• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

THE EFFECT OF IMAGING ORGANIZER ON STUDENTS’ DESCRIPTIVE WRITING ABILITY.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "THE EFFECT OF IMAGING ORGANIZER ON STUDENTS’ DESCRIPTIVE WRITING ABILITY."

Copied!
18
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

THE EFFECT OF IMAGING ORGANIZER ON STUDENTS’

DESCRIPTIVE WRITING ABILITY

A THESIS

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Pendidikan

by:

JELITA SITORUS

Registration Number 2113121035

ENGLISH DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND ARTS

STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)

vi

LIST OF TABLES

Page

Table 2. 1 The Sixth Group of Prewriting Frameworks ... 15

Table 3. 1 Research Design ... 24

Table 3.2 Descriptive Writing Indicators ... 26

Table 3.3 Treatment in Experimental Group ... 27

Table 3.4 Conventional Teaching in Control Group ... 28

Table 3.5 The Coefficient of (r) ... 30

Table 4.1 Students’ Score in Pre-Test ... 33

Table 4.2 Students’ Score in Post test ... 34

Table 4.3 Students’ Score in Pre-test and Post test ... 36

Table 4.4 Students Distribution Score Base on Sudijono’s Classification ... 36

Table 4.5 Normality of Data ... 39

(6)

vii

LIST OF FIGURES

Page

Figure 2.1 The Stages of Writing ... 7

Figure 2.2The Stages of Writing ... 9

Figure 2.3 The Example of Imaging Organizer ... 18

Figure 4.1 Students’ score in Pre-test ... 33

Figure 4.2 Students’ score in Post test ... 35

Figure 4.3 Students’ score in Experimental Group ... 36

(7)

i

ABSTRACT

Sitorus, Jelita. 2113121035. The Effect of Imaging Organizer on Students’ Descriptive Writing Ability. A Thesis, Faculty of Languages and Arts, State University of Medan. 2016.

This study deals with the effect of Imaging Organizer on students’ descriptive writing ability. The objective of this study was to find out if there was a significant effect of Imaging Organizer on students’ descriptive writing ability. It was conducted by using experimental research. The population of this study was tenth grade of SMA N 1 Siantar Narumonda, which is consisted of 8 parallel classes. Two classes were taken as the sample of the research. The class X 2 was a experimental group and class X 6 was as control group. The experimental group was taught by using Imaging Organizer strategy, otherwise control group was taught by using conventional strategy. The instrument for collecting data was writing test. The data was analyzed by using t-test formula. The result shows that the value of t-observed is higher than the value of t-table. (2.29>1.994 ( α= 0.05)) with the degree of freedom (df) = 70. Based on the data analysis of the study, the result indicates that the alternative hypothesis ( ) was accepted. It means that Imaging Organizer affects on students’ descriptive writing ability.

(8)

DECLARATION

Except where appropriately acknowledged, this thesis is my own work,

has been expressed through my own words and has not previously been submitted

for assessment.

I understand that this thesis may be screened electronically or otherwise

for plagiarism.

Medan, November 2015

Jelita Sitorus

(9)

iv

c. Descriptive Writing Assessment ... 13

3. Imaging Organizer ... 14

a. The Nature of Imaging Organizer ... 14

b. Advantages and Disadvantages of Imaging Organizer ... 16

c. Teaching Descriptive Writing through Imaging Organizer ... 17

(10)

v

e. Conventional Strategy ... 19

B. The Relevant of the Study... 20

C. Conceptual Framework ... 20

D. Hypothesis ... 21

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD ... 23

A. Research Method ... 23

B. Research Design ... 23

C. Population and Sample ... 24

D. The Instrument of Collecting Data ... 25

E. The Criteria of Scoring Writing Test ... 26

F. The Procedures of Research... 27

G. The Validity and Reliability of the Test ... 28

H. The Technique of Analyzing Data ... 30

CHAPTERIV THE DATA AND DATA ANALYSIS ... 32

A. Data Description ... 32

B. Data Analysis ... 37

C. Testing Hypothesis ... 41

D. Research Findings ... 41

E. Discussion ... 42

CHAPTERV CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION... 44

A. Conclusion ... 44

B. Suggestions ... 44

REFERENCES ... 45

(11)

viii

LIST OF APPENDICES

Page

Appendix A The Pre-test and Post test in Experimental and Control Groups 47

Appendix B Students’ score of Pre-test and Post test of Experimental groups 48

Appendix C Students’ score of Pre-test and Post test of Control groups ... 49

Appendix D The Calculation of Reliability of the Test ... 50

Appendix E Test for Distribution of Frequency in Experimental Group ... 52

Appendix F Test for Distribution of Frequency in Control Group ... 55

Appendix G Testing Normality in Experimental Group ... 58

Appendix H Testing Normality in Control Group ... 62

Appendix I Test for Homogeneity of Variance of Post test in Experimental and Control Groups ... 65

Appendix J The Calculation of t-test ... 67

Appendix K Table of Normality from 0 to Z ... 70

Appendix L Table List of testing Liliefors ... 71

Appendix M Percentage Points of the t Distribution ... 72

Appendix N Lesson Plan ... 73

(12)

1

1

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

A. Background of the Study

None has doubts about the function of using a language; that is to

communicate. English is one of International Languages besides French,

Arabic, Chinese, Spanish and Russian. It is a medium to exchange the

information, to tell ideas and to express their opinions. Nowadays, English is

important to be learnt since it is used in science, art, politics, education,

technology, etc. So, one is hoped to be able to listen, to speak, to read and to

write in English well.

