commit to user
i
AN ANALYSIS ON TRANSLATION QUALITY AND TECHNIQUES OF
SONG LYRICS TRANSLATION IN “BROTHER BEAR” MOVIE
THESIS
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for Sarjana Degree at
English Department of Faculty of Letters and Fine Arts
Sebelas Maret University
By:
Zabila Rizky Pradipta
C1307025
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF LETTERS AND FINE ARTS
SEBELAS MARET UNIVERSITY
SURAKARTA
commit to user
commit to user
commit to user
iv
PRONOUNCEMENT
Name : Zabila Rizky Pradipta NIM : C1307025
The researcher of this thesis truthfully affirms that the thesis entitled An Analysis on Translation Quality and Techniques of Song Lyrics Translation
in “Brother Bear” Movie is accomplished by herself and the researcher’s own
work. This thesis does not copy or plagiarize others’ work. The quotations and
references are stated in bibliography.
If the thesis is proved contain any plagiarisms, the researcher is ready to take the responsibility.
Surakarta, June 28th 2013 The Researcher
Zabila Rizky Pradipta
commit to user
v
MOTTO
“Don’t mind other people’s thoughts, just do
what you are comfortable to”
(Anonym)
“Our work is the presentation of our capabilities”
commit to user
vi
DEDICATION
This thesis is dedicated to:
My Dad in Heaven and Mom
My Grandma and Grandpa
My Brother
My Sister
My Family
commit to user
vii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This thesis entitled An Analysis on the Translation Quality and
Techniques of Song Lyrics Translation in “Brother Bear” Movie is finally
finished. Firstly, I would like to Thank to Allah SWT. Besides, The supports from everyone around me have given me the spirit to accomplish this thesis. For that reason, I would like to give appreciation to those who have helped and supported me:
1. Prof. Drs. MR. Nababan, M.Ed, M.A, Ph.D. as my thesis consultant. Thank you for the advices, guidance, concern, and attention from the beginning until the end of my thesis making process.
2. Drs. Riyadi Santosa, M.Ed, Ph.D, as the dean of Faculty of Letters and Fine Arts of Sebelas Maret University.
3. Drs. S. Budi Waskito, M.Pd, as the Head of English Non Regular Program of Faculty of Letters and Fine Arts, Sebelas Maret University. Thank you for your kindness and attention.
4. Drs. Mugijatna M.Si, Ph.D as my academic consultant. Thank you for the guidance and support.
commit to user
viii
mainstream, thank you for all the knowledge which have been shared for me.
7. My beloved dad and mom, my brother, and sister. Thank you for your support, attention, motivation,and love.
8. My beloved friends: Merack (Tika, Bibi, Foda, Intan, Mega, Wulan,
Kinanthi), Visual Communication Design ’09 (Oge, Cawid, Zico, Titan,
Widya, Widy, Bagir, Yun, Sandra, Langga) and all my friends that I can not mention here. Thank you for our friendship, your support and love. 9. All my friends in Non Regular: Thank you for the support and friendship. 10.My boyfriend. Thank you for your support, attention, and love.
Certainly, this thesis is far from perfect. Therefore, the researcher welcomes any suggestions and criticisms to make this a better work.
Surakarta, June 2013
commit to user
ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE ... i
APPROVAL BY THE SUPERVISOR ... ii
APPROVAL BY THE BOARD OF EXAMINER ... iii
PRONOUNCEMENT……….………iv A. Research Background ... 1
B. Problems Statements ... 4
C. Research Objectives ... 4
D. Research Limitation..………..5
E. Research Benefits ... 5
F. Thesis Organization ... 6
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW A. Definition of Translation ... 7
commit to user
x
D. Methods of Translation ... 17
E. Problems in Translation ... 20
F. Translation Quality Assessment ... 22
G. Subtitling ... 24
H. Summary of “Brother Bear” Movie ... 27
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY A. Type of Research ... 30
B. Data and Source of Data ... 30
C. Sample and Sampling Technique ... 31
D. Method of Data Collection ... 31
E. Technique of Data Analysis ... 33
F. Research Procedures ... 34
commit to user
xi
B.3. Discussions………...64
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Conclusion……….77 B. Recommendation………...79
BIBLIOGRAPHY
commit to user
xii
Page
3.1. The scale of accuracy………..32
3.2. The scale of acceptability………....33
4.1. Amplification….……….…37
4.9. Particularization………...47
4.10. Generalization………..48
4.11. Discursive translation……….…….48
4.12. Adaptation………...49
4.13. Conversion of metaphor to sense……….….…...50
4.14. Translation techniques..………...52
4.15. The classification of translation accuracy………58
4.16. The classification of translation acceptability ………....63
4.17. The relationship between translation technique and accuracy………69
commit to user
xiii
ABSTRACT
Zabila Rizky Pradipta, C1307025, 2013, AN ANALYSIS ON TRANSLATION
QUALITY AND TECHNIQUES OF SONG LYRICS TRANSLATION IN
“BROTHER BEAR” MOVIE. Thesis: English Department, Faculty of Letters and Fine Arts, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta.
This research is a descriptive qualitative study which concentrates on examining the translation techniques used in translating the song lyrics in
“Brother Bear” movie and assessing the translation quality in terms of accuracy
and acceptability.
This research uses two sampling techniques, total sampling technique and purposive sampling technique. In collecting the data, the researchers used total sampling technique. The total data are 150 lines selected from the four songs. The purposive sampling technique was used to determine the three people as raters.
From the analysis, there are thirteen techniques employed in translating the song lyrics. There are 56 data using amplification (24.78%), 58 data using reduction (25.66%), 67 data using literal translation (29.64%), 3 data using structural shift (1.32%), 11 data using class shift (4.87%), 3 data using unit shift (1.32%), 9 data using modulation (3.99%), 11 data using synonymy (4.87%), 1 data using particularization (0.44%), 2 data using generalization (0.89%), 2 data using discursive creation (0.89%), 1 data using adaptation (0.44%), and 2 data using conversion of metaphor to sense (0.89%).
The results of the analysis on the translation accuracy reveal that there are 88 data (58.66%) considered accurate, 58 data (38.66%) considered less accurate, and 4 data (2.66%) considered inaccurate. Meanwhile, the analysis on the translation acceptability shows that there are 106 data (70.66%) belonging to acceptable translation, 43 data (28.66%) belonging to less accurate translation, and 1 data (0.66%) belonging to unacceptable translation.
