• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Paper-12-Acta23.2010. 115KB Jun 04 2011 12:03:10 AM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Paper-12-Acta23.2010. 115KB Jun 04 2011 12:03:10 AM"

Copied!
10
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

SOME APPLICATIONS OF FRACTIONAL CALCULUS OPERATORS TO CERTAIN SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC

FUNCTIONS WITH NEGATIVE COEFFICIENTS

B.A. Frasin

Abstract. The object of the present paper is to derive various distortion theo-rems for fractional calculus and fractional integral operators of functions in the class BT(j, λ, α) consisting of analytic and univalent functions with negative coefficients.

Furthermore, some of integral operators of functions in the classBT(j, λ, α) is shown. 2000Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C45.

1.Introduction and definitions

LetA(j) denote the family of functions of the form:

f(z) =z+ ∞ X

n=j+1

anzn (j∈N={1,2,3,· · · }), (1)

which are analytic in the open unit disk U = {z : |z| < 1}. A function f(z) belonging to A(j) is in the class B(j, λ, α) if and only if

Re

zf′

(z) + (2λ2−λ)z2f′′ (z)

4(λ−λ2)z+ (2λ2−λ)zf′(z) + (2λ2+ 1)f(z)

> α (2) for someα(0≤α <1) and λ(0≤λ <1),and for all z∈U.

LetT(j) denote the subclass of A(j) consisting of functions of the form:

f(z) =z− ∞ X

n=j+1

anzn (an≥0, j ∈N), (3)

Further, we define the class BT(j, λ, α) by

(2)

The class BT(j, λ, α) was introduced and studied by the author in [3]. The

class BT(j, λ, α) is of special interest because it reduces to various classes of

well-known functions as well as many new ones. For example The classes BT(1,0, α) = T∗

(α) and BT(1,1, α) = C(α) were first studied by Silverman [10]. The classes

BT(j,0, α) =Tα∗(j) and BT(j,1, α) =Cα(j) were studied Srivastava et al. [13]. The

class BT(1,1/2, α) =BT(α) was studied by Gupta and Jain [4].

In order to show our results, we shall need the following lemma.

Lemma 1. ([3])Let the functionf(z)be defined by (3). Then f(z)∈BT(j, λ, α) if and only if

∞ X

n=j+1

σ(n, α, λ)an≤1−α, (5) where

σ(n, α, λ) := (2λ2−λ)n2+ [1 + (1 +α)(λ−2λ2)]n+ (1 + 2λ2−3λ)α (6)

and 0≤α <1,0≤λ <1.The result is sharp.

2.Fractional calculus

Many essentially equivalent definitions of fractional calculus (that is fractional derivatives and fractional integrals) have been given in the literature (cf., e.g., [1], [2, Chap. 13], [5],[7], [8], [9], [11, p.28 et. seq.]. We find it to be convenient to recall here the following definitions which are used earlier by Owa [6] (and, subsequently, by Srivastava and Owa [12]).

Definition 1. The fractional integral of order µis defined, for a function f(z),

by

D−µ

z f(z) =

1 Γ(µ)

z

Z

0

f(ζ)

(z−ζ)1−µdζ, (7)

where µ >0, f(z) is an analytic function in a simply-connected region of the z-plane containing the origin, and the multiplicity of (z−ζ)1−µ

is removed by requiring log (z−ζ) to be real when z−ζ >0.

Definition 2. The fractional derivative of order µ is defined, for a function

f(z), by

zf(z) = 1 Γ(1−µ)

d dz

z

Z

0

f(ζ)

(3)

where 0 ≤µ < 1, f(z) is an analytic function in a simply-connected region of the

z-plane containing the origin, and the multiplicity of (z−ζ)−µ

is removed as in Definition 1 above.

Definition 3. Under the hypotheses of Definition 2, the fractional derivative of order n+µ is defined by

Dnz+µf(z) = d

n

dznD µ

zf(z), (9)

where 0≤µ <1 and n∈N0 ={0,1,2, . . .}. We begin by proving

Theorem 1. If f(z)∈BT(j, λ, α), then

D −µ

z f(z)

|z|1+µ Γ(2 +µ)

1− (1−α)Γ(j+ 2)Γ(2 +µ) σ(j+ 1, α, λ)Γ(j+ 2 +µ)|z|

j (10) and

D

µ

z f(z)

|z|1+µ Γ(2 +µ)

1 + (1−α)Γ(j+ 2)Γ(2 +µ) σ(j+ 1, α, λ)Γ(j+ 2 +µ)|z|

j, (11) for µ >0 and z∈U.The results (10) and (11) are sharp.

