• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

DAFTAR PUSTAKA. 3. Rhee SY, Kim YS. Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. 2015;

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Membagikan "DAFTAR PUSTAKA. 3. Rhee SY, Kim YS. Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. 2015;"

Copied!
36
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Creager M, Libby P. Peripheral Arterial Disease In: Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO, editors. Braunwald’s Heart Disease : A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2015. 1312 p.

2. Antono D, Hamonangani R. Penyakit Arteri Perifer. In: Setiati S, editor. Buku Ajar Ilmu Penyakit Dalam. 1st ed. Jakarta: InternaPublishing; 2014. p. 1516–26.

3. Rhee SY, Kim YS. Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. 2015;283–90.

4. Coffman JD, Eberhardt RT. Peripheral Arterial Disease, Diagnosis and Treatment. New York: Springer Seienee&Business Media; 2003.1-34p. 5. Rooke TW, Hirsch a. T, Misra S, Sidawy a. N, Beckman J a., Findeiss LK,

et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guideline for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease. Circulation. Elsevier Inc.; 2011;58(19):2020–45.

6. Fowkes FGR, Rudan D, Rudan I, Aboyans V, Denenberg JO, McDermott MM, et al. Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet. Elsevier Ltd; 2013;382(9901):1329–40.

7. Selvin E. Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Peripheral Arterial Disease in the United States: Results From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2000. Circulation. 2004;110(6):738–43.

8. Fowkes FGR, Low LP, Tuta S, Kozak J. Ankle-brachial index and extent of atherothrombosis in 8891 patients with or at risk of vascular disease: Results of the international AGATHA study. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(15):1861–7.

9. Rhee SY, H G, ZM L, SW-K C, S W, P P. Multi-country study on the prevalence and clinical features of peripheral arterial disease in Asian type 2 diabetes patients at high risk of atherosclerosis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;76(1):82–92.

10. American Diabetes Association. Epidemiology and Impact of Peripheral Arterial Disease in People with Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(12):3333–41.

(2)

11. American Heart Association. What is peripheral vascular disease? In American Heart Association; 2012.

12. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdominal Aortic). Circulation. 2006;113(11):e463–5.

13. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy J a., Nehler MR, Harris K a., Fowkes FGR, et al. Inter-Society Consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). Int Angiol. 2007;26(2):82–157.

14. F Brian Boudi M. Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis Treatment & Management. Medscape. 2016; [cited 2016 Jun 17]

15. Marso SP, Hiatt WR. Peripheral arterial disease in patients with diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(5):921–9.

16. The Japan Diabetes Society. Evidence-based Practice Guideline for the Treatment for Diabetes in Japan 2013. Diabet Med. 2013;1–3.

17. Ilmiah Populer [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jan 26]. Available from: http://www.pdpersi.co.id/content/popular_science.php?psid=30

18. Dinas Kesehatan Jateng. Daftar Tabel Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Semarang: Dinkes Jateng; 2008. 38 p.

19. Huh JH, Choi E, Lim JS, Lee MY, Chung CH, Shin JY. Serum cystatin C levels are associated with asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients without overt nephropathy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2015;108(2):258–64.

20. Rahman A. Faktor – Faktor Risiko Mayor Aterosklerosis pada Berbagai Penyakit Aterosklerosis di RSUP Dr. Kariadi Semarang. Diponegoro University; 2012.

21. Tomeleri CM, Ronque ER, Silva DR, Cardoso Junior CG, Fernandes R a, Teixeira DC, et al. Prevalence of dyslipidemia in adolescents: comparison between definitions. Rev Port Cardiol. Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia; 2015;34(2):103–9.

22. Bittner V. Perspectives on dyslipidemia and coronary heart disease in women: an update. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2006;21(6):602–7.

23. Fakhrzadeh H, Tabatabaei-malazy O. Dyslipidemia and Cardiovascular Disease. Endocrinol Metab Res Cent Tehran Univ Med Sci. 2008;

(3)

24. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan. Riset Kesehatan Dasar (RISKESDAS) 2007. Lap Nas 2007. 2008;1–384.

25. Rinandyta SA. Perbedaan Kadar LDL pada Penderita Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 dengan Hipertensi dan Tanpa Hipertensi di RSUD Dr. Moewardi. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta; 2012.

26. Ilminovia F. Hubungan antara Status Diabetes Melitus dengan Status Penyakit Arteri Perifer (PAP) pada Pasien Hipertensi In Abstract Book ESC 26th. European student congress; 2015.

27. Longo DL, Kasper DL, Jameson JL, Fauci AS, Hauser SL, Loscalzo J, editors. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 18th ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill; 2012. 2066 p.

28. Agrawal K, Eberhardt RT. Contemporary Medical Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease. Cardiol Clin. Elsevier Inc; 2015;33(1):111–37. 29. Runge MS, Greganti MA. Netter’s Internal Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia:

Saunders Elsevier; 2009. 213 p.

