• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

chapter12.ppt 211KB Dec 31 1997 01:06:16 PM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "chapter12.ppt 211KB Dec 31 1997 01:06:16 PM"

Copied!
17
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Chapter XII

Chapter XII

Sampling:

Sampling:

Final and Initial Sample Size

Final and Initial Sample Size

Determination

(2)

Chapter Outline

Chapter Outline

1) Overview

2) Definitions and Symbols

2) Definitions and Symbols

3) The Sampling Distribution

4) Statistical approaches to Determining Sample Size

4) Statistical approaches to Determining Sample Size

5) Confidence Intervals

i. Sample Size Determination: Means

ii. Sample Size Determination: Proportions

6) Multiple Characteristics and Parameters

6) Multiple Characteristics and Parameters

(3)

8) Adjusting the Statistically Determined Sample Size

8) Adjusting the Statistically Determined Sample Size

9) Non-response Issues in Sampling

9) Non-response Issues in Sampling

i. Improving the Response Rates

i. Improving the Response Rates

ii. Adjusting for Non-response

ii. Adjusting for Non-response

10) International Marketing Research

11) Ethics in Marketing Research

11) Ethics in Marketing Research

12) Internet and Computer Applications

13) Focus On Burke

13) Focus On Burke

14) Summary

14) Summary

15) Key Terms and Concepts

15) Key Terms and Concepts

(4)

Symbols for Population

Symbols for Population

and Sample Variables

and Sample Variables

Table 12.1

Table 12.1

Variable Population Sample

Mean µ X

Proportion  p

Variance 2 s2

Standard deviation  s

Size N n

Standard error of the mean x Sx

Standard error of the proportion p Sp

Standardized

variate (z) (X-µ)/ (X-X)/S

Coefficient of variation (C)  S/X

-

(5)

-95% Confidence Interval

[image:5.720.29.647.91.450.2]

95% Confidence Interval

Figure 12.1

Figure 12.1

X

L

_

X

U

_

X

_

(6)

Steps Means Proportions

1. Specify the level of precision D = $5.00 D = p - = .05

2. Specify the confidence level (CL) CL = 95% CL = 95%

3. Determine the z value associated with CL z value is 1.96 z value is 1.96

4. Determine the standard deviation of the

population Estimate :  = 55 Estimate :  = 0.64

5. Determine the sample size using the

formula for the standard error n =

2z2/D2 = 465 n = (1-) z2/D2 = 355

6. If the sample size represents 10% of the population, apply the finite population correction

nc = nN/(N+n-1) nc = nN/(N+n-1)

7. If necessary, reestimate the confidence

interval by employing s to estimate  =   zx = p

zss p

8. If precision is specified in relative rather than absolute terms, determine the sample size by substituting for D.

D = Rµ

n = C2z2/R2 D = R

n = z2(1-)/(R2)

Sample Size Determination

Sample Size Determination

for Means and Proportions

for Means and Proportions

Table 12.2

Table 12.2

(7)

Variable

Mean Household Monthly Expense On Department store shopping Clothes Gifts

Confidence level 95% 95% 95%

z value 1.96 1.96 1.96

Precision level (D) $5 $5 $4

Standard deviation of the

population () $55 $40 $30

Required sample size (n) 465 246 217

Sample Size For Estimating

Sample Size For Estimating

Multiple Parameters

[image:7.720.36.693.95.449.2]

Multiple Parameters

Table 12.3

(8)

Methods of Improving Response Rates

Improving Response Rates

[image:8.720.24.712.36.510.2]

Improving Response Rates

Fig. 12.2

Fig. 12.2

Reducing Refusals

Reducing Not-at-Homes

Prior

Notification

Motivating Respondents

Incentives Questionnaire Design

and

Administration

Follow-Up Other

Facilitators

(9)

Arbitron Responds to Low Response Rates

RIP 12.1

RIP 12.1

Arbitron, a major marketing research supplier, was trying to improve response rates in order to get more meaningful results from its surveys. Arbitron created a special cross-functional team of employees to work on the response rate problem. Their method was named the “breakthrough method” and the whole Arbitron system concerning the response rates was put in question and changed. The team suggested six major strategies for improving response rates:

1. Maximize the effectiveness of placement/follow-up calls.

2. Make materials more appealing and easy to complete.

3. Increase Arbitron name awareness.

4. Improve survey participant rewards.

5. Optimize the arrival of respondent materials.

6. Increase usability of returned diaries.

(10)

Exit Polling of Voters

Exit Polling of Voters

RIP 12.2

RIP 12.2

Warren Mitofsky, executive director of Voter Research and Surveys (VRS), states that planning exit interviews for a presidential election begins two years before the big day. The New York City-based staff of 22 grows to 60 during an election year; on election day, it blossoms to 6,000 workers who conduct exit interviews at 1,500 polling places.

