WATER QUALITY MONITORING IN PEPE RIVER
THESIS
A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF POSTGRADUATE PROGRAM FOR THE
DEGREE OF MASTER IN ENVIROMENTAL SCIENCE
BY:
MOHMED ABRAHEM M ARSHEDA NIM. A131302014
POSTGRADUATE PROGRAM SEBELAS MARET UNIVERSITY
WATER QUALITY MONITORING IN PEPE RIVER SURAKARTA
THESIS By:
MOHMED ABRAHEM M ARSHEDA NIM. A131302014
Supervisor Board
Name Signature Date
Supervisor I Dr. I Gusti Ayu Ketut R achmi Handayani , S.H.,M.M
Supervisor II Prof. Dr. Ir. MTh Sri Budiastuti, M.Si
Fulfil the Qualificatiopn On 6 February 2014
Head of Environment Sciences Study Program Postgraduate Program of Sebelas Maret University
WATER QUALITY MONITORING IN PEPE RIVER SURAKARTA
THESIS
By
MOHMED ABRAHEM M ARSHEDA NIM. A131302014
Has been maintained in front of reviewers and has been declared eligible on the date ... June 2014
Reviewers Team :
Occupation Name Signature Date
Head Of Reviewers Dr. Sunarto, M.S
NIP.195406051991031002
Reviewer Members Dr. I Gusti Ayu Ketut R achmi Handayani , S.H.,M.M
NIP. 197210082005012001
Prof.Dr.Ir. MTh.Sri Budiastuti, M.Si NIP. 1959120519850320012
Certified :
Director of Postgraduate Program Sebelas Maret University
Head of
Environmental Science Study Program
Prof. Dr. Ir. Ahmad Yunus, M.S. NIP.196107171986011001
ORIGINALITY AND PUBLICATION STATEMENT
Name : MOHMED ABRAHEM M ARSHEDA NIM : A131302014
We declared that:
SURAKARTA
Is my work and free of plagiarism, and there is no scientific papers that have been asked by others to obtain academic degrees and there is no work or opinion ever written or published by another person exception writing used as reference in this text and a reference sources well as mentioned in the bibliography .I fat a later proved there is plagiarism in scientific papers, If in the future proved my statement is not true, then I am willing to accept the academic sanction, revocation of a degree that I obtained from this thesis
PREFACE
the First, thanks to allah Almighty and our Prophet Muhammad for the strength and courage of faith to complete the thesis.My sincere gratefulness goes to the important people without whom I would never have been able to finish my thesis: my supervisors, my friends, and my family. Their guidance, help, and support were the most valuable treasure for me.
I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my first supervisors,Dr. I Gusti Ayu Krh, S.H.,M.H ., and my second supervisors,Prof. Dr. Ir. Sribudi Astuti . for their excellent guidance, care, and patience that had provided excellent atmosphere to do my research.
SUMMARY
Pepe River is a river that crosses the city of Surakarta, splitting the northern part of the city. This river will lead to the Solo River, one of the largest river in Java. Before emptying into the Solo River, the river will be joined by several rivers such as Anyar River and Gajahputih River. The rivers that flow through the city and empties into the Bengawan Solo will also affect the quality of the main river, Bengawan Solo.
Pepe River headwaters west of the city of Surakarta, Boyolali region. Before entering the urban area, with potential activity dominated by agriculture and livestock pollution. With higher pollution level sare expected to occur when Pepe River flow entering the urban area of Surakarta.
Observation studies showed a high density on the riverbank Pepe River region, especially into the urban area. Dense residential density will contribute a lot of domestic waste into the water. This will potentially worse if attention to lack of availability of sanitation facilities and processing household waste.
Surakarta is a city of commerce, does not have a huge industry. However, some domestic industries are textiles, batik production. Batik industry has specific wastes are hazardous heavy metals are mixed in the stain. Metallic elements such as Cr6, Cd and Cu are widely used in the fabrication of dye to brighten staining results and increase the durability of the color on the fabric.
Observations on the social and cultural riverbank Pepe River shows low concern for the environment, especially the conservation of the river. The majority of the public views Pepe River as a family toilet and a garbage dump. Some dug wells along the river, giving the pervasive threat of contamination to the drinking water community.
Society at Pepe River riverbank area generally have lower middle economic levels. Education they have apparently not too high so that an understanding of the risks of waste and environmental awareness is still low. In some situations still visible view of small children bathing in river waters contaminated by sewage.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SHEET OF LEGALIZATION
.. ii
LIST OF FIGURES CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ... 1
A. Background ... 1
B. The Problems Statement ... 5
C. Objective of The Research ... 6
D. The Advantages of The Research ... 7
CHAPTER II. LITERATURE REVIEW... 8
A. Water problems ... 8
B. Water Resource Potencies in Indonesia. ... 11
C. Water Resources Problems in Indonesia... 12
D. Pollution Prevention and River Water Quality Improvement Programme... 15
E. Water pollution control by the authority of the government and society... 15
F. Measures Need And Has To Be Don ... 16
CHAPTER III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ... 17
B. Materials for Research ... 18
C. Population and Sampling ... 18
D. Research Procedure ... 19
CHAPTER IV A. Pepe River Condition ... 23
B. Water Sample Analysis Result... 25
C. Discussion ... 27
D. comparative Study with Indonesia Regulation ... 39
E. Study Level of Pollution with Storet Method ... 40
F. General Review of Research ... 43
CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION... 47
A. Conclusion ... 47
B. Recommendation... 47
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Laboratory Analysis Result of Pepe River Water Sample, Physical
... .26
Table 2. Laboratory Analysis Result of Pepe River Water sample, Chemical
Parameters 26
Table 3. Laboratory Analysis Result of Pepe River Water sample, Biological
Parameters 27
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 24
...
Figure 3 Comparative Histogram of Temperature Analysis
Figure 4 Comparative Histogram of Electric Conductivity Analysis
Figure 5 Comparative Histogram of pH Analysis
Figure 6 Comparative Histogram of Iron (Fe) and Manganese (Mn) Analysis
Figure 7 Comparative Histogram of Zinc (Zn) Analysis
Figure 8 Comparative Histogram of Sulphate Analysis
Figure 9 Comparative Histogram of DO, COD and BOD analysis
LIST OF APPENDIX
Appendix 1 Research Picture in 3 Station
Continued From Appendix 1
Appendix 2 Laboratory Research
Appendix 3 physical and Chemical Parameters
Continued From Appendix 3
Continued From Appendix 3
Continued From Appendix 3
Continued From Appendix 3
Continued From Appendix 3
Appendix 4 Biological parameter