ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
j o ur na l h o m e p a g e :w w w . c a s e r e p o r t s . c o m
Osteofibrous dysplasia-like adamantinoma versus osteofibrous dysplasia in children: A case report of challenging diagnosis
Achmad Fauzi Kamal
a, Fahmi Anshori
a,∗, Evelina Kodrat
baDepartmentofOrthopaedic&Traumatology,CiptoMangunkusumoNationalCentralHospitalandFacultyofMedicine,UniversitasIndonesia,Jalan DiponegoroNo.71,JakartaPusat,Jakarta10430,Indonesia
bMusculoskletalPathologyDivision,DepartementofAnatomicPathology,FacultyofMedicineUniversitasIndonesia-CiptoMangunkusumoHospital, Jakarta,Indonesia
a rt i c l e i nf o
Articlehistory:
Received7January2021
Receivedinrevisedform22January2021 Accepted23January2021
Availableonline28January2021
Keywords:
Osteofibrousdysplasia
Osteofibrousdysplasia-likeadamantinoma Immunohistochemicalstaining
a b s t ra c t
INTRODUCTION:Osteofibrousdysplasia(OFD)andOsteofibrousdysplasia-likeAdamantinomahaveasim- ilarappearancebothinclinicalandradiography,butdifferentinitshistopathology.Despitethissimilarity, thetreatmentandprognosisaredifferent,thereforethediagnosisshouldbeestablishedprecisely.
CASEILLUSTRATION:Athree-year-oldboywasadmittedtohospitalafterfallingonhislowerleg.Abead sizelumpappearedonhistibiawithpainandswelling,whichlaterbecameenlarged.Diagnosisofosteofi- brousdysplasiaandadamantinomawasconsidered.Weperformedlimb-salvageprocedurebycurretage, bonegrafting,andinternalfixationapplication.Thehistologysectionshowedwovenbonerimmedby polygonalosteoblastcellwithinterveningfibrousstromaandsmallnestsoftumourcellsraisedthepossi- bilityofepithelialdifferentiation.Thepositivityforcytokeratinimmunostainingconfirmedthediagnosis asosteofibrousdysplasia-likeadamantinoma.Inthiscaseitisaveryrarespectrumofmalignancyin children.
DISCUSSION: These two tumor entities have identical radiographic characteristics, histopathology featuresthedistinction betweenclassicadamantinoma andOFD-like adamantinomabased onthe predominantepithelialcomponent.Therelationshipofosteofibrousdysplasiawithadamantinomais unclear.Severalauthorsconsideredpossiblecallingrelationshiposteofibrousdysplasiaas“juvenile adamantinoma”.However,doesnotruleoutthepossibleexistenceofdenovoosteofibrousdysplasia notrelatedtoadamantinoma.
CONCLUSIONS:OFD-likeadamantinomaandOsteofibrousDysplasiahadsimilarhistopathologypattern, apathologistmustbeawareofthisfeatureandperformimmunohistochemicalstainingforkeratinpar- ticularlywhenthehistopathologicalfeatureofosteofibrousdysplasiashowedsmallnestsoftumorcells withinthefibrousstroma.diagnosticchallengingandrequiremultidisciplinaryapproach.
©2021TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierLtdonbehalfofIJSPublishingGroupLtd.Thisisanopen accessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
1. Introduction
Osteofibrousdysplasia(OFD)andOFD-likeAdamantinomahave asimilarappearancebothinclinicalandradiography,butdiffer- entinitshistopathology.Despitethissimilarity,thetreatmentand prognosisare verydifferent,thereforeestablishmentof diagno- sisshouldbeperformedprecisely.TheagespectrumofOFDisin thefirstandseconddecadeoflifewhereastheagespectrumof adamantinomaisolderthan20.ThepredilectionsiteofOFDmost oftenintheanteriorshaftofthetibiaofchildern[1,2].TheOFD makesuplessthan1%ofallprimarybonetumour,andusually developinpatientsyoungerthan20yearsoldorinskeletallyimma-
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mailaddresses:fauzikamal@yahoo.com(A.F.Kamal),fhmanshori@gmail.com (F.Anshori),evelina.kodrat@yahoo.com(E.Kodrat).
turepatients.MostlyallOFDoccurintheshaftoftibia,withfew reportsariseinfibulaandotherlongbonesinarmsuchashumerus, radius,andulna.Adamantinomacandevelopatanyagewithado- lescentandyoungadultaremostoftenaffected.Thesetumours frequentlyfoundinthemiddlepartofthetibia,andinmanycases thefibulaisalsoaffected.Inrareinstances,alsocanbefoundinthe bonesofthearm,rib,pelvic,foot,andspine.About20%ofthese tumourmetastasizetootherpartsofthebodies,mostoftentothe lung,lymphnode,andotherbones[3,4].
