DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 (The Anti-Dumping Agreement)
Understanding on rules and procedures governing the settlement of disputes (DSU Perjanjian WTO)
Uruguay Round Agreement, Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994
Buku
Arora, N.D. Political Science for Civil Services Main Examination. New Delhi:
Tata McGraw-Hill Education Private Limited, 2010.
Bain, Gofar. Uruguay Round Dan Sistem Perdagangan Masa Depan. Jakarta:
Djambatan, 2001.
Becerra, Juan Angel. Interpretation and application of tax treaties in North America.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IBFD, 2007.
Brian J. Arnold, The Interpretation of Tax Treaties: Myth and Reality. Bulletin for International Taxation, 2010.
Chatterjee, Aneek. International Relations Today: Concepts and Applications.
Noida: Pearson Education Limited, 2010.
Darrussalam, John Hutagaol, Danny Septriadi, Konsep dan Aplikasi Perpajakan Internasional. Jakarta: Danny Darrussalam Tax Center, 2010.
Eckstein, H. Handbook of Political Science: Political Science-Scope and Theory.
F. G. Read. Vol. 7. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley Press, 1975.
Erawati, A.F. dan J.S Badudu dalam Muhammad Sood. Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011.
Ernst-Ulrieh Peterrsmann. The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System:
International Law, International Organization and Dispute Settlement.
London: Kluwer Law International. 1997.
Hartono, C.F.G. Sunaryati. Penelitian Hukum Di Indonesia Penelitian Hukum Di Indonesia Pada Akhir Abad Ke-20. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni, 1994.
Hata. Hukum Ekonomi Internasional. Setara Press, 2016.
Herliana. Dispute Settlement Under the World Trade Organization: Inequality Protection Between Developed and Developing Countries. Depok: Voices from Asia: For a Just and Equitable World. 2007.
Ibrahim, J. Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif (3rd ed.). (Malang:
Bayumedia Publishing. 2007).
Ishaq, Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, Serta Disertasi, (Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta, 2017)
Jackson, Robert, dan Sorensen, Gorge. Pengantar Studi Hubungan Internasional, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. 2005
Kartadjoemena, HS. GATT dan WTO: Sistem, Forum dan Lembaga Internasional di Sidang Perdagangan. Jakarta: UI Press. 1996.
Luc de Broe, International Tax Planning and Prevention of Abuse. Amsterdam:
IBFD, 2008.
Marceau, G. Antidumping and Antitrust Issues in Free Trade Areas. Oxford:
Clarenden Press. 1994.
Marzuki, P. M. Penelitian Hukum. Rawamangun, Jakarta Timur: Kencana Prenada, 2010.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.
Petersman, Ernst Ulrich. The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement. London: Kluwer Law International, 1997.
Raju, K. World Trade Organization Agreement on Anti-Dumping: A GATT/WTO and Indian Legal Jurisprudence. Netherland: Wolters Kluwer. 2008
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.
Sprinz, Detlef F. Models, Numbers, and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations. Edited by Ann Arbor. Cambridge, Massachusetts: University of Michigan Press, 2004.
Sri Mamudji, et al., Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum, Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2005.
Steger, and Hainsworth. “’New Directions in International Trade Law: WTO Dispute Settlement.” In Dispute Settlement Resolution in the World Trade Organization. London: Cameron May, 1998.
Sumadji. P, Yudha Pratama dan Rosita, Kamus Ekonomi Edisi Lengkap Inggris-
Indonesia, Cet. I. Jakarta: Wacana Intelektual. 2006.
Suherman, A. M. Aspek Hukum dalam Ekonomi Global. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
2005.
World Trade Organization Secretariat Publication, A Handbook on the WTO Dispute Settlement System, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Yulianto Syahyu, Hukum Anti Dumping di Indonesia, Jakarta: Ghlmia Indonesia, 2004.
Jurnal
Annisa, R. Aulia. Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Dumping Ekspor Kertas Fotocopy Indonesia Ke Jepang Tahun 2012. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional JOM FISIP 4, no. 2 (2017).
Christhophorus Barutu, 2007, Sejarah Sistem Perdagangan Internasional (Dari Upaya Pembentukan Internasional Trade Organization, Eksistensi General Agreement On Tariffs and Trade Sampai Berdirinya World Trade Organization), Jurnal Hukum Gloris Juris, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katholik Atmajaya, Volume 7, Nomor 1, (1 Januari 2007).
