• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Profitabilitas Perbankan (Studi Empiris pada Bank Pembangunan Daerah periode 2010-2015)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Profitabilitas Perbankan (Studi Empiris pada Bank Pembangunan Daerah periode 2010-2015)"

Copied!
12
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Lampiran 1 : Pemilihan Bank Melalui Kriteria Berdasarkan Purposive Sampling

No Nama Bank Kriteria

1

Kriteria 2

Yang

memenuhikriteria 1 dan 2

1 PT. BPD Aceh   

2 PT. BPD Bali   

3 PT. BPD Bengkulu   

4 PT. Bank DKI   

5 PT. BPD Jambi   

6 PT. BPD Jawa Tengah   

7 PT. BPD Jawa Barat dan Banten, Tbk   

8 PT. BPD Jawa Timur, Tbk   

9 PT. BPD Kalimantan Tengah   

10 PD.BPD Kalimantan Timur   

11 PT. BPD Kalimantan Barat   

12 PT. BPD Kalimantan Selatan   

13 PT. BPD Lampung   

14 PT. BPD Maluku   

15 PT. BPD Nusa Tenggara Barat   

16 PT. BPD Nusa Tenggara Timur   

17 PT. BPD Papua   

18 PT. BPD Riau Kepri   

19 PT. BPD Sulawesi Tengah   

20 PT. BPD Sulawesi Tenggara   

21 PT. BPD Sulawesi Utara   

22 PT. BPD Sulawesi Selatan dan Sulawesi

(2)

23 PT. BPD Sumatera Barat   

24 PT. BPD Sumatera Selatan dan Bangka

Belitung   

25 PT. BPD Sumatera Utara   

(3)

LAMPIRAN 2

Hasil olahan data Populasi

(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)

2011

PT. BPD Sumatera Selatan dan

Belitung 2.56 25.87 6.67 75.98 80.64 1.46 6.44

2012

PT. BPD Sumatera Selatan dan

Belitung 1.90 16.71 6.50 75.98 82.28 6.82 16.10

2013

PT. BPD Sumatera Selatan dan

Belitung 1.76 11.74 7.97 94.80 86.23 9.01 5.36

2014

PT. BPD Sumatera Selatan dan

Belitung 2.13 15.63 7.91 85.97 81.54 7.10 4.67

2015

PT. BPD Sumatera Selatan dan

(8)

LAMPIRAN 3

Statistik Deskriptif Variabel Penelitian

BOPO LDR NIM NPL PDRB ROA ROE

Mean 73.76269 87.76276 8.441603 2.371731 48.20859 3.306474 25.81647 Median 73.04500 87.40000 8.035000 1.685000 6.405000 3.180000 25.70500 Maximum 100.8300 128.4300 18.04000 10.36000 456.8900 7.440000 48.39000 Minimum 55.29000 43.83000 4.950000 0.130000 -6.660000 0.010000 -0.360000 Std. Dev. 8.067412 14.32439 2.076560 2.145709 101.7453 1.118146 7.728395 Skewness 0.493458 -0.068574 1.542055 1.784668 2.281606 0.598044 -0.125790 Kurtosis 3.822428 3.300858 7.147910 6.145019 6.943104 4.271313 3.671651

Jarque-Bera 10.72754 0.710614 173.6598 147.1034 236.4113 19.80461 3.343651 Probability 0.004683 0.700958 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000050 0.187904

Sum 11506.98 13690.99 1316.890 369.9900 7520.540 515.8100 4027.370 Sum Sq. Dev. 10087.89 31804.15 668.3759 713.6306 1604577. 193.7888 9257.854

(9)

LAMPIRAN 4

Hasil Uji Chow dan Uji Hausman pada Variabel ROA

Redundant Fixed Effects Tests Equation: Untitled

Test cross-section fixed effects

Effects Test Statistic d.f. Prob.

Cross-section F 3.700648 (25,125) 0.0000 Cross-section Chi-square 86.417690 25 0.0000

Cross-section fixed effects test equation: Dependent Variable: ROA

Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 10/06/16 Time: 19:10 Sample: 2010 2015

Periods included: 6

Cross-sections included: 26

Total panel (balanced) observations: 156

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 7.462626 0.669374 11.14866 0.0000 NIM 0.160124 0.030184 5.305004 0.0000 LDR 0.007563 0.003624 2.086677 0.0386 BOPO -0.083838 0.006868 -12.20786 0.0000 NPL -0.021774 0.024563 -0.886461 0.3768 PDRB 0.001331 0.000566 2.350366 0.0201

(10)

Correlated Random Effects - Hausman Test Equation: Untitled

Test cross-section random effects

Test Summary

Chi-Sq.