Proof . Define the function G(z)by

G(z) = Γ(2 +µ)z−µ D−µ

z f(z)

= z− ∞ X

n=j+1

Γ(n+ 1)Γ(2 +µ) Γ(n+ 1 +µ) anz

n

= z− ∞ X

n=j+1

Ψ(n)anzn,

where

Ψ(n) = Γ(n+ 1)Γ(2 +µ)

Γ(n+ 1 +µ) (n≥j+ 1). (12)

It easy to see that

0<Ψ(n)≤Ψ(j+ 1) = Γ(j+ 2)Γ(2 +µ)

(4)

Furthermore, it follows from Lemma 1 that ∞

X

n=j+1 an≤

1−α

σ(j+ 1, α, λ), (14)

Therefore, by using (13) and (14), we can see that

|G(z)| ≥ |z| −Ψ(j+ 1)|z|j+1 ∞ X

n=j+1

an≥ |z| − (1−α)Γ(j+ 2)Γ(2 +µ)

σ(j+ 1, α, λ)Γ(j+ 2 +µ)|z|

j+1 (15)

and

|G(z)| ≤ |z|+Ψ(j+1)|z|j+1 ∞ X

n=j+1

an≤ |z|+

(1−α)Γ(j+ 2)Γ(2 +µ) σ(j+ 1, α, λ)Γ(j+ 2 +µ)|z|

j+1, (16)

which prove the inequalities of Theorem 1.

Finally, we can easily see that the results (10) and (11) are sharp for the function f(z) given by

D−µ

z f(z) =

z1+µ

Γ(2 +µ)

1− (1−α)Γ(j+ 2)Γ(2 +µ) σ(j+ 1, α, λ)Γ(j+ 2 +µ)z

j

(17) or

f(z) =z− 1−α σ(j+ 1, α, λ)z

j+1. (18)

Theorem 2. If f(z)∈BT(j, λ, α), then

|Dµzf(z)| ≥ |z| 1−µ

Γ(2−µ)

1− (1−α)Γ(j+ 2)Γ(2−µ) σ(j+ 1, α, λ)Γ(j+ 2−µ)|z|

j

(19)

and

|Dzµf(z)| ≤ |z| 1−µ

Γ(2−µ)

1 + (1−α)Γ(j+ 2)Γ(2−µ) σ(j+ 1, α, λ)Γ(j+ 2−µ)|z|

j

, (20)

for 0≤µ <1 and z∈U.The results (19) and (20) are sharp.

(5)

H(z) = Γ(2−µ)zµDzµf(z) = z−

∞ X

n=j+1

Γ(n+ 1)Γ(2−µ) Γ(n+ 1−µ) anz

n

= z− ∞ X

n=j+1

Φ(n)anzn,

where

Φ(n) = Γ(n)Γ(2−µ)

Γ(n+ 1−µ) (n≥j+ 1). (21)

It easy to see that

0<Φ(n)≤Φ(j+ 1) = Γ(j+ 1)Γ(2−µ)

Γ(j+ 2−µ) . (22)

Consequently, with the aid of (14) and (22), we have

|H(z)| ≥ |z|−Φ(j+1)|z|j+1 ∞ X

n=j+1

nan≥ |z|−

(1−α)Γ(j+ 2)Γ(2−µ) σ(j+ 1, α, λ)Γ(j+ 2−µ)|z|

j+1 (23)

and

|H(z)| ≤ |z|+ Φ(j+ 1)|z|j+1 ∞ X

n=j+1

nan≤ |z|+ (1−α)Γ(j+ 2)Γ(2−µ)

σ(j+ 1, α, λ)Γ(j+ 2−µ)|z|

j+1 .

(24) Now (19) and (20) follow from (23) and (24), respectively.

Finally, by taking the function f(z) defined by Dµzf(z) = z

1−µ

Γ(2−µ)

1− (1−α)Γ(j+ 2)Γ(2−µ) σ(j+ 1, α, λ)Γ(j+ 2−µ)z

j

(25) or for the function given by (18), the results (19) and (20) are easily seen to be sharp.

(6)

3.Fractional integral operator

We need the following definition of fractional integral operator given by Srivas-tava et al. [14].

Definition 4. For real number η >0, γ and δ, the fractional integral operator

I0η,γ,δ,z is defined by

I0η,γ,δ,z f(z) = z −η−γ

Γ(η)

z

Z

0

(z−t)η−1

F(η+γ,−δ;η; 1−t/z)f(t)dt, (26)

where a function f(z) is analytic in a simply-connected region of the z-plane con-taining the origin with the order

f(z) =O(|z|ε) (z−→0),

with ε >max{0, γ−δ} −1.