Dewa gede Pradnya Yustiawan, Perlindungan Industri Dalam Negeri Dari Praktik Dumping, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: Fakultas Hukum & Ilmu Sosial UNDIKNAS, Vol.1 No.1 (2018)
Dyan F. D. Sitanggang. Posisi, Tantangan, dan Prospek Bagi Indonesia Dalam Sistem Penyelesaian Sengketa WTO. Veritas et Justitia . Vol. 3 No. 1. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v3i1.252. 2017.
Hannad Tasya Zahrani, Efektivitas Performa Komite Anti Dumping Indonesia Dalam Memberi Perlindanguan Hukum Pada Indsutri Lokal, Jurnal Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol. 2 No.1 Desember 2020.
Hidayati, Maslihati Nur. “Analisis Tentang Sistem Penyelesaian Sengketa WTO:
Suatu Tinjauan Yuridis Formal.” Lex Jurnalica 11, no. 2 (2014).
Hudec, Robert E. “The New WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure: An Overview of The First Three Years.” Minnesota Journal of Global Rade, 1999, 68.
I Putu Surya Samudra dan I Wayan Novy Purwanto, S.H.,M.kn, Problematika Hukum Tentang Praktek Dumping Ditinjau dari Hukum Persaingan Usaha.
Jurnal Kertha Negara Vol. 8 No 3 Tahun 2020, hlm. 60-75. 2020.
Raden Fadila Jayandarie, Dr. Prita Amalia Helitha dan Novianty Muchtar.
Particular Market Situation - A Peculiar Accusation: A Case Study of The DS529 Case Between Indonesia and Australia Before the WTO. International
Journal of Business, Economics, and Law, Vol. 24, Issue 1 (April). ISSN 2289-1552. 2021.
Meliyani Sidiqah, Retaliasi Indonesia Atas Tuduhan Dumping Terhadap Korea Selatan, Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Vol. 3 No.1 Maret 2019.
Mo, John Shijian. Settlement of Trade Disputes Between Mainland China and The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan within the WTO. Chinese Journal of International Law, 2003.
Nita Anggraeni, Dumping Dalam Perspektif Hukum Dagang Internasional dan Hukum Islam, Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, Vol.XIV, No.2 (Desember 2015).
Priyono, J. Beberapa Aspek Apliksi Anti-Dumping Agreement pada Negara Sedang Berkembang. MMH, vol. 39, No. 1. 2010
Saloni Khanderia. The Compatibility of South African Anti-Dumping Laws with WTO Disciplines. African Journal of International and Comparative Law.
Volume 25, Issue 3. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 2017.
Sumarni, Intervensi Pemerintah Antara Penolakan dan Kebutuhan Di Bidang Ekonomi, Journal of Islamic and Economic Education, Vol.1 No.2, 2013, hal.
185-186.
Triyana Y, Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa WTO Dalam Sengketa yang Melibatkan Negara Sedang Berkembang, Justitia Et Pax, Volume 29, Nomor 1, Juni Tahun 2009.
Yessi Lesmana, Yu, and Joseph Wira Koesnaidi. “Particular Market Situation: A Newly Arising Problem or a New Stage in the Anti-Dumping Investigation?”
Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy 14, no. 2 (2019).
Yun, Mikyung. “The Use of ‘Particular Market Situation’ Provision and Its Implications for Regulation of Antidumping.” SSRN Electronic Journal 21, no. 3 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3051511.
Zhou, Weihuan, and Andrew Percival. “Debunking the Myth of ‘Particular Market Situation’ In WTO Antidumping Law.” Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 19, No. 4 (December 1, 2016): https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgw071.
Disertasi
Agus Brotosusilo. Globalisasi Ekonomi dan Perdagangan Internasional: Studi Tentang Kesiapan Hukum Indonesia Melindungi Produksi Dalam Negeri Melalui Undang-Undang Anti Dumping Dan Safeguard, Ringkasan Disertasi Pada Program Doktor Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia. 2006.
Surat Kabar
Iwan. Indonesia Menang Sengketa Kertas di WTO. Harian Ekonomi Neraca. 2019 Website
Andri, Yustinus. “Gugat Australia Soal BMAD Kertas, RI Perjuangkan Reformasi
WTO.” Ekonomi Bisnis, 2018.
https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20181219/12/871232/gugat-australia-soal- bmad-kertas-ri-perjuangkan-reformasi-wto.
Friana, Hendra. “Indonesia Gugat Australia Di WTO Atas Bea Masuk Kertas A4.”
