MICROTEACHING STUDENTS’ COMPREHENSION OF TEXT TYPES
A Thesis
Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree
in English Language Education
By
FX. Titis Ardiyanto Student Number: 041214045
ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA
ii A Thesis on
MICROTEACHING STUDENTS’ COMPREHENSION OF TEXT TYPES
FX. Titis Ardiyanto Student Number: 041214045
Approved by
Sponsor
iii A Thesis on
MICROTEACHING STUDENTS’ COMPREHENSION OF TEXT TYPES
FX. Titis Ardiyanto Student Number: 041214045
Defended before the Board of Examiners on August 5th, 2010
and Declared Acceptable
Board of Examiners
Chair person : C. Tutyandari, S.Pd., M.Pd. ____________
Secretary : Made Frida Yulia, S.Pd., M.Pd. ____________
Member : Ch. Kristiyani, S.Pd., M.Pd. ____________
Member : Made Frida Yulia, S.Pd., M.Pd. ____________
Member : C. Sih Prabandari, S.Pd., M.Hum. ____________
Yogyakarta, August 5th, 2010
Faculty of Teachers Training and Education Sanata Dharma University
Dean,
iv
STATEMENT OF WORK’S ORIGINALITY
I honestly declare that this thesis, which I have written, does not contain the work or parts of the work of other people, except those cited in the quotations and the references, as a scientific paper should.
Yogyakarta, August 5th, 2010 The Writer
v ABSTRACT
Ardiyanto, Fransiscus Xaverius Titis. 2010. Microteaching Students’ Comprehension of Text Types. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.
The latest curriculum used in Indonesia namely School-based Curriculum provided teachers more spaces for teaching their students, considering that each school even each student had their differences. Ironically, based on the researcher’s personal involvement with teachers in one of private schools in Yogyakarta, there were some teachers who had no clear comprehension of text types which had major parts in the School-based Curriculum. Microteaching students were assumed to be future teachers. They will teach text types to their students.
This research investigated the microteaching students’ level of comprehension of text types. There were two questions addressed. The first question discussed the microteaching students' level of comprehension of text types. The second question explored microteaching students’ difficulties on comprehending text types.
To answer the research questions, the researcher employed a mixed method, a combination of a quantitative research method and a qualitative research method. Two instruments were used to obtain the data, namely tests and interviews. Referring to the research instruments, there were two kinds of participants involved in the research. They were the test’s participants and the interview’s participants. The test participants were 17 microteaching students’ of Sanata Dharma University and the interview participants were three test participants who gained the highest, lowest, and median score of the test.
There were two major results obtained from the research. First, the microteaching students’ level of comprehension of text types was low. It indicated by 50.73 as their average score of the test. Analytical exposition was the text types which gained the lowest degree of comprehension. The generic structure of the text types was part of the text types which gained the lowest degree of comprehension. Second, there were two kinds of difficulties faced by the microteaching students for comprehending text types namely internal factors and external factors. The internal factors included laziness and their own characteristic. The external factors included lacking of information and involvement or interaction with text types. It was also in the condition that text types were not taught during microteaching students study at Sanata Dharma University. Suggestions were given to (1) microteaching students to have more involvement to text types so that they can improve their level of comprehension of text types, (2) English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University to teach text types in the study of the microteaching students, and (3) further researchers on the level of comprehension of text types to employ the real teachers as the subjects of the research.
vi ABSTRAK
Ardiyanto, Fransiscus Xaverius Titis. 2010. Microteaching Students’ Level of Comprehension of Text Types. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Kurikulum terbaru yang digunakan di Indonesia yaitu Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) memberikan ruang yang lebih banyak bagi guru untuk mengajar para siswanya dengan mempertimbangkan bahwa setiap sekolah atau bahkan setiap siswa mempunyai perbedaan. Tetapi sayangnya, berdasarkan pengalaman keterlibatan peneliti secara personal dengan para guru di salah satu sekolah swasta di Yogyakarta, terdapat beberapa guru yang belum memiliki pemahaman yang jelas tentang text types yang mempunyai keterlibatan yang besar dalam KTSP. Mahasiswa microteaching yang diasumsikan untuk menjadi guru-guru masa depan juga akan mengajar text types saat mereka mengajar para siswanya pada kemudian hari.
Penelitian ini meneliti tingkat pemahaman mahasiswa microteaching terhadap text types. Terdapat dua pertanyaan mendasar dalam penelitian ini. Pertanyaan pertama membicarakan tingkat pemahaman mahasiswa microteaching terhadap text types. Pertanyaan kedua membahas kesulitan-kesulitan yang dialami mahasiswa microteaching dalam memahami text types.
Untuk menjawab pertanyaan dari penelitian ini, peneliti menggunakan metode campuran yaitu kombinasi dari metode kuantitatif dan metode kualitatif. Terdapat dua alat yang digunakan untuk memperoleh data yaitu tes dan wawancara. Mengacu kepada alat penelitian, terdapat dua jenis partisipan yang terlibat dalam penelitian ini. Mereka adalah partisipan untuk tes dan partisipan untuk wawancara. Partisipan untuk tes adalah 17 mahasiswa microteaching dari Universitas Sanata Dharma dan partisipan untuk wawancara adalah tiga partisipan yang diambil dari partisipan untuk tes yang memperoleh nilai tertinggi, nilai terendah, dan nilai tengah dari tes.
vii
dan (3) peneliti mendatang yang fokus pada pemahaman text types untuk menggunakan guru sebagai subyek dari penelitian.
viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I hardly imagine having accomplished my thesis titled “Microteaching
Students’ Comprehension of Text Types” without the blessing of my Lord, Jesus Christ. His sacred heart faithfully accompanied me in the thesis accomplishment, both when I am in ups and downs.
I am indebted much to Christina Kristiyani, my sponsor, for giving me attention, suggestions, guidance, and motivation during the finishing process of
my thesis. My gratitude also goes to all PBI lecturers, who have guided me to be what I am now, and the secretariat staffs (Mbak Tari and Mbak Dani), who have supported me during the last six years.
