• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Pengaruh Faktor Host Dan Environment Terhadap Kejadian Penyakit Tb Paru Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Tomuan Kota Pematangsiantar Tahun 2015

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Pengaruh Faktor Host Dan Environment Terhadap Kejadian Penyakit Tb Paru Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Tomuan Kota Pematangsiantar Tahun 2015"

Copied!
33
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Widoyono, 2008. Penyakit Tropis Epidemiologi, Penularan, Pencegahan &

Pemberantasannya. Jakarta: Erlangga.

WHO, 2011. Global Tuberculosis Control. Switzerland: World Health Organization

Library Cataloguing in Publication Data.

____, 2014. Global Tuberculosis Report 2014. Switzerland: World Health

Organization Library Cataloguing in Publication Data.

Lampiran 1 : Kuisioner Penelitian

KUESIONER PENELITIAN

Pengaruh Faktor Host Dan Environment Terhadap Kejadian

Penyakit TB Paru Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Tomuan

Pematangsiantar Tahun 2015

A. DATA UMUM

1. Hari/Tgl Wawancara

:

2. Nomor Urut Responden :

3. Nama Pewawancara

:

B. IDENTITAS RESPONDEN

1. Nama Responden

:

2. Status Responden

: 1. Kasus

2. Kontrol

3. Alamat Responden

: ………

(2)

………

C. FAKTOR HOST/ KARAKTERISTIK INDIVIDU

1. Umur Responden

: ………… tahun

2. Jenis Kelamin

: 1. Laki-laki

2. Perempuan

3. Pendidikan Responden

: 1. Tidak pernah sekolah

2. Tidak tamat SD

3. Tamat SD/sederajat

4. Tamat SLTP/sederajat

5. Tamat SLTA/sederajat

6. Tamat Akademi/Perguruan Tinggi

4. Status Gizi

: 1.Tidak Baik, IMT < 18,5 dan > 25,0

2.

Baik

, IMT 18,5 – 25,0

a. BB

: ……. kg

b. TB

: ……. m

Berat Badan (kg)

IMT =

(Tinggi Badan)² (m)

(3)

2. Tinggi, UMP

≥ Rp. 1.

505.850,-

D.FAKTOR ENVIRONMENT/LINGKUNGAN

1. Kepadatan hunian

: 1. <10 m²/orang

2.

≥ 10 m²/orang

a. Jumlah penghuni rumah

: ………. Orang

b. Luas lantai rumah/ bangunan

: ………. m²

Jumlah luas lantai rumah/bangunan

Kepadatan hunian =

Jumlah anggota yang tinggal serumah

2. Luas ventilasi rumah

: 1. < 10 % dari luas lantai

2.

≥ 10 % dari luas lantai

a. Luas jendela

: ……… m²

b. Luas pintu terbuka

: ……… m²

c. Luas lubang angin

: ……… m²

Jumlah luas jendela+pintu+lubang angin

Luas Ventilasi Rumah =

Jumlah luas lantai rumah

(4)

2.

≥ 60 lux

4. Kondisi lantai rumah

: 1. Tidak kedap air

2. Kedap air

5. Kelembapan udara

: 1. < 40 % atau

≥ 70 %

2. 40 % - 70 %

6. Suhu udara

: 1. < 18 ºC atau >30 ºC

2. 18 ºC – 30 ºC

Ket:

Untuk Faktor Lingkungan

:1. Tidak memenuhi syarat

(5)