30. McDermott, M M, McGrae. Lower Extremity Manifestations of Peripheral Artery Disease. Am Hear Assoc J. 2015;115:1540–50.

31. Lozano FS, González-Porras JR, March JR, Lobos JM, Carrasco E, Ros E. Diabetes mellitus and intermittent claudication: a cross-sectional study of 920 claudicants. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2014;6:21.

32. Hallett Jr JW. Peripheral Arterial Disease. Merck Manuals. 2008;169–73. 33. Bordeaux LM, Reich LM, Hirsch AT. The Epidemiology and Natural.

Springer J. 2003;(Ic):21–35.

34. Baker. Smoking and Peripheral Arterial Disease ( PAD ). ASH Research Report Smoking and Peripheral Arterial Disease. 2014;

35. Tendera M, Aboyans V, Bartelink M-L, Baumgartner I, Clement D, Collet J-P, et al. ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases: Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries * The Task Force on the Diagnosis and Treat. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(22):2851–906.

36. Olin JW, Sealove B a. Peripheral artery disease: current insight into the disease and its diagnosis and management. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(7):678–92.

(4)

37. Hirsch AT, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D, Regensteiner JG. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awarness and treatment in primary care. JAMA. 2001;286(11):1317–24.

38. Age AT. Peripheral Arterial Disease in the Legs. In: CdcGov. p. 4–5. 39. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL.

ACC/AHA 2005 practice guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Sur. Circulation. 2006;113(11):463– 654.

40. Suyono S. Diabetes Melitus. In: Setiati S, editor. Buku Ajar Ilmu Penyakit Dalam. 1st ed. Jakarta: InternaPublishing; 2014. p. 2315–418.

41. American Diabetes Association. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(Supplement_1):S8–16.

42. Hirsch a T, Hiatt WR. PAD awareness, risk, and treatment: new resources for survival--the USA PARTNERS program. Vasc Med. 2001;6(3 Suppl):9–12.

43. Joshua A, Beckman, MD M, Mark A. Creager M, Peter Libby M. Diabetes and Atherosclerosis Epidemiologi, Pathophysiology, and Management. JAMA. 2002;(287):2570–81.

44. Coggins M, Lindner J, Rattigan S, Jahn L, Fasy E, Kaul S, et al. Muscle Perfusion by Capillary Recruitment. 2001;50

45. Forstermann U, Sessa WC. Nitric oxide synthases: regulation and function. European Heart Journal. 2012;33(7):829–37.

46. Hua L, Hongliang L, Yige B, Xiangxun Z, Yerong Y. Free Fatty Acids Induce Endothelial Dysfunction and Activate Protein Kinase C and Nuclear Factor-κB Pathway in Rat Aorta. Int J Cardiol. 152(2):218–24.

47. Erwinanto, Santoso A, Putranto JNE, Tedjasukmana P, Suryawan R, Rifqi S, et al. Pedoman tatalaksana dislipidemia. 1st ed. Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Kardiovaskular Indonesia; 2013.1-7p.

48. PERKENI. Konsensus Pengelolaan Dislipidemia di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan Ilmu Penyakit Dalam Fakultas Kedokteran UI; 2012.15-21p.

(5)

49. Fodor G. Primary prevention of CVD: Treating dyslipidemia. Am Fam Physician. 2011;83(10):1207–8.

50. Adam JM. Dislipidemia. In: Setiati S, editor. Buku Ajar Ilmu Penyakit Dalam. 1st ed. Jakarta: InternaPublishing; 2014. p. 2549–68.

51. Forouzandeh F, Salazar G, Patrushev N, Xiong S, Hilenski L, Fei B, et al. Metformin beyond diabetes: Pleiotropic benefits of metformin in attenuation of atherosclerosis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(6):1–12.

52. Jamkhande PG, Chandak PG, Dhawale SC, Barde SR, Tidke PS, Sakhare RS. Therapeutic approaches to drug targets in atherosclerosis. Saudi Pharm J SPJ Off Publ Saudi Pharm Soc. King Saud University; 2014;22(3):179– 90.

53. Elizabeth Klodas M. High Blood Pressure and Atherosclerosis. WebMD. 2016; [cited 2016 Jun 17]

54. Aboyans V, Criqui MH, Abraham P, Allison M a., Creager M a., Diehm C, et al. Measurement and Interpretation of the Ankle-Brachial Index: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;126(24):2890–909.

55. Mahameed A Al. Peripheral Arterial Disease. Cleve Clin J Med. 2009; 56. Bonham P, Cappuccio M, Hulsey T, Michel Y, Kelechi T, Jenkins C. Are

Ankle and Toe Brachial Indices (ABI-TBI) Obtained by a Pocket Doppler Interchangeable With Those Obtained by Standard Laboratory Equipment? J Wound, Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2007;34(1):35–44.

