DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Anis SD. 1992. Pengaruh Kepadatan dan Interval Pemotongan Gliricida sepium Terhadap Produksi dan Mutu Hijauan di Lahan Pertanaman Kelapa.[Tesis].Bogor: Sekolah Pascasarjana, KPK Insitut Pertanian Bogor-Universitas Sam Ratulangi.
Anggrodi R.1990. Ilmu Makanan Ternak Umum. Cetakan ketiga. Jakarta: PT.
Gramedia.
[AOAC] Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 17thEd . Washington: AOAC International.
Astuti M, M Bell, P Sitorus, GE Bradford.1984. The impact of altitude on sheep and goat production. Working paper No.30.SR-CRSP/Balitnak. Bogor.
Beever DE, Offer N, Gill M. 2000. The Feeding value of Grass product. In Hopkins A. Editor. Grass: Its Production and Utilization. Published for British Grassland Soc. By Beckwell Science 141-195.
Beaucheimin KA. 1996. Using ADF and NDF in dairy cattle diet formulation-a Western Canadian prespective. J Anim Feed Sci Tech 58:101-111.
Bulo D, Warren BE, Ivory DA. 1985. Nutritive Value Assessment of Grass and Legume Spesies.[Annual Report].Balai Penelitian Ternak, Ciawi.Indonesia. Annual Report-Forage Research Project pp 40-41.
Chiy PC, Philips CJC. 1997. Effect of Sodium Fertilizer on the Chemical Compostion of Perennial Ryegras and white clover leaves of different physiological ages. J Sci Food Agric 73: 337-348.
Church DC, Pond WG.1995. Basic Animal Nutrition and Feeding. 4 th Ed. New York: New York Press.
Crowder LV, Chheda HR. 1982. Tropical Grassland Husbandry. London and New York. Longman Press.
Devendra C, Burns M. 1994. Produksi Kambing di Daerah Tropis. Terjemahan Harya Putra. ITB Bandung dan Universitas Udayana.
Dhanda JS et al. 2003. Goat meat production: Present status and future possibilities. AJAS 16: 1842 – 1852.
[Ditjennak] Direktorat Jendral Peternakan. 2007. Kebijakan Pengembangan Ternak Kambing Dalam Upaya Pemenuhan Kuota Ekspor ke Timur Tengah. Semiloka Pengembangan Kambing Boerawa. Lampung. 29 – 30 Juli 2007. Direktorat Perbibitan. Ditjen Peternakan. Departemen Pertanian. hlm 1-10.
Ella A. 1996. Produktivitas dan kualitas hijauan leguminosa pakan (Flamengia congesta dan Desmodium rensonii) pada pola tanam tumpang sari sengan tanaman jagung. [Disertasi]. Bogor. Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Ginting SP, Mahmalia Fera. 2008. Kambing Boerka: Kambing Tipe Pedaging Hasil Persilangan Boer x Kacang. Wartazoa 18: 117-127.
Greyling JPC. 2000. Reproduction traits in the Boer Goat does. J Small Rumin 36: 171 – 177.
Hassen A, Rethman NFG, Van Niekerk, Tjelele TJ. 2007. Influence of Season/year and Species on Chemical Composition and In Vitro Digestibility of Five Indigofera accessions. J Anim Feed Sci Technol 136:312–322
Haude ME .1997. Identification and Classification of Colorants used during Mexicos early Colonial Period. Book and Paper Group Annual Vol.16.
The American Institute of Conservation. pp 16-05.
Hegarty MP, Pound AW. 1968. Indospicine a New Hepatotoxic Amino Acid from Indigofera Spicata. J Aust Agric Res 217: 354-355
Herlinae. 2003. Evaluasi nilai nutrisi dan potensi hijuan asli lahan gambut pedalaman di Kalimantan Tengah sebagai Pakan Ternak. [Tesis]. Bogor:
Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Humphreys LR. 1978. Tropical Pasture and Fodder Crops. London: Longman Group Press.
Hoffman PC, Shaver RD, Combs DK. 2001. Focus on Forage. Vol 3: No 10.
Horne PM, WW Stur. 1999. Mengembangkan Teknologi Hijauan Makanan Ternak Bersama Petani Kecil. ACIAR. Monograf ACIAR no 65.