I would like to thank my family, my father, M. Sukro Sumartiyana, my mother, P. Suginah, and my sisters, Stefany Titis Bayuprima and Y. Titisari Nugraheny, for their stories, support, love, kindness, and warmth. My deepest love and gratitude go to my girlfriend, Agt. Ika Isrianawati, for love, patience, care, warmth, kindness, sharing moments, and support.
ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TITLE PAGE ... i
APPROVAL PAGES ... ii
STATEMENT OF WORK’S ORIGINALITY ... iv
ABSTRACT ... v
ABSTRAK ... vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ... viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ... ix
LIST OF TABLES ... xv
LIST OF FIGURES ... xvi
LIST OF APPENDICES ... xvii
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study ... 1
B. Problem Formulation ... 5
C. Problem Limitation ... 5
D. Research Objectives ... 6
E. Research Benefits ... 6
1. Microteaching Students of English Language Education Study Program 6
2. Lecturers of English Language Education Study Program ... 6
x
4. Other Researchers ... 7
5. Policy Makers ... 7
F. Definition of Terms ... 8
1. Microteaching Students ... 8
2. Text Comprehension ... 8
3. Text Types ... 9
CHAPTER II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE A. Theoretical Description ... 10
1. Text Comprehension ... 10
2. Microteaching ... 15
3. Text Types ... 16
a. Recounts ... 16
1) Social Function ... 17
2) Generic Structure ... 17
3) Lexicogrammatical Features ... 17
b. Narrative ... 17
1) Social Function ... 17
2) Generic Structure ... 18
3) Lexicogrammatical Features ... 18
c. Procedure ... 18
1) Social Function ... 18
xi
3) Lexicogrammatical Features ... 19
d. Descriptive ... 19
1) Social Function ... 19
2) Generic Structure ... 19
3) Lexicogrammatical Features ... 19
e. News Item ... 20
1) Social Function ... 20
2) Generic Structure ... 20
3) Lexicogrammatical Features ... 20
f. Report ... 20
1) Social Function ... 21
2) Generic Structure ... 21
3) Lexicogrammatical Features ... 21
g. Analytical Exposition ... 21
1) Social Function ... 21
2) Generic Structure ... 22
3) Lexicogrammatical Features ... 22
h. Hortatory Exposition ... 22
1) Social Function ... 22
2) Generic Structure ... 22
3) Lexicogrammatical Features ... 23
i. Spoof ... 23
xii
2) Generic Structure ... 23
3) Lexicogrammatical Features ... 23
j. Explanation ... 24
1) Social Function ... 24
2) Generic Structure ... 24
3) Lexicogrammatical Features ... 24
k. Discussion ... 24
1) Social Function ... 25
2) Generic Structure ... 25
3) Lexicogrammatical Features ... 25
l. Review ... 25
1) Social Function ... 25
2) Generic Structure ... 26
3) Lexicogrammatical Features ... 26
4. Text Types Versus Genre ... 26
5. School-based Curriculum ... 27
B. Theoretical Framework ... 28
CHAPTER III. METHODOLOGY A. Research Method ... 30
B. Research Participants ... 31
1. Participants for the Test ... 31
xiii
C. Research Instruments ... 32
1. Tests ... 32
2. An Interview ... 33
D. Data Gathering Techniques ... 34
E. Data Analysis Techniques ... 34
F. Research Procedures ... 35
CHAPTER IV. RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS A. Microteaching Students’ Comprehension of Text Types ... 39
1. Test I ... 39
a. Recount ... 39
b. Narrative ... 41
c. Procedure ... 42
d. Descriptive ... 43
e. News Item ... 44
f. Analytical Exposition ... 46
2. Test II ... 50
a. Report ... 50
b. Hortatory Exposition ... 51
c. Spoof ... 52
d. Explanation ... 54
e. Discussion ... 55
xiv
B. Microteaching Students’ Difficulties on Comprehending Text Types ... 63
CHAPTER V. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS A. Conclusions ... 66
B. Suggestions ... 67
1. Microteaching Students ... 68
2. English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University ... 68
3. Further Researchers ... 68
REFERENCES ... 69
xv
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 1.1 The Comparison for Each Curriculum ... 2
Table 4.1. Recount ... 40
Table 4.2. Narrative ... 41
Table 4.3. Procedure ... 42
Table 4.4. Descriptive ... 43
Table 4.5. News Item ... 45
Table 4.6. Analytical Exposition ... 46
Table 4.7. Identification and Purpose of the First Test ... 47
Table 4.8. Generic Structure of the First Test ... 48
Table 4.9. Lexicogrammatical Features of the First Test ... 49
Table 4.10. Report ... 50
Table 4.11. Hortatory Exposition ... 51
Table 4.12. Spoof ... 53
Table 4.13. Explanation ... 54
Table 4.14. Discussion ... 55
Table 4.15. Review ... 56
Table 4.16. Identification and Purpose of the Second Test ... 57
Table 4.17. Generic Structure of the Second Test ... 58
Table 4.18. Lexicogrammatical Features of the Second Test ... 59
Table 4.19. Summary of the Result of the Test for Each Participants ... 61
xvi
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure 2.1. Model of the Reading Comprehension Process ... 11
xvii
LIST OF APPENDICES
Page
Appendix 1: Test I ... 78
Appendix 2: A Blank Answer Sheet of the Test I ... 80
Appendix 3: Examples of the Participants’ Answer Sheet of the Test I ... 82
Appendix 4: Test II ... 88
Appendix 5: A Blank Answer Sheet of the Test II ... 90
Appendix 6: Examples of the Participants’ Answer Sheet of the Test II ... 92
Appendix 7: The Interview Transcription of the Respondent M ... 98
Appendix 8: The Interview Transcription of the Respondent C ... 101
Appendix 9: The Interview Transcription of the Respondent E ... 103
1 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
In this chapter, the researcher presents six major issues namely
background of the study, the problem formulation, the problem limitation, the
research objectives, the benefits of the research, and the definition of the terms
used in the research.
