• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Daniel Breaz. 49KB Jun 04 2011 12:08:35 AM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Daniel Breaz. 49KB Jun 04 2011 12:08:35 AM"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

INTEGRAL OPERATORS ON THE UCD(

α

)-CLASS

by Daniel Breaz

Abstract. We consider the class of functions f =z+a2z2 +a3z3 +..., that are analytically and univalent in the unit disk.

We consider the class of functions UCD(α), α ≥0 with the properties

( )

z zf

( ) ( )

z z U

f′ ≥ ′′ ∀ ∈

Re α .

In this paper we present some results from integrals operators at this class.

1.Introduction

Theorem A. [4] A sufficient condition for a function f of the form

( )

z =z+a2z2 +a3z3 +...

f (1)

so that it belongs to the UCD

( )

α ,α ≥0 class is

( )

[

1 1

]

1

2

≤ ⋅ − +

k= k α k ak . (2)

2.Main results

Theorem 1. Let be fS ,f

( )

z =z+a2z2+a3z3+...,zU . We suppose that the coefficients of function f verify the condition

( )

[

1 1

]

1

2

≤ ⋅ − +

k= k α k ak .

We consider the integral operator

( )

=

( )

z

dt t

t f z F

0

, which is the Alexander operator.

(2)

Proof

Let be f of the form (1), verifying the condition (2). We have:

( )

(

)

=

  

+ + + = + + + = + + +

=

z z

z

t a t a t dt t

a t a dt

t t a t a t z F

0 3

3 2 2

0

2 3 2 0

3 3 2 2

3 2

1 K K

K

... 3 2

3 3 2 2

z a z a z+ +

= .

Denoting

2 , ≥

= k

k a b k

k ,

we can write,

( )

3 3 ...

2

2 + +

+

=z b z b z z

F

.

In that following, we evaluate the relation (2), for the function

F

, with the coefficients

b

k.

( )

[

+ −

]

⋅ =

[

+

( )

]

⋅ =

[

+

( )

]

⋅ ⋅ ≤

== k= k k a k a

k k b

k k

k

k k

k k

k

1 1

1 1

1 1

1

2 2

2

α α

α

( )

[

1 1

]

[

1

( )

1

]

1

2 2

< ⋅ − + ≤

⋅ −

+

= k= k k

k k k a

a

k α

α .

According to the relation (2), from the Theorem A, we obtain:

( )

z U

UCD

F∈ α , α >0 , ∈ .

Theorem 2. Let be

f

A

,

( )

3 3 ...

2

2 + +

+

=z a z a z z

f ,α ≥0, zU.We suppose

that the condition (2) is satisfied and we consider the Libera operator,

( )( )

=

( )

z

dt t f z z f L

0

2

.

Then LUCD

( )

α , 0α ≥ , zU . Proof

Let be f of the form (1) verifying the condition (2).

(3)

( )

(

)

=   

+ + +

= + + + =

z z

t a t a t z dt t

a t a t z z F

0 4

3 3

2 2

0

3 3 2 2

4 3

2 2 2

K K

=   

+ + +

= 2 3 3 4 K

2

4 3

2 2

z a z a z z

= + + = + +

+ =

2 3

3 2 2

1 2 4

2 3

2

k

k k

z k

a z

z a z a

z K .

Denoting

1 2

+ =

k a bk k ,

we can write

( )( )

3 3 ...

2

2 + +

+

=z b z b z z

f

L .

We evaluate the relation (2), for the function obtained after integration with the coefficients bk..

Since 2k ≥ , we have

( )

[

]

[

( )

]

[

( )

]

+ ⋅ ⋅ − + =

+ ⋅ − + =

⋅ −

+

=2=2=2 1 2 1

1 1

2 1 1

1 1

k

k k

k k

k

k a k

k k

a k

k b

k

k α α α

( )

[

]

1

3 2 3 2 1

1

2

< ≤ ⋅ ⋅ − + ≤

=

k

k

a k

k α .

that implies

( )

f UCD

( )

α

L ∈ , α ≥0, so, the Libera operator preserves this class.

Theorem 3. Let be fA, f

( )

z =z+a2z2 +a3z3+...,zU . We suppose that the condition (2) is satisfied and we consider the Bernardi operator,

( )

= +

z f

( )

t tdt

z z F

0

1

1 γ

γγ , 1γ ≥− .

Then, we have FUCD

( )

α , 0α ≥ , zU . Proof

Let be f of the form (1), verifying the condition (2). We have

( )

= +

z

(

+ + +

)

⋅ − = +

z

(

t +a t + +a t + +

)

dt=

z dt t t

a t a t z z F

0

2 3 1 2 0

1 3

3 2 2

1 1

K

K γ γ γ γ γ

(4)

=     + + + + + + =     + + + + +

= + + K + + + K

3 2 1 1 2 1

1 3 3

2 2 1 0 2 2 1 γ γ γ γ γ γ γ γ γ γ γ γ γ γ z a z a z z t a t z z

= ⋅ ++ ⋅ + = + ++ + ++ + = 2 3 3 2 2 1 3 1 2 1 k k k z k a z z a z a z γγ γγ

γγ K .

Let be

k a

bk k

++ ⋅

= γγ 1 .

