• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

t bing 1007219 bibliography

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "t bing 1007219 bibliography"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Bibliography

Alwasilah, A. C. (2009). Pokoknya Kualitatif: Dasar-dasar Merancang dan Melakukan Penelitian Kulaitatif. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Boud, D. (1991). Implementing Student Self Assessment. HERDSA Green Guide. No.5. Second Edition. Sydney, Australia.

Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking Assessment for the Learning Society, Studies in Continuing Education, 22 (2), 151 - 167

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles. An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. Pearson Education, Inc., New York, USA.

Chinnawongs, S. (2001). In Search of an Optimal Writing Feedback Strategy. PASSA, 31 (July), 27 – 43.

Cohen, A. D. (1996). Speech Acts. In Mckay, S. L., & Hornberger, H. N. (eds). (1996). Sociolinguistics and language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Corder, P. (1967). The Significance of Learners’ Errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5: 161 – 170.

Creswell, J. (2009). Research Design. California: Sage Publications.

De Bot, K., Lowie, W. & Verspoor, M. (2005). Second Language Acquisition: An Advance Resource Book. Routlage Applied Linguistics. New York, USA.

Enginarlar, H. (1993). Student Response to Teacher Feedback in EFL Writing. System, 21 (2): 193 – 204.

(2)

Fujieda, Y. (2007). Perceptional Changes Toward Peer Response: How Writers Incorporated Feedback Into Revision. Retrieved March 28, 2012, from http://www.kyoai.ac.jp/college/ronshuu/no-09/fujieda.pdf

Gebhard, J. G. (2000). Teaching English as a Foreign or Second Language. USA: The University of Michigan Press.

Harmer, J. (2007). How to Teach English. China: Pearson Education Limited.

Hamer, J., Kell, C. & Spence, F. (2007). Peer Assessment Using Aropa; Australian Computing Society. Retrieved January 20, 2013, from www.cs. Aukland.ac.nz/~j-hamer/peer-assessment-using-Aropa.pdf

Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on Feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3 (2): 141 – 163.

Huntley, H. S. (1992). Feedback strategies in intermediate and advance second language composition. A discussion of the effects of error correction, peer review, and student-teacher conferences on students writing and performance.

Washington, DC. Education Resources Information Center. ERIC Database ED355809.

Hyland, K., (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in Second Language Writing. USA: Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R. T. (1998). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th edition). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Kumar, R. (1996). Research Methodology: A Step by Step Guide for Beginners. Addison Wesley Longman Australia Pty Limited.

(3)

Lee, N. S. Written Peer Feedback by EFL Students: Praise, Criticism and Suggestion. Retrieved March 28, 2012, from http://park.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/eigo/KJEE/001/129-139.pdf

Leki, I. (1991). The Preferences of ESL Students for Error Correction in College -Level Writing Classes. Foreign Language Annuals, 24: 203 – 218.

Lin, G. H. C., & Chien, P. S. C. (2009). An investigation into the effectiveness of peer feedback. Journal of Applied Foreign Languages Fortune Institute of Technology, 3, 79 – 87.

Liu, E. Z., Lin, S. S.,Chiu, C., & Yuan, S. (2001) Web-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education. 44, 246-251.

Liu, J., & Hansen, J. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Lynch, R., Seery, N. & Gordon, S. (2010). The Formative Value of Peer Feedback in Project Based Assessment. 3rd International Symposium for Engineering Education, 2010, University College Cork, Ireland.

Murphy, T., & Jacons, G. M. (2000). Encouraging Critical Collaborative Autonomy. JALT Journal, 22, 228 – 244.

Nicol, D. (2010a). From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback in Mass Higher Education. Assessment and evaluation in Higher Education, 35:5, 501 – 517

Nicol, D. (2010b). The Foundation of Graduate Attributes: Developing Self-regulation Through Self and Peer Assessment. QAA Scotland, Enhancement

Themes. Retrieved January 20, 2013, from

www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/documents/G21C/Assessment 150910.pdf

(4)

Nunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Poehner, M., & Lantolf, J. (2005). Dynamic Assessment and the Transcendence of Mediated Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 323 – 340.

Radecki, P. M., & Swales, J. M. (1988). ESL Student Reaction to Written Comments on Their Written Work. System, 16 (3): 355 – 365.

Rollinson, P. (2005). Using Peer Feedback in the ESL writing class, ELT Journal, 59 (1), 23 – 30.

Sadler, D. R. (2010) Beyond Feedback: Developing student Capability in Complex Appraisal, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher education, 35:5, 535 – 550

Saito, H. (1994). Teachers’ Practices and Students’ Preferences for Feedback on

Second Language Writing: A Case Study of Adult ESL Learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11: 46 – 70.

Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004). Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 8 (1), 31 – 54.

Sanjaya, W. (2005). Pembelajaran dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Somervell, H. (1993). “Issues in Assessment, Enterprise and Higher Education: The Case for Self-, Peer and Collaborative Assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 18 (3): 221 – 233.

Sultana, A. (2009). Peer Correction in ESL Classrooms. BRAC University Journal, Volume VI, no. 1, 2009, pp. 11 – 19. Bangladesh.

Taylor, B. (1981). Content and written form: A two-way street. TESOL, Quarterly, 15 (1), 5 – 13.

Thaksanan, P. (2007). Effects on Peer Correction on Student’s Writing. Master’s

(5)

Ting, M. & Qian, Y. (2010). A Case Study of Peer Feedback in a Chinese EFL Writing Classroom. Chinese Journal of applied Linguistics, Volume 33, no. 4, Aug, 2010, pp. 87 – 98. China.

Truscott, J. (1996). The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes. Language Learning 46 (2): 327 – 369.

Villamil, O., & Guerrero, M. (1998). Assessing the Impact of Peer Revision on L2

Writing. Retrieved January 20, 2013, from

www.applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/19/4/491.pdf

Walz, J., (1982). Error Correction Techniques for the Foreign Language Classroom. Washington DC. : Prentice Hall Inc.

Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the Affective Advantage of Peer Feedback in the ESL Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4: 209 – 222.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Newmann and Thompson (1987) question whether cooperative learning is effec tive in senior high school (grades 10 12) There is ample evidence that these methods

Ciparay dapat membina karakter siswa, karena mata pelajaran PPKn termasuk.. kelompok mata pelajaran umum wajib A dan dapat menjadi mata

pendekatan ilmiah pada modul sistem operasi ini mendapatkan nilai sangat baik. Tujuh responden pada penelitian mendeskripsikan pendapat yaitu,

dilakukan seseorang dapat dilihat dari hasil yang telah dicapai dalam. belajar, yaitu berupa

dapat melatihkan kemampuan berpikir ktiris dan penguasaan konsep siswa. Selanjutnya, selain adanya keterkaitan model inkuiri terbimbing dengan. berpikir kritis ataupun

is subject to Final Withholding Tax but the Final Withholding Tax has not been deducted and remitted to the TLRS must be included in you Gross Income at Line 5 of your income

Sumatera Utara Medan Untuk Melengkapi Salah Satu Syarat Ujian Sarjana Dalam.. Bidang Ilmu

butir soal dengan materi dan kesesuaian butir soal dengan indikator soal. Sedangkan untuk validitas butir soal diperoleh berdasarkan hasil. uji coba instrumen. Teknik yang