• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Paper14-Acta26-2011. 106KB Jun 04 2011 12:03:15 AM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Paper14-Acta26-2011. 106KB Jun 04 2011 12:03:15 AM"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

RUSCHEWWYH-TYPE UNIVALENT HARMONIC FUNCTIONS STARLIKE OF THE COMPLEX ORDER

Abdul Rahman S. Juma

Abstract. In this paper, we have defined the classRT

H(γ, λ, β) by making use

of the Ruscheweyh derivatives and we give necessary and sufficient conditions for the functions to be in RTH∗(γ, λ, β).

2000Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C45.

1. Introduction

A continuous function f = u+iv is a complex-valued harmonic function in a domain D ⊂ C if both u and v are real harmonic in D. In any simply connected domain, we can write f = h+g, where h and g are analytic in D. We call h the analytic part and g the co-analytic part of f. Clunie and Sheil-Small [2] proved a necessary and sufficient condition forf to be locally univalent and sense-preserving in Dis that |h′(z)|>|g(z)|inD.

Let Hdenote the class of functions f =h+g that are harmonic univalent and sense-preserving in the unit disk U = {z : |z| < 1} with f(0) = fz(0)−1 = 0. Therefore we can express analytic and co-analytic parts of the functionf =h+gas

h(z) =z+

X

n=2

anzn, g(z) =

X

n=1

bnzn, |b1|<1. (1)

We can note thatHreduces toS, the class of normalized univalent analytic functions whenever the co-analytic part g≡0.

LetRTH denote the family of functions f =h+g that are harmonic inU with

the normalization

h(z) =z−

X

n=2

anzn, g(z) =

X

n=1

(2)

For λ > −1, γ ∈C\ {0} and 0 β 1, we let RT

H(γ, λ, β) denote the class of all

functions in RTH for which Re

1 + 1

γ

z(Dλf(z))

βz(Dλf(z))+ (1β)Dλf(z) −1

>0. (3)

Here, the operatorDλf(z) is the Ruscheweyh derivative ofφ(z) = P∞ n=1

cnzn given by

Dλϕ(z) = z

(1−z)1+λ ∗ϕ(z) =

X

n=1

Bn(λ)cnzn,

where ∗stands for the convolution or Hadamard product of two power series and

Bn(λ) = (λ+ 1)(λ+ 2)· · ·(λ+n−1)

(n−1)! , see [5]. Also if f(z) =h(z) +g(z) then

Dλf(z) =Dλh(z) +Dλg(z), see [4]. (4) We note that RTH∗(γ,0,0) is the class of harmonic function in the unit disk studied by Sibel et al. [6].

Furthermore, letST∗

H(γ, λ, β) denote the subclass atRTHconsisting of functions f =h+g∈ RTH that satisfy the following

X

n=1

[2((n−1)(1−β) + (β(n−1) + 1)|γ|)Bn(λ)an

+((n+ 1)(1−β) +|(n+ 1)(1−β)−2γ(1−β(n+ 1))|)Bn(λ)bn]≤4|γ| (5) We also consider LR∗H(γ, λ, β) the subclass ofRTH consisting of functions

f =h+g∈ RTH that satisfy the following ∞

X

n=1

(n−1)(1−β)Re(γ)

|γ| + (1 +β(n−1)|γ|

Bn(λ)an

+

(n+ 1)(1−β)Re(γ)

|γ| −(1−β(n+ 1))|γ|

Bn(λ)bn≤(2 +β)|γ| (6) The harmonic starlike functions studied by Avci and Zlotkiewicz [1], Jahangiri [3], Silverman [7], and Silverman and Silvia [8].