A. Background of the Study
During the 65 years of its independence (1945 – 2010), Indonesian
government has applied nine curricula in its education system. Those are Learning
Plan 1947, Explained Learning Plan 1952, Curriculum 1964, Curriculum 1968,
Curriculum 1975, Curriculum 1984, Curriculum 1994 and Supplement of
Curriculum 1999, Curriculum 2004/Competence-based Curriculum, and
Curriculum 2006/School-based Curriculum (Dwitagama, 2008). Referring to the
curricula used, they provide the fact that the changing of the curriculum used in
Indonesia nowadays is so rapidly; nine curricula are used during 65 years or in
other words one curriculum is applied for 7.22 years in average. During the last
decade (2000 – 2010), there are not less than three curricula used in Indonesia. It
means that one curriculum is used for 3.33 years in average. The latest curriculum
known as School-based Curriculum has been applied in Indonesian education
since 2006. It was two years after the application of the previous curriculum used;
Since the research is conducted in 2010, the researcher only focused on the
last two curricula used in Indonesia those are Competence-based Curriculum and
School-based Curriculum which played significant effects for the research.
Therefore, the researcher only provided the comparison for the last two curricula
in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1 The Comparison for Each Curriculum
No. Curriculum Focus
1. Curriculum 2004/Competence-based Curriculum
Focuses of the students’ competence achievement individually as well as
collaboratively, learning outcomes oriented and diversity of the students, variation in the use of approaches and methods in the learning process, teachers are not the only source of the learning and study, assessment focuses on the learning process and learning outcomes in the effort of gaining competence mastery and achievement.
2. Curriculum 2006/School-based Curriculum
Focuses of the students’ competence achievement individually as well as
collaboratively, learning outcomes oriented and diversity of the students, variation in the use of approaches and methods in the learning process, teachers are not the only source of the learning and study, assessment focuses on the learning process and learning outcomes in the effort of gaining competence mastery and achievement.
Referring to Table 1.1 number 8 and 9, there are no differences in the focus of the curriculum between Competence-based Curriculum and School-based
Curriculum. The difference is in the application. Competence-based Curriculum
provides indicators by which students pass the test or not but School-based
Curriculum does not. It is the school responsibility to provide the indicators. It
means that every school in Indonesia may have different indicators for students
learning achievement.
School-based Curriculum provides the teachers more spaces for teaching
their students, considering that each school even each student has their differences
either the inside factors and the outside factors. That each student has their unique
way of learning is one of the inside factors which has to be well considered
instead of the curriculum itself. The outside factor includes where the location of
the school is. Teaching the students in a remote area obviously needs different
approaches and methods compared to teaching them in a big city. Using the latest
curriculum, the government is expecting that it will match the needs of every
province in Indonesia because the government only provided the basic
competence and the standard of competency, the rests -including the materials,
approaches and methods used, and also media- is the teachers’ responsibility to
decide as long as it matches the needs of the students and the curriculum (KTSP,
2006).
Considering the curriculum, learning English is a matter of learning the
four skills; listening, reading, speaking, and writing. In writing skill, there are 12
These test types included recount, narrative, procedure, descriptive, news item,
report, analytical exposition, hortatory exposition, spoof, explanation, discussion,
and review. Senior High School teachers must be aware of these kinds of text
types that the government of Indonesia suggests the students to learn these text
types well based on the graduate competence standard.
In order to graduate from Senior High School, students have to
comprehend the theory or the generic structure and the lexicogrammatical features
and the use or the social function of the text types. This is the teachers'
responsibility to teach them so that they comprehend the concept and the use of it.
Ironically, based on the researcher’s personal involvement with teachers in
one of private schools in Yogyakarta, there are some teachers that have no clear
understanding of the recent curriculum especially when dealing with text types. It
goes worse because in School-based Curriculum, text types are always discussed
in the end of every chapter of the study. It means that text types become an
essential part of the curriculum. It is in the consideration of the changes of the
curriculum used in the education in Indonesia that nowadays is changing too
often. There are few trainings which are not sufficient enough conducted by the
government of Indonesia. Specifically, there are some teachers that had no
sufficient understanding of text types whereas it has to be taught in class (Dya,
2008).
It is also stated by Syamsury, the Head of Yogyakarta Education
Department that, "Belum semua guru memahami KTSP. Kami perlu terus
Curriculum. We have to keep socializing it,”] after opening Technical Guidance
and Training of School-based Curriculum at SMAN 7 Yogyakarta (Dya, 2008).
Microteaching students who are expected to be future teachers have to
prepare themselves solving these problems. By testing them about their level of
comprehension of text types, it will provide them with more awareness of their
current skills and after the researcher provides the result of the research, students
with low and even average level of understanding had to study more in order to be
better teachers in the future they are expected to.
B. Problem Formulation
The research was aimed to answer these two major questions as follows.
1. What is the microteaching students' level of comprehension of text types?
2. What are the microteaching students’ difficulties in comprehending text
types?
C. Problem Limitation
The problem is limited only to the comprehension of the 12 kinds of text
types offered by the government of Indonesia which have to be taught in the
Senior High School and especially in what part of the text and in what kinds of
text the microteaching students have the low comprehension of. The subjects of
the research are also limited for only 21 microteaching students of Sanata Dharma
D. Research Objectives
There are two objectives of the research. The first objective of the research
is to know the microteaching students’ level of comprehension of text types
especially in what part of the text and in what kinds of text the microteaching
students have the low comprehension of. The second objective is to know why the
microteaching students have low level of comprehension of text types. This is to
identify their difficulties on comprehending text types.
E. Research Benefits
There are five groups of people will have the benefits of the research.
They are microteaching students of English Language Education Study Program,
lecturers of English Language Education Study Program, Indonesian government,
other researchers, and policy makers.
1. Microteaching Students of English Education Study Program
By testing the microteaching students, the researcher recognizes that they
need to develop their mastery of text types in order to be better teachers in the
future by having better mastery of text types.
