THE APPLICATION OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGY IN
LEARNING SPEAKING OF HIGH, AVERAGE, AND LOW
LEVEL STUDENT IN SMA MUHAMMADIYAH 2
OF SURABAYA
SKRIPSI
Submitted in a Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for S-1 Degree in English
Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty
BY:
AS AMARIZULHAQ
20121111048
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURABAYA
iii
THE APPLICATION OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGY IN
LEARNING SPEAKING OF HIGH, AVERAGE, AND LOW
LEVEL STUDENT IN SMA MUHAMMADIYAH 2
OF SURABAYA
SKRIPSI
Submitted in a Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for S-1 Degree in English
Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty
BY:
AS AMARIZULHAQ
20121111048
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURABAYA
PERNYATAAN TIDAK MELAKUKAN PLAGIAT
Saya yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:
Nama : AS AMARIZULHAQ
NIM : 20121111048
Pogram Studi : Bahasa Inggris
Fakultas : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Menyatakan dengan sebenarna bahwa skripsi yang saya tulis ini
benar-benar merupakan hasil karya saya sendiri, bukan merupakan pengambilalihan
tulisan atau pikiran orang lain yang saya akui sebagai hasil tulisan atau pikiran
saya sendiri.
Apabila kemudian hari terbukti atau dapat dibuktikan bahwa skripsi ini
hasil jiplakan, maka saya bersedia menerima sanksi atas perbuatan tersebut sesuai
peraturan yang berlaku.
Surabaya, 08 Agustus 2016
Yang Membuat pernyataan,
v
Motto:
”Do not ever wasteyour time, because it will not come back to you”.
Dedication:
Halaman Persetujuan Pembimbing
Skripsi yang ditulis As Amarizulhaq ini telah disetujui oleh dosen pembimbing untuk diujikan tanggal 16 Agustus 2016.
Dosen Pembimbing Tanda Tanga Tanggal
I. Gusti Nur Hafifah, S.Pd. M.Pd. ………. …………
II. Vega Hesmatantya, S.Pd. M.Pd. ………. ………….
Mengetahui:
Ketua Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris,
vii
Halaman Pengesahan Penguji
Skripsi ini yang ditulis oleh As Amarizulhaq telah diuji dan dinyatakan sah oleh
Panitia Ujian Tingkat Sarjana (S1) Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya sebagai salah satu syarat memperoleh gelar
Sarjana Pendidikan, pada tanggal 16 Agustus 2016.
Dosen Penguji Tanda Tangan Tanggal
I. Gusti Nur Hafifah, S.Pd, M.Pd. ………. ………..
II. Dr. Dwijani Ratnadewi, M.Pd. ……… …………
III. Sofi Yunianti, S.Pd, M.Pd. ………. …………
Mengetahui,
Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya,
Dekan,
ACKNOWLEDEMENT
All praises to Allah SWT who has provided grace for his guidence and blessing and
greeting are due to our prophet Muhammadiyah SAW, hope Allah always bestows His
guidences and blessings to him, his family, companions and His fellows who always
istiqomah in the way of Allah, so the author is given the opportunity to be able to finish
this research on time. This study entitled The Application of Metacognitive Strategy in
Learning Speaking of High, Average, and Low Level Student in SMA Muhammadiyah 2
at Surabaya is structured to fulfill the requirements obtained a degree of English Program
in Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya.
To be able finish this research, the author gets lots of help and support from all of
people surround who provide morally and materially. For that, no words can express my
pleasure except thank you, especially to:
1. DR. Dr. Sukadiono, M.M. as Rector of Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya. 2. Dr. M. Ridlwan, M.Pd, as Dean of Teacher Training and Education Faculty,
Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya.
3. Mr. Sulton Dedy Wijaya, S.Pd. as Chairperson of English Program.
4. Mrs. Gusti Nur Hafifah, S.Pd. M.Pd. and Miss. Vega Hesmatantya, S.Pd. M.Pd. as
my Advisors of English Program who guide me during make this thesis. They help
me with all the time with their passion without hesitate. Hope, Allah give them
long-life and blessings all the time.
5. Mr. and Mrs. Lecturer of English Teaching and Education Department who taught the
author so many things.
6. All of my friends and others who could not I say it one by one in this thesis.
Through this research that had been settled as perfect as possible. Hopefully, this
thesis could give so many benefits to the readers, for all of education world and could
give contribute to whoever need. So, we hope critics and suggestions from all the readers
which are really need to improve this research in the future.
Surabaya, 08 Agustus 2016
As Amarizulhaq
ix
Lembar Persetujuan Pembimbing……… ... iv
Lembar Pengesahan Penguji ... v
Pernyataan Keaslian Tulisan……….. . vi
Abstract……… ... vii
2.1.2. The Comparison of Teaching Strategies and Learning Strategies 8
2.2. Learning Speaking………...……… 8
3.2.2. Average Level Learner……… 21
3.3. Instruments of the Research………... 23
3.4. Data Collection techniques……….. 24
3.5. Data Analysis………... . 26
CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS………... 27
4.1. Findings……… .... 27
4.1.1. Strategy used by High Level Student of Speaking Skill in Four Main Representative’s Metacognitive Strategy ………. .. 28
4.1.1.1. Selective Attention……….. 29
4.1.1.2. Planning……….. . 30
4.1.1.3. Monitoring……….. . 31
4.1.1.4. Evaluation……….. .. 32
4.1.2. Strategy used by Average Level Student of Speaking Skill in Four Main Representative’s Metacognitive Strategy ………. . 34
4.1.2.1. Selective Attention……….. 35
4.1.2.2. Planning……….. . 35
4.1.2.3. Monitoring……….. . 37
4.1.2.4. Evaluation……….. .. 37
xi
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4.1.1 the percentage of High Level Learner Metacognitive Learning Speaking
Table 4.1.2 the percentage of Average Level Learner Metacognitive Learning Speaking
Table 4.1.3 the percentage of Low Level Learner Metacognitive Learning Speaking
Table 4.1.4 High Level Learner Metacognitive Learning Speaking
Table 4.1.5 Average Level Learner Metacognitive Learning Speaking
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 4.2.1 Chart of High level learner Metacognitive learning speaking.
