46
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Gebreabiezgi Teklebirhan, Adane Bitew. Prevalence of Dermatophytic
Infection and the Spectrum of Dermatophytes in Patients Attending a Tertiary
Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. International Journal of Microbiology.
2015.
2. Maria da Gloria, Santana GB, Criado PR, et al. Chronic widespread
dermatophytosis due to Trichophyton rubrum: a syndrome associated with a
Trichophyton-specific functional defect of phagocytes. Front Microbiol.2015.
3. Hidayati Afif Nurul, dkk. Mikosis Superfisialis di Divisi Mikologi Unit Rawat
Jalan Penyakit Kulit dan Kelamin RSUD Dr. Soetomo Surabaya Tahun
2003-2005.Berkala Ilmu Kesehatan Kulit dan Kelamin. 2009.
4. Havlickova Blanka, A.Czaika Victor, Friedrich markus. Epidemiological
trends in skin mycoses worldwide. Blackwell publishing Ltd Mycoses. 2008
5. Ilkit M, Durdu M. Tinea pedis: the etiology and global epidemiology of a
common fungal infection. Critical Riviews in Microbiology. 2015.
6. Bell-Syer SE, Khan SM. Torgerson DJ. Oral treatments for fungal infections of
the skin of the foot. 2012
7. Perdoski. Dermatofitosis Superfisialis. Jakarta: balai penerbit FKUI 2001
8. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1091684-overview#a6
Akses
29
9. Vikas Kumar, Ragini Tilak1, Pradyot Prakash, Chaitanya Nigam, Richa Gupta.
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences 2 (2011) 134-138 Tinea Pedis–an Update
10.
http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/magazines/allwoman/Myths-surrounding-athlete-s-foot-_16490106 Akses 20 Januari
11. Wolff Klaus Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology In General Medicine Seventh Edition
Volume Two . New York: Mc Graw Hill Medical,2008.
12. http://www.bpac.org.nz/BPJ/2014/December/docs/BPJ65-tinea-pedis.pdf
Akses 30 November
13.
http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/athletes-foot/basics/definition/con-20014892 Akses 30 November
14. .http://www.dermnetnz.org/fungal/tinea-pedis.html Akses 1Desember
15. Gino A
Epidemiology of dermatophytoses: retrospective analysis from 2005
to
2010
and
comparison
with
previous
data
from
1975.
NEWMICROBIOLOGICA, 35, 207-213, 2012
16. Burns Toni, et al. Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology Volume 2.Wiley
Blackwell ;2012
17. Carlo CJ, Bowe MD. Tinea Pedis (Athlete’s Foot) [pamphlet]. (USA); 2012.
18. http://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/17887/5/Chapter%20I.pdf
Akses 30 November
20. W.J.S Poerwadarmita.Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia.Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
1996
21. Djajusman H.S. Polisi dan Lalu Lintas. Bandung: Mabak. 1976 :8
22. Elder, David. Lever’s Histopathology of The Skin Tenth Edition.
Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2009.
