DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Allard RW.1960. Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons Inc. University
of California. New York. Page 150-165.
Baker RJ. 1978. Issue in Diallel Analysis. Crop Sci (18): 533-536.
Bari AS, Musa, Sjamsudin E.1974. Pengantar Pemuliaan Tanaman. Fakultas
Pertanian IPB. Bogor. 91 hal.
Beck DL, Vasal SK, Carossa J. 1990: Heterosis and Combining Ability of
CIMMYT’s Tropical Early and Intermediate Maturity Maize (Zea mays L.)
Germplasm. Maydica, 35, 279–285
Betrán FJ, Beck D, Bänziger M, and Edmeades GO. 2003. Genetic Analysis of
Inbred and Hybrid Yield Under Stress and Nonstress Environments in
Tropical Maize. Crop Sci. 43:807-817.
Brucher H. 1989. Useful Plants of Neotropical Origin and Their Wild Relatives.
Springer-Verlag. Berlin.
Budiman, LF. dan Sujiprihati S. 2000. Evaluasi Hasil dan Pendugaan Nilai Heterosis
pada Delapan Jagung Hibrida dalam: Prosiding Ekspose Hasil Penelitian
Bioteknologi Pertanian Departemen Pertanian Jakarta. Hal. 320-327.
Chaudhary AK, Chaudhary LB and Sharma KC. 2000. Combining Ability Estimates
of Early Generation Inbred Lines Derived from Two Maize Populations. Ind. J.
Genet. And Plant Breeding. 60: 55-61.
Chaudary HK. 1971. Elementary Principles of Plant Breeding 2
ndedition. Oxford
and IBH Publishing Co. India.
Crowder LV. 1986. Plant Genetic. Terj. Kusdiarti L. 1986. Genetika Tumbuhan.
Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta.
Dehghanpour Z, Ehdaie B and Moghaddam M. 1996. Diallel Analysis of Agronomic
Characters in White Endosperm Maize. J. Genet. And Breeding. 50 : 357-365.
Departemen Pertanian. 2007. Pusat Data dan Informasi Pertanian. www. deptan.go.id
[ 20 Mei 2007 ].
Falconer DS and Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 4
thed.
Longman . London.
Griffing B. 1956. Concept of General and Specific Combining Ability in Relation to
Diallel Crossing System.Aus.Biol Sci 9(4) : 463-493.
Hallauer AR. 1990. Methods Used in Developing Maize Inbreds. Maydica. 35: 1-16.
Hallauer AR. and Miranda JB. 1988. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. Iowa
State University Press. Ames, IA.
Hayes HK , Immer FR , Smith DC. 1955. Methods of Plant Breeding 2
ndedition.
McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc. United States of America.
Hede AR, Srinivasan G, Stølen O, and Vasal SK. 1999. Identification of Heterotic
Pattern in Tropical Inbred Maize Lines using Broad-based Synthetic Testers.
Maydica 44:325-331.
Henderson CR. 1952. Specific and General Combining Ability. pp. 352-357. In
Gowen JW, (Ed). Heterosis. Iowa State College Press. New York. United
States of America.304p.
Iriany RN. Makkulawu T. Isnaini M. Dahlan M. dan Subandi .2003. Evaluasi Daya
gabung Karakter Ketahanan Terhadap Penyakit Bulai Melalui Persilangan
Diallel. Penelitian Pertanian Tanaman Pangan.Vol 22.No 3.
Jones JS and Bingham ET. 1995. Inbreeding Depression in Alfalfa and Cross
Pollinated Crops. p. 209-229. In: Janick J. (ed). Plant Breeding Reviews.
Volume 13. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Jones NF. 1952. Plasmagenes and Chromogenes in Heterosis. pp. 224-235. In
Gowen JW, (Ed). Heterosis. Iowa State College Press. New York. United
States of America.304p.
Kalla VR. Kumar and Basandrai AK. 2001. Combining Ability Analysis and Gene
Action Estimates of Yield and Yield Contributing Characters in Maize. Crop
Res. Hisar. 22: 102-106
Kasryno F. 2002. Perkembangan Produksi dan Konsumsi Jagung Dunia Selama
Empat Dekade Yang Lalu dan Implikasinya Bagi Indonesia.(The Progress of
World Maize Production and Consumption for The Last Four Decades, and Its
Implication to Indonesia). Paper presented at One Day Seminar on Maize
Agrobusiness, Bogor, June 24 2002.AARD.