57. Carmo G a L, Mandil a, Nascimento BR, Arantes BD, Bittencourt JC, Falqueto EB, et al. Can we measure the ankle-brachial index using only a stethoscope? A pilot study. Fam Pract. 2009;26(1):22–6.

58. WOCN Wound Committee. Ankle Brachial Index. J Wound, Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2012;39(April):S21–9.

59. Inada A, Weir GC, Bonner-Weir S. Induced ICER I?? down-regulates cyclin a expression and cell proliferation in insulin-producing ?? cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;329(3):925–9.

60. Yogiantoro M. Hipertensi Esensial. Buku Ajar Ilmu Penyakit Dalam Jilid 1. IV. Jakarta: FKUI; 2006. 610-14 p.

61. F Brian Boudi M. Treatment of Low HDL levels and High Triglyceride levels in Patients With Diabetes. Medscape. 2016;[cited 2016 Jun 17]

(6)

62. Selvin E, Erlinger TP. Prevalence of and risk factors for peripheral arterial disease in the United States: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2000. Circulation. 2004;110(6):738–43.

63. Pepine CJ, Handberg EM. The vascular biology of hypertension and atherosclerosis and intervention with calcium antagonists and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Clin Cardiol. 2001;24(11 Suppl):V1–5.

(7)

Lampiran 1. Informed Consent (Persetujuan Pasien)

JUDUL PENELITIAN : Hubungan antara Dislipidemia dengan Derajat Keparahan Penyakit Arteri Perifer (PAP) pada Pasien Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 Terkontrol Sedang. INSTANSI PELAKSANA : Bagian Ilmu Penyakit Dalam FK Undip -

Mahasiswa Program Studi Strata-1 Kedokteran Umum Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro

PERSETUJUAN SETELAH PENJELASAN

(

INFORMED CONSENT)

Yth Bapak/Ibu ………..

Nama saya Eka Aryani, saya mahasiswa Program Studi S1 Ilmu Pendidikan Dokter Fakultas Kedokteran UNDIP. Saya melakukan penelitian dengan judul “Hubungan antara Dislipidemia dengan Derajat Keparahan Penyakit Arteri Perifer (PAP) pada Pasien Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 Terkontrol Sedang”. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hubungan antara dislipidemia dengan derajat keparahan penyakit arteri perifer (PAP) pada pasien DM tipe 2 terkontrol sedang. Dislipidemia adalah kelainan metabolisme lipid (lemak darah) dimana terjadi peningkatan maupun penurunan komponen lipid seperti kolesterol total, kolesterol LDL (Low Density Lipoprotein), TG (trigliserida), serta menurunnya kolesterol HDL (High Density Lipoprotein) dalam darah. Penyakit arteri perifer adalah gangguan suplai darah ke ekstremitas atas atau bawah (tungkai atau lengan) karena obstruksi atau sumbatan sehingga timbul gejala seperti rasa nyeri pada ekstremitas tersebut(klaudikasio intermiten). Bapak/Ibu

(8)

terpilih sebagai peserta penelitian ini. Apabila Bapak/Ibu setuju untuk menjadi peserta penelitian maka ada beberapa hal yang akan Bapak/Ibu alami, yaitu:

- Pengambilan informasi nama, umur, jenis kelamin, status merokok, status hipertensi dan keluhan yang dirasakan melalui wawancara

- Diukur tekanan darah pada kedua kaki dan kedua lengan pada saat istirahat - Dan bila diperlukan, akan diukur tekanan darah pada kaki setelah berolah

raga naik-turun bangku selama 4-5 menit atau berjalan selama 6 menit atau dorsofleksi plantarfleksi selama 6 menit.

Keuntungan bagi Bapak/Ibu yang bersangkutan ikut dalam penelitian ini adalah mendapat fasilitas pendeteksian Penyakit Arteri Perifer (PAP) serta mengetahui derajat PAP yang diderita apabila terdeteksi. Dengan dilakukanya pendeteksian ini, kita dapat mengetahui apakah terdapat sumbatan pembuluh darah pada lengan atau kaki Bapak/Ibu. Bapak/Ibu juga akan diberi pemahaman mengenai PAP. Saya menjamin bahwa penelitian ini tidak akan menimbulkan efek yang merugikan pada Bapak/Ibu. Dalam penelitian ini tidak ada intervensi dalam bentuk apapun terhadap Bapak/ Ibu. Setiap data pemeriksaan dan penelitian dijamin kerahasiaannya dengan tidak mencantumkan identitas subyek. Sebagai peserta penelitian keikutsertaan ini bersifat sukarela dan tidak dikenakan biaya penelitian.