Jia ZH, Sahlu I, Fernandez JM, Hart,SP, The TH. 1995. Effect of Dietary Protein Level on Performan of Angora and Chasmere. Small Ruminant Research.
J Int Goat Assoc 16 (2) : 113-119.
Jung HG, MS Allen. 1995. Characteristics of Plant Cell Walls Affecting Intake and Digestibility of Forages by Ruminants. J Anim Sci 73: 2774–2790.
Kabaija E, Smith OB. 1989. Influence of Season and Age of Regrowth on The Mineral Profile of Gliricidia sepiem and Leucaena leucophala. J Trop Agric 66: 125-128.
Kabi F. Bareeba FB. 2008. Herbage biomass production and nutritive value of mulberry (Morus alba) and Calliandra calothyrsus harvested at different cutting frequencies. J Anim Feed Sci Technol 140:178–190.
Karachi M, 1997. Growth and Nutritive Value of Lablab purpureas accessions in Semi-arid Kenya. J Trop Grassl 31: 214-218.
Karim AB, Rhodes ER, Savill PS. 1991. Effect of Cutting Interval on Dry Matter Yield of of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam) De Wit. J Agrofor Syst 16: 129–
137.
Lioger HA .1990. Plantes Medicinals de Puerto Reis Caribe. Inc San Juan.
Press inc.
Lu CD, Kawas JR, Mahgoub OG. 2005. Fibre digestion and utilization in goats. J Small Rumin Res 60: 45-52.
Luginbuhl JM, Poore MH, Conrad AP. 2000. Effect of level of whole cootonseed on intake, digestibility and performance of growing male goats fed hay- based diets. J Anim Sci 78: 1677-1683.
Luginbuhl JM, Poore MH. 2005. Nutrition of Meat Goats. EAH Webmaster, Departement of Animal Science. NCSU
Lukhele MS, Van Ryssen JBJ. 2002. The Chemical Composition and Potensial Nutritive Value of The Foliage of Four Subtropical Tree Spesies in South Africa for Ruminants. SAJ Anim Sci 33: 132-141.
Mahgoub O, Lu CD, Hameed CD, Richie A, Al-Halhali AS, Annamalia K. 2005.
Performance of Omani Goats fed diets containing various metabolizable energy densities. J Small Rumin Res 58:175-180.
McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD and Morgan CA. 2002. Animal Nutrition, 6thEd. London. Pretice Hall.
McDowell.1992. Mineral in Animal and Human Nutrition. Academic Press Inc.
Merkel RC et al.1999. Growth Potensial of five Sheep Genotypes in Indonesia.
Small Ruminant Research. J Int Goat Assoc 16 (2) : 113-119.
Nohong B. 2002. Produktivitas dan kualitas tanaman campuran alang-alang dengan Pueraria (Pueraria javanica Beth). Buletin Nutrisi dan Makanan Ternak 3(1): 33-40.
Nurjannah. 2006. Evaluasi Nutrisi Hijauan Lahan Gambut Kalimantan tengah Pada kambing kacang.[Tesis]. Bogor: Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor
[NRC] National Research Council.1981. Angora, Dairy and Meat Goats in Temperate and Tropical Countries. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
[NRC] National Research Council. 1995. Nutrient Requirment of Goats.
Washington DC: National Academy Press.
[NRC] National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient Requirement of Dairy Cattle.
Washington DC: National Academy Press
Parakkasi A. 1995. Ilmu Nutrisi dan Makanan Ternak Ruminan. Vol 1B. Jakarta:
Universitas Indonesia.
Perevolotsky A.1993. Nutritional Value of Common Oak (Quercus calliprinus) Browse as Fodder for Goats: Experimental results in ecological perspective. J Small Rumin Res 11: 95–106.
Peterson PR. 2005. Forage for Goat Production. Blacksburg. Dept. Virginia Tech University
Rahman S. 2002. Introduksi Tanaman Makanan Ternak di Lahan Perkebunan:
respon bebebrapa jenis tanaman makanan ternak terhadap naungan dan tata laksana pemotongan. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Peternakan 4 (1) : 46- 53.