Lampiran 2 : Master Data

MASTER DATA

No

Paru TB Umur Sttsgizi Penghasln Hunian Lantai Ventilasi Cahaya Lembab Suhu

1

1

2

1

1

1

2

1

2

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

2

3

1

1

2

1

1

2

1

1

2

2

4

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

2

2

5

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

6

1

1

2

2

2

2

1

1

2

1

7

1

1

2

1

1

1

2

2

2

1

8

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

2

2

2

9

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

1

2

2

10

1

2

2

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

11

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

1

12

1

1

2

1

1

2

1

1

2

1

13

1

2

2

1

1

1

2

2

1

2

14

1

2

2

1

2

2

1

2

1

2

15

1

2

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

2

16

1

2

1

2

1

2

1

1

1

2

17

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

18

1

2

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

19

1

1

1

2

1

2

1

1

1

2

20

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

21

1

1

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

2

22

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

23

1

2

1

2

2

2

1

2

1

2

24

1

2

2

1

2

1

1

1

1

2

25

1

2

1

1

1

2

1

1

2

1

26

1

1

2

1

2

2

1

2

2

2

27

1

2

1

1

2

2

2

1

2

1

28

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

2

2

29

1

2

1

1

1

2

1

2

2

1

30

1

2

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

1

31

1

1

2

1

2

1

2

1

1

2

32

1

1

2

1

1

1

2

2

2

1

33

1

1

1

2

1

2

1

2

1

2

34

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

1

2

(6)

36

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

37

2

2

2

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

38

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

39

2

2

2

1

2

2

1

2

2

2

40

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

41

2

1

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

1

42

2

2

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

1

43

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

2

44

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

1

45

2

1

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

46

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

47

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

48

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

49

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

50

2

2

2

1

2

1

1

1

2

1

51

2

1

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

52

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

1

2

53

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

54

2

1

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

55

2

1

2

1

2

1

1

1

2

1

56

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

57

2

2

2

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

58

2

1

2

1

1

2

1

2

1

2

59

2

1

2

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

60

2

2

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

1

61

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

62

2

1

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

2

63

2

1

1

2

2

1

2

2

2

1

64

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

65

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

66

2

1

2

2

2

2

1

1

2

2

67

2

1

1

1

2

1

2

2

2

1

68

2

1

2

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

69

2

1

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

2

(7)

Keterangan

*TB Paru 1. Kasus

:

2. Kontrol

*Umur 1. 15-50 tahun (usia produktif)

2. > 50 tahun

*Status GIzi 1. Tidak Baik (IMT<18,5 atau IMT>25)

2. Baik (IMT 18,5-25)

*Penghasilan 1. Rendah (<UMP, Rp. 1.505.850)

2. Tinggi (≥UMP, Rp. 1.505.850) *Hunian 1. TMS (<10m²per orang)

2. MS (≥10m² per orang) *Lantai 1. TMS (Tdk kedap air)

2. MS (Kedap air)

*Ventilasi 1. TMS (<10% dari luas lantai)

2. MS (≥10% dari luas lantai) *Cahaya 1. TMS( < 60 lux)

2. MS (≥ 60 lux)

*Lembab 1. TMS (<40% atau>70%)

2. MS( 40%-70% )

*Suhu 1. TMS(<18°C atau >30°C)

(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)

Lampiran 3 : Hasil Uji Analisis Univariat

HASIL ANALISIS UNIVARIAT

Frequency Table/ Kelompok KASUS

umur

20 57.1 57.1 57.1

15 42.9 42.9 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

15-50 tahun > 50 tahun Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

status gizi

21 60.0 60.0 60.0

14 40.0 40.0 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

Tidak baik Baik Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

penghasilan

27 77.1 77.1 77.1

8 22.9 22.9 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

Rendah Tinggi Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

kepadatan hunian

23 65.7 65.7 65.7

12 34.3 34.3 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

TMS MS Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Kelompok KASUS / BTA (+)

35 100.0 100.0 100.0

Kasus Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(12)

lantai rumah

11 31.4 31.4 31.4

24 68.6 68.6 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

TMS MS Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

ventilasi

23 65.7 65.7 65.7

12 34.3 34.3 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

TMS MS Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

cahaya

15 42.9 42.9 42.9

20 57.1 57.1 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

TMS MS Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

kelembaban

13 37.1 37.1 37.1

22 62.9 62.9 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

TMS MS Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

suhu

12 34.3 34.3 34.3

23 65.7 65.7 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

TMS MS Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(13)