Penanggung jawab penelitian:

EkaAryani

085642702444

Sudah mendengar dan memahami penjelasan penelitian, dengan ini saya menyatakan

SETUJU / TIDAK SETUJU

untuk ikut sebagai subyek/sampel penelitian ini.

Tegal, ……….2016 Saksi

Nama Terang : Nama Terang :

(9)

Lampiran 2

DAFTAR TILIK PENELUSURAN REKAM MEDIK No Keterangan Nama Jenis Kelamin Umur Alamat No HP Kontrol teratur/tidak Status merokok ya/ tidak DM

Status glikemik (HbA1c): Kadar gula darah terakhir GDS:

GDP:

Lamanya DM: Obat yang diminum: Dislipidemia ya/ tidak TC:

LDL: HDL: TG:

Lamanya dislipidemia: Obat yang diminum: Hipertensi

Tekanan darah terakhir: Obat yang diminum:

(10)

Lampiran 3

LEMBAR PENGUMPULAN DATA

ANKLE-BRACHIAL INDEX (ABI)

Tanggal Pemeriksaan:

Nama Pasien: Umur:

Catatan:

Apakah ada aktivitas berat yang baru saja dilakukan/ konsumsi kafein/ alkohol terakhir

Jenis Kelamin:

ABI saat istirahat

Kanan Pengukuran Rata-rata

Kiri Pengukuran Rata-rata I II I II Brachialis Brachialis Tibialis Posterior Tibialis Posterior Dorsalis Pedis Dorsalis Pedis

ABI kanan = rata − rata tertinggi tekanan sistolik kaki kanan DP atau TP rata − rata tertinggi tekanan sistolik lengan kanan atau kiri

ABI kiri = rata − rata tertinggi tekanan sistolik kaki kiri DP atau TP rata − rata tertinggi tekanan sistolik lengan (kanan atau kiri)

(11)

ABI setelah exercise

(Diakukan apabila nilai ABI saat istirahat normal namun terdapat gejala klaudikasio)

Lamanya exercise =

Nilai tekanan sistolik kaki setelah exercise = Nilai ABI setelah exercise =

Kelengkapan Data

Status Merokok : Lamanya DM :

Lamanya Dislipidemia

Minum obat hipertensi teratur atau tidak : Minum obat diabetes teratur atau tidak : Minum obat dislipidemia teratur atau tidak :

(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)

Lampiran 6. Biodata Mahasiswa

Identitas

Nama Lengkap : Eka Aryani Jenis Kelamin : Perempuan

Program Studi : Pendidikan Dokter

NIM : 22010112110093

Tempat, tanggal lahir : Tegal, 14 Februari 1995 E-mail : eka.aryani1402@gmail.com Nomor telepon/HP : 085642702444

Riwayat Pendidikan Formal

SD SMP SMA S1 Nama Institusi SDN Margadana 3 Kota Tegal SMPN 18 Kota Tegal SMAN 1 Kota Tegal Pendidikan Dokter Fakultas Kedokteran UNDIP Tahun masuk-lulus 2000-2006 2006-2009 2009-2012 2012

Organisasi yang Pernah Diikuti:

Lembaga Tahun

Divisi Pengembangan Mahasiswa Kelompok Studi Mahasiswa FK UNDIP

2013-2014

Bidang Riset HIMA KU UNDIP 2012-2014 Kelompok Ilmiah Remaja SMAN 1

Kota Tegal

2010-2012

Pengalaman Mengikuti Lomba Karya Ilmiah

Potensi Teng-teng Natto sebagai Alternatif Terapi Aterosklerosis, LKTI-GT Mini Scientific Fair 2014, Peserta Terbaik.

(17)

Lampiran 7. Hasil SPSS

Frequencies Frequency Table

Status Dislipidemia

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent Valid ya 21 70,0 70,0 70,0 tidak 9 30,0 30,0 100,0 Total 30 100,0 100,0 Jenis kelamin

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent Valid Laki-laki 17 56,7 56,7 56,7 Perempuan 13 43,3 43,3 100,0 Total 30 100,0 100,0 Usia N Valid 30 Missing 0 Mean 59,17 Median 58,50 Std. Deviation 7,250 Minimum 46 Maximum 71 Usia

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent Valid 46 2 6,7 6,7 6,7 50 2 6,7 6,7 13,3 51 1 3,3 3,3 16,7 52 1 3,3 3,3 20,0 53 2 6,7 6,7 26,7 54 2 6,7 6,7 33,3 55 2 6,7 6,7 40,0 57 1 3,3 3,3 43,3 58 2 6,7 6,7 50,0 59 1 3,3 3,3 53,3 62 1 3,3 3,3 56,7

(18)

64 3 10,0 10,0 66,7 65 2 6,7 6,7 73,3 66 2 6,7 6,7 80,0 67 3 10,0 10,0 90,0 68 2 6,7 6,7 96,7 71 1 3,3 3,3 100,0 Total 30 100,0 100,0 Status merokok