Here F(a, b;c;z) is the Gauss hypergeometric function defined by

F(a, b;c;z) = ∞ X

n=0

(a)n(b)n

(c)n(1)n

, (27)

where (ν)n is the Pochhammer symbol defined by

(ν)n=

Γ(ν+k) Γ(ν) =

1 (n= 0)

ν(ν+ 1)(ν+ 2)· · ·(ν+n−1) (n∈N) (28) and the multiplicity of (z−t)η−1

is removed by requiring log (z−t) to be real when z−t >0.

Remark 2. For γ =−η,we note that I0η,,z−η,δf(z) =D−η

z f(z).

In order to prove our result for the fractional integral operator, we have to recall here the following lemma due to Srivastava et al. [14].

Lemma 2. If η >0 and n > γ−δ−1, then

I0η,γ,δ,z zn= Γ(n+ 1)Γ(n−γ+δ+ 1) Γ(n−γ+ 1)Γ(n+η+δ+ 1)z

n−γ

. (29)

With aid of Lemma 2., we prove

Theorem 3. Let η >0, γ >2, η+δ >−2, γ−δ <2, γ(η+δ) ≤η(j+ 2), and

(7)

I

η,γ,δ

0,z f(z)

Γ(2−γ+δ)|z|1−γ Γ(2−γ)Γ(2 +η+δ)

1− (1−α)(2−γ+δ)j(2)j σ(j+ 1, α, λ)(2−γ)j(2−γ+δ)j

|z|j

(30)

and

I

η,γ,δ

0,z f(z)

Γ(2−γ+δ)|z|1−γ Γ(2−γ)Γ(2 +η+δ)

1 + (1−α)(2−γ+δ)j(2)j σ(j+ 1, α, λ)(2−γ)j(2−γ+δ)j

|z|j

(31)

for z∈U0,where

U0 =

U 1),

U−{0} (γ >1). (32)

The equalities in (30) and (31) are attained for the function f(z) given by (18). Proof . By using Lemma 2, we have

I0η,γ,δ,z f(z) = Γ(2−γ+δ) Γ(2−γ)Γ(2 +η+δ)z

1−γ

= −

∞ X

n=j+1

Γ(n+ 1)Γ(n−γ+δ+ 1) Γ(n−γ+ 1)Γ(n+η+δ+ 1)anz

n−γ

(z∈U0).

Letting

Ω(z) = Γ(2−γ)Γ(2 +η+δ) Γ(2−γ+δ) z

γIη,γ,δ

0,z f(z)

= z− ∞ X

n=j+1

∆(n)anzn, (33)

where

∆(n) = (2−γ+δ)n−1(2)n−1 (2−γ)n−1(2 +γ+δ)n1

(n≥j+ 1), (34)

we can see that the function ∆(n) is non-increasing for integers n≥j+ 1,then we have

0<∆(n)≤∆(j+ 1) = (2−γ+δ)j(2)j (2−γ)j(2 +γ+δ)j

(8)

Therefore, by using (14) and (35), we have

|Ω(z)| ≥ |z| −∆(j+ 1)|z|j+1 ∞ X

n=j+1 an

≥ |z| − (1−α)(2−γ+δ)j(2)j σ(j+ 1, α, λ)(2−γ)j(2 +γ+δ)j

|z|j+1

and

|Ω(z)| ≤ |z|+ ∆(j+ 1)|z|j+1 ∞ X

n=j+1 an

≤ |z|+ (1−α)(2−γ+δ)j(2)j σ(j+ 1, α, λ)(2−γ)j(2 +γ+δ)j

|z|j+1

forz∈U0,whereU0 is defined by (32). This completes the proof of Theorem 3. Remark 3. Takingγ =−η in Theorem 3, we get the result of Theorem 1.

4.Integral operators

Theorem 4. Let the functions f(z) defined by (3) be in the class BT(j, λ, α),

and cbe a real number such that c >−1.Then the function F(z) defined by

F(z) = c+ 1 zc

Z z

0 tc−1

f(t)dt (c >−1) (36)

also belonging to the class BT(j, λ, α).

Proof. From (36) we have

F(z) =z− ∞ X

n=j+1

c+ 1 c+n

anzn.

Therefore, ∞ X

n=j+1

σ(n, α, λ)

c+ 1 c+n

an≤

∞ X

n=j+1

σ(n, α, λ)an≤1−α,

(9)

F(z) =z− ∞ X

n=j+1

anzn (an≥0)

be in the class BT(j, λ, α) and let c be a real number such that c > −1. Then the

function given by (36) is univalent in |z|< R∗

,where

R∗ =R∗

(n, α, c) = inf

n

σ(n, α, λ)(c+ 1) n(1−α)(c+n)

1/(n−1)

(n≥2). (37)

The result is sharp, with the function f(z) given by

f(z) =z− (1−α)(c+n) σ(n, α, λ)(c+ 1)z

n (n2). (38)

Proof. From (36), we have

f(z) = z 1−c

(zcF(z))′ c+ 1 =z−

∞ X

n=j+1

c+n c+ 1

anzn.