We evaluate the relation (2) for the function F

( )

z =z+b2z2 +b3z3+... We have:

( )

[

]

[

( )

]

[

( )

]

≤ ++ ⋅ ⋅ − + = ++ ⋅ − + = ⋅ − +

=2=2=2 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 k k k k k k k a k k k a k k b k k γγ α γγ α α

( )

[

]

[

( )

]

= ≤ ∞= + − ⋅ ≤ + + ⋅ ⋅ − + ≤ 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 k k k

k k k a

a k

k α

γ γ

α , so:

( )

α

UCD F∈ . Theorem 4. Let

( )

= +

z f

( )

t tdt

z z F 0 1 1 γ γγ .

If f is of the form (1), fS, α >0 and Ref

( )

z ≥α zf ′′

( ) ( )

zzU, then

( ) ( )

1+γ Fz +zF′′

( )

z ≥α z

[

(

2+γ

)

F′′+zF ′′′

]

.

Proof

( )

( )

( )

=

( )

− + ⇔ ⋅ + = z z dt t t f z F z dt t t f z z F 0 1 0 1 1

1 γ γ γ

γγ γ .

After successive derivations, we obtain:

( )

z z F

( ) ( )

z f z z F

( )

z zF

( ) ( )

z f z

F z = + + ⋅ + ⇔ ⋅ = ⋅ + + ⋅ ⋅ +γγ − γ γ− γγ γ γ γ 1 ' 1 ' 1 1 1

1

( )

+ +

( )

+ +′′

( )

=

( )

⇔ ′

( )

+ + ⋅ ⋅ ′′

( )

=

( )

+ f z F z z F z f z

z F z z F z F ' 1 1 ' 1 1 '

1 γ γ γ γ

γ

( )

z F

( )

z zF

( )

z f

( )

z

F = ′′

+′′′ + ′′ + + ′′ ⇔ γ γ 1 1 1 . So, we have f

( )

z F

( )

z zF ′′′

( )

z
(5)

If Re f

( )

z ≥α zf ′′

( ) ( )

zzU,α >0, then

( )

f

( )

z zf

( )

z

UCD

f ∈ α ⇒ ′ ≥α ′′ .

In this inequality, we put the expressions of

f

and

f

′′

, and we obtain:

( )

( )

( )

′′′

( )

+ + ′′    

++ ≥

′′ + +

z zF z z F z zF z

F

γ γγ

α

γ 1

1 1

2 1

1

( ) ( )

( )

(

+

) ( )

′′ + ′′′

( )

+ ≥ ′′ + ′ + +

F z zF z z 2 F z z2F z

1 1

1

1 γ

γ α γ

γ

( ) ( )

+ F z +zF

( )

zz

[

(

+

) ( )

F z +z F ′′′

( )

z

]

⇔ 2

" 2 "

'

1 γ α γ .

Remark 5. If f is of the form (1), fS,α >0 and Re f

( )

z ≥α zf ′′

( ) ( )

zzU, then

( )

z z

f

α

1 '

log ≤ .

Proof

According to the Theorem 4 we have:

( )

( )

( )

′′′

( )

+ + ′′    

++ ≥

′′ + +

z zF z z F z z F z

F 2

1 1 1

2 1

1

γ γγ

α γ

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

′    

 

  

′′

+ + ′ ⋅

⋅ = ′′

+ + ′

′′′ + + ′′ ++ ⋅ ⋅ ≥

z F z zF z

z F z z

F

z F z z

F z

γ α

γ γ γγ

α

1 1 log

1 1

1 1 1

2 1

( )

[

f z

]

[

f

( )

z

]

z

z

⋅ ≤ ′ ′ ⇔ ′ ′ ⋅ ⋅ ≥

⇔1 α log log α1 .

References

1.Miller S.S., Mocanu P.T.- Integral operators on certain classes of analytic functions, Univalent Functions, Fractional Calculus, and their Applications, Halstead Pres, John Wiley (1989), 153-166.

(6)

3. Miller S.S., Mocanu P.T.- Differential subordinations and univalent functions, Michigan, Math. J. 28(1981), 157-171.

4. Rosy T., Stephen A.B., Subramanian K.G., Silverman H.- Classes of convex functions, Internat. J. Math.& Math. Sci., vol 23, No. 12(2000), 819-825.

5. Silverman H.- Univalent functions with negative coefficients, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 51(1975), 109-116.

Author:

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

In the paper, two propositions are formulated re- lated to choosing possibilities of aggregation coefficients for fractional criteria’ membership functions and also mathematical

At first, we make a brief presentation of class TUCD ( ) α and of some of its properties, as well as a number of matters connected to some integral operators studied on

The study of the convergence of series of this interested many mathematicians, these type of in particular convergent series having many applications in various domains.. In this

In the theory of univalent functions an interesting problem is to find those integral operators, which preserve the univalence, respectively certain classes of... The

In this note we shall study the analyticity and the univalence of some integral operators if the functions involved belongs to some special subclasses of univalent functions..

Frasin, Generalization of partial sums of certain analytic and univalent functions , Appl.. Murugusundaramoorthy, Neighbourhoods and partial sums of starlike based on

Srivastava, An extension of the univalent condition for a family of integral operators , Appl.. Mayer, The functions theory of one variable complex ,

Srivastava, The Hardy space of analytic functions associated with certain one-parameter families of integral operators, J.. Li, Some properties of two integral operators,