Reid RL, GA Jung, WV Thayne. 1988. Relationships Between Nutritive Quality and Fiber Components of Cool Season and Warm Season Forages: A retrospective study. J Anim Sci 66 : 1275–1291.
Rosenthal GA. 1982. Plant Nonprotein Amino and Imino Acids. New York and London. Academic Press.
Sarwono B. 2003. Beternak Kambing Unggul. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya.
SAS 1989. SAS User’s Guide. Version 6. 12th edition Vol.2. SAS Institute, Cary NC.
Shehu Y, Alhassan WS, PAL UR, Phillips CSJ. 2001. Yield and Chemical Composition Response of Lablab purpureus to Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizers. J Trop Grassl 35: 180-185.
Simanihuruk K. 2005. Pemanfaatan kulit buah markisa (Passiflora edulis Sims f.
Edulis Deg) sebagai pakan campuran pakan pelet komplit untuk kambing kacang.[Tesis]. Bogor: Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Steel RGD, Torrie JH. 1995. Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika. Ed ke–2 Sumantri B, penerjemah. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Terjemahan dari: The Principle and Prosedure of Statistics.
Suryahadi.1990. Penuntun Praktikum Ilmu Nutrisi Ruminansia. Bogor. Pusat Antar Universitas. Program Studi Ilmu Hayat. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Sutardi T. 1980. Landasan Ilmu Nutrisi. Bogor. Departemen Ilmu Makanan Ternak. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Thapa B, Walker DH, Sinclair FL. 1997. Indigenous knowledge of feeding value of tree fodder. J Anim Feed Sci Technol 67:97–114.
Thompson FN, Stuedemann JA. 1993. Pathophysiology of Fescue Toxicosis. J Agric Ecos 44: 263-281..
Tilley JMA, Terry RA. 1963. A two stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage crops. J Br Grassl Soc 18:104–111.
Tjelele TJ. 2006. Dry Matter Production, Intake and Nutritive Value of Certain Indigofera Spesies [Tesis]. Pretoria. M.Inst. Agrar. University of Pretoria.
Van DTT, Mui NT, Ledin I. 2005. Tropical Foliages: effect of presentation method and spesies on intake by goats. J Anim Feed Sci Technol 118: 1- 17.
Van Hao N, Inger L. 2001. Performance of growing fed Gliricidia maculata. J Small Rumin Res 39: 113-119.
Van Soest PJ.1982. Nutrition Ecology in Ruminant. USA. Camstock Publising Assoation. Cornell University Press.
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597.
Water CJ, Givens DI. 1992. Nitrogen Degradability of Fresh Herbage: effect of maturity and growth type and prediction from chemical composition and by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. J Anim Feed Sci Technol 75:
3278-3286.
Whitehed DC. 2000. Nutrient Element in Grassland: Soil,Plant, Animal Relationship. Wallingford. CAB International Publising 367.
Lampiran 1 Layout Tata Letak Penelitian
K1
2 m K2
2 m K3
2 m
K4
P = Interval pemotongan Indigofera sp (P1: 30 hari. P2 : 60 hari . P3: 90 hari) T = Intensitas Pemotongan Indigofera sp ( T1 : 0.5 m, T2 : 1.0 m, T3 : 1.5 m)
P1 T3 P3 T2 P2 T1
P2 T2 P2 T3 P1 T1
P3 T1 P3 T3 P1 T2
P2 T2 P1 T3 P2 T3
P1 T2 P3 T1 P3 P3
P2 T1 P1 T1 P3 T2
P3 T1 P3 T2 P2 T1
P2 T3 P1 T2 P1 T1
P2 T2 P1 T3 P3 T3
P3 T2 P1 T3 P1 T2
P3 T1 P1 T1 P2 T2
P2 T1 P3 T3 P2 T3
