERNA 80

15. IBNU RIANTO 85

16. ISRA WANTY 75

17. LUTFI GHANI 100

18. M. ARIF 65

19. M. FACHRY 90

20. M. FAREL 80

21. M. HANAFI 100

22. MUTIARA AMIRZA 90

23. NAYLA SABRINA 60

24. OLIVIA SALSABILA 95

25. PUTRI RAFIQAH 75

26. RIDHO SINAGA 70

27. RISKI ANANDA 75

28. RISKI ARDIANSAH 80

29. RIZKY FITRIANI 100

30. SAID AKBAR 75

31. SILVI RIANTI 70

32. SITI ZULAIKA 90

33. SUCI RAMADANI 80

34. TEGUH 70

35. WINDY ARYANI 60

36. YOGA PRATAMA 70

37. YUDI ISMAIL 55

38. ZAHRA LUBIS 90

(9)

The score of students who do not use the Student Worksheet (LKS) on the material “My Best Friend”

NO. NAME SCORE

1. ABDUL FAIZ FARHAN 55

2. ALDO MULYA 80

3. AL IMAM 60

4. AL IMAN 70

5. ALDY AL-MUKTAR 50

6. AMANDA 75

7. AYU INDRIANI 100

8. AULIA DWI 75

9. AZAHRA KAYLA 100

10. BAGAS ARFANDI 70

11. DAFFA ABDULLAH 80

12. DAFFA MUTHOLIB 65

13. DESI WINDIANA 85

14. EKA PRATIWI 50

15. ENZI DWI WINATA 70

16. FAHRI AKBAR 60

17. GILANG PRATAMA 75

18. HAIKAL SYAPUTRA 70

19. KHAYLA AURA 80

20. MIFTA NASIRA 90

21. M. ALI RASYID 85

22. M. HERU 65

23. M. ADITYA 65

24. NADIA 70

25. NURHIDAYAT 80

26. NAYLA PUTRI 80

27. PUTRI SASKIA 90

28. PUTRI AYU 70

29. RANIA ANGGRAINI 75

30. RATIH AYUDIA 80

31. RATNA ANJANI 60

32. RAYHAN HARIADI 60

33. REHAN HIDAYAT 85

34. RISKI ANANDA 50

35. SARIFAH AINI 80

36. SELFY KHAIRUNNISA 95

37. VIONA ARDINI 75

38. WIRA ANDIKA 50

(10)

APPENDIX III

THE OUTPUT

(11)

NORMALITY TEST

Descriptives

Statistic Std. Error KELAS VII-

1

Mean 82.63 2.046

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Lower Bound 78.49 Upper Bound 86.78

5% Trimmed Mean 83.07

Median 85.00

Variance 159.104

Std. Deviation 12.614

Minimum 55

Maximum 100

Range 45

Interquartile Range 18

Skewness -.315 .383

Kurtosis -.766 .750

KELAS VII- 2

Mean 73.03 2.179

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Lower Bound 68.61 Upper Bound 77.44

5% Trimmed Mean 72.81

Median 75.00

Variance 180.459

Std. Deviation 13.433

Minimum 50

Maximum 100

Range 50

Interquartile Range 16

Skewness .023 .383

Kurtosis -.434 .750

Tests of Normality

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

KELAS VII-1 .141 38 .053 .945 38 .061

KELAS VII-2 .095 38 .200* .965 38 .282

*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

(12)
(13)
(14)

HOMOGENEITY TEST

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

NILAI Based on Mean .004 1 74 .947

Based on Median .006 1 74 .941

Based on Median and with adjusted df

.006 1 72.562 .941

Based on trimmed mean .008 1 74 .930

ANOVA

NILAI

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 1752.961 1 1752.961 10.325 .002

Within Groups 12563.816 74 169.781

Total 14316.776 75

(15)

INDEPENDENT T-TEST

Group Statistics

KELAS N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

NILAI KELAS VII-1 38 82.63 12.614 2.046

KELAS VII-2 38 73.03 13.433 2.179

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality of

Variances t-test for Equality of Means

F Sig. t Df

Sig.

(2- tailed)

Mean Differe nce

Std. Error Difference

95%

Confidence Interval of the

Difference Lower Upper NILAI Equal

varianc es assum ed

.004 .947 3.213 74 .002 9.605 2.989 3.649 15.562

Equal varianc es not assum ed

3.213 73.708 .002 9.605 2.989 3.649 15.562

(16)

APPENDIX IV

THE INSTRUMENT

TEST

(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)

M

APPENDIX V

THE

DOCUMENTATION

(23)
(24)

APPENDIX V

CURRICULUM VITAE

(25)

Identity

Name : Tara Pratiwi

NIM/Major : 0304182096/English Education Place and Date of Birth : Medan, September 7, 2000

E-mail : [email protected]

Gender : Female

Religion : Moslem

Phone Number : 082370883724

Address : Jl. Sari No. 50, Marindal I

Education

The Background of Education

The School Level The Name of School Year Primary School MIS Fauzan Al-Islamiyah 2006 - 2012 Junior High School SMP Negeri 22 Medan 2012 - 2015 Senior High School SMAS Eria Medan 2015 - 2018

College

State Islamic University of North

Sumatera (UIN-SU) Medan 2018 - Now (English Education)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The purpose of this study was to analyze is physics cognitive competence and science process skill of students using scientific inquiry learning model based on

The science worksheet using the guided inquiry approach is effective to improve the science process skills, critical thinking ability, and cognitive learning

The fourth stage is intended to determine the effectiveness of the E-student worksheet based on Learning Of Inquiry Sequences (LOIS) assisted by Canva on

The results of the study show that the student worksheet based on the scientific approach can improve student learning outcomes of 4.50 from an average of 70.00 to 74.50, and increasing

Furthermore, the Math Worksheet on the Mathematical Student Worksheet based on pictorial riddle is effectively used in the learning process for the fourth grade students of Public

"HOTS student worksheet to identification of scientific creativity skill, critical thinking skill and creative thinking skill in physics learning", Journal of Physics: Conference

27–36 DOI: 10.18592/ptk.v%vi%i.9002 IMPROVING THE CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY SCIENCE THROUGH PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING MODEL ASSISTED STUDENT WORKSHEET ETHNOSCIENCE Dian Armadha

The results showed that the steps to develop integrated science on Student Worksheet using cooperative method of Student Teams Achievement Divisions are: 1 In Student Worksheet there