In order to obtain the required result, it suffices to show that |f′

(z)−1|<1 whenever|z|< R∗

,where R∗

is given by (37). Now

f ′

(z)−1≤ ∞ X

n=j+1

n(c+n) c+ 1 an|z|

n−1 .

Thus |f′

(z)−1|<1 if

∞ X

n=j+1

n(c+n) c+ 1 an|z|

n−1

<1. (39)

But from Lemma 1, (39) will be satisfied if n(c+n)

c+ 1 an|z|

n−1

< σ(n, α, λ)

1−α , (40)

that is, if

|z| ≤

σ(n, α, λ)(c+ 1) n(1−α)(c+n)

1/(n−1)

(n≥2). (41)

(10)

References

[1] M.K. Aouf, On fractional derivatives and fractional integrals of certain sub-classes of starlike and convex functions, Math. Japon. 35 (1990), 831-837.

[2] A. Erd´elyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger and F.G. Tricemi,Tables of integral Transforms, voll. II, McGraw-Hill Book Co., NewYork, Toronto and London,1954.

[3] B.A. Frasin,On the analytic functions with negative coefficients, Soochow J. Math.Vol 31, No.3 (2005), 349-359.

[4] V.P. Gupta and P.K. Jain,Certain classes univalent analytic functions with negative coefficients II, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 15 (1976), 467-473.

[5] K.B. Oldham and T. Spanier,The Fractional Calculus: Theory and Applica-tions of Differentiation and Integral to Arbitrary Order, Academic Press, NewYork and London, 1974.

[6] S. Owa,On the distortion theoremsI, Kyungpook Math. J. 18 (1978), 53-59. [7] S. Owa, M. Saigo and H.M.Srivastava, Some characterization theorems for starlike and convex functions involving a certain fractional integral operators, J. Math. Anal. 140 (1989), 419-426.

[8] M. Saigo,A remark on integral operators involving the Gauss hypergeometric functions, Math. Rep. College General Ed. Kyushu Univ. 11 (1978),135-143.

[9] S.G. Samko, A.A. Kilbas and O.I. Marchev,Integrals and Derivatives of Frac-tional Order and Some of Their Applications (Russian), Nauka i Teknika, Minsk, 1987.

[10] H. Silverman, Univalent functions with negative coefficients, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 51 (1975),109-116.

[11] H.M.Srivastava and R.G. Buchman, Convolution Integral Equations with Special Functions Kernels, John Wiely and Sons, NewYork, London, Sydney and Toronto, 1977.

[12] H.M.Srivastava and S. Owa (Eds.),Univalent functions, Fractional Calculus, and Their Applications,Halsted Press (Ellis Horworod Limited, Chichester ), John Wiely and Sons, NewYork, Chichester, Brisbane and Toronto, 1989.

[13] H.M.Srivastava, S. Owa and S.K. Chatterjea, A note on certain classes of starlike functions, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova 77 (1987), 115-124.

[14] H.M.Srivastava, M. Saigo and S. Owa, A class of distortion theorems in-volving certain operators of fractional calculus, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 131 (1988), 412-420.

B.A. Frasin

Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

In this paper we derive several subordination results for certain class of analytic functions defined by an extended multiplier transformation.. 2000 Mathematics Subject

In order to analyse the binary complexity of factoring ordinary linear differential operators, Grigoriev [10] describes an algorithm which computes a fundamental sys- tem of

The main purpose of this paper is to consider the continuity of the multilinear commutators related to the Littlewood-Paley operators and BM O ( R n ) functions on certain Hardy

The object of the present paper is to discuss a convexity property for the integral operator Fn(z) involving k-uniformly starlike functions of order γ.. 2000 Mathematics

Sawano and Tanka(see [13]) introduced the Morrey spaces on the non-homogeneous spaces and proved the boundedness of Hardy-Littlewood maximal operators, Calder´ on- Zygmund operators

From [2][13], we know that the commutators and multilinear operators generated by the singular integral oper- ators and the Lipschitz functions are bounded on the Triebel-Lizorkin

In this paper, we introduce a new class of functions which are analytic and univalent with negative coefficients defined by using certain fractional operators descibed in the

Abstract.We define and investigate a new class of harmonic univalent functions defined by an integral operator.. We obtain coefficient inequalities, extreme points and distortion