Adams, W.K. & Wieman, C.E. (2010). Development and Validation of
Instrumens to Measure Learning of Expert – Like Thinking. International
Journal of Science Education, (-), hlm. 1 -24
Akpinar, M. & Tan, M. (2011). Developing, Implementing, And Testing A
Conceptual Change Text About Relativity. Western Anatolia Journal of
Educational Sciences (WAJES),- (-), hlm. 139-144
Alik, M.C., Ayas, A., & Coll, R.K. (2007). Enhancing Pre – Service Elementary
Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Solution Chemistry with Conceptual Change Text. International Journal of Sciemce and
Mathematics Education, 5 (-), hlm. 1 – 28
Al-khawaldeh, S.A. & Al-Olaimat, A.M. (2010). The Contribution of Conceptual
Change Texts Accompanied by Concept Mapping to Eleventh-Grade
Students Understanding of Cellular Respiration Concepts. Jounal Science
Education and Technologi. 19 (-), hlm.115–125
Bayir, G. & Geban, O. (2000). Effect of copceptual change approach on student’s
understanding of chemical change and conservation of matter. Hacettepe
Universitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 19 (-) , hlm. 79-84
Barke, H., dkk.(2009). Misconception in Chemistry: Addressing Perceptions in
Chemical Education. Berlin.: Springer
Beerenwinkel, A., dkk. (2011). Conceptual Change Texts in hemistry Teaching: A
Study on the Particle Model of Matter. International Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education, 9 (-), hlm. 1235 – 1259
Cetingul, I. & Geban, O. (2011). Using Conceptual Change Texts With Analogies
For Misconceptions In Acids And Bases. H. U. Journal of Education, 41 (-),
hlm. 112-123
Chittleborough, G. (2014). The Development of Theoretical Frameworks for
Understanding the Learning of Chemistry. Dalam I. Devetak dan S.A Glazar
(Penyunting), Learning with Understanding in the Chemistry Classroom
(hlm. 78 -94). Springer
Djaali. (Penyunting). (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta : PT. Bumi Aksara
Dahar, R. W. (1989). Teori – Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Elangga
Durmus, J. & Bayraktar, S. (Penyunting). (2010). Effects of Conceptual Change
Texts and Laboratory Experiments on Fourth Grade Students’
Understanding of Matter and Change Concepts. Journal Science Education
& Technology. 19 (-), hlm. 498 – 504
Furchan, A. (2011). Pengantar Penelitian Dalam Pendidikan. Jakarta: Pustaka
Pelajar
Gilbert, J.K & Treagust, D.F. (2009). Introduction: Macro, Submicro and
Symbolic Representations and the Realtionship Between Them: Key
Models in Chemical Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education,
4 (-), hlm. 1 – 8
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A
six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics
courses. Journal of Physics Education Research 66, (-)
Hakim, A., Liliasari & Kadarohman, A. (2012). Student Concept Understanding
of Natural Products Chemistry in Primary and Secondary Metabolites Using
the Data Collecting Technique of Modified CRI. International Online
Hendryadi . (2014). Content Validity (Validitas Isi). Teorionline Personal Paper,
- ,(1), hlm. 1 – 5
Horton, C., dkk. (Penyunting). (2007). Student Alternative Conceptions in
Chemistry. California Journal of Science Education, 7 (2), Hlm. 68-69
Kaya, E. & Geban, O. (2012). Facilitating Conceptual Change in Rate of Reaction
Concepts Using Conceptual Change Oriented Instruction. Education and
Science, 37(163), hlm. –
Koparan, T. (2010). The effect of conceptual change approach on 9th grade
students’Achievement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(-), hlm 3926–3931
Kustandi, C. & Sutjipto, B. (2002).Media Pembelajaran. Edisi kedua. Bogor:
Ghalia Indonesia
Lawshe, C.H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel
Psychology, 28 (-), hlm. 563 – 575
Lee, M. (2007). High School Students’ Alternative Ideas About Chemical
Bonding. Diakses dari:
http://www.csun.edu/-ml727939/cousework/690/Miha%27s% 20misconception %20report.doc
Levy, S.T. & Wilensky, U. (2009). Crossing levels and Representations: The
Connected Chemistry (CC1) Curriculum. Journal Science Education
Technology, - (-)
Lewis, R & Wynne. (2006). Chemistry Third Edition. China: Palgrave Macmillan
Liu, T., Lin, Y. & Tsai, C. (Penyunting). (2009). Identifying Senior High School
Students’ Misconceptions About Statistical Correlation, and Their Possible Causes: an Exploratory Study Using Concept Mapping With Interviews.
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7 (-), hlm.
791-820
Nabila, F. (2013). Perubahan Konseptual Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Level l
Sub – Mikroskopik siswa SMA kelas XI pada materi hidrolisis garam.