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent Valid Ya 6 20,0 20,0 20,0 pasif 5 16,7 16,7 36,7 mantan 3 10,0 10,0 46,7 tidak 16 53,3 53,3 100,0 Total 30 100,0 100,0 Hipertensi

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

Valid

Ya 13 43,3 43,3 43,3

Tidak 17 56,7 56,7 100,0

Total 30 100,0 100,0

Penyakit atherosclerosis lain

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent Valid Ya 7 23,3 23,3 23,3 Tidak 23 76,7 76,7 100,0 Total 30 100,0 100,0 Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Status Dislipidemia * Status PAP

(19)

Status Dislipidemia * Status PAP Crosstabulation

Status PAP Total

Ya Tidak

Status Dislipidemia ya

Count 12 9 21

Expected Count 8,4 12,6 21,0

% within Status PAP 100,0% 50,0% 70,0%

% of Total 40,0% 30,0% 70,0%

tidak

Count 0 9 9

Expected Count 3,6 5,4 9,0

% within Status PAP 0,0% 50,0% 30,0%

% of Total 0,0% 30,0% 30,0%

Total

Count 12 18 30

Expected Count 12,0 18,0 30,0

% within Status PAP 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

% of Total 40,0% 60,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 8,571a 1 ,003 Continuity Correctionb 6,356 1 ,012 Likelihood Ratio 11,699 1 ,001

Fisher's Exact Test ,004 ,003

Linear-by-Linear Association 8,286 1 ,004

N of Valid Cases 30

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,60. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

For cohort Status PAP = Tidak

,429 ,262 ,702

(20)

T-Test

Group Statistics

Status PAP N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Kolesterol total Ya 12 212,00 45,798 13,221

Tidak 9 164,33 34,077 11,359

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality of

Variances

t-test for Equality of Means

F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Differenc e Std. Error Differenc e 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper Kolester ol total Equal variances assumed 1,62 2 ,218 2,61 9 19 ,017 47,667 18,199 9,577 85,757 Equal variances not assumed 2,73 5 18,999 ,013 47,667 17,430 11,184 84,149 T-Test Group Statistics

Status PAP N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

LDL Ya 12 136,83 31,007 8,951

Tidak 9 104,44 30,566 10,189

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

t-test for Equality of Means

F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Differenc e Std. Error Differenc e 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper LDL Equal variances assumed ,042 ,840 2,383 19 ,028 32,389 13,591 3,942 60,836 Equal variances not assumed 2,388 17,52 3 ,028 32,389 13,562 3,841 60,937

(21)

T-Test

Group Statistics

Status PAP N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

HDL Ya 12 25,58 9,549 2,756

Tidak 9 33,67 5,074 1,691

NPar Tests

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks

Status PAP N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

Trigliserida Ya 12 13,42 161,00 Tidak 9 7,78 70,00 Total 21 Test Statisticsa Trigliserida Mann-Whitney U 25,000 Wilcoxon W 70,000 Z -2,061

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,039

Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)] ,041b

a. Grouping Variable: Status PAP b. Not corrected for ties.

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

t-test for Equality of Means

F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Differenc e Std. Error Differenc e 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper HDL Equal variances assumed 4,985 ,038 -2,298 19 ,033 -8,083 3,517 -15,445 -,721 Equal variances not assumed -2,499 17,44 3 ,023 -8,083 3,234 -14,893 -1,273

(22)

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

jumlah dislipidemia * Status PAP 21 100,0% 0 0,0% 21 100,0%

jumlah dislipidemia * Status PAP Crosstabulation

Status PAP Total

Ya Tidak

jumlah dislipidemia

1 komponen

Count 0 6 6

Expected Count 3,4 2,6 6,0

% within Status PAP 0,0% 66,7% 28,6%

% of Total 0,0% 28,6% 28,6%

2 komponen

Count 9 3 12

Expected Count 6,9 5,1 12,0

% within Status PAP 75,0% 33,3% 57,1%

% of Total 42,9% 14,3% 57,1%

3 komponen

Count 2 0 2

Expected Count 1,1 ,9 2,0

% within Status PAP 16,7% 0,0% 9,5%

% of Total 9,5% 0,0% 9,5%

4 komponen

Count 1 0 1

Expected Count ,6 ,4 1,0

% within Status PAP 8,3% 0,0% 4,8%

% of Total 4,8% 0,0% 4,8%

Total

Count 12 9 21

Expected Count 12,0 9,0 21,0

% within Status PAP 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

% of Total 57,1% 42,9% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 11,813a 3 ,008

Likelihood Ratio 15,186 3 ,002

Linear-by-Linear Association 8,710 1 ,003

N of Valid Cases 21

a. 6 cells (75,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,43.