Frequency Table/ Kelompok KONTROL

umur

21 60.0 60.0 60.0

14 40.0 40.0 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

15-50 tahun > 50 tahun Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

status gizi

3 8.6 8.6 8.6

32 91.4 91.4 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

Tidak baik Baik Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

penghasilan

15 42.9 42.9 42.9

20 57.1 57.1 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

Rendah Tinggi Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

kepadatan hunian

12 34.3 34.3 34.3

23 65.7 65.7 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

TMS MS Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Kelompok KONTROL/ BTA (-)

35 100.0 100.0 100.0

Kontrol Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(14)

lantai rumah

7 20.0 20.0 20.0

28 80.0 80.0 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

TMS MS Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

ventilasi

8 22.9 22.9 22.9

27 77.1 77.1 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

TMS MS Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

cahaya

4 11.4 11.4 11.4

31 88.6 88.6 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

TMS MS Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

kelembaban

4 11.4 11.4 11.4

31 88.6 88.6 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

TMS MS Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

suhu

10 28.6 28.6 28.6

25 71.4 71.4 100.0

35 100.0 100.0

TMS MS Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

(15)

Lampiran 4 : Hasil Uji Analisi Bivariat

HASIL ANALISIS BIVARIAT

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

70 100.0% 0 .0% 70 100.0%

umur * kelompok status gizi * kelompok penghasilan * kelompok kepadatan hunian * kelompok

lantai rumah * kelompok ventilas i * kelompok cahaya * kelompok kelembaban * kelompok suhu * kelompok

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Valid Mis sing Total

(16)

umur * kelompok

Crosstab

20 21 41

20.5 20.5 41.0

48.8% 51.2% 100.0% 57.1% 60.0% 58.6% 28.6% 30.0% 58.6%

15 14 29

14.5 14.5 29.0

51.7% 48.3% 100.0% 42.9% 40.0% 41.4% 21.4% 20.0% 41.4%

35 35 70

35.0 35.0 70.0

50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Count

Expected Count % within umur % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within umur % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within umur % within kelompok % of Total

15-50 tahun

> 50 tahun umur

Total

Kasus Kontrol kelompok

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.059b 1 .808

.000 1 1.000

.059 1 .808

1.000 .500

.058 1 .810

70 Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctiona

Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases

Value df

As ymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14. 50.

(17)

Risk Estimate

.889 .343 2.302

.943 .589 1.511

1.061 .656 1.716

70 Odds Ratio for umur

(15-50 tahun / > 50 tahun) For cohort kelompok = Kasus

For cohort kelompok = Kontrol

N of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper 95% Confidence

Interval

status gizi * kelompok

Crosstab

21 3 24

12.0 12.0 24.0

87.5% 12.5% 100.0% 60.0% 8.6% 34.3% 30.0% 4.3% 34.3%

14 32 46

23.0 23.0 46.0

30.4% 69.6% 100.0% 40.0% 91.4% 65.7% 20.0% 45.7% 65.7%

35 35 70

35.0 35.0 70.0

50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Count

Expected Count % within status gizi % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within status gizi % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within status gizi % within kelompok % of Total

Tidak baik

Baik status

gizi

Total

Kasus Kontrol kelompok

(18)

Chi-Square Tests

20.543b 1 .000

18.324 1 .000

22.421 1 .000

.000 .000

20.250 1 .000

70 Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctiona

Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases

Value df

As ymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12. 00.

b.

Risk Estimate

16.000 4.094 62.528

2.875 1.811 4.565

.180 .061 .527

70 Odds Ratio for s tatus

gizi (Tidak baik / Baik) For cohort kelompok = Kasus

For cohort kelompok = Kontrol

N of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper 95% Confidence

(19)

penghasilan * kelompok

Crosstab

27 15 42

21.0 21.0 42.0

64.3% 35.7% 100.0% 77.1% 42.9% 60.0% 38.6% 21.4% 60.0%

8 20 28

14.0 14.0 28.0

28.6% 71.4% 100.0% 22.9% 57.1% 40.0% 11.4% 28.6% 40.0%

35 35 70

35.0 35.0 70.0

50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Count

Expected Count % within penghasilan % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within penghasilan % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within penghasilan % within kelompok % of Total

Rendah

Tinggi penghasilan

Total

Kasus Kontrol kelompok

Total

Chi-Square Tests

8.571b 1 .003

7.202 1 .007

8.790 1 .003

.007 .003

8.449 1 .004

70 Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctiona

Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases

Value df

As ymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14. 00.