2. Lecturers of English Language Education Study Program
The benefits of the research are aimed to the lecturers of English Language
Education Study Program so that they can be aware of how important having
3. Indonesian Government
The research is also beneficial for the Indonesian government especially
The Ministry of National Education of Indonesia by which provides them
feedback on how students of microteaching class of Sanata Dharma University
Yogyakarta, who are expected to be future teachers, comprehension of the text
types is; so that the government produces more trainings and seminars for the
teachers and future teachers as necessary.
4. Other Researchers
The research is expected to give insight on the level of comprehension of
text types of the microteaching students of Sanata Dharma University. It also
expected that the research will be beneficial for anyone in need for further
research studies e.g. the research participants are real English teachers especially
considering that there is not many research have been conducted on this topic.
5. Policy Makers
The research is also projected to give suggestions and guidelines for
evaluations of the education policy. It is expected that with the completion of the
research, the policy makers will be able to give a review of the existing policies in
education that will lead into a better quality of education in Indonesia and
F. Definition of Terms
This section presents the definition of terms which is intended to avoid
confusion and misconception, namely microteaching students, Text
comprehension, and text types.
1. Microteaching Students
Students of English Education of Sanata Dharma University Yogyakarta
are able to take this subject after they have passed the prerequisite subjects. The
goal of this class is as follows. The students understand the concepts and
procedure of English language teaching and are able to apply them in a real
classroom teaching situation and to evaluate their teaching performance
(Nurwidasa, Bram, Budiraharja, Herawati 2004: p. 110).
2. Text Comprehension
Text comprehension refers to “begins with decoding of words, processing
of those words in relation to one another to understand the many small ideas in the
text. And then, both unconsciously and consciously, it operates on the ideas in the
text to construct the overall meaning encoded in the text” (Pressley, 2000, p. 551).
In this research, text comprehension refers to the participants’ comprehension of
3. Text Types
These refer to the 12 kinds of text types proposed by The Ministry of
National Education of Indonesia which are to be learnt by Senior High School
students. Those text types are recount, narrative, procedure, descriptive, news
item, report, analytical exposition, hortatory exposition, spoof, explanation,
discussion, andreview. Each type of the texts has three major elements. They are
social function, generic structure, and lexicogrammatical features. For example,
the social function of recounts is to retell events for the purpose of informing or
entertaining. It reconstructs past events in time order in which it occurred. Some
of it assesses the significance, other recounts responses emotively, and others
assesses aspects of events critically. Recounts usually have their basic structure
those are orientation, events, and reorientation. Orientation provides the setting
and introduces participants. Events tell what happen, in what sequence. Recounts
focus on specific participants, use past tense and material processes. It uses
10 CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
In this chapter, the researcher presented two major issues namely the
theoretical description and theoretical framework used in the research. This
chapter also presented three major theories related to the research namely Text
Comprehension, Microteaching, and Types of Texts. This chapter also presented a
distinction between Text Types and genre.
A. Theoretical Description
There were three major theories related to the research namely Text
Comprehension, Microteaching, and Types of Texts. Here, the researcher also
presented a distinction between Text Types and genre.
1. Text Comprehension
Text comprehension refers to “beginning with decoding of words,
processing of those words in relation to one another to understand the many small
ideas in the text, and then, both unconsciously and consciously, operating on the
ideas in the text to construct the overall meaning encoded in the text” (Pressley,
2000, p. 551). It is generally agreed that the understanding of written text called
upon both bottom-up word recognition processes and top-down comprehension
different sources of information, including in some cases, the integration of
linguistic information with graphic information.
Figure 2.1. Model of the Reading Comprehension Process
Orthographic units Phonological units
Written text
Word representation
Sentence representation
Prior knowledge
During the past decades, research on text comprehension has moved
towards models in which memory-based and constructivist aspects of
comprehension are more integrated (Perfetti & Verhoeven, 2008). Taking an
integrated model of text comprehension as a starting point, important questions
are how text processing can be modelled, how it actually takes place, and how
children learn to develop text comprehension skills. In order to be able to address
such questions, a blueprint model of the reader is given in Figure 2.1 (Perfetti, 1999).
The reading of text starts with the identification of individual words i.e.
the processes which convert the visual input into a linguistic representation. The
lexical quality hypothesis (Perfetti & Hart, 2001) expresses the basic idea that
reading skill among readers is supported by their knowledge of words, including
the precision of the reader’s representation of orthography, phonology,
morphology and meaning. Word decoding or the accurate and fast retrieval of the
phonological code for written word forms is commonly assumed to play a central
role in reading and the development. More specifically, the automatization of
word decoding skills and attainment of fluent reading levels is essential for the
development of word decoding (Perfetti, 1992; Samuels, 1994; Stanovich, 2000).
Van Orden and Goldinger (1994) has proposed even greater mediation of the
process of word recognition, which they define as the outcome of the interactions
between phonological, visual, and meaning information in recurrent sub symbolic
networks. Phonological connections are further assumed to play a critical role in
enables the devotion of mental resources to the meaning of a text and thus allows
readers to clearly used reading as a tool for the acquisition of new information and
knowledge (Perfetti, 1998; Samuels & Flor, 1997; Spear-Swerling & Sternberg,
1994).
As a next step, text comprehension requires word-to-text integration.
Understanding sentences requires the identification of words. As a word is
identified, the reader connects it to a continuously updated representation of the
text. Studies of eye movements (Just & Carpenter, 1992; Reichle, Pollatsek,
Fisher, & Rayner, 1998) have revealed some important aspects of sentence
comprehension during reading. First, it is found that even skilled readers
possessed on most of the words they have read. This seemed to imply that word
identification is at the heart of reading comprehension. In addition, it is shown
that interpretation immediately follows recognition and that fixations tend to be
longer at the end of sentences. The latter finding indicates that integrative
comprehension processes must particularly take place at sentence endings.