AlthoughOFDhastypicalhistopathologyfeature,OFD-likeareas arealsoobservedatperipheryofclassicadamantinoma,andsome haveindicatedthatOFDcouldbeeitheraprecursortooraregres- siveadamantinomaprocess[5].
Theso-called OFD-likeadamantinomasharescertainaspects ofboth OFDand adamantinoma.In anefforttobetterdescribe theirmorphology,clinicalcourse,andrelationship,expertshave analysedthephysiology,biochemical,histopathology,immunohis-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.01.093
2210-2612/©2021TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierLtdonbehalfofIJSPublishingGroupLtd.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
CASE REPORT – OPEN ACCESS
A.F.Kamaletal. InternationalJournalofSurgeryCaseReports80(2021)105599
tochemistry,ultrastructural,andmolecularcharacteristicsofOFD andadamantinomas.PatientswithOFDwereusuallyyoungerthan thoseofwithadamantinoma.Osteoblasticandosteoclastwasmore commoninOFDthaninOFD-likeadamantinoma.Inadditiontothe unnoticeablesmallclustersofepithelialcellsinOFD-likeadamanti- noma,isolatedkeratin-positivecellswithaspecialultrastructural hybridfibroblastic-epithelial phenotypehavebeenfoundinthe stromaofallOFDandOFD-likeadamantinomas[6,7].Analysiswith insitufluorescencehybridizationrevealedtrisomies7,8,and/or 12intheOFD,OFD-like,andclassicadamantinomawithspindle cell stroma,supportingOFDneoplasticoriginanda typicalhis- togenesisforall3lesions.Trisomiesinosteoblastsorosteoclasts werenotfound,indicatingthattheosseousportionisreactiveand non-neoplastic.Herewepresentour3-year-oldboywithOsteofi- brousDysplasia-likeadamantinomathatcametoourcenter.Our manuscripthasbeenreportedinlinewiththeSCAREcriteria[15].
2. Casedescription
Athree-year-oldboycametoourpolyclinicwithchiefcomplain therewasalumpandpainonhislowerleg.Hecamewithahis- toryoftraumaintibia,andpainalongwithswelling.Abeadsize lumpappearedonhisproximaltibiawithpain,whichlaterbecame enlarged(Fig.1).
Fromphysicalexaminationthemasswasnotclearlyseen,no venectationnorwound,inpalpablewefoundhardmassatmid shafttibiawithpainvasscore3–4and,illdefineborder,immobile.
Thecircumferentialdiameter24cm(contralateral23cm),range ofmotionhipandkneewasnormal.Distalneurovascularwithin normallimit(Figs.2and3).
Intraoperatively,the incisionwas madeat theanteromedial side of the leg layer by layer until the periosteum. Then the periosteumwasincisedatonesideandperformedcurettageuntil
Fig.1. Clinicalpictureofthepatient;hardpalpablemassmeasuring24cmcircumferential(contralateral23cm),immobilewithilldefinemargin.
Fig.2.Preoperativeradiographyrightcruris;showinggeographiclyticlesionseptationatmidshafttibiawithoutperiostealreaction,narrowtransitionalzone,welldefine margin,thereisnocortexbreakage,nosignsofttissueinvolvment.
Fig.3. MRIoftheleg;tumorlesionappearsonanteriorsideoftibia,isointensityonT1andhyperintensityonT2.Aftercontrastadministrationlesionuptakecontrastand enhancementoflesionwithhomogenouspattern,nosigninfiltrationintosurroundingsofttissueandintramedullary.ConclusionfromMRIareprimarybonetumorsuggestif benignsuspectosteofibrousdysplasia,nosignofmalignancy.
Fig.4.(A)identifyingandcurettageofthetumor,(B)bonedefectaftercurettageinthecruris,(C)bonegraftapplication,(D)smallDCPplateapplication.
CASE REPORT – OPEN ACCESS
A.F.Kamaletal. InternationalJournalofSurgeryCaseReports80(2021)105599
Fig.5.(A)Thehistologyshowingirregulartrabeculaeofwovenbonerimmedbyosteoblastswithinterveningfibrousstromaandsmallnestsofepithelialcells(arrow),H&E, 40×;(B)Smallnestsoftumorcellpositiveforcytokeratin(100×).
Fig.6. Post-operativex-ray.