(20)

Risk Estimate

4.500 1.599 12.664

2.250 1.201 4.214

.500 .313 .799

70 Odds Ratio for

penghasilan (Rendah / Tinggi) For cohort

kelompok = Kas us For cohort

kelompok = Kontrol N of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper 95% Confidence

Interval

kepadatan hunian * kelompok

Crosstab

23 12 35

17.5 17.5 35.0

65.7% 34.3% 100.0%

65.7% 34.3% 50.0% 32.9% 17.1% 50.0%

12 23 35

17.5 17.5 35.0

34.3% 65.7% 100.0%

34.3% 65.7% 50.0% 17.1% 32.9% 50.0%

35 35 70

35.0 35.0 70.0

50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Count

Expected Count % within

kepadatan hunian % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within

kepadatan hunian % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within

kepadatan hunian % within kelompok % of Total

Kasus Kontrol kelompok

(21)

Chi-Square Tests

6.914b 1 .009

5.714 1 .017

7.033 1 .008

.016 .008

6.816 1 .009

70 Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctiona

Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases

Value df

As ymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17. 50.

b.

Risk Estimate

3.674 1.369 9.858

1.917 1.143 3.215

.522 .311 .875

70 Odds Ratio for kepadatan

hunian (TMS / MS) For cohort kelompok = Kasus

For cohort kelompok = Kontrol

N of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper 95% Confidence

(22)

lantai rumah * kelompok

Crosstab

11 7 18

9.0 9.0 18.0

61.1% 38.9% 100.0% 31.4% 20.0% 25.7% 15.7% 10.0% 25.7%

24 28 52

26.0 26.0 52.0

46.2% 53.8% 100.0% 68.6% 80.0% 74.3% 34.3% 40.0% 74.3%

35 35 70

35.0 35.0 70.0

50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Count

Expected Count % within lantai rumah % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within lantai rumah % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within lantai rumah % within kelompok % of Total

TMS

MS lantai rumah

Total

Kasus Kontrol kelompok

Total

Chi-Square Tests

1.197b 1 .274

.673 1 .412

1.204 1 .272

.413 .206

1.179 1 .277

70 Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctiona

Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases

Value df

As ymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9. 00.

(23)

Risk Estimate

1.833 .614 5.471

1.324 .827 2.121

.722 .384 1.358

70 Odds Ratio for lantai

rumah (TMS / MS) For cohort kelompok = Kasus

For cohort kelompok = Kontrol

N of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper 95% Confidence

Interval

ventilasi * kelompok

Crosstab

23 8 31

15.5 15.5 31.0

74.2% 25.8% 100.0% 65.7% 22.9% 44.3% 32.9% 11.4% 44.3%

12 27 39

19.5 19.5 39.0

30.8% 69.2% 100.0% 34.3% 77.1% 55.7% 17.1% 38.6% 55.7%

35 35 70

35.0 35.0 70.0

50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Count

Expected Count % within ventilas i % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within ventilas i % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within ventilas i % within kelompok % of Total

TMS

MS ventilas i

Total

Kasus Kontrol kelompok

(24)

Chi-Square Tests

13.027b 1 .000

11.348 1 .001

13.492 1 .000

.001 .000

12.841 1 .000

70 Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctiona

Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases

Value df

As ymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15. 50.

b.

Risk Estimate

6.469 2.256 18.548

2.411 1.441 4.034

.373 .198 .702

70 Odds Ratio for

ventilas i (TMS / MS) For cohort

kelompok = Kas us For cohort

kelompok = Kontrol N of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper 95% Confidence

(25)

cahaya * kelompok

Crosstab

15 4 19

9.5 9.5 19.0

78.9% 21.1% 100.0% 42.9% 11.4% 27.1% 21.4% 5.7% 27.1%

20 31 51

25.5 25.5 51.0

39.2% 60.8% 100.0% 57.1% 88.6% 72.9% 28.6% 44.3% 72.9%

35 35 70

35.0 35.0 70.0

50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Count

Expected Count % within cahaya % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within cahaya % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within cahaya % within kelompok % of Total

TMS

MS cahaya

Total

Kasus Kontrol kelompok

Total

Chi-Square Tests

8.741b 1 .003

7.224 1 .007

9.174 1 .002

.006 .003

8.616 1 .003

70 Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctiona

Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases

Value df

As ymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9. 50.