The coefficient condition

P n=2

n(|an|+|bn|) ≤ 1, with b1 = 0 is sufficient for

(3)

[7] proved that this coefficient condition is also necessary if b1 = 0 and if an and bn in (1) are negative. Jahangiri [3] proved that if f =h+gis given by (1) and if

X

n=1

n−α

1−α|an|+ n+α

1−α|bn|

≤2, 0≤α <1, a1 = 1, (8) thenf is harmonic, univalent, and starlike of orderαinU. This condition is proved to be also necessary if h and g are of the form (2). the case when α = 0 is given in [8], and for α=b1 = 0, see [7].

2.Main Results Theorem 1. ST

H(γ, λ, β)⊂ RTH∗(γ, λ, β).

Proof. Let f ∈ STH∗(γ, λ, β). We need to show that the condition (3) holds, therefore

Re{[(γ−1)[βz(Dλh(z))′−βz(Dλg(z))+ (1β)Dλh(z) + (1β)Dλg(z)] +z(Dλh(z))′−z(Dλg(z))]/[γ[βz(Dλh(z))βz(Dλg(z))+ (1β)Dλh(z) +(1−β)Dλg(z)]}>0, where 0β <1, γC\ {0}, λ >−1.

Using the fact thatRe w >0 if and only if|w+ 1|>|1−w|, then we have and by (2)

|(2γ−1)[βz(Dλh(z))βz(Dλg(z))+ (1β)Dλh(z) + (1β)Dλg(z)] +z(Dλh(z))′−z(Dλg(z))| − |βz(Dλh(z))βz(Dλg(z))

+ (1−β)Dλh(z) + (1β)Dλg(z)z(Dλh(z))+z(Dλg(z))|

=|(2γ−1)[βz−P∞

n=2βnBn(λ)anzn−P∞n=1βnBn(λ)bnzn+ (1−β)z −P∞

n=2(1−β)Bn(λ)anzn+P∞n=1(1−β)Bn(λ)bnzn] +z−P∞n=2nBn(λ)anzn −P∞

n=1nBn(λ)bnzn| −|βz−P∞

n=2βnBn(λ)anzn−P∞n=1βnBn(λ)bnzn+(1−β)z−P∞n=2(1−β)Bn(λ)anzn +P∞

n=1(1−β)Bn(λ)bnzn−z+P∞n=2nBn(λ)anzn+Pn=1∞ nBn(λ)bnzn| = 2γz−P∞

n=2(2γβn−βn+ 2γ−2γβ−1 +β+n)Bn(λ)anzn −P∞

n=1(2γβn−βn−2γ+ 2γβ+ 1−β+n)Bn(λ)bnzn| − |P∞

n=2(n−βn−1 +β)Bn(λ)anzn+P∞n=1(n+ 1−βn−β)Bn(λ)bnzn|

>2|γ| −(P∞

n=22((n−1)(1−β) + (β(n−1) + 1)|γ|)Bn(λ)an+P∞n=1((n+ 1)(1−β) +|(n+ 1)(1−β)−2γ(1−β(n+ 1))|)Bn(λ)bn) ≥ 0. For sharpness consider the function

f(z) = z−

X

n=2

|γ|

(n−1)(1−β) + (β(n−1) + 1)|γ|snz n

+

X

n=1

2|γ|

(n+ 1)(1−β) +|(n+ 1)(1−β)−2γ(1−β(n+ 1))tnz

(4)

where sn, tn are non-negative and

P n=2

sn+

P n=1

tn = 1 and all the functions of the form (8) are in RTH∗(γ, λ, β), since

X

n=2

(2((n−1)(1−β) + (β(n−1) + 1)|γ|)Bn(λ)an+

X

n=1

((n+ 1)(1−β)

+|(n+ 1)(1−β)−2γ(1−β(n+ 1))|)Bn(λ)bn= 2|γ|(1 +

X

n=2

sn+

X

n=1

tn) = 4|γ|.

Theorem 2. RT

H(γ, λ, β)⊂ LR∗H(γ, λ, β).