Fig.7.Clinicalpictureafterone-yearpost-operative.
thedistalandproximaledge.Afterthecurettage,thedefectwas filledwithbonegraftandtheperiosteumwassuturedback.For the reinforcementof theleg,a small 9-holesDCP wasapplied.
After that thewound was cleansedand sutured layerby layer (Figs.4–6).
DiagnosisofOFD-likeadamantinomawasconsideredafterthis casewasdiscussedinclinicopathologyforumandourpathologist suspiciousofmultipelsmallnestislandofepithelialcellinthestro- mal.Thenweproceedtoexcludethepossibilityofmalignancywith perfomedimmunohistochemicalstainingforkeratin.Thepositiv- ityforcytokeratininimmunostainingconfirmedthediagnosisas osteofibrousdysplasia-likeadamantinoma.Inthiscase,itisvery rarespectrumofmalignancyinchildren.
Osteofibrousdysplasia-likeadamantinomahadtypicalfeature of osteofibrous dysplasia with spectrum age in childern, slow growingmass, fromimagingthere is nosignof soft tissueand intramedullary involvement ofthe tumor.Thehistology ofthis tumorisoverall similartoOFD,thebonytrabeculaearemostly rimmedbyosteoblastwithinterveningfasciclesoffibroblasticcells.
Thesmallnestsofepithelialcellsandindividualkeratinpositive cellsinthestromaarecharacteristicfeatureofOFD-likeadamanti- noma.Therefore,itisessentialtoconfirmthediagnosisfromthe morphologyandimmunostaining.
We evaluatedthepatientoneyearaftersurgery,there isno complain,patientcanwalknormallywithoutaid.Clinicalandradi- ologicalevaluationthereisnosignofrecurrencyFigs.7and8.
3. Discussion
OsteofibrousDysplasiaispredominantlyachildhood’sdisease, while adamantinoma usually occurs in adolescents and young adults,and indeedhalfofthepatientsinourOFDserieswere9 yearsoldorolder,whereasnonewithadamantinomawaslessthan 9yearsold.ThepredominantsymptomsforOFDispainless,how- everifthepainpresentitis mandatorytoincludetheOFD-like adamantinomaasadifferentialdiagnosis[1,5].
Thesetwo tumorentitieshaveidenticalradiographiccharac- teristicsincludingthepredilectionforthetibialdiaphysisanterior cortexanda multiloculated,mixedosteolyticandsclerotic pre- sentationwithscleroticmargins.Bothlesionsinthetibiamaybe multifocalorhavesynchronouslesionsinthefibula.Likeprevious studies,ourstudyshowedthattibialbowingismorecommonin OFD,howevermedullaryextensionismorefrequentinadamanti- noma, but there is no pathognomonic picture characteristic of eitherlesion.
The radiologic features of the OFD and OFD-like Adamanti- nomaarequitesimilar.Itisnotpossibletodistinguishbetween osteofibrous dysplasia and OFD-like adamantinoma based on imagingalone[9].Classicadamantinomacouldbedistinguished fromosteofibrousdysplasiaaccordingtotheinvolvementofthe medullarycavity and soft tissue extensionseen on MRI [9,12].
Completeinvolvementofthemedullarycavityisalmostalways seen in an adamantinoma. In contrast to OFD and OFD-like
CASE REPORT – OPEN ACCESS
A.F.Kamaletal. InternationalJournalofSurgeryCaseReports80(2021)105599
Fig.8.Plainradiographyafterone-yearpost-operativeandimplantremoval.
adamantinoma,intramedullaryinvolvementisminimalorabsent [9,12].
Someauthorsuggestedosteofibrousdysplasiaareradiologically diagnostic, howeverradiological featureof osteofibrousdyspla- siaandOFD-likeadamantinomaareindistinguishable.Bothhave samesitepredilectiononmidshafttibia,anteriorbowing,multiple lucencies,scleroticfoci,orbothfeaturesinvolvingtheanterolat- eral cortex of the tibia withassociated cortical expansionand sclerosisoftheinterveningcortex.Thereisalittledifferentiation betweenOFD-likeadamantinomaandosteofibrousdysplasia.OFD- likeadamantinomausuallypresentwithlonghistoryofdullpain onanteriortibia,ontheotherhandosteofibrousdysplasiausu- allypainlesswithanteriorbowingoftibia,butclinicalsymptom isnotpathognomonic.However,whenwecomparedifferentiation betweenclassicadamantinomaandOFD-likeadamantinomamore clearly,in classicadamantinomamostlythereisinvolvement of intramedullarycavity,surroundingsofttissueandcompletecorti- caldisruption.Thisimagingfeatureareabletodistinguishbetween classicadamantinomawithOFD-likeadamantinoma[3].