23. Wolff, klaus. Fitzpatrick’s Color Atlas and Synopsis of Clinical Dermatology
Seventh Edition. New York: Mc. Graw Hill,2013
24. Zhou Z, Liu T, Zhang Z. Skin Disease in United Nations Peacekeepers in
Lebanon. J. R. Army Med Corps. 2016
25. Baihaqy Muhammad. Prevalensi dan Faktor Risiko Terjadinya Tinea Pedis
pada Pekerja Pabrik Tekstil. Semarang : Universitas Diponegoro; 2014
26. Mustofa Ahmad. Prevalensi dan Faktor Risiko Terjadinya Pityriasis
Versicolor pada Polisi Lalu Lintas Kota Semarang. Semarang : Universitas
Diponegoro ; 2014
27. Matricciani Lisa, Jones Sara. Treating Tinea Pedis in Patients with Diabetes.
Lampiran 3. Kuesioner penelitian
KUESIONER PENELITIAN
HIGIENE PERORANGAN TERHADAP
TINEA PEDIS
Keterangan Responden
1. Nomor
:
2. Tanggal pemeriksaan
:
3. Petugas pemeriksa
:
Identitas Responden
1. Nama
:
2. Jenis Kelamin
:
3. Umur
:
4. Pangkat
:
5. Satuan Kepolisian
:
6. Mulai bekerja di kepolisian :
7. Nomer HP
:
8. Apakah anda pernah mendapatkan terapi tinea pedis (kutu air) pada 1
bulan terakhir?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
Petunjuk Pengisian : Berilah tanda silang (X) pada jawaban yang anda pilih
I. Kebersian Umum
1. Berapa kali anda mandi setiap harinya?
Skor
a. Dua kali atau lebih
(1)
2. Apakah anda mandi selalu memakai sabun mandi?
a. Ya
(1)
b. Tidak
(0)
3. Apakah sabun yang anda gunakan adalah sabun antiseptik?
a. Ya
(1)
b. Tidak
(0)
4. Bagaimana penggunaan handuk yang anda pakai?
a. Digunakan sendiri
(1)
b. Digunakan untuk banyak orang/bergantian
(0)
5. Berapa seringkah anda mengganti handuk anda?
a. 3 hari sekali
(1)
b. 5 hari sekali
(0)
6. Apakah anda mencuci kaki dan mengeringkannya setelah beraktivitas?
a. Ya
(1)
b. Tidak
(0)
7. Apakah saat mandi anda menggosok dan membersihkan sela-sela jari kaki,
tumit, dan area kaki?
a. Ya
(1)
b. Tidak
(0)
II. Kebersihan yang terkait pekerjaan
1. Berapa seringkah anda mengganti kaos kaki anda?
a. Setiap hari
(1)
b. Dua hari sekali atau lebih
(0)
2. Jika sepatu dan kaos kaki anda tidak langsung dicuci, bagaimanakah anda
menyimpan benda tersebut?
a. Diletakkan di tempat yang terkena sinar matahari langsung
(1)
b. Diletakkan di tempat yang tidak terkena sinar matahari
(0)
3. Berapa jam dalam sehari anda memakai sepatu?
a. Kurang dari 8 jam
(1)
III. Durasi mengatur lalu lintas
1. Berapa lama durasi anda mengatur lalu lintas?
a. < 4 jam
(1)
Lampiran 4. Hasil Analisis
Analisis Univariat
Coordi nates of the Curve Test Result Variable(s): Umur
20.00 1.000 1.000 22.00 1.000 .824 25.00 1.000 .765 27.50 .958 .765 28.50 .833 .706 29.50 .792 .647 30.50 .625 .647 31.50 .625 .529 32.50 .583 .412 34.00 .458 .412 36.00 .417 .412 38.50 .333 .412 40.50 .333 .353 41.50 .292 .294 43.00 .250 .235 44.50 .208 .235 45.50 .208 .176 47.00 .208 .118 49.00 .167 .118 51.00 .125 .118 52.50 .083 .059 54.00 .042 .000 56.00 .000 .000 Positiv e if Greater Than
or Equal Toa Sensitiv ity 1 - Specif icity
The test result v ariable(s): Umur has at least one tie between t he posit iv e actual state group and t he negat iv e actual state group.
The smallest cutof f v alue is the minimum
observ ed t est v alue minus 1, and the largest cutof f v alue is the maximum observ ed test v alue plus 1. All the other cutof f v alues are t he av erages of two consecutiv e ordered observ ed test v alues. a.
Coordi nates of the Curve
Test Result Variable(s): Lama bekerja
.00 1.000 1.000 1.50 1.000 .882 2.50 1.000 .824 6.00 1.000 .765 9.50 .917 .706 10.50 .833 .647 11.50 .708 .588 12.50 .583 .471 13.50 .542 .412 15.00 .458 .412 16.50 .417 .412 18.00 .333 .412 19.50 .333 .294 21.00 .292 .294 22.50 .167 .294 23.50 .125 .294 25.00 .125 .235 27.00 .125 .118 28.50 .083 .118 30.50 .083 .059 32.50 .042 .059 33.50 .042 .000 35.00 .000 .000 Positiv e if Greater Than
or Equal Toa Sensitiv ity 1 - Specif icity
The test result v ariable(s): Lama bekerja has at least one tie between the posit iv e actual state group and t he negativ e actual state group.