(23)

Frequencies

jenis komponen

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent Valid HDL 4 19,0 19,0 19,0 TG 2 9,5 9,5 28,6 TC HDL 1 4,8 4,8 33,3 HDL TG 10 47,6 47,6 81,0 LDL HDL 1 4,8 4,8 85,7 TC LDL HDL 2 9,5 9,5 95,2 TC LDL HDL TG 1 4,8 4,8 100,0 Total 21 100,0 100,0 NPar Tests Descriptive Statistics N Mean Std. Deviation

Minimum Maximum Percentiles

25th 50th (Median) 75th jenis komponen 21 3,57 1,720 1 7 2,00 4,00 4,00 Status PAP 21 1,43 ,507 1 2 1,00 1,00 2,00

(24)

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks

Status PAP N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

jenis komponen Ya 12 14,38 172,50 Tidak 9 6,50 58,50 Total 21 Test Statisticsa jenis komponen Mann-Whitney U 13,500 Wilcoxon W 58,500 Z -3,059

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,002

Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)] ,002b

a. Grouping Variable: Status PAP b. Not corrected for ties.

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Jenis kelamin * Status PAP 30 100,0% 0 0,0% 30 100,0%

Jenis kelamin * Status PAP Crosstabulation

Status PAP Total

Ya Tidak

Jenis kelamin

Laki-laki

Count 6 11 17

Expected Count 6,8 10,2 17,0

% within Status PAP 50,0% 61,1% 56,7%

% of Total 20,0% 36,7% 56,7%

Perempuan

Count 6 7 13

Expected Count 5,2 7,8 13,0

% within Status PAP 50,0% 38,9% 43,3%

% of Total 20,0% 23,3% 43,3%

Total

Count 12 18 30

Expected Count 12,0 18,0 30,0

% within Status PAP 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

(25)

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square ,362a 1 ,547 Continuity Correctionb ,051 1 ,821 Likelihood Ratio ,361 1 ,548

Fisher's Exact Test ,711 ,410

Linear-by-Linear Association ,350 1 ,554

N of Valid Cases 30

a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,20. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Jenis kelamin (Laki-laki / Perempuan)

,636 ,145 2,784

For cohort Status PAP = Ya ,765 ,320 1,828

For cohort Status PAP = Tidak

1,202 ,651 2,220

N of Valid Cases 30

T-Test

Group Statistics

Status PAP N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Usia Ya 12 61,08 6,302 1,819

Tidak 18 57,89 7,722 1,820

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

t-test for Equality of Means

F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Differenc e Std. Error Differenc e 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper Usia Equal variances assumed 1,788 ,192 1,191 28 ,244 3,194 2,683 -2,300 8,689 Equal variances not assumed 1,241 26,72 0 ,225 3,194 2,574 -2,089 8,477

(26)

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Status merokok * Status PAP

30 100,0% 0 0,0% 30 100,0%

Status merokok * Status PAP Crosstabulation

Status PAP Total

Ya Tidak

Status merokok Ya

Count 4 2 6

Expected Count 2,4 3,6 6,0

% within Status PAP 33,3% 11,1% 20,0%

% of Total 13,3% 6,7% 20,0%

pasif

Count 3 2 5

Expected Count 2,0 3,0 5,0

% within Status PAP 25,0% 11,1% 16,7%

% of Total 10,0% 6,7% 16,7%

mantan

Count 1 2 3

Expected Count 1,2 1,8 3,0

% within Status PAP 8,3% 11,1% 10,0%

% of Total 3,3% 6,7% 10,0%

tidak

Count 4 12 16

Expected Count 6,4 9,6 16,0

% within Status PAP 33,3% 66,7% 53,3%

% of Total 13,3% 40,0% 53,3%

Total

Count 12 18 30

Expected Count 12,0 18,0 30,0

% within Status PAP 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

% of Total 40,0% 60,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 4,167a 3 ,244

Likelihood Ratio 4,199 3 ,241

Linear-by-Linear Association 3,902 1 ,048

(27)

a. 6 cells (75,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,20.

Risk Estimate

Value Odds Ratio for Status

merokok (Ya / pasif)

a

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Hipertensi * Status PAP 30 100,0% 0 0,0% 30 100,0%

Hipertensi * Status PAP Crosstabulation

Status PAP Total

Ya Tidak

Hipertensi Ya

Count 9 4 13

Expected Count 5,2 7,8 13,0

% within Status PAP 75,0% 22,2% 43,3%

% of Total 30,0% 13,3% 43,3%

Tidak

Count 3 14 17

Expected Count 6,8 10,2 17,0

% within Status PAP 25,0% 77,8% 56,7%

% of Total 10,0% 46,7% 56,7%

Total

Count 12 18 30

Expected Count 12,0 18,0 30,0

% within Status PAP 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

(28)