Everyone believes that writing is one of the ways to deliver, tell, and

inform every single idea in our mind. Somehow, writing is the toughest part of

English, since our grammar/structure and vocabulary are needed in this skill.

In addition, lack of regular reading habits may be the cause of difficulties in

writing. Experiences, events, histories and ideas can be expressed through

written form, which is considered very difficult for many students. It is proved

that Indonesian’s writing International English Language Test System

(IELTS) score is the lowest of all skills. It shows in the score of IELTS

researchers’-test-taker performance in 2012 for listening (6.3), speaking (6.1),

reading (6.5), and writing (5.7)source:

(13)

2

2

Thus, the reality was experienced while taking teaching training/

(PPL) in SMA N 1 Kisaran, the students complained whenever they were

asked to write on a certain topic. Actually, they had not any idea and even if

they had ideas, the problem was they do not know how to arrange their ideas

or put them in to a good order. They found many difficulties in delivering

their ideas through writing. Actually, the students should be able to write a

text, but students’ writing ability is still low. Based on the syllabus for tenth

grade of senior high school, the students should able to write four genres

namely: narrative, descriptive, recount, and explanation. In this study is

limited to focus on teaching descriptive text.

Students might have some ideas on their mind, but they do not know

how to express them in writing. It may arise because of the inappropriate

learning strategy applied by teachers in teaching writing. The researcher found

that most of English teachers tend to focus merely on providing their students

with vocabulary relating to the required topic and some guiding questions in

order to help them shape their ideas into the completed paragraphs. Besides

that, the researcher found that some teachers, taught the students grammar in

so epic a way for the whole teaching time, but indeed being well-understood

students in grammar - either theoretically or practically - is not the objective of

standard competence and basic competence from teaching English. In

addition, it may arise because of students’ motivation, students’ prior

(14)

3

Responding to these problems and by considering the importance of

writing skills, it is compulsory to find a fit strategy as a solution to that

situation. Actually, there are some ways to facilitate students’ writing ability

namely: Brainstorming, Key Words, Web/Cluster, Sketch and Label and

Imaging Organizer, etc. Imaging Organizer is proposed to solve the problem

since it can stimulate students to express the ideas and to elaborate them

briefly.

An Imaging Organizer is, like a graphic organizer, a visual

representation of knowledge that structures information by arranging aspects

of a concept or topic through making pictures. Making pictures means to make

pictures in our minds into blank sheets. Picture refers to a description that

gives you an idea in your mind of what something is like.

According to the research that has been done by Mahmood, Nikoo & Bonyadi (2013) in Tehran proved that Graphic Organizer is useful method for learning enhancing reading comprehension among Iranian EFL learners. Another research which were done by Griffin, Malone & Kameenui (2001) in McGraw-Hill clarified that Graphic Organizer facilitate comprehension, recall, and transfer information contained in an expository book. In addition, Handini and Saragih (2013) found that Four Square Graphic Organizer gave significant effect on students’ achievement in writing descriptive text.

(15)

4

use of critical thinking. In addition, it can generate excitement and enthusiasm toward learning. Therefore, this study is designed and conducted to identify the effect of Imaging Organizer.

B. The problem of the Study

The problem of the study is formulated:

Is there any effect of Imaging Organizer on the students’ ability in writing

descriptive text?

C. The Objective of the study

The objective is to find out whether there is the effect of Imaging

Organizer on students’ ability in writing descriptive text for students in the

tenth grade of SMA N.1 Siantar Narumonda.

D. The Scope of the Study

This research was only focusing to teach descriptive text, exactly in

describing person by using Imaging Organizer.

E. The Significance of the Study

The finding of this research is expected to be useful for:

1) Theoretically, it develops the theories for teaching writing

especially descriptive text.

2) Practically, It is as a reference for teachers in English

teaching-learning process especially in teaching descriptive text. Then, it enlarges

the understanding of others researcher in improving in writing skill and

(16)

44 CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

A. Conclusion

The result of calculation test shows that the observed (2.29)> the

t-table (1.994). It means that the alternative hypothesis is accepted. So, it is

concluded that Imaging Organizer strategy affects the students’ ability in writing

descriptive texts.

B. Suggestions

As the result of the study, it is suggested that:

1. The English teachers should use the strategy in their attempt to improve

students’ ability in writing descriptive text, especially for the students

who have difficulty to explore ideas, to think of what to write on the

writing substantial.

