• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

PENGARUH PENDEKATAN PROGRESIF TERHADAP PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN MAHASISWA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN DAN PENULISAN JURNAL MATEMATIKA.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "PENGARUH PENDEKATAN PROGRESIF TERHADAP PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN MAHASISWA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN DAN PENULISAN JURNAL MATEMATIKA."

Copied!
13
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

DISERTASI

Diajukan untuk Memenuhi Sebagian dari

Syarat untuk Memperoleh Gelar Doktor Ilmu Pendidikan dalam Bidang Pendidikan Matematika

KODIRUN NIM. 1008842

SEKOLAH PASCASARJANA

UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA BANDUNG

(2)

Disetujui dan Disahkan oleh Tim Penguji Disertasi untuk Diajukan pada Ujian Tahap II

Prof. H. Yaya S. Kusumah, M.Sc., Ph.D. Promotor Merangkap Ketua

Prof. Jozua Sabandar, M.A., Ph.D. Ko-Promotor Merangkap Sekretaris

Prof. Dr. H Darhim, M.Si. Anggota Tim Promotor Merangkap Penguji

Siti Fatimah, Ph.D. Anggota Penguji

Prof. Dr. H. Hamzah Upu, M.Ed. Penguji Luar Perguruan Tinggi

Mengetahui,

Ketua Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

(3)

Kodirun, 2014

Pengaruh pendekatan progresif

Terhadap peningkatan kemampuan mahasiswa Dalam pembuktian dan penulisan jurnal matematika

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Almeida, D. (2003). Engendering proof attitudes: Can the genesis of mathematical knowledge teach us anything? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34 (4), 479–488.

Anderson, J. R., Simon, H. A., & Reder, L. M. (1997). “Applications and Misapplications of Cognitive Psychology to Mathematics Education.”

[Online]. Tersedia: http://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/papers/146/Applic.MisApp.pdf [1 April 2011].

Ansari, B. I. (2004). Menumbuhkembangkan Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Komunikasi Matematik Siswa SMU melalui Strategi Think-Talk-Write. Disertasi Doktor pada PPS UPI Bandung : tidak diterbitkan.

Arikunto, S. (2002). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Arsac, G. (2007). Origin of Mathematical Proof, History and Epistemology.

Dalam Boero (ed.), Theorems in Schools: From History Epistemology and Cognition to Classroom Practise, 27-42. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. ISBN 978-90-77874-21-9.

Artzt, A. F. (1996). Developing Problem Solving Behaviors by Assessing Communication in Cooperative Learning Groups. Year Book 1996 Ed. Elliot, Portia dan Kenney, Margaret. Communication in Mathematics K-12

and Beyond. Reston, V.A.: NTCM.

Askew, M., Brown, M., Denvir, H., & Rhodes, V. (2000). Describing Primary Mathematics Lessons Observed in the Leverhulme Numeracy Research Programme: A Qualitative Framework. Makalah diseminarkan pada The Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education ke 24, Hiroshima, Japan.

Baker, D., & Campbell, C. (2004). Fostering the development of mathematical thinking: Observations from a proof course. Primus,14(4),345–353.

Baroody, A. J. (1993). Problem Solving, Reasoning, and Communicating. New York: Macmillan Publishing.

Baveja, B., Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1985). An Experiment in Conceptually Based Teaching Strategies. Eugene, OR: Booksend Laboratories.

(4)

Kodirun, 2014

Pengaruh pendekatan progresif

Terhadap peningkatan kemampuan mahasiswa Dalam pembuktian dan penulisan jurnal matematika

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Billingsley, G., Scheuermann, B. & Webber, J. (2009). A Comparison of Three Instructional Methods for Teaching Math Skills to Secondary Students with Emotional/Behavioral Disorders. Manuscript submitted for publication in Behavioral Disorders. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.mendeley.com/ research/comparison-instructional-methods-teaching-math-skills-secondary-students-emotionalbehavioral-disorders-5/ [19 Januari 2012].

Bloch, E. D. (2000). Proofs and Fundamentals. A First Course in Abstract Mathematics. New York: Birkhäuser Boston, c/o Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 175 Fifth Street Avenue, New York, NY 10010. ISBN 0-8176-4111-4.

Brown, D.E. dan Michel, S. (2010). Assessing Proofs With Rubrics: the RVF Method. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. [Online]. Tersedia: http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/crume2010/Archive/Brown_D.pdf [23 Februari 2011].