Figure 4.2.2 Chart of Average level learner Metacognitive learning speaking.
xiii
LIST OF APPENDIX
Appendix 1 List of Questions for Interview……… 57
Appendix 2 Transcription of Teacher Interview……… 59
Appendix 3 Transcription of High Learner Interview……… 67
Appendix 4 Transcription of Average Level Transcription of Low Level Learner Interview……… 72
Appendix 5 Transcription of Low Level Learner Interview……… 78
Appendix 6 Transcription of Questionnaire’s Instruction……… 83
Appendix 7 Metacognitive Learning Speaking Questionnaire High Learner (HL)……… 84
Appendix 8 Metacognitive Learning Speaking Questionnaire Average Learner (AL)………. 88
Appendix 9 Metacognitive Learning Speaking Questionnaire Low Learner (LL)……… 92
Appendix 10 Transcription of High Level Learner Speech……… 96
Appendix 11 Transcription of Average Level Learner Speech……….. 97
Appendix 12 Transcription of Low Level Learner Speech……… 98
Appendix 13 The Result of Metacognitive Strategy of High Level Learner.. 99
Appendix 14 The Result of Metacognitive Strategy of High Level Learner.. 100
Appendix 15 The Result of Metacognitive Strategy of High Level Learner.. 101
Appendix 16 The Application of Learning Strategy………... 102
Appendix 17 Metacognitive Strategies List for Students……… 103
Appendix 18 Research Letter……….. 104
REFERENCES
Berne, J. E. (1998). Examining the relationship between L2 listening research, pedagogical theory, and practice. Foreign Language Annals, 31(2), 169-90.
Berne, J. E. (2004). Listening comprehension strategies: A review of the literature. Foreign Language Annals, 37(4), 521-531.
Cahyani, H. 2010. A Profile of Successful English Language Learners. A Case Study of Students at Accounting Department, State Polytechnic of Malang. Paper presented in the 2nd National English Language Teachers and Lectures Conference, State University of Malang, Indonesia. March 20, 2010.
Chamot, A.U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14-26.
Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P. B., & Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Chen, Y. (2005). Barriers to acquiring listening strategies for EFL learners and their pedagogical applications. TESL-EJ,8(4), Retrieved December 19, 2015 from
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London: Longman.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Defining and Organizing Language Learning Strategies.2015. Retrieved December 19, 2015 from.www.nclrc.org/guides/HED/pdfs/chapter2.pdf.
Educational Testing Service. (2012). Secondary level English proficiency test. Retrieved December 19, 2015 from http://www.ets.org/slep/about
xv
Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (1992). Student perceptions, problems and strategies in second language lecture comprehension. RELC Journal, 23(2), 60–80.
Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development theory, practice and research implications. RELC Journal, 39(2), 188–213.
Hinkel, E. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching the four skills. TESOL Quarterly 40(1), 109-131.
Hornby, Albert S. 2005. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English (7th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Intersegmental Committee of Academic Senates. (2006). ESL Students in California Public Higher Education. ICAS ESL Task Force Report.
Lawes, S. & Santos, D. (2007). Teaching learning strategies: What do teachers learn? Language Learning Journal, 35, 221-237.
Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ).2015. Retrieved
December 19, 2015 from
https://larc.sdsu.edu/larryvandergrift/6metacognitivequestionnaire.pdf
Nunan, David. 2003. Practical English Languag Teaching, 1st edition. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Companies.
Nunan, David. 1999. Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston: Heinle&Heinle.
O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, K. (1989). Listening Comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10(4), 418-437.
Oxford, Rebecca L. 1990. Language Learning Strategies. What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston: Heinle&Heinle.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
Oxford, R. L. (1993). Research update on teaching L2 listening. System, 21(2), 205-211.
Oxford, R. L. (2002). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. Methodology in language teaching, 124–132.
Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J.A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1-23.
Richards, J. & Schmidt, R. W. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Pearson Education Limited.
Shen, H. J. (2003). The role of explicit instruction in ESL/EFL reading. Foreign Language Annals, 36(3), 424–433.
Singaporean Students’ Awareness of Listening and Speaking Strategies. Language Awareness, 15(3), 199–219.
The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines 2012 Speaking.2016. Retrieved May 13 2016 form
http://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/public/ACTFLProficiencyGuideli nes2012_FINAL.pdf
Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30(3), 387-409.
Vandergrift, L. (2002). 'It was nice to see that our predictions were right': Developing
Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learn to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3-25.
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191–210.
Widiati, U. and Cahyono, B. Y. 2006. “The Teaching EFL Speaking in the