Sentence comprehension can at best be understood as an operation which
uses both sentence structure and word meanings to formulate hypotheses about the
meaning of the sentence. Different theories about how words are attached to
syntactic structures (MacDonald, Perlmutter, & Seidenberg, 1994; Frazier &
Clifton, 1996) agree on the conclusion that each word is immediately attached to a
syntactic phrase. Word-by-word processing leads to word-to-text integration. This
referential integration is necessary to maintain comprehension of the situation
To arrive at text comprehension, the reader must combine the meaning of
each sentence with the message accumulated up to that point on the basis of prior
text. This memory-based position sees comprehension as the product of
evaluations of the information from text. Major models of text comprehension,
such as the construction integration model (Kintsch, 1988), the landscape model
(van den Broek, Risden, Fletcher, & Thurlow, 1996) and the resonance model
(Gerrig & McKoon, 1998), have shown that text comprehension cannot be done
with only the information present in the text, but that individuals also use their
prior knowledge to construct new knowledge that is relevant to their individual
experiences and situations. The propositional structure of the contents of a
passage is said to define two types of structures: a micro-propositional structure
referring to the coherence of propositions which are in close proximity in the text,
on the one hand, and a macro-propositional structure specifying a more global
level of meaning, on the other hand (Perfetti & Verhoeven, 2008).
In this line of thought, it is claimed that readers construct situation models
as they attempt to comprehend text. During this process, two levels of
representation are involved: a model of the propositions of the text (the text
model) and a model of what the text is about (the situation model) (Perfetti &
Verhoeven, 2008). The basic meanings are extracted from the sentences,
progressively built up by reading successive sentences and supplemented by
inferences in order to make the text coherent. Because texts cannot be fully
explicit, there are abundant opportunities for the reader to make inferences about
It is this level of comprehension that reflected ‘situation’ information and required
additions to linguistic-based accounts. A situation model might help the student to
identify and define problems, to specify reasons for problem solution, to generate
strategies for solving identified problems, and to observe results of attempted
solutions (Zwaan, Kaup, Stanfield, & Madden, 2001). The basic premise is that
text comprehension involves the mental simulation of the referential situation, and
that these mental simulations are constrained by the linguistic and pictorial
information in the text, the processing capacity of the human brain and the nature
of human interaction with the world (Zwaan & Radvansky, 1998). Situation
model components include information from the text, inferences based on the text,
relevant prior knowledge and inferences that relate the text and prior knowledge
(Singer, Graesser, & Trabasso, 1994; Kintsch, 1998).
Difficulties in text comprehension might occur at mainly three different
levels of processing: at the level of the word, at the level of the sentence, and at
the level of the text (Yuill & Oakhill, 1991). From the researcher’s previous
knowledge, there are some difficulties in text comprehension. They are lack of
words’ mastery, lack of prior knowledge, and the topic of the text itself. The
examples of each type of text are attached on the appendix.
2. Microteaching
Microteaching is a training concept that can be applied at various
pre-service and in-pre-service stages in the professional development of teachers (Allen &
Microteaching students only teach for about five students instead of 30 – 40 of the
normal students in real classroom. The length of the lesson is also not as long as
in real classroom. It also happens with the scope of the lesson or the unit taught as
the consequences of the time reduction.
In their book titled Microteaching, Allen and Ryan also state five
fundamental proportions of microteaching.
First, microteaching is real teaching. Although the teaching situation is a constructed one in the sense that teacher and students work together in a practice situation, nevertheless, bona fide teaching does take place.
Second, microteaching lessens the complexities of normal classroom teaching. Class size, scope of content, and time are all reduced.
Third, microteaching focuses on training for the accomplishment of specific tasks. These tasks may be the practice of instructional skills, the practice of techniques of teaching, the mastery of certain curricular materials, or the demonstration of teaching methods.
Fourth, microteaching allows for the increased control of practice. In the practice setting of microteaching, the rituals of time, students, methods of feedback and supervision, and many other factors can be manipulated. As a result, a high degree of control can be built into the training program.
Fifth, microteaching greatly expands the normal knowledge-of-results or feedback dimension in teaching.
3. Text Types
According to PERMEN No. 22 tahun 2006 tentang standar isi untuk
satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah, there are 12 kinds of text types. Those
are recounts, narrative, procedure, descriptive, news item, report, analytical
exposition, hortatory exposition, spoof, explanation, discussion, and review.
a. Recounts
There are three major elements of recounts. Those are social function,
1). Social Function
The social function of recounts was to retell events for the purpose of
informing or entertaining. It reconstructed past events in time order in which it
occurred. Some of it assessed the significance, other recounts responded
emotively, and others assessed aspects of events critically.
2). Generic Structure
Recounts usually had their basic structure that was orientation, events, and
reorientation. Orientation provided the setting and introduced participants. Events
told what happen, in what sequence.
3). Lexicogrammatical Features
Recounts focused on specific participants, used past tense and material
processes. It used circumstances of time and place.
b. Narrative
There are three major elements of narrative. Those are social function,
generic structure, and lexicogrammatical features.
1). Social Function
The social function of narratives was to amuse, entertain, and deal with
events which led to a crisis or turning point of some kind which in turn finds a
resolution.
2). Generic Structure
The generic structure of narratives was orientation, evaluation,
complication, resolution, and sometimes reorientation.
3). Lexicogrammatical Features
Narratives focused on specific and usually individualized participants. It
used material processes, behavior and verbal processes, and also relational and
mental processes. It usually used temporal conjunctions and temporal
circumstances and also used past tense as its tense.
c. Procedure
There are three major elements of procedure. Those are social function,
generic structure, and lexicogrammatical features.
1). Social Function
The social function of procedures was to describe how something was
accomplished through a sequence of actions of steps.
2). Generic Structure
3). Lexicogrammatical Features
Procedures usually used simple present tense, temporal conjunctions, and
material processes on writing a procedure. It focused on generalized human
agents.
d. Descriptive
There are three major elements of descriptive. Those are social function,
generic structure, and lexicogrammatical features.
1). Social Function
The social function of a descriptive was to describe a particular person,
place, or thing.
2). Generic Structure
Descriptive had identification and description as its generic structure.
Identification identified phenomenon to be described. Description described parts,
qualities, and characteristics.