Lampiran 2 Data Curah Hujan Kabupaten Deli Serdang Tahun 2009 Curah Hujan Tahun 2009 (mm)
Januari Februari Maret April Mei Juni Jumlah Curah
Hujan
1.509 582 4.685 1.402 3.012 7.533
Sumber Dinas Pertanian Kabupaten Deli Serdang, Sumatera Utara
Lampiran 3 Analisis Sidik Ragam Produksi BK Indigofera sp
General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable:
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT Fhit Sig P<0.05
Blok 3 14.98 4.99 3.13 0.04
Interval (P) 2 884.95 442.47 277.15 0.0001
Intensitas (T) 2 1012.83 506.41 317.20 0.0001
Interaksi P*T 4 141.94 35.48 22.23 0.0001
Galat 24 38.31 1.59
Total 35 2093.03
Uji Lanjut Duncan Produksi BK Indigofera sp
Duncan Grouping Mean N Perlakuan STD
A 33.2525 4 P3T3 1.11
A 31.2250 4 P2T3 2.06
B 28.9425 4 P3T2 1.68
C 22.8275 4 P3T1 1.02
D 20.6950 4 P2T2 0.87
D 20.1475 4 P1T3 1.45
E 17.4025 4 P1T2 0.74
F 11.6350 4 P2T1 0.71
F 11.2450 4 P1T1 0.27
Lampiran 4 Analisis Sidik Ragam Jumlah Cabang Indigofera sp
General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable:
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig
P<0.05
Blok 3 33.35 11.11 6.73 0.0019
Interval (P) 2 17.37 8.68 5.26 0.0127
Intensitas(T) 2 774.04 387.02 234.38 0.0001
Interaksi P*T 4 24.57 6.14 3.72 0.0171
Galat 24 39.63 1.65
Total 35 888.98
Uji Lanjut Duncan Grouping
Duncan Grouping Mean N INTER STD
A 27.665 4 P3T3 1.50
A 27.583 4 P2T3 2.36
B 23.750 4 P1T3 3.51
C 20.085 4 P3T2 1.68
C 19.833 4 P2T2 1.35
C 19.250 4 P1T2 1.76
D 15.168 4 P1T1 1.15
D 15.165 4 P3T1 0.69
D 14.753 4 P2T1 1.00
Lampiran 5 Analisis Sidik Ragam Rasio Daun/Batang
General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable:
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
Blok 2 0.02 0.01 2.21 0.1420
Interval (P) 2 0.12 0.06 11.80 0.0007
Intensitas (T) 2 0.00 0.002 0.52 0.6018
Interaksi P*T 4 0.02 0.007 1.30 0.3119
Galat 24 0.04 0.0018
Total 35 23.11
Uji Lanjut Duncan Grouping
Duncan Grouping Mean N INTER STD
A 2.63750 4 P1T2 0.05
A 2.61750 4 P1T1 0.03
A 2.60500 4 P1T3 0.03
B 1.73750 4 P2T3 0.04
B 1.73250 4 P2T2 0.06
B 1.68500 4 P2T1 0.03
C 0.72000 4 P3T3 0.03
D 0.64500 4 P3T1 0.03
D 0.62250 4 P3T2 0.02
Lampiran 6 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kandungan Bahan Organik
General Linear Models Procedure
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
Blok 2 2.68 1.34 3.27 0.06
Interval (P) 2 11.22 5.61 13.69 0.00
Intensitas (T) 2 2.87 1.43 3.51 0.05
Interaksi P*T 4 1.82 0.45 1.12 0.38
Galat 16 6.55 0.40
Total 26 25.17
UJI LANJUT DUNCAN
INTERVAL MEAN N DUNCAN GROUPING
P1 90.28 3 A
P2 89.24 3 B
P3 88.73 3 B
Lampiran 7 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kandungan Protein Kasar
General Linear Models Procedure
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
Blok 2 0.59 0.29 0.51 0.61
Interval (P) 2 75.74 37.87 64.46 0.00
Intensitas (T) 2 1.48 0.74 1.26 0.30
Interaksi P*T 4 0.37 0.09 0.16 0.95
Galat 16 9.40 0.58
Total 26 87.59
UJI LANJUT DUNCAN
INTERVAL MEAN N DUNCAN GROUPING
P1 21.61 3 C
P2 25.69 3 A
P3 23.27 3 B
Lampiran 8 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kandungan NDF
General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable: NDF