Proof. Let f ∈ RTH∗(γ, λ, β), then from the condition (3) we have

Re

( 1

γ

z(Dλh(z))z(Dλg(z))

βz(Dλh(z))βz(Dλg(z))+ (1β)Dλh(z) + (1β)Dλg(z))−1 !)

>−1.

By using (2), we obtain Re{γ1([z−P∞

n=2nBn(λ)anzn−P∞n=1nBn(λ)bnzn]/[βz− P∞

n=2βnBn(λ)anzn−P∞n=1βnBn(λ)bnzn+ (1−β)z −P∞

n=2(1−β)Bn(λ)anzn+P∞n=1(1−β)Bn(λ)bnzn]−1}>−1,then, we have

Re        1 γ

−P∞ n=2

(n−βn−1 +β)Bn(λ)anzn−

P n=1

(n−βn+ 1−β)Bn(λ)bnzn

z− P∞ n=2

(βn+ 1−β)Bn(λ)anzn+

P n=1

(1−β−βn)Bn(λ)bnzn       

>−1.

Choosing z→1− on the real axis, we obtain

P n=2

(n−1)(1−β)Bn(λ)an+

P n=1

(n+ 1)(1−β)Bn(λ)bn 1− P∞

n=2

(1 +β(n−1))Bn(λ)an+

P n=1

(1−β(n+ 1))Bn(λ)bn

Re

1

γ

≤1,

thus,

X

n=2

(n−1)(1−β)Bn(λ)an+

X

n=1

(n+ 1)(1−β)Bn(λ)bn

≤ |γ| 2

Re(γ) 1−

X

n=2

(1 +β(n−1))Bn(λ)an+

X

n=1

(1−β(n+ 1))Bn(λ)bn !

(5)

then we get P∞ n=1

h

(n−1)(1−β)Re(γ)|γ| + (1 +β(n−1)|γ|iBn(λ)an

+h(n+ 1)(1−β)Re(γ)|γ| −(1−β(n+ 1))|γ|iBn(λ)bn ≤ 2|γ|. Then by (6) we have

f ∈ LR∗H(γ, λ, β). Theorem 3. ST

H(γ, λ, β) = RTH∗(γ, λ, β) = LR∗H(γ, λ, β), where 0 < γ ≤1,0 ≤ β <1 and λ >−1.

Proof. Ifγ ∈(0,1], then the condition (5) and (6) are equivalent and hereSTH∗(γ, λ, β) = LR∗H(γ, λ, β). By making use the previous two theorems, we get the result and this complete the proof.

Theorem 4. LR

H(γ, λ, β) 6⊆ RTH∗(γ, λ, β), if Re(γ) ≤ 0 and Re(γ) 6= −12 or

γ ∈(32,∞).

Proof. Consider the function f(z) = z− λ+11 z2, λ > −1, f ∈ LR

H(γ, λ, β), since

P∞ n=1

h

(n−1)(1−β)Re(γ)|γ| + (1 +β(n−1))|γ|iBn(λ)an

+h(n+ 1)(1−β)Re(γ)|γ| −(1−β(n+ 1)|γ|iBn(λ)bn=|γ|+(1−β)Re(γ)|γ| +(1+β)|γ|= (2 +β)|γ|+ (1−β)Re(γ)|γ| ≤(2 +β)|γ|when γ ∈C\ {0}and Re(γ)<0.

Also, letr=Re(γ)<0 andt be negative real number such that

(1−β) + 2r(1 +β)(1−t) >0. If we choose z = 1β+γ(1+β)(1γ(1−t) t), then z ∈ U and by Dλf(z) = zz2, we have 1 + 1

γ

z(Dλ

f(z))′

βz(Dλ

f(z))′+(1β)Dλf

(z)−1

= t < 0, then

f(z)6∈ RT∗

H(γ, λ, β).