Larish LLB. and Brewbaker JL. 1999. Diallel Analyses of Temperate and Tropical
Popmaizes. Maydica. 44: 279-284
Mohr H and Schopfer P. 1995. Plant Physiology. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
New York. 629p.
Morris M. 1995. Asias Public and Private Maize Seed Industries Changing. Asian
Seed. 2 : 3-4.
Obilana AT and Hallauer AR. 1974 Estimation of Variability of Quantitative Traits in
BSSS by using Unselected Maize Inbred Lines. Crop Sci., 14: 99–103
Pallival S and Sprague GF. 1981. Improving adaptation and yield dependability in
maize in the developing world. CIMMYT. Mexico.
Park K (ed.). 2001. Corn Production in Asia. Food and Fewrtilizer Technology
Center for The Asian and Pacific Region. Taiwan.
Poehlman JM. 1979. Breeding Field Crops. The AVI Publishing Company Inc.
Westport. Connecticut. 486p.
Poehlman JM and Sleeper DA. 1987. Breeding Field Crops 4
thedition.Iowa State
University Press.Ames.
Poespodarsono S. 1988. Dasar-dasar Ilmu Pemuliaan Tanaman. PAU IPB. Bogor.
Pradhan SK. Lothan KB and Jitendriya M.2005. Studies on Gene Action and
Combining Ability Analysis in Basmati Rice. Journal Central European
Agriculture Vol 7(2) :267 – 272.
Romagosa I. dan Fox PN.1993. Genotype x Environment Interaction and Adaptation
p 374-390 In M.D. Hayward , N.O.Bosemark and I. Romagosa (eds) Plant
Breeding, Principles and Prospects. Chapman & Hall . London.
San-Vicente FM, Bejarano A, Marin C and Crossa J. 1998. Analysis of Diallel
Crosses Among Iimproved Tropical White Endosperm Maize Populations.
Maydica. 43: 147-153.
Setiyono RT dan Subandi. 1996. Analisis Heterosis dan Daya Gabung Jagung.
Penelitian Pertanian Tanaman Pangan. 15 (1):30-34.
Silitonga TS, Minantyorini L. Cholisoh, Warsono, dan Indarjo. 1993.Evaluasi Daya
Gabung Padi Bulu dan Cere. Penelitian Pertanian 1:6-14.
Singh RK, Chaudary BD. 1979. Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic
Analysis. Revised Edition. Kalyani Publiosher. New Delhi. 304p.
Soewarso. 1982. Pendugaan Daya Gabung Sifat-Sifat Agronomis Pada Beberapa
Varietas Tembakau Virginia Flue-cured (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Tesis.
Fakultas Pascasarjana. IPB. Bogor.
Sprague GF and Tatum LA.1942.General vs Specific Combining Ability in Single
Cross of Corn. J Amer. Soc. Agron 34 :923-932.
Sprague GF and Dudley JW. 1988. Corn and Corn Improvement. Third edition. Crop.
Sci. Soc. Am., Inc., Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Inc. Wisconsin. 968p.
Stoskopf NC, Tomes DT, and Christie BR. 1993. Plant Breeding : Theory and
Practice. Westview Press. Colorado. 531p.
Subandi, Dahlan M, dan Rifin A. 1998. Hasil dan strategi penelitian jagung, sorgum,
dan terigu dalam pencapaian dan pelestarian swasembada pangan. p. 347-357.
Dalam: Inovasi Teknologi Pertanian. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan
Pertanian. Jakarta.
Sujiprihati S. 1996. Heterosis and Combining Ability and Yield Prediction in Hybrids
from Local maize Inbred Lines. Disertasi. Doctor of Philosophy Universiti
Pertanian Malaysia. Malaysia.
Sujiprihati S, Saleh GB and Ali ES.2001. Combining Ability Analisys for Yield and
Related Characters in Single Cross Hybrids of Tropical Maize (Zea mays
L.).Sabrao Journal of Breeding and Cenetics 33(2) 111-120.
Sutjahjo SH. 1987. Heterosis dan Daya Gabung Galur-Galur Tomat tahan layu
Bakteri ( P. solanaceae E.F. Smith) Hasil Persilangan Metode DSM (Diallel
Selective Mating). Tesis. Fakultas Pascasarjana. IPB. Bogor.
Swastika DKS, Kasim F, Suhariyanto K, Sudana W, Hendayana R, Gerpacio RV, and
Pingali PL. 2004. Maize in Indonesia: Production Systems, Constraints, and
Research Priorities. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.