(26)

Risk Estimate

5.813 1.686 20.044

2.013 1.332 3.043

.346 .141 .850

70 Odds Ratio for

cahaya (TMS / MS) For cohort

kelompok = Kas us For cohort

kelompok = Kontrol N of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper 95% Confidence

Interval

kelembaban * kelompok

Crosstab

13 4 17

8.5 8.5 17.0

76.5% 23.5% 100.0% 37.1% 11.4% 24.3% 18.6% 5.7% 24.3%

22 31 53

26.5 26.5 53.0

41.5% 58.5% 100.0% 62.9% 88.6% 75.7% 31.4% 44.3% 75.7%

35 35 70

35.0 35.0 70.0

50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Count

Expected Count % within kelembaban % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within kelembaban % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within kelembaban % within kelompok % of Total

TMS

MS kelembaban

Total

Kasus Kontrol kelompok

(27)

Chi-Square Tests

6.293b 1 .012

4.972 1 .026

6.553 1 .010

.024 .012

6.203 1 .013

70 Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctiona

Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases

Value df

As ymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8. 50.

b.

Risk Estimate

4.580 1.316 15.932

1.842 1.217 2.788

.402 .166 .976

70 Odds Ratio for

kelembaban (TMS / MS) For cohort kelompok = Kasus

For cohort kelompok = Kontrol

N of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper 95% Confidence

(28)

suhu * kelompok

Crosstab

12 10 22

11.0 11.0 22.0

54.5% 45.5% 100.0% 34.3% 28.6% 31.4% 17.1% 14.3% 31.4%

23 25 48

24.0 24.0 48.0

47.9% 52.1% 100.0% 65.7% 71.4% 68.6% 32.9% 35.7% 68.6%

35 35 70

35.0 35.0 70.0

50.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Count

Expected Count % within suhu % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within suhu % within kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % within suhu % within kelompok % of Total

TMS

MS suhu

Total

Kasus Kontrol kelompok

Total

Chi-Square Tests

.265b 1 .607

.066 1 .797

.265 1 .606

.797 .399

.261 1 .609

70 Pearson Chi-Square

Continuity Correctiona

Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases

Value df

As ymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11. 00.

(29)

Risk Estimate

1.304 .474 3.590

1.138 .703 1.844

.873 .513 1.486

70 Odds Ratio for

suhu (TMS / MS) For cohort

kelompok = Kas us For cohort

kelompok = Kontrol N of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper 95% Confidence

(30)

Lampiran 5 : Hasil Uji Analisis Multivariat

HASIL ANALISIS MULTIVARIAT

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

70 100.0

0 .0

70 100.0

0 .0

70 100.0 Unweighted Casesa

Included in Analysis Mis sing Cases Total

Selected Cases

Unselected Cas es Total

N Percent

If weight is in effect, s ee class ification table for the total number of cases.

a.

De pendent V aria ble Encodi ng

0 1 Original Value

Kasus Kontrol

Int ernal Value

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

0 35 .0

0 35 100.0

50.0 Observed

Kasus Kontrol kelompok

Overall Percentage Step 0

Kasus Kontrol

kelompok Percentage Correct Predicted

Constant is included in the model. a.

(31)

Va riables in the Equa tion

.000 .239 .000 1 1.000 1.000

Constant St ep 0

B S. E. W ald df Sig. Ex p(B )

Variables not in the Equation

20.543 1 .000

8.571 1 .003

6.914 1 .009

13.027 1 .000

8.741 1 .003

6.293 1 .012

38.247 6 .000

sttsgizi penghasilan hunian ventilas i cahaya kelembaban Variables

Overall Statistics Step

0

Score df Sig.

Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)

Om nibus Tests of Model Coe fficients

51.319 6 .000

51.319 6 .000

51.319 6 .000

-2. 415 1 .120

48.904 5 .000

48.904 5 .000

St ep

Chi-square df Sig.

A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the Chi-squares value has dec reas ed from the previous st ep.

a.

Mode l Summ ary

45.721a .520 .693 48.137a .503 .670 St ep

1 2

-2 Log lik elihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelk erke R Square

(32)

Cl assi fica tion Tablea

Overall Percentage

Kasus Kontrol kelompok

Overall Percentage St ep 1

St ep 2

Kasus Kontrol

kelompok Percentage Correc t Predic ted

The cut value is .500 a.

Va riables in the Equa tion

3.123 .995 9.857 1 .002 22.711 3.233 159.549

1.296 .868 2.232 1 .135 3.655 .667 20.011

1.807 .933 3.752 1 .053 6.091 .979 37.900

2.059 .956 4.641 1 .031 7.835 1.204 50.987

1.707 .976 3.055 1 .080 5.511 .813 37.356

1.915 .915 4.376 1 .036 6.786 1.128 40.811

-19.394 4.800 16.322 1 .000 .000

3.468 .969 12.805 1 .000 32.088 4.801 214.481

2.034 .880 5.339 1 .021 7.642 1.362 42.898

1.888 .885 4.551 1 .033 6.606 1.166 37.428

1.942 .945 4.229 1 .040 6.975 1.095 44.412

1.796 .885 4.116 1 .042 6.023 1.063 34.132

-18.508 4.552 16.529 1 .000 .000

stt sgiz i penghasilan hunian ventilas i cahaya ventilas i cahaya

(33)

Model if Term Rem oved

-29.934 14.147 1 .000

-24.068 2.415 1 .120

-25.049 4.377 1 .036

-25.484 5.247 1 .022

-24.547 3.373 1 .066

-25.273 4.825 1 .028

-33.755 19.373 1 .000

-27.371 6.605 1 .010

-26.603 5.069 1 .024

-26.449 4.762 1 .029

-26.280 4.423 1 .035

Variable stt sgiz i penghasilan hunian ventilas i cahaya kelembaban St ep

1

stt sgiz i hunian ventilas i cahaya kelembaban St ep

2

Model Log Lik elihood

Change in -2 Log

Lik elihood df

Sig. of the Change

Variables not in the Equation

2.370 1 .124

2.370 1 .124

penghasilan Variables

Overall Statistics Step 2a

Score df Sig.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Untuk membuat Modul ini penulis membuat struktur navigasi dan storyboard dengan menggunakan Macromedia Flash MX 2004 serta komponen-komponen lainnya yang mendukung proses

Pertama : Nama-nama guru di lingkungan Kementerian Agama dalam lampiran ini dinyatakan LANJUT mengikuti PLPG Sertifikasi Guru dalam Jabatan Rayon 142 Universitas PGRI Adi

Untuk membuat web telah terdapat banyak software yang beredar di pasaran tetapi dari semua software tersebut masih terdapat banyak kekakuan atau kekurangan sehingga web tidak

BANGKALAN RAYON 142 UNIVERSITAS PGRI ADI BUANA SURABAYA. NO NO.PESERTA NAMA INSTANSI/TEMPAT BERTUGAS

Akan tetapi, sebagai sebuah sarana yang baru untuk memasarkan produk, menimbulkan pertanyaan bagi para pengelola bisnis di internet tersebut tentang perancangan situs serta

PESERTA PLPG TAHAP II SERTIFIKASI GURU KEMENTERIAN AGAMA TAHUN

Rekonsiliasi antara beban pajak penghasilan yang dihitung dengan menggunakan tarif pajak yang berlaku sebesar 25% pada tahun 2010 dan 28% pada tahun 2009 atas laba

4.3 Menelaah dan merevisi teks hasil observasi, tanggapan deskriptif, eksposisi, eksplanasi, dan cerita pendek sesuai dengan struktur dan kaidah teks baik secara lisan