2. Since this research is limited to the investigation of the Imaging

Organizer on writing and how the Imaging Organization can be

developed is not known, it is suggested that a research should be done

(17)

45

REFERENCES

Al-Hinnawi, Arwa N. 2012. The Effect of the Graphic Organizer Strategy on Students’ English Vocabulary Building. English Language Teaching.

IV (12) 62-69

Ary, Donald., Jacobs, Lucy Cheser. & Razavieh, Asghar. 2002. Introduction to

Research in Education (sixth edition). Canada: Wadsworth Group.

________________. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education (eighth

edition). Canada: Wadsworth Group.

Best, J.W., and Kahn, J. V. 2006. Research in Education (tenth edition). Boston: Pearson Education.

Carol, J.A, E. Wilson & G. Forlini. 2001. Writing and Grammar. New Jersey: Prentice.

Chamot, Anna Uhl. et al. 1999. The Learning Strategies Handbook. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Demire, Ozcan. 2013. English Language Teaching Methodologies. Ankara: Pegem A Yayinlari.

Dirgeyasa, I Wy. 2012. Maritime English Writing. Medan: Unimed Press.

Dirgeyasa, I W. 2014. College Academic Writing: A Genre Based Perspective. Medan: Unimed Press.

Griffin, C.C., Malone, L. D. & Kameenui, E.J. 2001. Effects of Graphic Organizer Instruction on Fifth-Grade Students. The Journal of Educational

Research. Vol. 89 (2) 1-10.

Handini, Frida Dian and Saragih, Amrin. 2013. Improving the Students’ Achievement in Writing Descriptive Text. Register.

Harmer, Jeremy. 2003. How to teach Writing. London: Pearson Education

Harmer, Jeremy. 2004. How to teach Writing. London: Pearson Education

Hyland, Ken. 2009. Teaching and Researching Writing, (second edition). England: Pearson Education.

Hughes, Arthur. 2003. Testing for Language Teachers, (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Knapp, Peter and Megan, Watkins. 2005. Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies

(18)

46

Kothari, C.R. 2004. Research Methodology Methods and Technique, (second

revised edition). New Delhi: New Age International.

Mahmood, M.H.K., Nikoo, F.R. & Boyandi, A. 2013. The Role of Schema or Background Knowledge Activation and Graphic Organizer on Increasing Iranian EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, Vol.2 (2) 1-13.

Mcknight, Khaterine S, 2013. The Elementary Teacher’s Big Book of Graphic

Organizers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Patel, M.F., and Jain, P.M. 2008. English Language Teaching : Methods, Tools

and Technique. Jaipur : Sunrise Publishers and Distributors.

Roberts, Jane M.E, 2004. 25 Prewriting Graphic Organizers and Planning Sheets. New York: Scholastic.

Richard-Amato,Patricia A. 2003. Making It Happen, (third edition). New York: Pearson Education.

Shoari, Elnaz and Farrokhi Farrahman. 2014. The Effect of Graphic Organizer Strategy on Improving Iranian EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning.

IJRLT. I (3) 71-82.

Siahaan, Sanggam. 2008. Issues in linguistics. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Siregar, Nurhafni. 2011. The Effect of Graphic Organizer and Concientiousness

on Students’ Achievement in Reading Comprehension. Medan: English Applied Linguistics Study Program Postgraduate State University of Medan.

Sudijono, Anas. 2007. Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raya Gravindo Persada

Tayib, Abdul-Majeed. 2015. The Effect of Using Graphic Organizer on Writing.

International Journal of English Language Teaching. III(1) 11-31

Turnbull, Joanna. et al. 2010. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Great

Clarendon Street: Oxford University Press.

Zaini, S.H., Mokhtar, S.Z. & Nawawi, M. 2010. The Effect of Graphic Organizer on Students’ Learning in School. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology. Vol. 10 (1) 1-7.

http://ielts.org/researchers/analysis-of-test-data/test-taker-performance-2012.aspx

accessed on January 27th 2015

Gambar

Figure 2.1 The Stages of Writing ...................................................................
table (1.994). It means that the alternative hypothesis    is accepted. So, it is

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

This study aims to find out wheter students’ achievement taught by using Quantum Learning is higher than taught Mind Mapping Method in writing Descriptive Text.. The research was

This research focuses on students’ ability in writing descriptive text , the development of main idea, the students’ grammatical aspects, and cohesion and

Based on the students’ difficulty in writing descriptive text, the writer wants to do the research entitled “ST UDENTS ’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT OF THE

The teachers, as one the consideration in teaching writing skill especially descriptive text by using Mind Mapping Technique. The Students to be motivated on writing

THE EFFECT OF FIELD TRIP METHOD ON STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT..

This study was aimed at finding out the effect of applying Round Robin Writing strategy on students’ achievement in writing descriptive text.. This study used the

Furthermore, the result of data analysis showed that applying controlled writing technique especially questions and answers type in writing descriptive text gave significant

Regarding to the advantages of graphic organizers above, the researcher will conduct experimental research using graphic organizer in the form of “Report Writing