3). Lexicogrammatical Features
In writing a descriptive text, we usually use simple present tense, attribute
and identifying processes, and also epithets and classifiers in nominal groups. It
e. News Item
There are three major elements of news item. Those are social function,
generic structure, and lexicogrammatical features.
1). Social Function
The social function of news items was to inform readers, listeners, or
viewers about events of the day which were considered newsworthy or important.
2). Generic Structure
The generic structure of news item was newsworthy events which
recounted the event in summary form, background events which elaborated what
happened, and sources which were commented by participants in, witnesses to,
and authorities’ expert on the event.
3). Lexicogrammatical Features
When we wrote a news item, we usually used short, telegraphic
information about story captured in headline and also we used material processes
to retell the event and projecting verbal processes in source stage. It focused on
circumstances.
f. Report
There are three major elements of report. Those are social function,
1). Social Function
The social function was to describe the way things are, with reference to a
range of natural and social phenomena in our environment.
2). Generic Structure
The generic structure of a report was general classification which told
what the phenomenon discussed and description which told what the phenomenon
discussed was liked in terms of parts, qualities, and habits or behaviours.
3). Lexicogrammatical Features
It focused on generic participants, used simple present tense and relational
processes to state what was and that which it was. Here, there was no temporal
sequence.
g. Analytical Exposition
There are three major elements of analytical exposition. Those are social
function, generic structure, and lexicogrammatical features.
1). Social Function
The social function was to persuade the reader or listener that something
2). Generic Structure
The generic structure of an analytical exposition was thesis, arguments,
and reiteration.
3). Lexicogrammatical Features
Features usually used were the use of simple present tense, relational
processes, and internal conjunction. It focused on generic human and nonhuman
participants.
h. Hortatory Exposition
There are three major elements of hortatory exposition. Those are social
function, generic structure, and lexicogrammatical features.
1). Social Function
A hortatory exposition which considered as a complex text had its social
function that was to persuade the reader or listener that something should or
should not be the case.
2). Generic Structure
The generic structure was thesis which was announcement of issue of
concern, argument which was reasons for concern and leading to
recommendation, and recommendation which was statement of what ought or
3). Lexicogrammatical Features
A hortatory exposition focused on generic human and nonhuman
participants except for speaker or writer referring to self. It used mental processes
to state what writer thought or felt about issue, and material processes to state
what happened. It also focused on relational processes which was to state what
was or should be. It used simple present tense.
i. Spoof
There are three major elements of spoof. Those are social function, generic
structure, and lexicogrammatical features.
1). Social Function
The social function was to retell an event with a humorous twist.
2). Generic Structure
Its generic structure was orientation which set the scene, event which told
what happened, and twists which provided the ‘punch line’.
3). Lexicogrammatical Features
It focused on individual participants. It used past tense and material
j. Explanation
There are three major elements of explanation. Those are social function,
generic structure, and lexicogrammatical features.
1). Social Function
The social function was to explain the processes involved in the formation
or workings of natural or socio-cultural phenomena.
2). Generic Structure
The generic structure of an explanation was a general statement to position
the reader and a sequenced explanation of why or how something occurred.
3). Lexicogrammatical Features
Features commonly used were material and relational processes and also
used mainly of temporal and causal circumstances and conjunctions. It used
simple present tense and focused on generic, nonhuman participants.
k. Discussion
There are three major elements of discussion. Those are social function,
1). Social Function
A discussion was a type of text whose social function was to present at
least two points of view about an issue.
2). Generic Structure
Its generic structure was issue, arguments for and against or statements of
differing points of view, and conclusion or recommendations.
3). Lexicogrammatical Features
It focused on generic human and generic nonhuman participants. It used
material processes, relational processes, and mental processes. It also used
comparative. In addition, discussions were like expositions in many.
l. Review
There are three major elements of review. Those are social function,
generic structure, and lexicogrammatical features.
1). Social Function
The social function was to critique an art work or event for a public
2). Generic Structure
The generic structure of a review was orientation which told the audience
the context, interpretative recount which told the synopsis, evaluation which
provided an evaluation or judgement, and evaluative summation which provided a
kind of punch line which summed up the reviewer’s opinion of the art event as a
whole but it was optional.
3). Lexicogrammatical Features
Reviews focused on particular participants. It used direct expression of
opinions through use of attitudinal texts (value-laden vocabulary) including
attitudinal epithets in nominal groups, qualitative attributes, and affective mental
processes. It also used elaborating and extending clause and group complexes to
package the information.
4. Text Types Versus Genre
One way of making a distinction between genre and text type was to say
that the former was based on external, non linguistic, “traditional” criteria while
the latter was based on the internal, linguistic characteristics of texts themselves
(Biber, 1988, pp.70 & 170).
A genre, in this view, was defined as a category assigned on the basis of
external criteria such as intended audience, purpose, and activity type, that was, it
properties other than lexical or grammatical (co-)occurrence features, which were,
instead, the internal (linguistic) criteria forming the basis of text types categories.
In deciding the term text types used in the research instead of genre, the
researcher also referred to the terms used by The National Department of
Education Ministry of Indonesia reflected in the latest curriculum used in
Indonesia that was School based Curriculum. In the curriculum, the term used was
text types instead of genre.
5. School-based Curriculum
PERMEN No.23/ about Senior High School Graduates’ Competence
Standard states as follows.