The smallest cutof f v alue is the minimum
observ ed t est v alue minus 1, and the largest cutof f v alue is the maximum observ ed test v alue plus 1. All the other cutof f v alues are t he av erages of two consecutiv e ordered observ ed test v alues. a.
3. ROC Higiene
Coordi nates of the Curve Test Result Variable(s): HIgiena
2.00 1.000 1.000 3.50 .958 1.000 4.50 .958 .882 5.50 .917 .824 6.50 .833 .647 7.50 .583 .294 8.50 .333 .176 9.50 .125 .000 11.00 .000 .000 Positiv e if Greater Than
or Equal Toa Sensitiv ity 1 - Specif icity
The test result v ariable(s): HIgiena has at least one tie between t he posit iv e actual state group and t he negat iv e actual state group.
The smallest cutof f v alue is the minimum
observ ed t est v alue minus 1, and the largest cutof f v alue is the maximum observ ed test v alue plus 1. All the other cutof f v alues are t he av erages of two consecutiv e ordered observ ed test v alues. a.
Analisis Bivariat
1. Kategori Lama bekerja
Crosstab 4 0 4 1.7 2.3 4.0 23.5% .0% 9.8% 13 24 37 15.3 21.7 37.0 76.5% 100.0% 90.2% 17 24 41 17.0 24.0 41.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count
Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count
Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis < 6 >= 6 Lama bekerja Total positif negatif Tinea pedis Total Chi-Square Tests 6.258b 1 .012 3.870 1 .049 7.664 1 .006 .024 .024 6.105 1 .013 41 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1. 66.
b.
Risk Estimate
2.846 1.837 4.410
41 For cohort Tinea
pedis = positif N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al
2. Kategori durasi mengatur lalu lintas
3. Kategori higiena
Crosstab 10 11 21 8.7 12.3 21.0 58.8% 45.8% 51.2% 7 13 20 8.3 11.7 20.0 41.2% 54.2% 48.8% 17 24 41 17.0 24.0 41.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis CountExpected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count
Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis < 4 jam >= 4 jam Durasi mengatur lalu lintas Total positif negatif Tinea pedis Total Chi-Square Tests .672b 1 .412 .253 1 .615 .675 1 .411 .530 .308 .656 1 .418 41 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8. 29.
b.
Risk Esti mate
1.688 .481 5.929
1.361 .645 2.871
.806 .479 1.355
41 Odds Rat io f or Durasi
mengatur lalu lintas (< 4 jam / >= 4 jam) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif
For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif
N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al
Crosstab 12 10 22 9.1 12.9 22.0 70.6% 41.7% 53.7% 5 14 19 7.9 11.1 19.0 29.4% 58.3% 46.3% 17 24 41 17.0 24.0 41.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count
Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count
Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis < 7,5 >= 7,5 HIgiena Total positif negatif Tinea pedis Total Chi-Square Tests 3.347b 1 .067 2.285 1 .131 3.420 1 .064 .112 .065 3.266 1 .071 41 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7. 88.
Kategori penggunaan sabun anti septik
Risk Esti mate
3.360 .896 12.600
2.073 .892 4.818
.617 .363 1.049
41 Odds Rat io f or HIgiena
(< 7,5 / >= 7,5) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif
For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif
N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al Crosstab 8 2 10 47.1% 8.3% 24.4% 9 22 31 52.9% 91.7% 75.6% 17 24 41 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Tidak Y a sabun antiseptik Total positif negatif Tinea pedis Total Chi-Square Tests 8.092b 1 .004 6.129 1 .013 8.278 1 .004 .008 .007 7.895 1 .005 41 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
1 cells (25.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4. 15.
Kategori penggunaan handuk
Risk Esti mate
9.778 1.729 55.304
2.756 1.465 5.182
.282 .080 .993
41 Odds Rat io f or sabun
antiseptik (Tidak / Y a) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif
For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif
N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al Crosstab 2 0 2 11.8% .0% 4.9% 15 24 39 88.2% 100.0% 95.1% 17 24 41 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis digunakan bany ak orang
digunakan sendiri pemggunaan handuk Total positif negatif Tinea pedis Total Chi-Square Tests 2.968b 1 .085 .974 1 .324 3.667 1 .055 .166 .166 2.896 1 .089 41 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is . 83.