Tirto, 2018. https://tirto.id/indonesia-gugat-australia-di-wto-atas-bea-masuk- kertas-a4-dcg6.
Lakshimkumaran & Sridharan Attorneys. “Use of ‘Particular Market Situation’
Provision in Anti-Dumping Investigations.” Lakshimkumaran & Sridharan Attorneys, 2020. https://www.lakshmisri.com/insights/articles/use-of- particular-market-situation-provision-in-anti-dumping-investigations/.
Ministry of economy, trade and industry. “METI and MOF Did not Find Dumping of Imports of Cut Sheet Paper Originating in the Republic of Indonesia”. Di akses melalui http://www.meti.go.jp/engli sh/press/2013/0626_01.html. 2012 Pablo, Samuel. “Australia Terapkan Anti Dumping, Ekspor Kertas RI Anjlok
40%.” CNBC Indonesia, 2018.
https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20181220150718-4-47300/australia- terapkan-anti-dumping-ekspor-kertas-ri-anjlok-40.
———. “RI Gugat Australia Ke WTO Soal Ekspor Kertas Fotokopi A4.” CNBC Indonesia, 2018. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20181218132100-4- 46900/ri-gugat-australia-ke-wto-soal-ekspor-kertas-fotokopi-a4.
Reuters. “Indonesia Takes Australia to WTO over Duties on A4 Paper.” Reuters, 2017. https://www.reuters.com/article/australia-indonesia-paper/indonesia- takes-australia-to-wto-over-duties-on-a4-paper-idUSL8N1LM460.
Saputra, Endang. “Dituduh Dumping Indonesia Layangkan Gugatan Ke Australia.”
JPP, 2017. https://jpp.go.id/ekonomi/perdagangan/306700-dituduh-dumping- indonesia-layangkan-gugatan-ke-australia.
World Trade Organization. “Dispute Settlement Training Module: Chapter 3 - WTO Bodies Involved in the Dispute Settlement Process.” WTO, 2020.
https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/disp_settlement_cbt_e/c3s1p1 _e.htm.
———. “Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization.”
WTO, 2020.
https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/analytic_index_e/wto_agree_01 _e.htm.
———. “Press Release - Indonesia Files WTO Complaint over Australian Duties
on Paper Imports.” WTO, 2017.
https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news17_e/ds529rfc_05sep17_e.htm.
———. WT/DS529/1. WTO. 2017.
https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S009-
Html.aspx?Id=243818&BoxNumber=3&DocumentPartNumber=1&Languag e=E&HasEnglishRecord=True&HasFrenchRecord=True&HasSpanishRecor d=True&Window=L&PreviewContext=DP&FullTextHash=371857150#
———. Australia – Anti-Dumping Measures on A4 Copy Paper. WTO. 2017.
https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S009-
DP.aspx?language=E&CatalogueIdList=243818,239263,239002,238774,238 770,238561&CurrentCatalogueIdIndex=0&FullTextHash=&HasEnglishRec ord=True&HasFrenchRecord=True&HasSpanishRecord=True
———. Indonesia — Certain Measures Affecting the Automobile Industry. WTO.
1999. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds54_e.htm Zhou, Weihuan. “Indonesia Challenges Australia’s Anti-Dumping Measures at the
WTO.” UNSW, 2017. https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/business- law/indonesia-challenges-australia’s-anti-dumping-measures-wto.
Dokumen Lainnnya
Federal Register. Final Results of Antidumping Administrative Review.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce. C3. 1996.
Gustav Brink. Anti-Dumping in South Africa. Tralac Working Paper No.
D12WP07/July. Stellenbosch: Tralac. 2012.
Market Brief. Uncoated paper for writing, printing HS 4802 (ITPC-Osaka, Januari 2016). 2016.
WTO Dispute Settlement Body. Anti-dumping Duties on Imports of Certain Paper from Indonesia - Panel Report pursuant to Article 21.5 of the DSU. World Trade Organization. 2007.
World Trade Organization (WTO). Australia – Anti Dumping Measures on A4 Copy Paper. Geneva: World Trade Organization. 2019.
———. Korea - Anti-dumping Duties on Imports of Certain Paper from Indonesia - Panel Report pursuant to Article 21.5 of the DSU - Action by the Dispute Settlement Body. WT/DS312/12. 2007.
———. South Africa - Anti-Dumping Measures on Uncoated Woodfree Paper - Communication from Indonesia. WT/DS374/2. 2008.