Statistic Chi-Sq. d.f. Prob.

Cross-section random 20.189729 5 0.0012

Cross-section random effects test comparisons:

Variable Fixed Random Var(Diff.) Prob.

NIM 0.140875 0.155252 0.000313 0.4162 LDR -0.002970 0.002643 0.000004 0.0036 BOPO -0.064731 -0.074099 0.000016 0.0202 NPL -0.043402 -0.035219 0.000377 0.6736 PDRB 0.001512 0.001390 0.000000 0.3467

Cross-section random effects test equation: Dependent Variable: ROA

Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 10/06/16 Time: 19:13 Sample: 2010 2015

Periods included: 6

Cross-sections included: 26

Total panel (balanced) observations: 156

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 7.182734 0.807320 8.897009 0.0000 NIM 0.140875 0.034112 4.129759 0.0001 LDR -0.002970 0.003969 -0.748295 0.4557 BOPO -0.064731 0.007864 -8.231162 0.0000 NPL -0.043402 0.031918 -1.359779 0.1763 PDRB 0.001512 0.000506 2.987206 0.0034

Effects Specification

Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)

(11)

LAMPIRAN 5

Hasil Uji Chow dan Uji Hausman pada Variabel terikat ROE

Redundant Fixed Effects Tests Equation: Untitled

Test cross-section fixed effects

Effects Test Statistic d.f. Prob.

Cross-section F 3.621688 (25,125) 0.0000 Cross-section Chi-square 84.995501 25 0.0000

Cross-section fixed effects test equation: Dependent Variable: ROE

Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 10/06/16 Time: 19:18 Sample: 2010 2015

Periods included: 6

Cross-sections included: 26

Total panel (balanced) observations: 156

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 39.59475 5.944054 6.661237 0.0000 NIM 0.969897 0.268031 3.618607 0.0004 LDR 0.036119 0.032183 1.122300 0.2635 BOPO -0.308203 0.060984 -5.053864 0.0000 NPL -1.210458 0.218118 -5.549560 0.0000 PDRB 0.009731 0.005029 1.934815 0.0549

(12)

Correlated Random Effects - Hausman Test Equation: Untitled

Test cross-section random effects

Test Summary

Chi-Sq.

Statistic Chi-Sq. d.f. Prob.

Cross-section random 21.577195 5 0.0006

Cross-section random effects test comparisons:

Variable Fixed Random Var(Diff.) Prob.

NIM 0.680501 0.901647 0.026209 0.1719 LDR -0.053628 -0.002878 0.000313 0.0041 BOPO -0.519502 -0.398132 0.001370 0.0010 NPL -0.922080 -1.146500 0.031489 0.2060 PDRB 0.008468 0.008920 0.000001 0.7053

Cross-section random effects test equation: Dependent Variable: ROE

Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 10/06/16 Time: 19:19 Sample: 2010 2015

Periods included: 6

Cross-sections included: 26

Total panel (balanced) observations: 156

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 64.87697 7.201770 9.008476 0.0000 NIM 0.680501 0.304300 2.236286 0.0271 LDR -0.053628 0.035410 -1.514496 0.1324 BOPO -0.519502 0.070153 -7.405274 0.0000 NPL -0.922080 0.284729 -3.238443 0.0015 PDRB 0.008468 0.004516 1.875399 0.0631

Effects Specification

Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Penelitian ini menggunakan metode survei dengan teknik kausal, dimana data dianalisis dengan analisis jalur (path analysis). Selanjutnya dilakukan analisis pengaruh

Wakil Ketua Komtap Pelaku dan Penyedia Jasa Logistik Kadin Indonenesia Anggota Team Penyedia Jasa Logistik Sislognas4. 2014 – Saat ini, Ketua Umum Asosiasi Pengusaha

We show that (1) our algorithm can effectively estimate the correctness of extractions, the truthfulness of triples, and the accuracy of sources; (2) our model significantly

Muhibin (2003: 151) menyampaikan bahwa terhambatnya minat belajar akan menghambat pertumbuhan cita-cita. Siswa yang tidak didukung oleh minat belajar, cendrung

[r]

aattscai liGimnB-fecnftn^an Jiopadn aaU ap Xsagoamm - dan Jiy a pada Iscttaotodaa p csarlntaiu. Khueuaa/A

Nyeri berhubungan dengan terputusnya kontinuitas jaringan tulang (fraktur) akibat kecelakaan lalu lintas yang ditandai dengan klien mengatakan merasa nyeri pada bagian kepala depan

Mengenal Magnet, Medan Magnet, cara membuat magnet, benda-benda yang dapat dijadikan bahan membuat magnet dan benda-benda yang tidak bisa dijadikan bahan