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
Blok 2 0.10 0.05 0.77 0.48
Interval (P) 2 11.65 5.82 86.54 0.00
Intensitas (T) 2 0.42 0.21 3.13 0.07
Interaksi P*T 4 4.29 1.07 15.95 0.00
Galat 16 1.07 0.06
Total 26 17.55
Uji Lanjut Duncan Grouping
Duncan Grouping Mean N INTER STD
A 36.8367 3 P3T1 0.32
A 36.7967 3 P3T2 0.51
A 36.6433 3 P2T2 0.25
A 36.5633 3 P3T3 0.15
B 36.0733 3 P2T3 0.20
B 35.8133 3 P1T1 0.13
C 35.3667 3 P2T1 0.21
D 34.8267 3 P1T2 0.13
D 34.7400 3 P1T3 0.16
Lampiran 9 Analisis Sidik Ragam kandungan ADF
General Linear Models Procedure
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
Blok 2 0.76 0.38 2.72 0.09
Interval (P) 2 0.40 0.23 1.65 0.22
Intensitas (T) 2 7.45 3.72 26.47 0.00
Interaksi P*T 4 1.79 0.44 3.18 0.04
Galat 16 2.25 0.14
Total 26 12.73
Uji Lanjut Duncan Grouping
Duncan Grouping Mean N INTER STD
A 25.2933 3 P2T1 0.34
B A 24.6667 3 P1T1 0.58
BA 24.6433 3 P2T2 0.13
BAC 24.5700 3 P3T1 0.61
BDC 24.2667 3 P3T2 0.20
EDC 23.8633 3 P1T2 0.44
ED 23.7200 3 P1T3 0.59
ED 23.7000 3 P3T3 0.16
E 23.2533 3 P2T3 0.23
Lampiran 10 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kandungan Kalsium
General Linear Models Procedure
Dependent Variable:
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
Blok 2 0.02 0.01 2.21 0.14
Interval (P) 2 0.12 0.06 11.80 0.00
Intensitas (T) 2 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.60
Interaksi P*T 4 0.02 0.00 1.30 0.31
Galat 16 0.08 0.00
Total 26 0.27
Uji Lanjut Duncan Grouping
INTERVAL MEAN N DUNCAN GROUPING
P1 1.54 3 A
P2 1.47 3 AB
P3 1.37 3 C
Lampiran 11 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kandungan Fosfor
General Linear Models Procedure
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
Blok 2 0.003 0.001 0.84 0.44
Interval (P) 2 0.18 0.09 44.83 0.00
Intensita (T) 2 0.24 0.12 59.28 0.00
Interaksi P*T 4 0.07 0.01 8.80 0.00
Galat 16 0.03 0.00
Total 26 0.53
Uji Lanjut Duncan Grouping
Duncan Grouping Mean N INTER STD
A 1.11 3 P1T2 0.02
A 1.08 3 P2T2 0.01
B 0.97 3 P1T3 0.07
B 0.94 3 P3T2 0.04
B 0.93 3 P2T1 0.04
B 0.91 3 P1T1 0.05
C 0.83 3 P3T3 0.05
C 0.83 3 P2T3 0.05
D 0.63 3 P3T1 0.04
Lampiran 12 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan in vitro Bahan Kering
General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable:
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
Blok 2 0.85 0.42 1.15 0.34
Interval (P) 2 230.14 115.07 311.44 0.00
Intensitas (T) 2 26.60 13.30 36.00 0.00
Interaksi P*T 4 2.42 0.60 1.64 0.21
Galat 16 5.91 0.36
Total 26 265.94
Uji Lanjut Duncan Grouping
Duncan Grouping Mean N INTER STD
A 77.1300 3 P2T3 0.49
BA 76.0833 3 P2T2 0.55
BC 75.0333 3 P2T1 0.51
C 74.9533 3 P1T3 0.82
C 74.0700 3 P1T2 0.43
D 72.6533 3 P1T1 0.71
E 70.8667 3 P3T3 0.60
F 68.3833 3 P3T2 0.43
F 68.0267 3 P3T1 0.82
Lampiran 13 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan in Vitro Bahan Organik
General Linear Models Procedure
Dependent Variable: KCBO
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
Blok 2 1.67 0.83 3.19 0.06
Interval (P) 2 143.82 71.91 273.64 0.00
Intensitas (T) 2 12.60 6.30 23.98 0.00
Interakasi P*T 4 4.92 1.23 4.68 0.01
Galat 16 4.20 0.26
Total 26 167.23
Uji Lanjut Duncan Grouping