Troyer AF and Larkins JR 1985 Selection for Early Flowering in Corn: 10 late
synthetics. Crop Sci., 25: 695–697
Vasal SK, Srinivasan G, Pandey S, Cordova HS, Han GC, and Gonzalez FC. 1992b.
Heterotic patterns of ninety-two white tropical CIMMYT maize lines. Maydica
37:259-270.
Virmani SS, Aquino RC, Khush GS, and Yoshida S. 1981. Heterosis Breeding in
Rice. Paper presented at the 12thAnnual Scientific Meeeting of the Crop
Science Society, Sapilang, La Union, Philippines, April 22-24, 1981.
Welsh JR. 1981. Fundamental of Plant Genetic and Breeding. Colorado State
University. John Wiley and Sons. New York.
Wong CC. 1991. Inbreeding depression after three generations of selfing in five
maize varieties. B. Agric. Sc. Project Report. Universiti Pertanian Malaysia.
Malaysia.
Lampiran 1. Silsilah galur-galur yang digunakan .
Diagram silsilah 276-4
Asal materi pemuliaan : CI-POPB cy2
Musim/
Tahun
Generasi Kode
Model
Polinasi
Pedigree
MK - 2000
S2
-
Selfing
CI-POPB cy2)-
MH - 2001
S3
276d
Selfing
CI-POPB cy2)-6
MK – 2001
S4 276d
Selfing
CI-POPB cy2)-6-1
MH - 2002
S5
276d
Selfing
CI-POPB cy2)-6-1-1
MK1 - 2003
S6
276d
Selfing
CI-POPB cy2)-6-1-1-1
MK2 - 2003
S7
276d
Selfing
CI-POPB cy2)-6-1-1-1-1
Diagram silsilah 261-2
Asal materi pemuliaan : BGR-POPA cy3
Musim/
Tahun
Generasi Kode
Model
Polinasi
Pedigree
MK - 2001
S2
-
Selfing
BGR-POPA cy3)-
MH - 2002
S3
261b
Selfing
BGR-POPA cy3)-4
MK - 2003
S4 261b
Selfing
BGR-POPA cy3)-4-1
MH - 2004
S5
261b
Selfing
BGR-POPA cy3)-4-1-3
MK1 - 2004
S6
261b
Selfing
BGR-POPA cy3)-4-1-3-1
MK2 - 2004
S7
261b
Selfing
BGR-POPA cy3)-4-1-3-1-7
Diagram silsilah 425-3
Asal materi pemuliaan : CPS6
Musim/
Tahun
Generasi Kode
Model
Polinasi
Pedigree
MK - 2002
S2
-
Selfing
CPS6)-
MH - 2003
S3
425c
Selfing
CPS6)-5
MK - 2003
S4 425c
Selfing
CPS6)-5-2
MH - 2004
S5
425c
Selfing
CPS6)-5-2-1
MK1 - 2004
S6
425c
Selfing
CPS6)-5-2-1-3
MH - 2005
S7
425c
Sib
CPS6)-5-2-1-3 #
Asal materi pemuliaan : CPS18-1
Musim/
Tahun
Generasi Kode
Model
Polinasi
Pedigree
MK - 2002
S2
-
Selfing
CPS18-1)-
MH - 2003
S3
426
Selfing
CPS18-1)-7
MK - 2003
S4
426
Selfing
CPS18-1)-7-1
MH - 2004
S5
426
Selfing
CPS18-1)-7-1-4
MK1 - 2004
S6
426
Selfing
CPS18-1)-7-1-4-1
MH - 2005
S7
426
Selfing
CPS18-1)-7-1-4-1-2
Diagram silsilah 605
Asal materi pemuliaan : CI-POPE cy3
Musim/
Tahun
Generasi Kode
Model
Polinasi
Pedigree
MK - 2000
S2
-
Selfing
CI-POPE cy3)-
MH - 2001
S3
605
Selfing
CI-POPE cy3)-3
MK – 2001
S4
605
Selfing
CI-POPE cy3)-3-6
MH - 2002
S5
605
Selfing
CI-POPE cy3)-3-6-5
MK1 - 2003
S6
605
Selfing
CI-POPE cy3)-3-6-5-1
MK2 - 2003
S7
605
Selfing
CI-POPE cy3)-3-6-5-1-2
Diagram silsilah 612
Asal materi pemuliaan : LMP-POPC cy2
Musim/
Tahun
Generasi Kode
Model
Polinasi
Pedigree
MK - 2003
S2
-
Selfing
LMP-POPC cy2)-
MH - 2004
S3
612
Selfing
LMP-POPC cy2)-3
MK – 2004
S4
612
Selfing
LMP-POPC cy2)-3-6
MH - 2005
S5
612
Selfing
LMP-POPC cy2)-3-6-1
MK1 - 2006
S6
612
Selfing
LMP-POPC cy2)-3-6-1-2
MK2 - 2006
S7
612
Selfing
LMP-POPC cy2)-3-6-1-2-1
Diagram silsilah 786
Asal materi pemuliaan : LAMU-17
Musim/
Tahun
Generasi Kode
Model
Polinasi
Pedigree
MK - 2000
S2
-
Selfing
LAMU-17)-