Bunnett, R. (2007). Writing in the Mathematics Classroom: Does It Have an

Effect on Students‟ Mathem ati cal Reasoning? Tesi s MA unt uk

Departm ent of Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Educat ion U n i v e r s i t y of N e b r a s k a -Li n c o l n July 2007. [O n l i n e ]. T e r s e d i a : http://scimath.unl.edu/MIM/files/research/FellowsR.pdf [12 Januari 2012]. Burns, M. (1996). What I Learn from Teaching Second Grade. Teaching Children

Mathematics, 3(3): November 1996, 124-127.

Burns, M. & Sibey. (1999). Math Journals Boost Real Learning. Instructor, 110(7), 18.

Cai, J., Perry, B., Wong, N. Y., dan Wang, T. (2009). What is Effective Teaching? A Study of Experienced Mathematics Teachers from Australia, the Mainland China, Hongkong China, and the United States. Effective

Mathematics Teaching from Teachers’ Perspectives. National and Cross-National Studies. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers P.O. Box 21858, 3001 AW, The Netherlands.

(5)

Kodirun, 2014

Pengaruh pendekatan progresif

Terhadap peningkatan kemampuan mahasiswa Dalam pembuktian dan penulisan jurnal matematika

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Countryman, J. (1992). Writing to Learn Mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Cupillari, A. (2005). The Nuts and Bolts of Proofs. Third Edition. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press. 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01813. ISBN 13: 978-0-12-088509-1.

Doherty, B. J. (1996). The Write Way: A Look at Journal Writing in First-Year Algebra. Mathematics Teacher 89, 556-560.

Dreyfus, T. (1990). Advanced Mathematical Thinking. Dalam Mathematics and Cognition, Pearla Nesher and Jeremy Kilpatrick (eds.). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990. pp. 113-134.

Dreyfus, T. (1999). Why Johnny can't prove. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1), 85-109.

Drake, B. M., dan Amspaugh, L. B. (1994). What Writing Reveals in Mathematics. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 16(3), 43-50. Edwards, B. S. & Ward, M. B. (2004). Surprises from Mathematics Education

Research: Student (Mis)use of Mathematical Definitions. The American Mathematical Monthly,111,411–424.

Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a Model of Learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122-128.

English, L. D. (2004). Mathematical and Analogical Reasoning in Early Childhood. Dalam Lyn D. English (Ed.). Mathematical and Analogical Reasoning of Young Learners. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Mahwah.

Fraivillig, J. (2001). Strategies for Advancing Children's Mathematical Thinking.

Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(8), 454 - 459.

Freitag, M. (1997). Reading and Writing in the Mathematics Classroom. The Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 16-21.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind. (Tenth-Anniversary Edition, 1993). New York: Basic Books. New York, 10 East 53rd Street. New York, NY 10022-5399.

(6)

Kodirun, 2014

Pengaruh pendekatan progresif

Terhadap peningkatan kemampuan mahasiswa Dalam pembuktian dan penulisan jurnal matematika

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Georgia Assessment for the Certification of Educators (GACE). (2008). GACE Mathematics Standards Assessment Chart. Copyright 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., atau afiliasinya. Evaluation Systems, Pearson, P.O. Box 226, Amherst, M.A 01004. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.google.co.id/ url?sa=t&rct=j&q=mathematical+proof+indicators&source=web&cd=13&v ed=0CCcQFjACOAo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gamte.org%2Fgace_to_ nctm_alignment.pdf&ei=4o_VTrfND8LlrAeE5MmZDg&usg=AFQjCNEm 3zTOTcDLC4rcgz8c7PE8av282w&sig2=wjWtFCD6onJGfzV8dr4RFg [30 November 2011].

Gliem, J. A., dan Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. [Online]. Tersedia: htt ps:// schol arworks.iupui.edu /bitstream /handl e /1805 / 344 /Gliem%20&%20Gli em . pdf? s

Goel, V. (2003). Cognitive Neuroscience of Deductive Reasoning. In Cambridge Handbook of Thinking & Reasoning, Eds. K. Holyoak & R. Morrison. Cambridge University Press. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.yorku.ca/ vgoel/reprints/Goel_cambridge2a.pdf [12 Desember 2010].

Gopen, G. D., dan Smith, D. A. (1990). What‟s an Assignment Like You Doing in a Course Like This? Writing to Learn Mathematics. The College Mathematics Journal, 21(1), 2-19.

