• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

1 1.1 The Background of the Study

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "1 1.1 The Background of the Study"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT………. i

ABSTRAK………... ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..………. iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS……….. iv

LIST OF TABLES……….. ix

LIST OF FIGURES………..…. x

LIST OF APPENDICES………... xi

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION………. 1

1.1 The Background of the Study………... 1

1.2 The Identifications of Problems……….. 13

1.3 The Limitations of Problems……….. 15

1.4 The Problems of the Study………. 15

1.5 The Objectives of the Study………... 16

1.6 The Significances of the Study……… 16

1.7 The Limitations of Terms……… 18

CHAPTER IIREVIEW OF LITERATURE………... 18

2.1 Theoretical Framework……… 18

2.1.1 Multilingual Education (MLE) ……….. 18

a. The Nature of Multilingual Education………... 18

b. Multilingual Competence………..………..……….. 20

c. Multilingual Education in the World………. 21

2.1.2 First Language-Based Multilingual Education (FL-BMLE)………. 23

a. The Concept of First Language………. 24

b. First Language in Multilingual Education……… 26

c. FL-BMLE Learning Model………... 27

d. The Ideal Model of FL-BMLE ………. 29

2.1.3 Learning English at Elementary Schools………..31

a. English Test for Elementary Learners………... 31

(2)

v

b. Learning Theories in English Language Teaching……… 32

c. Second Language Acquisition………...……… 33

d. Communicative Language Teaching………. 34

e. Translanguaging Theory in Multilingual Education………. 40

f. Constructivism Learning Theory………... 44

2.1.4 Designing a Learning Model………. 51

a. Language Learning Model……….51

b. Components of Learning Model………53

c. Kinds of Learning Model……….. 54

d. Phases of Designing Learning Model………... 56

e. The Effectiveness of Learning Model………... 57

1. The Validity………... 58

2. The Reliability………... 58

3. The Practicality………..59

4. The Effectiveness……….. 60

2.2Related Studies………... 61

2.3 Conceptual Framework……….. 71

2.4 The Design of MT-BMLE Learning Model……….. 71

2.4.1 Learning Syntax in FL-BMLE Model……… 74

2.4.2 Social System in FL-BMLE Model………... 76

2.4.3 Management Reaction Principles………...……….77

2.4.4 Support System in FL-BMLE Model………..………78

2.4.5 Instructional Impacts ……….……… 78

CHAPTER IIIRESEARCHMETHODOLOGY……… 79

3.1Research Design………. 79

3.2Time and Location of the Research……….. 80

3.3Population and Sample………. 80

3.4 Developmental Research Design……….…... 80

3.4.1 Phase 1: Preliminary Investigation……….. 81

3.4.2 Phase 2: Design/Prototyping……… 84

(3)

vi

3.4.3 Phase 3: Realization/Constructions……….... 86

3.4.4 Phase 4: Test, Evaluation, Revision……… 91

3.5The Instruments and Techniques of Data Collection………... 96

3.5.1 The Validation Sheets……….. 96

3.5.2 The Experts' Scoring Sheets………... 98

3.5.3 The Observation Sheets………..… 100

3.5.4 Learners and Teachers' Questionnaires………....100

3.5.5 English Test………..101

3.6 The Techniques of Data Analysis………...….101

CHAPTERIVDATA ANALYSIS, FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS..………..109

4.1. Data Analysis……….... 109

4.1.1 Phase-1: Preliminary Investigation………...109

4.1.1.1 Results of the Preliminary Investigation………. ... 109

a. The Existed Learning Model ………...… 110

b. Teacher’s Needs Analysis ………... 113

c. Learners’ Needs Analysis………...115

d. The Results of Learners’ Pre Test………...122

4.1.1.2 Preliminary Investigation Results on Teaching Kits………...124

4.1.2 Phase-2: Design/Prototyping……….....126

4.1.2.1 The Design of FL-BMLE Learning Model……….....126

a. The Design of FL-BMLE Learning Syntax………....127

b. The Design of Social System………...128

c. The Design of Reaction Principles Management………...128

d. The Design of Support System………...129

e. The Design of Instructional Impacts………...129

4.1.2.2 The Design of Teaching Kits………...130

a. English Lesson Plan (RPP) ………...131

b. The Teaching Materials Design………...133

c. The Teacher’s Guide Book Design………...134

d. The Learners’ Guide Book………...135

(4)

vii

e. The Learners’ Worksheets………...136

f. English Test……….………...137

4.1.2.3 Research Instruments Design……….... 137

a. Selecting the Format and Types of Instrument……… 137

b. Defining Aspects and Indicators of Instruments………. 138

c. Designing Rules and Criteria of Research Instruments………... 144

4.1.3 Phase-3: Realization………. 145

4.1.3.1 Learning Model Realization……….. 145

4.1.3.2. Realization of Teaching Kits……… 149

4.1.3.3. Realization of Research Instruments ……… 152

4.1.4 Phase-4: Test, Evaluation, and Revision………... 157

4.1.4.1 The Validity of FL-BMLE Research Instruments………... 158

4.1.4.2. The Validity of FL-BMLE Learning Model………... 159

4.1.4.3. The Reliability of FL-BMLE Learning Model……… 168

4.1.4.4 The Practicality of FL-BMLE Learning Model and Teaching Kits………. 169

4.1.4.5 The Effectiveness of Learning Model Implementation…………..……….. 170

4.1.4.6 The Results of Model Trials………... 171

1. The Results of Trial 1………. 171

2. The Results of Trial 2………. 181

4.2 RESEARCH FINDINGS………...….. 192

4.3 DISCUSSIONS………...….. 196

4.3.1 The Design of FL-BMLE Model in English Language Learning……….. 196

4.3.2 Piaget and Vygotsky Learning Theories in Language Learning……….. 201

4.3.3 The Novelty of the Research………203

4.3.4 The Limitations of the Study……… 206

(5)

viii

CHAPTER VCONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS………. 208

5.1 CONCLUSIONS.……….….. 208

5.2IMPLICATIONS.……….….. 209

5.3 SUGGESTIONS……… 211

BIBLIOGRAPHY………... 213

APPENDICES………...………... 224

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Peningkatan Keterampilan Dasar dan Penguasaan Konsep Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL) pada Pembelajaran Biologi Kelas VIII

29 Gresia Indri Pramita, ““Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Berdasarkan Gaya Berpikir Siswa Kelas

Although prior research has emphasized on the students disengagement in English language learning and teaching practices, a few studies have focused on the factors and

The objective of this research is to improve the teaching and learning process of reading at VIII A and VIII B of SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Sawangan Magelang

Category 3: There are Differences in the FL 1 Teachers’ Attitude towards FL 1 Learning and Teaching in Childhood and towards the CLIL Approach with Regard to Gender, Years of

The practicality instrument is used to assess the practicality of the product produced in the form of learning sets, including lesson plans, teaching materials, and evaluation

Teacher Standards  Dimension 1: Professional Knowledge  Dimension 2: Professional Teaching and Learning Process  Dimension 3: Personal and Professional Attributes  Dimension

4 Practicality test of mathematics and science integrated learning instructional documents using PBL model consist of four aspects such as the observation results of SAP