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 8,167a 1 ,004 Continuity Correctionb 6,160 1 ,013 Likelihood Ratio 8,488 1 ,004

Fisher's Exact Test ,008 ,006

Linear-by-Linear Association 7,895 1 ,005

N of Valid Cases 30

a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,20. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Hipertensi (Ya / Tidak)

10,500 1,889 58,359

For cohort Status PAP = Ya 3,923 1,320 11,656

For cohort Status PAP = Tidak

,374 ,161 ,869

N of Valid Cases 30

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Penyakit atherosclerosis lain * Status PAP

30 100,0% 0 0,0% 30 100,0%

Penyakit atherosclerosis lain * Status PAP Crosstabulation

Status PAP Total

Ya Tidak

Penyakit atherosclerosis lain Ya

Count 4 3 7

Expected Count 2,8 4,2 7,0

% within Status PAP 33,3% 16,7% 23,3%

% of Total 13,3% 10,0% 23,3%

Tidak Count 8 15 23

(29)

% within Status PAP 66,7% 83,3% 76,7%

% of Total 26,7% 50,0% 76,7%

Total

Count 12 18 30

Expected Count 12,0 18,0 30,0

% within Status PAP 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

% of Total 40,0% 60,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 1,118a 1 ,290 Continuity Correctionb ,380 1 ,537 Likelihood Ratio 1,100 1 ,294

Fisher's Exact Test ,392 ,266

Linear-by-Linear Association 1,081 1 ,299

N of Valid Cases 30

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,80. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Penyakit atherosclerosis lain (Ya / Tidak)

2,500 ,445 14,037

For cohort Status PAP = Ya 1,643 ,701 3,849

For cohort Status PAP = Tidak

,657 ,266 1,626

N of Valid Cases 30

Crosstabs

Minum obat * Status PAP Crosstabulation

Status PAP Total

Ya Tidak

Minum obat Teratur

Count 6 16 22

Expected Count 8,8 13,2 22,0

% within Status PAP 50,0% 88,9% 73,3%

% of Total 20,0% 53,3% 73,3%

(30)

Expected Count 3,2 4,8 8,0

% within Status PAP 50,0% 11,1% 26,7%

% of Total 20,0% 6,7% 26,7%

Total

Count 12 18 30

Expected Count 12,0 18,0 30,0

% within Status PAP 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

% of Total 40,0% 60,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 5,568a 1 ,018 Continuity Correctionb 3,757 1 ,053 Likelihood Ratio 5,601 1 ,018

Fisher's Exact Test ,034 ,027

Linear-by-Linear Association 5,383 1 ,020

N of Valid Cases 30

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,20. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Minum obat (Teratur / Tidak teratur)

,125 ,020 ,799

For cohort Status PAP = Ya ,364 ,165 ,802

For cohort Status PAP = Tidak

2,909 ,853 9,925

N of Valid Cases 30

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Obat dislipidemia * Status PAP

(31)

Obat dislipidemia * Status PAP Crosstabulation

Status PAP Total

Ya Tidak

Obat dislipidemia ya

Count 5 3 8

Expected Count 3,2 4,8 8,0

% within Status PAP 41,7% 16,7% 26,7%

% of Total 16,7% 10,0% 26,7%

tidak

Count 7 8 15

Expected Count 6,0 9,0 15,0

% within Status PAP 58,3% 44,4% 50,0%

% of Total 23,3% 26,7% 50,0%

tidak minum obat

Count 0 7 7

Expected Count 2,8 4,2 7,0

% within Status PAP 0,0% 38,9% 23,3%

% of Total 0,0% 23,3% 23,3%

Total

Count 12 18 30

Expected Count 12,0 18,0 30,0

% within Status PAP 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

% of Total 40,0% 60,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 6,632a 2 ,036

Likelihood Ratio 9,068 2 ,011

Linear-by-Linear Association 5,695 1 ,017

N of Valid Cases 30

a. 4 cells (66,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,80.

Risk Estimate

Value Odds Ratio for Obat

dislipidemia (ya / tidak)

a

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

(32)

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

obat hipertensi * Status PAP 30 100,0% 0 0,0% 30 100,0%

obat hipertensi * Status PAP Crosstabulation

Status PAP Total

Ya Tidak

obat hipertensi

teratur

Count 5 2 7

Expected Count 2,8 4,2 7,0

% within Status PAP 41,7% 11,1% 23,3%

% of Total 16,7% 6,7% 23,3%

tidak teratur

Count 4 2 6

Expected Count 2,4 3,6 6,0

% within Status PAP 33,3% 11,1% 20,0%

% of Total 13,3% 6,7% 20,0%

tidak minum obat

Count 3 14 17

Expected Count 6,8 10,2 17,0

% within Status PAP 25,0% 77,8% 56,7%

% of Total 10,0% 46,7% 56,7%

Total

Count 12 18 30

Expected Count 12,0 18,0 30,0

% within Status PAP 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

% of Total 40,0% 60,0% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 8,198a 2 ,017

Likelihood Ratio 8,523 2 ,014

Linear-by-Linear Association 7,016 1 ,008

N of Valid Cases 30

a. 4 cells (66,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,40.