Gould, P. (2007). Developing Mathematical Reasoning through Argumentation. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.criced.tsukuba.ac.jp/ math/apec/apec2007/ progress_report/specialists_session/Peter_Gould.pdf [20 Maret 2011]. Grossman, F. J., Smith, B., & Miller, C. (1993). Did You Say „Write‟ in

Mathematics Class? Journal of Developmental Education, 22(4), 2-6. Haghighi, A. M., Vakil, R., & Wetiba, J. K. (2006).

Reverse-Traditional/Hands-On: An Alternative Method of Teaching Statistics. Applications and Applied Mathematics (AAM): An International Journal. [Online]. Tersedia: http://pvamu.edu/pages/398/asp Vol. 1, No. 1 (2006) pp. 62 – 82. [27 Desember 2011].

(7)

Kodirun, 2014

Pengaruh pendekatan progresif

Terhadap peningkatan kemampuan mahasiswa Dalam pembuktian dan penulisan jurnal matematika

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Harel, G. & Sowder, L. (1998). Students‟ Proof Schemes: Results from

Exploratory Studies. Dalam A.H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput & E. Duminsky (Eds.) Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III (hh. 234-283). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/deductive

Huang, R. (2005). Verification or Proof: Justification of Pythagoras‟ Theorem in Chinese Mathematics Classrooms. Dalam Chick, H. L. & Vincent, J. L. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 3, pp. 161-168. Melbourne: PME.

Hungerford, T. W. (tanpa tahun). Abstract Algebra. Philadelphia: Saunders College Publising.

Jones, K. (1997). Student Teachers‟ Conceptions of Mathematical Proof.

Mathematical Education Review, Volume 9, pp. 21-32. [Online]. Tersedia: http://eprint.soton.ac.uk/41245/1/Jones_student_teachers_conceptions_proof _MER_1997.pdf [30 September 2010].

Jones, K. (2000). The Student Experience of Mathematical Proof at Univeristy Level. The Internati onal Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology. Vol. 31, No. 1, 53-60. [Online]. Tersedia: www.crm e.sot on.ac.uk/publi cations /kjpubs/JonesIJME.pdf [08 Maret 2011].

Jones, K. (2001). Providing a Foundation for Deductive Reasoning: Students‟ Interpretations when Using Dynamic Geometry Software and Their Evolving Mathematical Explanations. Educational Studies in Mathematics

44: 55-85. Kluwer Academic Publishers, the Netherlands.

Joyce, B., Weil, M., dan Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of Teaching. Model-Model Pembelajaran. (Diterjemahkan oleh Achmad Fawaid dan Ateilla Mirza). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Junaedi, I. (2007). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menulis dan Pemahaman Matematis Melalui Pembelajaran dengan Strategi Writing from a Prompt dan Writing in Performance Tasks pada Siswa Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. SPs UPI Bandung. Disertasi, tidak diterbitkan.

(8)

Kodirun, 2014

Pengaruh pendekatan progresif

Terhadap peningkatan kemampuan mahasiswa Dalam pembuktian dan penulisan jurnal matematika

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Kim, Y. & Baylor, A. L. (2007). Pedagogical Agents as Social Models to Influence Learner Attitudes. Educational Technology, 47 (1), 23-28.

Kim, O. K., & Kasmer, L. (2008). The Effect of Using Prediction Questions in the Middle School Algebra Classroom. [Online]. Tersedia: http: //www. google.co.id/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=mathematical%20reasoning%20indicators& source=web&cd=7&ved=OCEYQFjAG&url=http%3A%2F2Fmath.unipa.it %2F~grim%2F21_project%2F21_Charlotte_KimKasmerPaperEdit.pdf&ei= t4XVTs38KYTIrQex9oiNDg&usg=AFQjCNHaCskfN8WnbJioYl4ZPXgfK 7p7mw&sig2=UgAKwGpd2HAzlvodq8nbZg&cad=rja [30 November 2011].

Krantz, S. G. (2007). The History and Concept of Mathematical Proof. [Online]. Tersedia: www.math.wustl.edu/~sk/eolss.pdf [11 Januari 2011].

Kuchemann & Hoyles. (2002). Students‟ Understanding of a Logical Implication and Its Converse. Dalam A. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Conference of Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, 84 – 88). Hiroshima (Japan). [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.lettredelapreuve.it /OldPreuve/PME/PME26/RRKuchemann.pdf [12 Mei 2011].

Kusnandi. (2008). Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Strategi Abduktif-Deduktif untuk Menumbuhkembangkan Kemampuan Membuktikan pada Mahasiswa. Disertasi pada Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Bandung: Tidak diterbitkan.

Lacefield III, W. O. (2007). An Inquiry into Elementary Teachers‟ Dispositions toward Mathematics Instruction and Their Choices of Teaching Methods. Dalam Kuchemann, D (Ed.). 2007. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 27, 3, November 2007.

Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching Problems and the Problems of Teachings. Newhaven, CT: Yale University Press.

Leighton, J. P. (2006). Teaching and Assessing D educti ve Reasoning Skills. The Journal of Experimental Education. Winter 2006 Vol 74 Iss 2

pp 109, 28 pgs. [Online]. Tersedia: http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb? index=19&did=972922081&SrchMode=2&sid=10&Fmt=4&Vinst=PROD &Vtype=PQD&RQT=309&Name=PQD&TS=1300377956&clientId=8369 8 [17 Maret 2011].

(9)

Kodirun, 2014

Pengaruh pendekatan progresif

Terhadap peningkatan kemampuan mahasiswa Dalam pembuktian dan penulisan jurnal matematika

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Mathematically.” [Online]. Tersedia: http://oar.nipissingu.ca/pdfs/v722.pdf [29 April 2012].

Martin, W. G., & Harel, G. (1989). Proof Frames of Preservice Elementary Teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 20 (1), 41 – 51. [Online]. Tersedia: http://math.ucsd.edu/~harel/Downloadable/Proof%20 Frames.pdf [12 April 2011].

Mangisila, J. O., dan Winiowska, E. P. (1996). Developing and Assessing Mathematical Understanding in Calculus through Writing. Year Book 1996 Ed. Elliot, Portia dan Kenney, Margaret. Communication in Mathematics K -12 and Beyond. Reston, V.A.: NTCM.

Maya, R. (2011). Pengaruh Pembelajaran dengan Metode Moore Termodifikasi

Terhadap Pencapaian Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Pembuktian Matematik Mahasiswa. Disertasi SPs UPI Bandung. Tidak diterbitkan. McNaught, M. D., & Grouws, D. A. (2009). Learning Goals and Effective

Mathematics Teaching: What Can We Learn From Research? [Online]. Tersedia: http://163.21.236.74/attachments/month_1006/8201068144348. pdf [23 Desember 2011].

Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and

Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: a Possible “Hidden Variable” in

Diagnostic Pretest Scores. Ames, Iowa: Department of Physics and Astronomy. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.physics.iastate.edu/per/ docs/Addendum_on_normalized_gain.pdf [19 Maret 2009].

Miller, L. D. (1992). Teacher Benefits from Using Impromptu Writing Prompts in Algebra Classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(4), 329-340.

Mitchell, J.C. & Johnson, M. (2008). Mathematical Proofs. Handout #35. CS103A. Robert Plummer. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.stanford.edu/ class/cs103a /handouts/35%20Mathematical%20Proofs.pdf [29 Januari 2011].

Moore, R. (1993). Does Writing about Science Improve Learning about Science?

Journal of College Science Teaching, 22(4), 212-217.

Nahrgang, C. L. & Peterson, B. T. (1986). Using Writing to Learn Mathematics.

(10)

Kodirun, 2014

Pengaruh pendekatan progresif

Terhadap peningkatan kemampuan mahasiswa Dalam pembuktian dan penulisan jurnal matematika

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Panasuk, R., Stone, W., & Todd, J. (2002). Lesson Planning Strategy for Effective Mathematics Teaching. Education, Vol. 122. No. 4. EBESCO Publishing. [Online]. Tersedia: www.ausscan.com/maths20teaching.pdf [22 Desember 2011].

Peng, G. (2002). Two Student-centred Teaching Methods in Mathematics. [Onl i ne] . Te rsedi a : http://www.google.co.id/url?sa=t&rct=j&q= two%20student-centred%20teaching%20methods%20in% 20mathematics& source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCEQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fsydney.edu. au%2Fscience%2Funiserve_science%2Fpubs%2Fchina%2Fvol1%2Fpeng.p df&ei=UPjrTsarDcOzrAe_o_mBCQ&usg=AFQjCNE3tYbnGLmkqyREXu 3nuYSa1LuDsw&sig2=PtTpgy5tSa_hqTvSdP8wxA [17 Desember 2011]. Pehkonen, E. & Kaasila, R. (2010). Students’ Conception on Effective

Mathematics Teaching. On Mathematics Teaching. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.tktk.ee/bw_client_files/tktk_pealeht/public/img/File/yldine/2010 /mavi/MAVI16_Pehkonen_etal.pdf [20 April 2011].

Permendiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi dan Standar Kompetensi Lulusan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking Mathematically: Communication in Mathematics Classrooms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Reiss, K., Klieme, E., & Heinze, A. (2001). Prerequisites for the Understanding of Proofs in the Geometry Classroom. Dalam M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, 97 – 104). Utrecht: Utrecht University.

Recio, A. M. & Godino, J. D. (2001). Institutional and personal meanings of proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(1), 83-99.

(11)

Kodirun, 2014

Pengaruh pendekatan progresif

Terhadap peningkatan kemampuan mahasiswa Dalam pembuktian dan penulisan jurnal matematika

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Richardson, O (ed.). (2005). Developing Rubrics. Mt. San Antonio College, 1100 N. Grand Avenue, Walnut, CA 91789, (909) 594-5611

Rose, B. (1989). Writing and Mathematics: Theory and Practice. Dalam P. Connolly & T. Vilardi (Eds.), Writing to Learn Mathematics and Science

(pp.15-30). New York: Teachers College Press.

Ross, J. A. & Bruce, C. (2005). Teachers‟ Beliefs in Their Instructional Capacity.

Proceedings of the Psychology of Mathematics Association. North America, Roanoke, Virginia.

Ruseffendi, E. T. (1993). Statistik Dasar untuk Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: IKIP Bandung Press.

Ruseffendi, E.T. (2005). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Pendidikan & Bidang Non-Eksakta Lainnya. Bandung: Tarsito.

Russek, B. (1998). Writing to Learn Mathematics. Writing Across the Curriculum. Vol. 9: August 1998.

Selden, J., & Selden, A. (1995). Unpacking the Logic of Mathematical Statements. Educational Studies in Mathematics 29, 123 – 151.

Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2003). Errors and misconceptions in college level theorem proving. Technical Report, Mathematics Department, Tennesse Technological University. [Online]. Tersedia: http: //www. math. tntech. Edu/techreports/TR_2003_3.pdf [12 November 2012].

Shepard, R. G. (1993). Writing for Conceptual Development in Mathematics.

Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12, 287-293.

Shibli, A. (1992). Increasing Learning with Writing in Quantitative and Computer Courses. College Teaching, 40(4), 123-127.

Silver, E. A., dan Smith, M. S. (1996). Building Discourse Communities in Mathematics Classroom: A Worthwile but Challenging Journey. Year Book 1996 Ed. Elliot, Portia dan Kenney, Margaret. Communication in Mathematics K-12 and Beyond. Reston, V.A: NTCM.

(12)

Kodirun, 2014

Pengaruh pendekatan progresif

Terhadap peningkatan kemampuan mahasiswa Dalam pembuktian dan penulisan jurnal matematika

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Smith, J. C. (2006). A Sense-making Approach to Proof: Strategies of Students in Traditional and Problem-based Number Theory Courses. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 25 2006 73-90.

Steen, L. A. 1999. Twenty Questions about Mathematical Reasoning. The Concluding Chapter in NCTM's 1999 Yearbook Which is Devoted to Mathematical Reasoning: Developing Mathematical Reasoning in Grades K-12. Lee Stiff, Editor. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1999, pp. 270-285. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.math. wisc.edu/~wilson/Courses/Math903/SteenQuestions.htm [ 6 Mei 2011]. Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and Proving in Schools Mathematics. Journal for

Research in Mathematics Education. Vol. 38 (3), 289-321.

Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Philippou, G.N. (2007). Preservice

teachers‟ knowledge of proof by mathematical induction. Journal of

Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 145–166.

Sudjono, A. (2001). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Suherman, E. dan Sukjaya, Y. (1990). Petunjuk Praktis untuk Melaksanakan Evaluasi Pendidikan Matematika. Bandung: Wijayakusumah 157.

Suryadi, D. (2008). Metapedadidaktik dalam Pembelajaran Matematika: Suatu Strategi Pengembangan Diri Menuju Guru Matematika Profesional. Pidato Pengukuhan sebagai Guru Besar dalam Bidang Ilmu Pendidikan Matematika pada Fakultas Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, 22 April 2008.

Thompson. (2006). Assessing Mathematical Reasoning: An Action Research Project. Michigan State University – TE 855, December 2, 2006. [Online]. Tersedia: https://www.msu.edu/~thomp603/assess%20reasoning.pdf [12 Desember 2011].

Ufer, S. & Heinze, A. (2008). Development of Geometric Proof Competency from Grade 7 to 9: A Longitudinal Study. [Online]. Tersedia: http: //www. google .co.id/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=indicators%20of%20ability%20for%20mathemati cal%20proof&source=web&cd=10&ved=OCHEQFjAJ&url=http%3A%2F %2Ftsg.icme11.org%2Fdocument%2Fget&2F284&ei=XcPVTpy7BMe4rAf MtfmrDg&usg=AFQjCNG-FhhxH3myLac-FlbCQEY3ls7HSA&sig2=orz F63QbhJQd3MjhLzcGDg [30 November 2011].

(13)

Kodirun, 2014

Pengaruh pendekatan progresif

Terhadap peningkatan kemampuan mahasiswa Dalam pembuktian dan penulisan jurnal matematika

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Conference of Psychology of Mathematics Education (289 – 294). Rehovot (Israel): Weizman Institute.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, M.A: Harvard University Press. Wahyudin. (2011). Materi Pokok Fondasi dan Bukti Matematika; 1-9. Edisi 1,

Cetakan 1. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Weber, K. (2001). Student Difficulty in Constructing Proofs: The Need for Strategic Knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48, 101 – 119. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.springerlink.com/content/jq2cdlg17au1lr90/ [2 Februari 2011].

Weber, K. (2004). A Framework for Describing the Processes that Undergraduates Use to Construct Proofs. Dalam M. J.Hoines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.) International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 28th, Bergen, Norway, 14–18.

Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of Competence: a Conceptual Clarification. Dalam D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.). Defining and Selecting Key Competencies, 45-65. Seattle: Hoggrefe &Huber Publishers.

Widhiarso, W. (2008). Uji Hipotesis Komparatif. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada. [On-line]. Tersedia: http://elisa.ugm. ac.id/files/wahyu_psy/maaio0d2/Membaca%20t-tes.pdf. [25-11-2012] www.kam usbesar.com

Xiuping, Z. (2002). The Combination of Traditional Teaching Method and Problem Based Learning. The China Papers, Vol. 1, October 2002 http://science.uniserve.32 edu.au/pubs/china/vol1/. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.google.co.id/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=mathematics%20traditional%20 instructional%20methods&source=web&cd=4&sqi=2&ved=0CD4QFjAD& url=http%3A%2F%2Fsydney.edu.au%2Fscience%2Funiserve_science%2F pubs%2Fchina%2Fvol1%2Fxiuping.pdf&ei=Xff4TrqLF87wrQetiLTTDw& usg=AFQjCNFHn1BcOhBrVWPAcAOmUmypeyhiAQ&sig2=CpYN8zqCr VE_IdTJtjxSPg [21 Desember 2011].

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Al-Attas also considers “tafsir and ta’w ī l as valid methods o f approach to knowledge and scientif i c methodology respecting our study and interpretation o f the world

Salah satu contoh media yang interaktif, kreatif dan edukatif untuk anak usia dini yaitu media permainan Ular Tangga “Jejak Petualang”.. Permainan ular tangga adalah salah satu

1) Smith Van Ness. Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamic, 6th ed.. 2) Sandler. Chemical, Biochemical adn Engineering Thermodynamics,

Berita Acara Evaluasi Dokumen administrasi dan Kualifikasi nomor : tanggal 15 Januari dan 12 Januari 2015 terhadap calon penyedia Pengadaan perawatan,pemeliharaan dan perbaikan

[r]

Sedikit di awal tulisan ini kami sudah mengungkapkan konsep guru ideal adalah yang “siap” dengan segala hal, namun dalam konteks dan kondisi pendidikan seperti di Indonesia

- Warga tidak mampu : orang kota Semarang yang punya KTP/KK Kota Semarang yang secara ekonomi tidak mampu dan mendapat Surat Keterangan Tidak Mampu (SKTM) dari lurah diketahui

Potensi pasar relatif besar namun pengetahuan dan pemahaman masyarakat secara umum tentang produk, jasa dan manfaat perbankan syariah relatif rendah Jawa Barat JaTeng