THE INFLUENCE OF CO-OP CO-OP TO TEACH READING SKILL
VIEWED FROM STUDENTS’ INTEREST
(An Experimental Research in the twelfth grade students of SMK Batik 1 Surakarta in 2012-2013 Academic Year)
Thesis
Presented
As partial fulfillment of the requirements for
the graduate degree of English education
By
SUSENO APRIADI
NIM. S891108110
ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
GRADUATE PROGRAM
PRONOUNCEMENT
Herewith, I testify that there are no plagiarisms in this thesis from the previous research which have been done by the other researchers. The writer only includes the opinion from the experts and he includes the source in this research paper. If in the next day there are plagiarisms found in this research paper, the writer will be fully responsible for that.
Surakarta, 07 April 2013
Motto
Reading is the way to understand the
world
(Researcher)
“Read! In the Name of your lord Who
has created (all that exists). He has
taught man that which he knew not”
ABSTRACT
Suseno Apriadi, NIM. S891108110. The Influence of Co-op Co-op to Teach Reading Skill Viewed From Students’ Interest (An Experimental Research in the
twelfth grade students of SMK Batik 1 Surakarta in 2012-2013 Academic Year). First
Consultant: Prof Dr. Joko Nurkamto, M.Pd; Second Consultant: Dr. Sujoko, M.A. Thesis. Surakarta. English Education Department Graduate Shool, Sebelas Maret University of Surakarta. 2013.
The goal of this research is to find out whether: (1) Co-op Co-op is more influencing than Direct Instruction to teach reading at the twelfth graders of SMK Batik Surakarta in the Academic Year of 2012/2013; (2) the students who have high interest have better reading skill than those who have low interest at the twelfth graders of SMK Batik Surakarta in the Academic Year of 2012/2013; and (3) there is an interaction between teaching method and interest for teaching reading at the twelfth graders of SMK Batik Surakarta in the Academic Year of 2012/2013.
The method which is applied in this research is experimental study. It was conducted at the twelfth graders of SMK Batik Surakarta. The population of the research is the twelfth graders of SMK Batik Surakarta in the Academic Year of 2012/2013. The samples were two classes. In taking the sample, a cluster random sampling technique was applied. Each class was divided into two group; the students who have high and low interest. Then, the techniques which were used to collect the data were questionnaire of interest and a multiple choice test for reading skill. The two instruments were tried out to get valid and reliable items. The data were analyzed by using multifactor analysis of ANOVA 2x2 and tuckey test.
Based on the result of the analysis, there are some research findings that can be taken: (1) Co-op Co-op is significantly different from Direct Instruction to teach reading and Co-op Co-op is more influential than Direct Instruction to teach reading. (2) The reading skill of the students who have high interest is significantly different from that of those who have low interest and (3) There is an interaction between teaching method and interest in teaching reading; (a) for the students who have high interest, Co-op Co-op is more influential than Direct Instruction to teach reading and (b) for the students who have low interest, Direct Instruction is more influential than op op to teach reading; and Direct instruction is not influential than op Co-op to teach reading.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
All praises just for Allah SWT, The lord of the universe, the One who sent the Messenger Muhammad SAW to guide human to the safest religion, Islam. Thanks for blessing me in finishing my thesis entitled “The Influence of Co-Op Co-Op to Teach
Reading Skill Viewed from Students’ Interest”. I also would like to say thank to
beloved person in the world, Muhammad SAW for his guidance to the human kind the earth and for bringing them into His light. Furthermore, I would like to express my thanks and appreciation to the people who have contributed so many things for me in finishing my thesis.
His deepest gratitude and appreciation are addressed to: (1) The Director of Graduate Program of the University of Sebelas Maret Surakarta; (2) The Head of English Educational Department of Graduate Program of the University of Sebelas Maret Surakarta; (3) Prof. Dr. Joko Nurkamto, M.Pd as first consultant and Dr. teacher in control class in conducting this research. He would like to deliver special thanks to beloved mother and father, and sisters.