From histopathology feature the distinction between classic adamantinomaandOFD-likeadamantinomabasedonthepredom- inantepithelialcomponent.Inclassicadamantinomatheepithelial component isdominantandeasilyseen,but theOFD-like areas areinconspicuous.ConverselyOFD-likeadamantinomahavesmall nestsofepithelialcomponentwithpredominantOFD-likeareas.
Thesmallnestsofepithelialtumorcellsarecharacteristicfeature ofOFD-likeadamantinoma.Thesmallnestofepithelialcellsalso distinguishesOFD-likeadamantinomafromosteofibrousdyspla- sia,asintheosteofibrousdysplasiathesmallnestofepithelialcells isnotseen.Onlysinglescatteredkeratin-positivestromalcellsare presentinOFD[3,14].
OFD-likeadamantinomaandosteofibrousdysplasiahavesimi- larhistopathologypattern,pathologistmustbeawaretoperform immunohistochemicalstainingforkeratinparticularlywhenthe histopathologicalfeature of osteofibrous dysplasia shows small nestsofepithelialtumourcellswithinthefibrousstroma[1,5].
Therelationshipofosteofibrousdysplasiawithadamantinoma isunclear.Czerniaketal.[3]reportedthatthereisacontinuum oflesionswithclassicadamantinomaatoneendandosteofibrous dysplasiaattheother.Thishypothesisisalsosupportedbyanother authorconsideredthispossiblerelationshipbycallingosteofibrous dysplasiaas“juvenileadamantinoma”.Thishypothesis,however doesnotsetasidethepossibilityofdenovoosteofibrousdysplasia thathasnorelationtoadamantinoma.However,thestudydeter- minedthattherewasnodefiniteevidenceofaprecursorrolefor osteofibrousdysplasia[3,9,11].
AstheOFDisnotmalignantlesionandwillnotgrowafterthe patientreachesskeletalmaturity,thetreatmenttypicallyinvolves observationandconservativetreatment.However,ifthelesionhas causedconsiderable damagetothebone it is advisabletoper-
formsurgicalremovalofthelesioninordertostabilizethebone.
On theotherhand, treatmentof adamantinomaalwaysrequire surgery. They do not respond to chemotherapy and radiation.
Thetreatmentforadamantinomaissomewhatlikethetreatment forGCTandosteosarcomawithregardstosurgicalmanagement, adamantinomaisafarmoreaggressivelesionthanOFDandassuch requireswidelocalresectionwithreconstructivesurgeryforopti- malmanagement.Adamantinomahasariskoflocalrecurrenceand pulmonarymetastaticdiseasedespiteislowerthananotherbone malignancy.Variousstudysuggeststhatacurettagecombinedwith bonegraftcouldbeconsideredforthetreatmentofthetumorlike adamantinoma[8–10].Conservativemanagement withobserva- tionsometimescanbedone,howeverresectionwithclearmargin isrequiredforpatientswithadamantinoma.[8,13].Oneyearafter surgeryweevaluatepatientandwefoundnosignofrecurrency norprogressionintoworsecondition.However,becausethiscase of low-grademalignancy weplantoevaluateeveryyearinthis patient.
4. Conclusion
We reported a rare case of OFD-like adamantinoma which was treatedby limbsalvage surgery withcurettage,bone graft application, ORIFplateandscrew.OFD-like Adamantinomaand osteofibrousdysplasiahadsimilarhistopathologypattern,pathol- ogistmustbeawaretoperformimmunohistochemicalstainingfor keratin particularlywhen thehistopathological featureof oste- ofibrous dysplasia shows small nestsof tumorcells withinthe fibrousstroma.AlthoughtheincidenceofOFD-likeadamantinoma islow,itisimportanttorecognizethisrarebonetumour.Further- more,todifferentiatebetweenosteofibrousdysplasiaandOFD-like Adamantinomastilldiagnosticchallengingandrequiremultidisci- plinaryapproach.
Conflictsofinterest
Theauthorsreportnodeclarationsofinterest.
Funding
The authorsreportnoexternal sourceoffundingduringthe writingofthisarticle.
Ethicalapproval
Ethicalapprovalwasnotrequiredinthiscasereport.
Consent
Writteninformedconsentwasobtainedfromthepatientfor publicationofthiscasereportandaccompanyingimages.Acopy ofthewrittenconsentisavailableforreviewbytheEditor-in-Chief ofthisjournalonrequest.