Skripsi. Bandung: FPMIPA UPI (tidak diterbitkan)
Nurlaela, A. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Pilihan Ganda
Dua Tingkat Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi
Ikatan Kimia. (Skripsi). Bandung: FPMIPA UPI (tidak diterbitkan)
Onder, I. & Geban, O. (2006). The Effect Of Conceptual Change Texts
OrientedInstruction On Students' Understanding Of The
SolubilityEquibilirium Concept. H.U. Journal of Education,30 (-), hlm.
166-173
Ozkan, G. & Selcuk, G. S. (2012). How Effective is “Conceptual Change
Approach” in Teaching Physics?. Journal of Education and Instructional Studies in the World, 2 (2), hlm. 182 – 190
Ozmen, H. (2004). Some Student Misconceptions in Chemistry:A Literature
Review of Chemical Bonding. Journal of Science Education and
Technology, 13 (2). 147 - 159
Ozmen, H. (2007). The Effectiveness of Conceptual Change Texts in Remediating
High School Students’ Alternative Conceptions Concerning Chemical Equilibrium. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8 (3), hlm. 413 – 425
Pabuccu, A. & Geban, O. (2006a). Remediating Misconceptions Concerning
Chemical Bonding Through Conceptual Change Text. H.U Journal of
Education, 30 (-), hlm. 184 – 192
Pabuccu, A. & Geban, O. (2012b). Students’ Conceptual Level of Understanding
on Chemical Bonding. International Online Journal of Educational
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 41 tahun 2007 tentang Standar
Proses untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.s
Pinarbasi, T., dkk. (2006). An Investigation of effectiveness of Conceptual
Change Text – oriented Instruction on students’ understanding of solution
concepts. Research in Science Education 36 (- ),hlm. 313 – 335
Posner, dkk. (1982). Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a
Theory of Conceptual Change. Science Education. 66 (2), hlm. 211 – 227
Rahman, A., Enawati, dan Erlina (2012). Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMA
Negeri 9 Pontianak Pada Materi Ikatan Kimia. [online]. Diakses dari:
http://download.portalgaruda.org/article.php?article=196297&val=2338&titl
e=Miskonsepsi%20Siswa%20Kelas%20XI%20IPA%20SMA%20Negeri%2
09%20Pontianak%20Pada%20Materi%20Ikatan%20Kimia.
Sendur, G. (2012). Prospective Science Teachers’ Misconceptions in Organic
Chemistry: The Case of Alkenes. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9
(3), hlm. 186 – 190
Sendur, G. & Toprak, M. (2013). The role of conceptual change texts to
improvestudents’ understanding of alkenes. Chemistry EducationResearch and Practice, 14 (43), hlm. -
Sevim, S. (2013). Promoting Conceptual Change in ScienceWhich is More
Effective: Conceptual Change Text or Analogy? Journal of Turkish Science
Education,10 (3), hlm. –
Silbelberg, M. (2007). Principles of General Chemistry. Boston: Mc Graw Hill.
Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning Difficulties in Chemistry: An Overview. Turkish
Science Education, 4 (2), hlm. 1 – 20
Sumarni, W. (2010). Penerapan Learning Cycle Approach Sebagai Upaya
Meminimalisasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pada Materi Struktur Molekul.
-Sunyono, dkk. (2015). Supporting Students in Learning with Multiple
Representation to Improve Student Mental Models on Atomic Structure
Concepts. Science Education International, 26 (2), hlm. 104 – 125
Tastan, O., dkk. (2008). Effectiveness of Conceptual Change Text-oriented
Instructionon Students’ Understanding of Energy in Chemical Reactions.
Journal Science Education & Technology, 17 (-), hlm. 444 – 453
Trianto. (2010). Pengantar Penelitian Pendidikan Bagi Pengembangan Profesi
Pendidikan & Tenaga Kependidikan. Jakarta: Kencana
Wilson, R. F. (2012). Measurement and Evaluation in Counceling and
Development. AACE
Yuruk, N. (2007). The Effect of Supplementing Instruction with Conceptual
ChangeTexts on Students’ Conceptions of Electrochemical Cells. Journal Science Education & Technology, 16 (-), hlm. 515 – 523
Wenning, C.J. (2008) . “Dealing More Effectively with Alternative Conceptions in Science”. Journal Physic Education Online, 5 (1), hlm. 11 - 19
Whitten K.W., dkk. (2004). General Chemistry. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Wu, dkk. (2000). Promoting Conceptual Understanding of Chemical
Reresentations: Students’ Use of a Visualization Tool in the Classroom. - .
Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science
Teaching. New Orleans
Zirbel, E.L. (-). Teaching to Promote Deep Understanding and Instigate
Conceptual Change. [Online]. Diakses dari:
