Programme
3 !
E
E
t
'E
tt
:t
eE g$ F FI rg {H
ii
It
Ei5i
lr
€ }Fii
6 :
t!^!{E
is:+i
iit
F!!"ii
!E:tld
iii$i
uili
;iaf!
il
ir
'i
5Flit
,r
'*
ttH!
ir
'Fifl
+i*;
iig
I
i€$i;
{+{i
;I:P
EIFi
t;:i
rgi
.trtr-rt!
i,li;
5Ct{t!
ii*{i
t
t!:
'ii$18
TiES
'ftriii
l'
€-sEgtEFiF
F$iii:
r
titf,:
Eliilt{
r,€
ii!
iii
t
EI!19
fB t
cll
$algi:t
{uE
f
! IiFr
r{riE
F'it
[$t
!f'EEiiF
I
:il
\
:tF
$i:
EE?!
it*r
.
tgttl
$siii
'r
tia{
!rt
EFE+f
it5:!e
'!
!iiE
'iEi
i.;
i
itattF
!IE 1F
t!ttE
FF
ir!
1-riF
t-iF{r;tr
ii[EF
3 F6i E5
F!i
*i
istF!
Eqtti
e
"F"
ir;l:
F;t!{R
!1iii.
ntili
a!t4t5;
t:iiF
"eEit
!::
;
taf
ii5
lFg
r$tiE
Fiit
ECoS 2015 -r4dr ieodoGl co6r.ic Fr.@
cdic
sci.lyl ..ltDttuw&arrlt@$1ffi
ieJctdklrcal
OrganisingCommittee
le&*&NeeA4.lfu*%Frc
Intemational Advisory Board
tud.@ddrerdttuee
Deternination of fracture totrghngs ofsmall cenmic discs aDd platB Dsitrg the ball-on-tbree-bslls tesa
Tdia Luber. Stefe R4chc1, TjototdacdeTirlaNindhia:, Srefd SFoblr
\n$itut ffir Shkrur lnd FunklionskeEnik. Monbuiversibel
k
bh, ler.Tunne.Sftn 5.3700 L€6b€n,
Aufir
Depdnen orVRhdE. tn8leen & I dr)aM I r.teriry.l'nbrm. Ba i. lndone.is Mr'e'ialsce re' Leoben l-o$lungCmbH, Ro*scebrmle l2,3 00 kokn,Ausma Ketryods: ball{n-three-bails l€s! Facturc toueiDes, ninjatuied d@h ical testirs.
Abstmcl: Fmcnn€ bDghr6s
m*wnals
on cemicconpo!{ts
d mt€rialse
sudly lqfomed on alatively ldge, b&-shap€d specinem (3 r 4
:
45 nm"l), whicb deofi€n mEh bissq the conlonents or the
eomi
ol naterial that is available fron lab scaleprcesing uits, Suitdble sDecinens thu have to be nelfactued spdtely md oflen with
a diff@nt prcc*sing route.Then nicrosb@tft dd theEfoe th€n mechdical b€havior cm
vrry lor tnis reaon. A new nactre ntruelness tesl h pEsenled. w[ich @ be applied to din
di$ or plateihaped sp€cinetr (0.5
m
thickrcs). lt isbsd
on the ballon-lnree-balls (B3B) test, which is a bidial srrengd t$l n€ihod Rll-suited fof lhe stengthnedwnot
of llin circule discs o! r€cllngdd plates. If the sp€cinec
e
pepd€d *ith a o@k of welldenned e€onetry, the B3B test
@
be used for n&hre tougnness hebu€nenls too. Indalog/ b tne surfm cmck in flexue (SCF) detho4 atificial semi€lliptical surfrc€ cEks
e
inaoduced irlo the enler oflhe discs with a (n@p in.lenter ddre plalicolly dofomed zone is rnoved by edndine or polishirg. Tnen the sp4ines @ loaded bidiallyin the B3Bt€st jie. The cnck is opeftd in node I duing loading.