Finally, he realizes that this thesis is still far from perfect, so he always needs constructive criticism and suggestions from the readers in order to make this thesis improve. Last but not least, he does expect that this thesis can be very useful to other researchers, teachers, and students as well.
DEDICATION
My beloved parents who always pray for me
My beloved sisters
Andianto who alwas makes me laugh, motivates,
support and encourage to finish this thesis
All my friends who always support me in doing this
thesis
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE PAGE ……… i
APPROVAL PAGE BY THE ADVISORS…...……… ii
LEGITIMATION PAGE BY THE EXAMINERS……….. iii
PRONOUNCEMENT ………. iv
MOTTO ……… v
ABSTRACT ………..………... vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ………..……… vii
DEDICATION ……… viii
TABLE OF CONTENT ………..……… ix
LIST OF TABLES ……… xii
LIST OF FIGURES ………. xiii
LIST OF APPENDICES ………. xiv
Chapter I: INTRODUCTION ……….. 1
A.Background of the study ………... 1
B.Identification of the Problem ………. 8
C.Problem Limitation ………... 9
D.Problem Statement………. 9
E.Benefit of the Study ……….. 10
Chapter II: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ……….. 11
a. Definition of Reading ………. 11
b. Types of Reading ………….….………. 14
c. Micro and Macro Skill of Reading………. . 16
d. Principles of Teaching Reading ……….. 19
e. Models of Reading ……….. 21
1) Description of Direct Instruction ………. 33
2) Procedure of Direct Instruction……… 36
3) The Advantages of Direct Instruction ……… . 36
4) The Disadvantages of Direct Instruction ………… 37
3. Interest ……… 38
a. Definition of Interest ……….. 38
b. Factors Affecting Learning Interest ……… 39
c. Roles of Interest in Learning ……….. 41
B.Review on Related Studies ………. 42
C.Rationale ……….. 45
Chapter III: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ……….. 50
A.Place and Time of Research ……… 50
B.Research Method ………. 51
C.Population, Sample and Sampling………... 52
D.Technique of Collecting the Data ……… 53
E.Validity and Reliability of Instrument………. 56
F. Technique of Analyzing the Data………. 58
G.Statistical Hypothesis……… 69
Chapter IV: THE RESULT OF THE STUDY ……….. 72
A.The Description of the Data ………... 72
B.Normality and Homogeneity Test………... 81
C.Hypothesis test ……… 86
D.Discussion of the Result of the Study ……… 90
Chapter V: CONCLUSION, IMPLICATION AND SUGGESTION …….. 95
A.Conclusion ………. ……… 95
B.Implication ……… 95
C.Suggestion ………. 97
References……… 98
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1. Time schedule of the research ……… 50
Table 3.2 Positive statement ……….. 55
Table 3.3 Negative statement ………. 55
Table 3.4 Anova ………. 63
Table 3.5 Summary of the analysis ………. 68
Table 4.1 frequency distribution of A1 ……….. 73
Table 4.2 frequency distribution of A2 ……….. 74
Table 4.3 frequency distribution of B1 ……….. 75
Table 4.4 frequency distribution of B2 ……….. 76
Table 4.5 frequency distribution of A1B1 ………. 77
Table 4.6 frequency distribution of A2B1 ………. 78
Table 4.7 frequency distribution of A1B2 ………. 79
Table 4.8 Frequency Distribution of A2B2 ……… 80
Table 4.9 Normality Test ………... 81
Table 4.10 the Result of Homogeneity Test ……… 85
Table 4.11 the Homogeneity Test ……….... 86
Table 4.12 Multifactor Analysis of variance ……… 87
List of Figure
Figure 4.1 ……… 73
Figure 4.2 ………..……….. 74
Figure 4.3 ………..………. 75
Figure 4.4 ………...……… 76
Figure 4.5 ……….……….. 77
Figure 4.6 ………..……… 78
Figure 4.7 ……….………. 79
LIST OF APPENDIXES