1. Mendengarkan
Memahami makna dalam wacana lisan interpersonal dan transaksional, secara formal maupun informal, dalam bentuk recount, narrative, procedure, descriptive, news item, report, analytical exposition, hortatory exposition, spoof, explanation, discussion, dan review, dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari
[1. Listening
Understanding meaning in interpersonal and transactional spoken text formally and informally in terms of recount, narrative, procedure, descriptive, news item, report, analytical exposition, hortatory exposition, spoof, explanation, discussion, and review, in the daily life context]
2. Berbicara
Mengungkapkan makna secara lisan dalam wacana interpersonal dan transaksional, secara formal maupun informal, dalam bentuk recount, narrative, procedure, descriptive, news item, report, analytical exposition, hortatory exposition, spoof, explanation, discussion, dan review, dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari
[2. Speaking
3. Membaca
Memahami makna dalam wacana tertulis interpersonal dan transaksional, secara formal maupun informal, dalam bentuk recount, narrative, procedure, descriptive, news item, report, analytical exposition, hortatory exposition, spoof, explanation, discussion, dan review, dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari
[3. Reading
Understanding meaning in interpersonal and transactional written text formally and informally in terms of recount, narrative, procedure, descriptive, news item, report, analytical exposition, hortatory exposition, spoof, explanation, discussion, and review, in the daily life context]
4. Menulis
Mengungkapkan makna secara tertulis dalam wacana interpersonal dan transaksional, secara formal maupun informal, dalam bentuk recount, narrative, procedure, descriptive, news item, report, analytical exposition, hortatory exposition, spoof, explanation, discussion, dan review, dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari
[4. Writing
Expressing written meaning in interpersonal and transactional text formally and informally in terms of recount, narrative, procedure, descriptive, news item, report, analytical exposition, hortatory exposition, spoof, explanation, discussion, and review, in the daily life context]
B. Theoretical Framework
The research discussed three theories those were text comprehension, text
types and microteaching. Text comprehension referred to “beginning with
decoding of words, processing of those words in relation to one another to
understand the many small ideas in the text, and then, both unconsciously and
consciously, operating on the ideas in the text to construct the overall meaning
encoded in the text” (Pressley, 2000, p. 551).
According to The Ministry of National Education of Indonesia, there were
High School teachers had the most important and crucial role for making the
students mastered those text types. The researcher discussed each type of text
including the social function, generic structure, and lexicogrammatical features
used in each of the text besides the researcher also wrote one example for each
text so that the reader of the research achieved clear understanding of each of the
text types.
Microteaching is a training concept that can be applied at various
pre-service and in-pre-service stages in the professional development of teachers (Allen &
Ryan: 1969). In microteaching the complexities of the real class are reduced.
Microteaching has some fundamental elements those are decisions, structure,
pattern of training, the supervisor, microteaching students, and videotape
30 CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY
In this chapter, the researcher presented the research method, the research
participants, the research instruments, the data gathering techniques, the data
analysis techniques, and the research procedure.
A. Research Method
The research used a mixed method, a combination of a quantitative
research method and a qualitative research method. According to Cohen (1980),
quantitative research is defined as a social research that employs empirical
methods and empirical statements. Cohen states that an empirical statement is
defined as a descriptive statement about what “is” the case in the “real world”
rather than what “ought” to be the case. Typically, empirical statements are
expressed in numerical terms. Another factor in quantitative research is that
empirical evaluations are applied. Empirical evaluations are defined as a form that
seeks to determine the degree to which a specific program or policy empirically
fulfills or does not fulfill a particular standard or norm.
Moreover, Creswell (1994) defines quantitative research as a type of
research that is explaining phenomena by collecting numerical data that are
analyzed using mathematically based methods (in particular statistics). The
research was considered as a quantitative research because the purpose of the
what the microteaching students’ comprehension of text types were by testing 21
microteaching students of Sanata Dharma University. It was also in the condition
that the researcher provided a generalization as the result of the data gathered. The
research was also considered a survey for most quantitative researches are.
On the other hand, the research was considered as a qualitative research
because the researcher wanted to know the reasons of why some microteaching
students had low comprehension of text types by interviewing three informants
taken from the previous participants. For deciding the informants, the researcher
used extreme cases by interviewing one informant who gained the highest score of
the test and one informant who gained the lowest score of the test; for the reason
of providing more comprehensive findings, the researcher was also interviewing
one informant gaining the median score of the test.
B. Research Participants
The researcher used two kinds of participants for accomplishing the
research. The first participants were the participants for the test and the second
participants were the participants for the interview or the respondents.
1. Participants for the Test
The participants of the research were microteaching students of Sanata
Dharma University. There were two groups of participants. The first group was
the participants of the Test I which was participated by 21 participants. The
participants. Finally there were only 17 qualified participants who contributed in
both test because three of the second group of participants missed the second test
and one of the first group of participants missed the second test.
In order to gain a deep comprehension and due to time constraint, the
researcher chose one class only as research population randomly. The class taken
as the participants was the microteaching class D of the academic year 2009/2010.
2. Participants for the Interview
The second participants were taken from the previous 17 participants. The
researcher then, used extreme cases for choosing the second participants those
were one participant with the highest degree of comprehension of text types, one
participant with the lowest degree of comprehension of text types, and to get
more comprehensive pictures the researcher then also interviewed one participant
with the average degree of comprehension of text types.
3. Research Instruments
For accomplishing the research, the researcher used two instruments. The
first instrument was tests and the second instrument was the interview.
1. Tests
Hughes (1989: 9) stated that there were four types of tests. Those were
proficiency tests, achievement tests, diagnostic tests, and placement tests. The test
measure teachers’ ability in a language especially in text types regardless of any
training they might have had in that language.
The test was divided into two parts, the first test and the second test. The
first one tested the microteaching students’ mastery for the first six text types.
Those were recount, narrative, procedure, descriptive, news item, and analytical
exposition. The first test was conducted on February 5th 2010 at Microteaching Laboratory A. The second one tested the microteaching students’ mastery for the
rest six of the text types. Those were report, hortatory exposition, spoof,
explanation, discussion, and review. The second test was conducted on March 1st 2010 at Microteaching Laboratory A. The participants were to determine what
kind of texts those were in the consideration of the social purpose, generic
structure, and lexicogrammatical features for each text. The data then were used to
answer the first question of the problem formulation of the research.
2. An Interview
Downs, Smeyak, and Martin (1980) stated that there was three kind of
interviews used in research. Those were personal interview, telephone interview,
and focus group interview. This research was using personal interview of
face-to-face interview because the writer was interviewing all subjects in personal, not in
group and also without a telephone but in face-to-face situation. The interview
was conducted on April 30th, 2010 at Microteaching Laboratory A.