(33)

Risk Estimate

Value Odds Ratio for obat

hipertensi (teratur / tidak teratur)

a

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis 30 100,0 Missing Cases 0 ,0 Total 30 100,0 Unselected Cases 0 ,0 Total 30 100,0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value

Ya 0

Tidak 1

Categorical Variables Codings

Frequency Parameter coding

(1)

Minum obat Teratur 22 1,000

Tidak teratur 8 ,000

Hipertensi Ya 13 1,000

Tidak 17 ,000

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Observed Predicted

Status PAP Percentage

Correct Ya Tidak Step 0 Status PAP Ya 0 12 ,0 Tidak 0 18 100,0 Overall Percentage 60,0

(34)

b. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant ,405 ,373 1,184 1 ,277 1,500

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

Step 0 Variables

Hipertensi(1) 8,167 1 ,004

obat_dm(1) 5,568 1 ,018

Overall Statistics 10,027 2 ,007

Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig. Step 1 Step 10,792 2 ,005 Block 10,792 2 ,005 Model 10,792 2 ,005 Step 2a Step -2,303 1 ,129 Block 8,488 1 ,004 Model 8,488 1 ,004

a. A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the Chi-squares value has decreased from the previous step.

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood Cox & Snell R

Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1 29,589a ,302 ,408

2 31,892a ,246 ,333

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter estimates changed by less than ,001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.

1 ,070 2 ,966

(35)

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Status PAP = Ya Status PAP = Tidak Total

Observed Expected Observed Expected

Step 1 1 5 5,124 1 ,876 6 2 4 3,876 3 3,124 7 3 1 ,876 1 1,124 2 4 2 2,124 13 12,876 15 Step 2 1 9 9,000 4 4,000 13 2 3 3,000 14 14,000 17 Classification Tablea Observed Predicted

Status PAP Percentage

Correct Ya Tidak Step 1 Status PAP Ya 9 3 75,0 Tidak 4 14 77,8 Overall Percentage 76,7 Step 2 Status PAP Ya 9 3 75,0 Tidak 4 14 77,8 Overall Percentage 76,7

a. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower Upper Step 1a Hipertensi(1) -2,017 ,919 4,820 1 ,028 ,133 ,022 ,805 obat_dm(1) 1,552 1,048 2,190 1 ,139 4,719 ,604 36,836 Constant ,250 1,055 ,056 1 ,813 1,284 Step 2a Hipertensi(1) -2,351 ,875 7,219 1 ,007 ,095 ,017 ,529 Constant 1,540 ,636 5,863 1 ,015 4,667

(36)

Model if Term Removed

Variable Model Log

Likelihood Change in -2 Log Likelihood df Sig. of the Change Step 1 Hipertensi -17,390 5,190 1 ,023 obat_dm -15,946 2,303 1 ,129 Step 2 Hipertensi -20,190 8,488 1 ,004

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

Step 2a Variables obat_dm(1) 2,360 1 ,124

Overall Statistics 2,360 1 ,124

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Adapun yang menjadi fokus penelitian adalah perkongsian yang dilakukan di dalam usaha perikanan, kerja sama yang dilakukan oleh pemilik modal dengan pemilik perahu

Hal tersebut sebagimana hasil interview dengan Ustad Imam Sobari adalah: “ Bahwa di gontor itu tidak menganut golongan tertentu akan tetapi diajarkan beberapa madzab, sehingga

Didalam masyarakat Islam, hanya ada dua kelompok yaitu: Pertama , Kelompok ulama sebagai pewaris nabi, dan orangnya tidak banyak para ulama ini adalah orang-orang yang

dan semua sumber baik yang dikutip maupun yang dirujuk. telah saya nyatakan

Analisis data diperlukan untuk menganalisi dan mengindentifikasi data- data yang didapatkan dari studi lapangan maupun stuti pustaka. Data yang diperoleh akan

Anak angkat adalah anak yang haknya dialihkan dari lingkungan kekuasaan keluarga, orangtua, wali yang sah, atau orang lain yang bertanggung jawab atas perawatan,

Penulis memanjatkan puji dan syukur ke hadirat Tuhan Yang Maha Kuasa atas berkat dan rahmatNya lah penulis dapat menyelesaikan skripsi dengan judul “Daya Analgesik Sari Buah

Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa partisipasi politik masyarakat dalam perencanaan pembangunan khususnya pada forum musrenbang desa masih rendah, hal ini disebabkan karena