By the same way, let f(z) =z+λ+11 z2, then if γ ∈3(12−β),∞, we obtain

f ∈ LR∗H(γ, λ, β), since

X

n=1

(n−1)(1−β)Re(γ)

|γ| + (1 +β(n−1))|γ|)

Bn(λ)an

+

(n+ 1)(1−β)Re(γ)

|γ| −(1−β(n+ 1))|γ|

Bn(λ)bn = 3(1−β)Re(γ)

|γ| + 3β|γ| ≤(2 +β)|γ|.

Now let t be a negative real number such that 3(1−β) +γ(t−1)<0, choose

z=−3(1γ(tβ)+γ(t−1)1), thenz∈ U and by definition off we have 1 +1

γ

z(Dλf(z))′

βz(Dλf(z))+ (1β)Dλf(z)−1

=t <0,

therefore f 6∈ RTH∗(γ, λ, β). Theorem 5. RT

(6)

Proof. Consider the function fσ(z) = z−1+λσ z2, λ >−1 and σ > (1β)+γ(1+β)γ , then f ∈ RTH∗(γ, λ, β), since

Re

1 + 1

γ

z(Dλf σ(z))′

βz(Dλf

σ(z))′+ (1−β)Dλfσ(z) −1

=Re

1 + σz(1−β)

γ(σz(1 +β)−1)

>0.

We have also

X

n=1

[2((n−1)(1−β) + (β(n−1) + 1)|γ|)Bn(λ)an+ ((n+ 1)(1−β) +|(n+ 1)(1−β)−2γ(1−β(n+ 1))|)Bn(λ)bn]

= 2|γ|+ [2(1−β) + 2(β+ 1)|γ|]σ >4|γ|,

because σ > (1β)+γ(1+β)γ >1, thenf 6∈ ST∗

H(γ, λ, β).

References

[1] Y. Avci and E. Zlotkiewicz, On harmonic univalent mappings, Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-sklodowska, Sect. A, 44 (1990), 1-7.

[2] J. Clunie and T. Sheil-Small,Harmonic univalent functions, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn., Ser. A I Math. 9 (1984), 3-25.

[3] J. Jahangiri,Harmonic functions starlike in unit disk, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 235 (1999), 470-477.

[4] G. Murugusundaramoorthy and K. Vijaya, On certain classes of harmonic functions involving Ruscheweyh derivatives, Bull. Cal. Math. Soc. 96(2), (2004), 99-108.

[5] St. Ruscheweyh, New criteria for univalent functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 49 (1975), 109-115.

[6] Sibel Yalcin and Metin ¨Ozt¨urk, harmonic functions starlike of the complex order, Matema. Bech., 58 (2006), 7-11.

[7] H. Silverman, Harmonic univalent functions with negative coefficients, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 220 (1998), 283-289.

[8] H. Silverman and E. M. Silvia, Subclasses of harmonic univalent functions, N. Z. J. Math., 28 (1999), 275-284.

Abdul Rahman S. Juma Department of Mathematics University of Alanbar Address: Ramadi , Iraq

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

In the theory of univalent functions an interesting problem is to find those integral operators, which preserve the univalence, respectively certain classes of... The

We apply the first order linear differential subordination to obtain relations between new classes of analytic functions of fractional power.. In the theory of univalent functions,

We will investigate the integral operator for the classes of starlike and convex functions in the open unit disk.. Key Words : Bessel function, Starlike function,

Frasin, Generalization of partial sums of certain analytic and univalent functions , Appl.. Murugusundaramoorthy, Neighbourhoods and partial sums of starlike based on

In this article, we investigate a new class of non-Bazileviˇc functions with respect to k-symmetric points defined by a generalized differential operator.. Several

Abstract.We define and investigate a new class of harmonic univalent functions defined by an integral operator.. We obtain coefficient inequalities, extreme points and distortion

Srivastava, A new class of analytic functions de- fined by means of a convolution operator involving the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function,..

Noor, Some classes of p-valent analytic functions defined by certain integral operator, Appl.. Noor, On certain classes of analytic functions defined by Noor integral operator