Ai6
$e tes! the @ck sizesre
n*uEd
on the6etw
surfac6. The evalution of stes inlensiry f&tos is basd on finile elmenl cahdatioN.lir sol$ioG for the Fet@ sEess ed tle seon€tric frclor calcdat€dfo! pnctic.lly elevel mges of spdmem ed crok dimeNios
e
provided loeelbo silhM0ilTAl{
ul{vtnstrAl
Determination
of
fracture toughness
of
small
ceramic
discs
and plates
using
the
ball-on-three-balls
test
Tanja Lubel, Stefan Raschel, Tjokorda Gde
llrta
Nindhiar,Stefan Strobll,
qnsdtlt for s!!kb)r und Fuktlonslcdmib Mont nunisldt Lebe., Arstda
,DeparFmnt of Medrail€l Engln4dng, udat"M unlwEity, lhb€En, Ball, hdoaia
:t'4at!ials cent€r Lshen FlRhurc GmbH, L6ben, aLskl:
ECERS XN, 2l - 25, June 2015, Toledo
Motivation
stnndard KFspecimen
available material & components
Material properties depend
on
consolidation and
sintering conditions
WfiNTED
test
method
for
fracturc
toughness
applicable
to
small
material
pieces
++
+
+
ball-on-three-balls
test
B3B testPrinciple
Knoop
zone: grind off
/-\
K,.="","
yl:,i,;,,)ra
--xtp"F#
Goals
support R"
-(t
R-
\
F
=,Ia,i,,
)e
(1)
Fit-formulae
for
geometric
function
f
easy
evaluation
of
the
tests
further
calculations
possible
(sub-critical
crack
groMh,
btigue,
...)
(2)
Error
analysis
.
errors
from
B3Btest
('
1olo,Poisson's
ratio!!!)
.
errors
from
cmck
position
.
errors
from
crack shape
determination
(3)
Experimental
validation
Parametric
FEM
full
3D
FEMmodel
simulations
disc
&
f
support radius
&
I
dE
AE
EE
tl
0.4
0.50.05
0.100,1
0.20.1
0.20.6
0.70.15
0.2 0,30.3
0.40.8
Db
D= 2R13.8s6mm
20mm8mm
200GPa6,
F...-(r R \
F
f
l
.e .v
-\R'R' )
T
result of FEl4 simulation
a
c*
K,
along
the
crack
front
cc,
4
t=
0.15 and 4R.= 0.2c
non-symmetric
poisition of maximum depends
on
--
crack shape-
Poisson's ratioYa=
Y(a=0o)
rc=maxr(85"<p<90')
,']=
"....Gi
K\
response
s
urface
Fit-formulae
for
model
Y
inear terms interaction terms quadratic terms
3.s6 .
10j
-0.013779
0.0t6227
0.005191 s.96 . 105
-0.0074s0
0.007435
0.002684
Error
analysis
-
position
-\out
of
/al (a\ (t\
r. + c'
l;
l-',
[i
J-c.l&
J+'.
'+
..
t:
lt:
I
.,t:l(+).
"f
:1..
"
t:l[;l..
|:)..
*[i
Jtat'
lat'
lt\
6',1;
I
+c'
ttJ +."[4J
--rllSFK
errors
in plane shift,
\ ^.
plane shift, Arl
t
alh.
,"
,.,.
K
rotation, ct
Experimental validation
-.I
ffiMHIH
,..
0.545'"'
+ o.oo3H
@
E
0.23
85 + 7 110:! 57.5
9_5 + 1.802
0.012
o.zt
7a!
1140+1
53,5 + 0.2
(sEvNB)
5.1+ 0.2
(scD
5.0 + 0.2
(SEVNB)
ft-
Experimental validation
-
position
.rrorc
-\
5,5
5,0
3,5 3,0
x-Ofbet = 750pm
(-
3c-
o,2
Ra)fracture does NOT
sta.t
at indentation crackno influence of rctation
3.5 + 0.1
5.0 + 0.3
s. shbr 4 ar,
r6e
ra42 (2014)a
FESummary
M
simulations
-
fit
formulae for geometry function at two positionsError analysis
-
Poisson's ratio is important-
shift away from the central point causes signmcanteror
-
rotation causes no significanteffor
-
crdck
which are clitical at A are less affected by errors-
suiirable for smallsp€cimens:a
D"B
mm,t"o.5mm:
error +10o/o, larger specimens: similarto
standard /ar. mExperimental
validation
excellent agreement of B3B-KC wi bends of error analysis validated applicable to discs and plates