Authorcontribution
Achmad Fauzi Kamal contributes in the study concept or design,datacollection,analysisandinterpretation,oversightand
leadershipresponsibilityfortheresearchactivityplanningandexe- cution,includingmentorshipexternaltothecoreteam.
FahmiAnshoricontributestothestudyconceptordesign,super- visingandcriticallyreviewthemanuscript.
EvelinaKodratcontributestothestudyconceptordesign,data collectionandwritingthepaper.
Registrationofresearchstudies Notapplicable.
Guarantor
AchmadFauziKamal isthesoleguarantorof thissubmitted article.
Provenanceandpeerreview
Notcommissioned,externallypeer-reviewed Acknowledgement
Noconflictofinterestregardingforthepublicationofthispaper.
References
[1]B.Sarisozen,K.Durak,C.Ozturk,Adamantinomaofthetibiaina nine-year-oldchild,ActaOrthop.Belg.68(4)(2002)412–416.
[2]H.Nouri,H.Jaafoura,M.Bouaziz,etal.,Dedifferentiatedadamantinoma associatewithfibrousdysplasia,Orthop.Traumatol.Surg.Res.97(2011) 770–775.
[3]B.Czerniak,DorfmanandCzerniak’sbonetumors,in:DorfmanandCzerniak’s BoneTumors,2nded.,Elsevier,2015,pp.1142–1170p.
[4]K.K.Unni,C.Y.Inwards,Dahlin’sBoneTumors,6thed.,LippincottWilliams&
Wilkins,2009,halamanpage.
[5]B.C.Gleason,B.Liegl-Atzwanger,H.P.Kozakewich,etal.,Osteofibrous Dysplasiaandadamantinomainchildrenandadolescents:aclinicopathologic reappraisal,Am.J.Surg.Pathol.32(2008)363–376.
[6]J.Wang,R.Boyle,S.McCarthy,etal.,OsteofibrousDysplasia-like adamantinoma:acasereport,Pathology.50(Supplement1)(2018)S129.
[7]R.N.Kim,G.Ahn,G.-W.Kim,H.Y.Cho,Y.H.Oh,D.-H.Chung,Osteofibrous Dysplasia-likeadamantinoma-acasereportswithitsimmunohistochemical andultrastructuralstudies,KoreanJ.Pathol.38(2004)50–55.
[8]D.W.Scholfield,Z.Sadozai,C.Ghali,etal.,DoesOsteofibrousDysplasia progresstoadamantinomaandhowshouldtheybetreated?BoneJtJ.99-B (2017)409–416.
[9]A.Ratra,A.Wooldridge,G.Brindley,Osteofibrousdysplasia-like
adamantinomaofthetibiaina15-Year-Oldgirl,Am.J.Orthop.44(10)(2015) E411–3.
[10]B.R.Southam,A.H.Crawford,D.A.Billmire,J.Geller,D.VonAllmen,A.P.
Schumaier,etal.,Long-termfollow-upofadamantinomaofthetibia complicatedbymetastasesandasecondunrelatedprimarycancer:acase reportandliteraturereview,CaseRep.Orthop.2018(2018)1–9.
[11]D.Jain,V.K.Jain,R.K.Vasishta,P.Ranjan,Y.Kumar,Adamantinoma:a clinicopathologicalreviewandupdate,Diagn.Pathol.3(1)(2008).
[12]S.Bethapudi,D.A.Ritchie,E.Macduff,J.Straiton,Imaginginosteofibrous dysplasia,osteofibrousdysplasia-likeadamantinoma,andclassic adamantinoma,Clin.Radiol.69(2)(2014)200–208.
[13]H.Nouri,H.Jaafoura,M.Bouaziz,M.Ouertatani,L.Abid,M.H.Meherzi,etal., Dedifferentiatedadamantinomaassociatedwithfibrousdysplasia,Orthop.
Traumatol.Surg.Res.97(7)(2011)770–775,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.
2011.05.005[Internet]Availablefrom:.
[14]G.P.nielsen,P.C.W.Hogendoorn,AdamantinomaoflongboneinWHO classificationoftumor,in:SoftTissueandBoneTumor,5thed.,IARC,2020, pp.463–466.
[15]R.A.Agha,T.Franchi,C.Sohrabi,G.Mathew,fortheSCAREGroup,TheSCARE 2020guideline:updatingconsensusSurgicalCaseReport(SCARE)guidelines, Int.J.Surg.84(2020)226–230.
OpenAccess
ThisarticleispublishedOpenAccessatsciencedirect.com.ItisdistributedundertheIJSCRSupplementaltermsandconditions,which permitsunrestrictednoncommercialuse,distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalauthorsandsourceare credited.