Duncan Grouping Mean N INTER STD
A 74.9833 3 P2T3 0.62
B 73.2967 3 P2T2 0.90
B 72.3267 3 P2T1 0.49
C 71.1600 3 P1T3 0.44
C 70.7000 3 P1T1 0.52
C 70.1533 3 P1T2 0.47
D 68.6833 3 P3T3 0.23
D 68.1000 3 P3T2 0.72
E 66.8667 3 P3T1 0.50
Lampiran 14 Analisis Sidik Ragam Konsumsi Bahan Kering
General Linear Models Procedure
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
BLOK 4 6295.27 1573.81 3.82 0.03
Linier 1 17728.31 17728.31 43.01 0.00
Kuadratik 1 3116.10 3116.10 7.56 0.01
Kubik 1 5791.21 5791.21 14.05 0.00
PERLAKUAN 3 25160.73 8386.91 20.35 0.00
Galat 12 4946.03 412.16
Total 19 36402.03
Lampiran 15 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan Bahan Kering
General Linear Models Procedure
Dependent Variable:
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
BLOK 4 80.65 20.16 2.02 0.15
Linier 1 456.03 456.03 45.66 0.00
Kuadratik 1 3.07 3.07 0.31 0.58
Kubik 1 16.14 16.14 1.62 0.22
PERLAKUAN 3 741.20 247.06 24.74 0.00
Galat 12 119.85 9.98
Total 19 941.71
Lampiran 16 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan Bahan Organik
General Linear Models Procedure
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
Blok 4 66.01 16.50 1.66 0.22
Perlakuan 3 682.17 227.39 22.93 0.00
Linear 1 410.62 410.62 41.40 0.00
Kuadratik 1 1.33 1.33 0.13 0.72
Kubik 1 10.34 10.34 1.04 0.32
Galat 12 119.01 9.91
Total 19 867.20
Lampiran 17 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan Protein Kasar
General Linear Models Procedure
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
BLOK 4 30.97 7.74 1.41 0.28
Perlakuan 3 1869.34 623.11 113.61 0.00
Linear 1 1290.49 1290.49 235.29 0.00
Kuadratik 1 81.87 81.87 14.93 0.00
Kubik 1 7.05 7.05 1.29 0.27
Galat 12 65.81 5.48
Total 19 1966.13
Lampiran 18 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan NDF
General Linear Models Procedure
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
Blok 4 70.82 17.70 6.84 0.00
Perlakuan 3 498.88 166.29 64.21 0.00
Linier 1 175.81 175.81 41.90 0.00
Kuadratik 1 22.17 22.17 5.28 0.04
Kubik 1 39.98 39.98 9.53 0.00
Galat 12 50.35 4.19
Total 19 430.00
Lampiran 19 Analisis Sidik Ragam Kecernaan ADF
General Linear Models Procedure
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
Blok 4 70.82 17.70 6.84 0.00
Perlakuan 3 498.88 166.29 64.21 0.00
Linier 1 218.55 218.55 84.39 0.00
Kuadratik 1 45.26 45.26 17.48 0.00
Kubik 1 47.03 47.03 18.16 0.00
Galat 12 31.07 2.58
Total 19 600.78
Lampiran 20 Analisis Sidik Ragam Pertambahan Bobot Badan Harian
General Linear Models Procedure
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
Blok 4 240.07 60.01 3.28 0.04
Perlakuan 3 1869.76 623.25 34.09 0.00
Linier 1 1234.32 1234.32 67.50 0.00
Kuadratik 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99
Kubik 1 21.14 21.14 1.16 0.30
Galat 12 219.42 18.28
Total 19 2329.26
Lampiraan 21 Analisis Sidik Ragam Efisiensi Penggunaan Pakan
General Linear Models Procedure
Sumber Keragaman dB JK KT F hit Sig P<0.05
Blok 4 0.00 0.00 1.97 0.16
Perlakuan 3 0.00 0.00 13.71 0.00
Linier 1 0.00 0.00 1.91 0.19
Kuadratik 1 0.00 0.00 2.06 0.17
Kubik 1 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.86
Galat 12 0.00 0.00
Total 19 0.00