The researcher asked the participants the importance of comprehending
participants’ difficulties on comprehending text types which was reflected on the
result of the test that most of them had the level of Low (L) and only one
participant gained the level of Medium (M). It was included their sources of
studying those text types and their motivation. The motivation here also related to
what job they planned for their future because some of them prefer to not become
teachers. The data then were used to answer the second question of the problem
formulation of the research.
4. Data Gathering Techniques
The researcher used two techniques for accomplishing the research. The
first technique was testing the participants. The test was conducted twice. The first
one tested the microteaching students’ mastery for the first six text types. Those
were recount, narrative, procedure, descriptive, news item, and analytical
exposition. The second one tested the microteaching students’ mastery for the rest
six of the text types. Those were report, hortatory exposition, spoof, explanation,
discussion, and review.
The second technique was interviewing the second three participants. The
researcher then asked the participants’ difficulties on comprehending text types.
5. Data Analysis Techniques
First, the researcher analyzed the result of the test including what the
participants’ degree of comprehension of text types was. The researcher then
of the test. There were at least 18 tables showing each percentage of the test
provided by the researcher to map the result of the test. For analyzing the data, the
researcher looked over the School-based Curriculum offered by the government of
Indonesia for finding the social purpose of each text, the generic structure of each,
and also the lexicogrammatical language used in each text.
The researcher then figured out the comprehension of text types of each
participant and interviewed three chosen participants with the highest, average,
and lowest comprehension of text types. By the interview conducted, the
researcher gained the information from the informants about their difficulties in
comprehending text types to answer the second problem formulation.
6. Research Procedure
There were some steps for accomplishing the research as follows. First, it
was the problem and topic selection. The main reason for selecting the problem
and the topic selection of the research were the researcher concerns of the rapid
changing and development of the curriculum used in Indonesian education and its
effects on the teachers’ capability of teaching especially related to the text types
which played a big part on the newest curriculum.
Second, the researcher searched for the appropriate information needed by
the research e.g. related theories, related information of the ideal instruments, and
also the ideal participants. The researcher utilized two ways of information
gain books supporting the research. Second, the researcher browsed the Internet to
gain newest and related information supporting the research.
Third, the researcher selected the instruments used in the research. There
were two instruments of the research those were tests and interviews. The
researcher once composed a test specification for producing the test. Finishing the
test specification, the researcher then presented the draft of the test to be corrected
by the thesis sponsor. After receiving the feedback of the draft of the test, the
researcher then revised the test and did so until the thesis sponsor stated that the
test had been appropriate to collect the data of the research.
The first one tested the microteaching students’ mastery for the first six
text types. Those were recount, narrative, procedure, descriptive, news item, and
analytical exposition. The first test was conducted on February 5th 2010 at Microteaching Laboratory A.
The second one tested the microteaching students’ mastery for the rest six
of the text types. Those were report, hortatory exposition, spoof, explanation,
discussion, and review. The second test was conducted on March 1st 2010 at Microteaching Laboratory A. The participants were to determine what kind of
texts those were in the consideration of the social purpose, generic structure, and
Figure 3.1. An Overview of the Research Procedure
Background Identification
Searching for Information
Library The Internet
Instruments Selection
Test
Test Specification
Draft
Feedback
Final
Interview
Interview Guidelines
Draft
Feedback
Final
Participants Selection
Data Collection
Test I
Test II
Interview
Data Analysis
Mapping the Test
Mapping the Interview
The second instrument of the research was interview guidelines. The
researcher firstly drafted the interview guidelines to be corrected by the thesis
sponsor. After the interview guidelines had been appropriate to gain the second
data of the research, the researcher then conducted the interviews. The interview
was conducted on April 30th, 2010 at Microteaching Laboratory A.
The researcher asked the participants’ difficulties on comprehending text
types which was reflected on the result of the test that most of them had the level
of Low (L) and only one participant gained the level of Medium (M).
A general overview of the research procedure could be observed on the
39 CHAPTER IV
RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter presented the result of the research and the answers of the
questions stated in the problem formulation (see p.5). Answering the problem
formulation, the researcher then elaborated two major parts in this chapter namely
microteaching students' level of comprehension of text types and microteaching
students’ difficulties on comprehending text types.
A. Microteaching Students’ Comprehension of Text Types
In gathering the data of the microteaching students’ level of
comprehension of text types, the researcher conducted tests. There were two tests
conducted as follows.
1. Test I
The test was testing microteaching students’ level of comprehension of the
first six text types those were recount, narrative, procedure, descriptive, news
item, and analytical exposition. The test is attached in the appendices. The details
of the findings and discussion for each text types were discussed as follows.
a. Recount
There were six texts in the test I. The recount text was the text titled A
Table 4.1. Recount
No. Partici pants
Identification and purpose
Generic structure Features Total (%)
name purpose orientati on
events Reorie ntation
subject tense
1. A √ √ √ - - √ √ .
2. B √ - √ - - √ √ .
3. C √ - √ √ √ √ √ .
4. D √ √ √ √ √ √ √
5. E √ - √ - - √ √ .
6. F √ √ - - - √ √ .
7. G √ √ √ - - √ √ .
8. H √ - √ - √ √ √ .
9. I √ - √ √ √ √ √ .
10. J √ √ √ √ √ √ √
11. K √ √ - - - √ √ .
12. L √ √ √ √ - √ √ .
13. M √ √ √ √ √ √ √
14. N √ √ √ √ √ √ √
15. O √ √ √ √ √ √ √
16. P √ √ √ √ - √ √ .
17. Q √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Total . % . % %
Average 81.51%81.51%81.51%81.51%
Table 4.1. showed the result of microteaching students’ level of comprehension of recounts. The highest score was obtained by participant D, J,
M, N, O, and Q who scored 100. The lowest score was obtained by participant B,
E, F, and K who scored 57.14. The average score was 81.51 or in other words,
there were 81.51% of all 17 participants, for about 14 participants, comprehend
recount texts. For further details, there were 85.29% of all 17 participants, for
about 15 participants, comprehend the social function of recounts which was to
retell events for the purpose of informing or entertaining. There were 66.67% of