MH - 2001
S3
786
Selfing
LAMU-17)-8
MK – 2001
S4
786
Selfing
LAMU-17)-8-6
MH - 2002
S5
786
Selfing
LAMU-17)-8-6-2
MK1 - 2003
S6
786
Selfing
LAMU-17)-8-6-2-1
MH - 2004
S7
786
Sib
LAMU-17)-8-6-2-1 #
Diagram silsilah 969
Asal materi pemuliaan : BGR-POPD cy4
Musim/
Tahun
Generasi Kode
Model
Polinasi
Pedigree
MK - 2001
S2
-
Selfing
BGR-POPD cy4)-
MH - 2002
S3
969
Selfing
BGR-POPD cy4)-2
MK - 2003
S4
969
Selfing
BGR-POPD cy4)-2-9
MH - 2004
S5
969
Selfing
BGR-POPD cy4)-2-9-6
MK1 - 2004
S6
969
Selfing
BGR-POPD cy4)-2-9-6-1
MK2 - 2004
S7
969
Selfing
BGR-POPD cy4)-2-9-6-1-3
Lampiran 2. Anova Gabungan Antar Lokasi Karakter Panjang Tongkol
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah
Kuadrat
Kuadrat
Tengah
F Hit
Pr > F
LINGK 1
164.8470076
164.8470076
96.04
0.0001
ULNG(LOK) 5
172.7257141
34.54514283
20.13
0.0001
GENOTIPE 65
1017.884097
15.65975534
9.12
0.0001
LINGK*GENOTIPE 65 233.401424 3.59079114
2.09 0.0001
Galat 259
444.5508443
1.71641253
Total
395
2033.409087
Lampiran 3. Anova Gabungan Antar Lokasi Karakter Diameter Tongkol
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah
Kuadrat
Kuadrat
Tengah
F Hit
Pr > F
LINGK 1
0.01680477
0.01680477
0.03
0.8708
ULNG(LOK) 5
1.57585005
0.31517001
0.5
0.7785
GENOTIPE 65
60.28111158
0.92740172
1.46
0.0205
LINGK*GENOTIPE 65
44.2459474
0.68070688
1.07 0.3444
Galat 259
164.2970776
0.63435165
Total
395
270.4167914
Lampiran 4. Anova Gabungan Antar Lokasi Karakter Jumlah Biji per Tongkol
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah
Kuadrat
Kuadrat
Tengah
F Hit
Pr > F
LINGK 1
107177.1062
107177.1062
31.94
0.0001
ULNG(LOK) 5
120063.0656
24012.61313
7.15
0.0001
GENOTIPE 65
1095139.41
16848.29862
5.02
0.0001
LINGK*GENOTIPE 65 293775.629 4519.625061
1.35 0.055
Galat 259
869224.0507
3356.077416
Total
395
2485379.262
Lampiran 5. Anova Gabungan Antar Lokasi Karakter Bobot 1000 Biji
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah
Kuadrat
Kuadrat
Tengah
F Hit
Pr > F
LINGK 1
2279.040404
2279.040404
7.17
0.0079
ULNG(LOK) 5
3814.89899
762.979798
2.4
0.0376
GENOTIPE 65
161827.0202
2489.646465
7.83
0.0001
LINGK*GENOTIPE 65
34195.9596
526.0916861
1.66 0.0032
Galat 259
82301.76768
317.7674428
Total
395
284418.6869
Lampiran 6. Anova Gabungan Antar Lokasi Karakter Bobot Tongkol Panen
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah
Kuadrat
Kuadrat
Tengah
F Hit
Pr > F
LINGK 1
39.21064741
39.21064741 337.75
0.0001
ULNG(LOK) 5
53.23043243
10.64608649
91.7
0.0001
GENOTIPE 65
162.4440102
2.49913862
21.53
0.0001
LINGK*GENOTIPE 65 22.81070758 0.35093396
3.02 0.0001
Galat 259
30.06861055
0.11609502
Total
395
307.7644082
Lampiran 7. Anova Gabungan Antar Lokasi Karakter Hasil
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah
Kuadrat
Kuadrat
Tengah
F Hit
Pr > F
LINGK 1
30038530.25
30038530.25
42.41
0.0001
ULNG(LOK) 5
58711991.56
11742398.31
16.58
0.0001
GENOTIPE 65
400898802.6
6167673.886
8.71
0.0001
LINGK*GENOTIPE 65 68892147.63 1059879.194
1.5 0.015
Galat 259
183467327.6
708368.0601
Total
395
742008799.6
Lampiran 8. Nilai varians genotipe dan daya gabung karakter panjang tongkol di
lokasi Bogor.