(11)

Uncooperative pollsters are a problem among exit polling. VRS workers are told to record a basic demographic profile for non-compliers. From this demographic data, a voter profile is developed to replace the uncooperative pollster using the method of substitution. Age, sex, race, and residence are strong indicators of how Americans vote. For example, younger voters are more likely to be swayed by moral issues whereas older voters are more likely to consider a candidate’s personal qualities. Thus, VRS substitutes for non-respondents for other potential respondents who are similar in age, sex, race, and residence. The broad coverage of exit interviews and the substitution technique for non-compliant pollsters allow VRS to obtain margins of error close to 3 to 4%.

RIP 12.2 Contd.

(12)

Percentage Response Average Dollar

Expenditure Percentage of PreviousWave’s Response

First Mailing 12 412 __

Second Mailing 18 325 79

Third Mailing 13 277 85

Nonresponse (57) (230) 91

Total 100 275

Use of Trend Analysis in

Use of Trend Analysis in

Adjusting for Non-response

[image:12.720.22.702.86.432.2]

Adjusting for Non-response

Table 12.4

(13)

Finding Probabilities Corresponding

Finding Probabilities Corresponding

to Known Values

[image:13.720.38.698.28.455.2]

to Known Values

Figure 12A.1

Figure 12A.1

Z Scale

µ-3 µ-2 µ-1 µ µ+1 µ+2 µ+3

35 -3 40 -2 45 -1 50 0 55 +1 60 +2 65 +3

(µ=50,  =5)

Z Scale

Area is 0.3413

Area between µ and µ + 1 = 0.3431

Area between µ and µ + 2 = 0.4772

(14)

Finding Values Corresponding to

Finding Values Corresponding to

Known Probabilities

[image:14.720.43.702.30.504.2]

Known Probabilities

Figure 12A.2

Figure 12A.2

Area is 0.500

Area is 0.450

Area is 0.050

X

50

X Scale

-Z

0

(15)

Area is 0.475

Area is 0.475

X

50

X Scale

-Z

0

Z Scale

Area is 0.025

Finding Values Corresponding to Known

Finding Values Corresponding to Known

Probabilities: Confidence Interval

[image:15.720.29.698.33.500.2]

Probabilities: Confidence Interval

Fig. 12A.3

Fig. 12A.3

Area is 0.025

(16)

Marketing research firms are now turning to the Web to conduct online

research. Recently, four leading market research companies (ASI

Market Research, Custom Research Inc., M/A/R/C Research and

Roper Search Worldwide) partnered with Digital Marketing Services

(DMS), Dallas, to conduct custom research on AOL.

DMS and AOL will conduct online surveys on AOL's

Opinion Place

,

with an average base of 1,000 respondents by survey. This sample

size was determined based on statistical considerations as well as

sample sizes used in similar research conducted by traditional

methods. AOL will give rewards points (that can be traded in for

prizes) to respondents. Users will not have to submit their e-mail

addresses. The surveys will help measure response to advertiser's

online campaigns. The primary objective of these researches is to

gauge consumers' attitudes and other subjective information that can

help media buyers plan their campaigns.

Opinion Place

Bases Its Opinions on 1000

Respondents

RIP 12.3

(17)

Another advantage of online surveys is that you are sure to reach your

target (sample control) and that they are quicker to turn around than

traditional surveys like mall intercepts or home interviews. They also

are cheaper (DMS charges $20,000 for an online survey, while it costs

between $30,000 and $40,000 to conduct a mall-intercept survey of

1,000 respondents).

RIP 12.3 Contd

Gambar

Figure 12.1Figure 12.1
Table 12.3Table 12.3
Fig. 12.2Fig. 12.2
Table 12.4Table 12.4
+4

Referensi

Dokumen terkait