Kategori frekuensi mengganti handuk
Risk Estimate
2.600 1.748 3.867
41 For cohort Tinea
pedis = positif N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al Crosstab 9 10 19 52.9% 41.7% 46.3% 8 14 22 47.1% 58.3% 53.7% 17 24 41 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis 5 hari sekali 3 hari sekali mengganti handuk Total positif negatif Tinea pedis Total Chi-Square Tests .509b 1 .476 .156 1 .693 .509 1 .476 .537 .346 .496 1 .481 41 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7. 88.
Kategori mencuci kaki setelah aktivitas
Risk Esti mate
1.575 .451 5.504
1.303 .629 2.698
.827 .486 1.406
41 Odds Rat io f or mengganti
handuk (5 hari sekali / 3 hari sekali)
For cohort Tinea pedis = positif
For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif
N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al Crosstab 3 6 9 17.6% 25.0% 22.0% 14 18 32 82.4% 75.0% 78.0% 17 24 41 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Tidak Y a mencuci kaki Total positif negatif Tinea pedis Total Chi-Square Tests .314b 1 .575 .031 1 .859 .320 1 .572 .711 .435 .306 1 .580 41 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
1 cells (25.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3. 73.
Kategori menggosok dan membersihkan daerah kaki
Risk Esti mate
.643 .136 3.035
.762 .279 2.079
1.185 .681 2.062
41 Odds Rat io f or mencuci
kaki (Tidak / Y a) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif
For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif
N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al Crosstab 3 3 6 17.6% 12.5% 14.6% 14 21 35 82.4% 87.5% 85.4% 17 24 41 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Tidak Y a membersihkan daerah kaki Total positif negatif Tinea pedis Total Chi-Square Tests .211b 1 .646 .000 1 .991 .208 1 .648 .679 .488 .206 1 .650 41 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2. 49.
Kategori mengganti kaos kaki
Risk Esti mate
1.500 .264 8.523 1.250 .510 3.066 .833 .358 1.939 41 Odds Rat io f or membersihkan daerah kaki (Tidak / Y a) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif
For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif
N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al Crosstab 11 10 21 64.7% 41.7% 51.2% 6 14 20 35.3% 58.3% 48.8% 17 24 41 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis 2 hari sekali atau lebih
setiap hari f rekuensi ganti kaos kaki Total positif negatif Tinea pedis Total Chi-Square Tests 2.114b 1 .146 1.293 1 .256 2.138 1 .144 .208 .128 2.063 1 .151 41 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8. 29.
Kategori penyimpanan sepatu
Risk Esti mate
2.567 .711 9.266
1.746 .797 3.824
.680 .399 1.159
41 Odds Rat io f or
f rekuensi ganti kaos kaki (2 hari sekali atau lebih / setiap hari) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif
For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif
N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al Crosstab 5 11 16 29.4% 45.8% 39.0% 12 13 25 70.6% 54.2% 61.0% 17 24 41 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis tidak terkena sinar
matahari
terkena sinar matahari peny impanan sepatu Total positif negatif Tinea pedis Total Chi-Square Tests 1.128b 1 .288 .543 1 .461 1.145 1 .285 .344 .232 1.100 1 .294 41 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6. 63.
Kategori lama memakai sepatu
Risk Esti mate
.492 .132 1.837
.651 .283 1.498
1.322 .801 2.182
41 Odds Rat io f or
peny impanan sepatu (tidak terkena sinar matahari / t erkena sinar matahari) For cohort Tinea pedis = posit if For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al Crosstab 17 21 38 100.0% 87.5% 92.7% 0 3 3 .0% 12.5% 7.3% 17 24 41 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis > 8 jam < 8 jam lama memakai sepatu Total positif negatif Tinea pedis Total Chi-Square Tests 2.293b 1 .130 .820 1 .365 3.380 1 .066 .254 .190 2.237 1 .135 41 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1. 24.
Risk Estimate
.553 .415 .736
41 For cohort Tinea
pedis = negat if N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al