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat
Kuadrat Tengah
F Hit
Replication 2
0.3303
0.1652 0.23
Treatment 63 748.3337
11.8783 16.58
**
Galat 126 90.2430
0.7162
TOTAL 191 838.9070
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat
Kuadrat Tengah
F Hit
GCA 7 24.6364
3.5195
14.74
**
SCA 28 217.7560
7.7770
32.58
**
Reciprocals 28
7.0522
0.2519 1.05
ns
Galat 126 30.0810
0.2387
Lampiran 9. Nilai varians genotipe dan daya gabung karakter diameter tongkol
di lokasi Bogor.
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat
Kuadrat Tengah
F Hit
Replication 2
0.1922
0.0961 4.12
Treatment 63 33.2023
0.5270 22.61
**
Galat 126 2.9366
0.0233
TOTAL 191 36.3311
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat
Kuadrat Tengah
F Hit
GCA 7 0.6108
0.0873
11.23
**
SCA 28 10.1167
0.3613
46.51
**
Lampiran 10. Nilai varians genotipe dan daya gabung karakter jumlah biji per
tongkol di lokasi Bogor.
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat
Kuadrat Tengah
F Hit
Replication 2 9,368.9318 4,684.4659 3.55
Treatment 63 683,381.4888 10,847.3252 8.21
**
Galat 126
166,463.4863 1,321.1388
TOTAL 191
859,213.9069
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat
Kuadrat Tengah
F Hit
GCA 7
27,125.4106 3,875.0587
8.80
**
SCA 28
182,777.6346 6,527.7727
14.82
**
Reciprocals 28 17,890.7844
638.9566 1.45
ns
Galat 126
55,487.8288
440.3796
Lampiran 11. Nilai varians genotipe dan daya gabung karakter bobot 1000 biji di
lokasi Bogor.
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat
Kuadrat Tengah
F Hit
Replication 2 404.1667
202.0833 0.90
Treatment 63 117,050.0000 1,857.9365 8.25
**
Galat 126
28,362.5000 225.0992
TOTAL 191
145,816.6667
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat
Kuadrat Tengah
F Hit
GCA 7
3,483.3333 497.6190
6.63
**
SCA 28
30,863.8889
1,102.2817
14.69
**
Reciprocals 28 4,669.4444
166.7659 2.22
**
Galat 126
9,454.1667
75.0331
Lampiran 12. Nilai varians genotipe dan daya gabung karakter Bobot tongkol
panen di lokasi Bogor.
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat
Kuadrat Tengah
F Hit
Replication 2
2.9380
1.4690 19.62
Treatment 63 135.7325
2.1545 28.78
**
Galat 126 9.4323
0.0749
TOTAL 191 148.1028
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat
Kuadrat Tengah
F Hit
GCA 7 7.4927
1.0704
42.90
**
SCA 28 32.9560
1.1770
47.17
**
Reciprocals 28
4.7955
0.1713 6.86
**
Galat 126 3.1441
0.0250
Lampiran 13. Nilai varians genotipe dan daya gabung karakter hasil di lokasi
Bogor.
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat
Kuadrat Tengah
F Hit
Replication 2 7,819,226.3363
3,909,613.1682
19.62
Treatment 63
361,235,217.2542
5,733,892.3374
28.78
**
Galat 126
25,102,958.8686
199,229.8323
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat
Kuadrat Tengah
F Hit
GCA 7
19,940,893.6786
2,848,699.0969
42.90
**
SCA 28
87,708,220.0981
3,132,436.4321
47.17
**
Reciprocals 28 12,762,625.3080 455,808.0467 6.86
**
Galat 126
8,367,652.9562
66,409.9441
Lampiran 14. Nilai varians genotipe dan daya gabung karakter panjang tongkol
di lokasi Lampung.
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat Kuadrat
Tengah F
Hit
Ulangan 2 0.3689
0.1845 0.68
Perlakuan 63 600.6874
9.5347 35.18
**
Galat 126 34.1491
0.2710
TOTAL 191 635.2054
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat Kuadrat
Tengah F
Hit
GCA 7 54.3287
7.7612
85.91
**
SCA 28
129.0991 4.6107
51.04
**
Reciprocals 28 16.8013
0.6000 6.64
**
Galat 126 11.3830
0.0903
Lampiran 15. Nilai varians genotipe dan daya gabung karakter jumlah biji per
tongkol di lokasi Lampung.
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat Kuadrat
Tengah F
Hit
Ulangan 2 779.9167 389.9584 0.27
Perlakuan 63
1,238,544.9089
19,659.4430
13.47
**
Galat 126
183,931.2648
1,459.7719
TOTAL 191
1,423,256.0904
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat Kuadrat
Tengah F
Hit
GCA 7
32,983.3667
4,711.9095
9.68
**
SCA 28
362,651.9859
12,951.8566
26.62
**
Reciprocals 28 17,212.9503 614.7482 1.26
ns
Galat 126
61,310.4216 486.5906
Lampiran 16. Nilai varians genotipe dan daya gabung karakter Bobot tongkol
panen di lokasi Lampung.
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat Kuadrat
Tengah F
Hit
Ulangan 2 0.0768
0.0384 0.49
Perlakuan 63 84.6930
1.3443 16.98
**
Galat 126 9.9739
0.0792
TOTAL 191 94.7437
Sumber Variasi
db
Jumlah Kuadrat Kuadrat
Tengah F
Hit
GCA 7 8.5512 1.2216
46.30
**
SCA 28
16.4860 0.5888
22.31
**
Reciprocals 28 3.1939
0.1141 4.32
**
Lampiran 17. Nilai varians genotipe dan daya gabung karakter diameter tongkol di
lokasi Lampung.
Sumber Variasi db Jumlah Kuadrat Kuadrat Tengah F Hit
Ulangan 2 0.0567 0.0284 3.71
Perlakuan 63 37.7551 0.5993 78.34 **
Galat 126 0.9639 0.0076
TOTAL 191 38.7757
Sumber Variasi db Jumlah Kuadrat Kuadrat Tengah F Hit
GCA 7 0.3465 0.0495 19.41 **
SCA 28 11.8565 0.4234 166.06 **
Reciprocals 28 0.3820 0.0136 5.35 **
Galat 126 0.3213 0.0025
Lampiran 18. Nilai varians genotipe dan daya gabung karakter bobot 1000 biji di
lokasi Lampung.
Sumber Variasi db Jumlah Kuadrat Kuadrat Tengah F Hit
Ulangan 2 144.7917 72.3958 0.25
Perlakuan 63 190,914.5833 3,030.3902 10.49 **
Galat 126 36,388.5417 288.7979
TOTAL 191 227,447.9167
Sumber Variasi db Jumlah Kuadrat Kuadrat Tengah F Hit
GCA 7 4,616.3194 659.4742 6.85 **
SCA 28 54,271.8750 1,938.2812 20.13 **
Reciprocals 28 4,750.0000 169.6429 1.76 **
Galat 126 12,129.5139 96.2660
Lampiran 19. Nilai varians genotipe dan daya gabung karakter hasil di lokasi
Lampung.
Sumber Variasi db Jumlah Kuadrat Kuadrat Tengah F Hit Ulangan 2 481,228.7361 240,614.3680 0.99 Perlakuan 63 226,414,066.8379 3,593,874.0768 14.82 **
Galat 126 30,557,028.4711 242,516.0990
TOTAL 191 257,452,324.0450
Sumber Variasi db Jumlah Kuadrat Kuadrat Tengah F Hit
GCA 7 23,821,615.4438 3,403,087.9205 42.10 ** SCA 28 43,656,390.1412 1,559,156.7908 19.29 ** Reciprocals 28 7,993,350.0276 285,476.7867 3.53 **