flat-bottomed sherds tends to confirm this as far as the
Crow
Village potteryis concerned.All sherds were
examined
to determine the type oftemper
used in theirmanuf
actm-e.The
temper provedtobe predominantlyinorganic, with onlytwo
sherds containing a combination of organicand
inor- ganic tempering.The
inorganic temper consists of sand, gravel, or small pebbles with the coarser material being themost common;
grass is the only organic tempering material.
The
textm:e of the pottery is not particularly fine, but the tempering material seems to bedistributedfah'lyevenly throughouttheware. Inorganictempering protrudes through the surface in themajorityof sherds.To
determine the thickness of the ware, all of the unexfoliated sherdswere measured.The
thickestwas
12mm.,
the thinnest 4mm., and
the average about 7mm.
Nearly all thepotsherdsfrom
cooking vessels are gray-black orblack incolor, but therange is black to buff with afew
sherds ofan
extremelylightbrown.The
15 lam'p sherds are fragments of shallow, saucer-shaped con- tainersand
all are tempered with either gravel or pebbles.Ten
sherds
show
a series of grooves running around thebowl
(pi. 10, j).The most
groovesvisibleon any
onesherdisseven,and on
oneofthese sherds the grooves appear to reach almost to the center of thelamp.Seven
sherds of this type include a section of the rim,and on
all but one specimen there issome
kind of decorative treatment of the rim.One
sherd has three encircling lines outside the rim,two have two
such lines,and two have
a single line.A
single sherd has a deep, encirclinggrooveratherthan a simpleincised line. It ispossible thatlamps
with this style of surface treatmentwould have
a cross at the center of thebowl
(Oswalt, 1953, p. 18, pi. 1, 6, 8, 9) or theymay
have had
undecorated centers (Oswalt, 1953, pi. i, 7).A
singlefragment
which
represents almosthalf of amedium
sized vessel has adeepbowl and
five encircling linesnear the rim.The
centerof thislamp was
apparently undecorated (pi. lQ,n). Itmay
be thatsome
of the lined sherds previously describedcome from
alamp
of this type.Two
sherds,including onerim
fragment, arefrom
undecoratedlamps.The
rim fragment is apparentlyfrom
a very small vessel,and
the rimitself turnsup
onlyslightly, while the lipis flat.The
largestlamp
sherd in the coUection has a largeshaUow bowl and
a sharply turnedup
rim.The
lip is flat withan
incised groove runningaround
the top.On
the inside of thebowl
is a pair of en-circling lines
weU
below the rim, followedby
a set of three similar linesnearthe centerofthevessel (pi. 10, o).The
finallamp
fragment represents almosthalf of a very small vessel, perhaps a hunter'slamp
or a toy.
There
are four encircling lines running around thelamp
below therimand
a triple-lined central cross (pi. 10,p).Van''ston°e'l
CROW
VILLAGE,ALASKA 47 Grass
Artifacts of grass are not
numerous
in the collection, but they do revealsome
uses of this material.At
severalplaces in theexcavated portion of the midden, bunches of grass were found.These
may- represent grass collected for plaiting intoropeor for otheruses. Itisworth
noting that grasswas woven
into socksand
used for insoles in theYukon-Kuskokwim
region (Nelson, 1899, p. 43).A
largenumber
of plaited grass rope fragments were recovered, ofwhich
the illustrated specimen is typical (pi. 11,/).A
two-strand twisted section of grass netting consists ofmeshes
about 5 cm. square(pi. II,i).
A number
of small sections ofwovengrass were recoveredfrom H-3 and H-4
(pi. 11, g).These might
be part of grass bags or grass matting, both of which were used extensively in theYukon- Kuskokwim
region (Nelson, 1899, pp. 202-205).Bark and Koot
Among
themost
significant facts impressedupon
the excavators as theyworked
inthesitewas
theimportanceofbirchbark totheformer occupants.Hardly
a shovelful of dirt could bemoved
without en- countering strips ofbark,and
onmore
than oneoccasion the presence oflargenumbers
ofcutbarksections hindered excavationtoamarked
degree.
The
importance of this material in house construction has already been mentioned, and itnow
remains to describe birchbarkartifacts.
It is doubtless true that
much
of thebirchbark collectedwas made
intobaskets.
Nine
completeornearlycompletebasketswererecovered along with fragments ofmany
more.A
few bark baskets were remarkably wellpreserved, but themajoritycrumbled
intofragments as soon as they dried.Thus
thenumber
of basketsmight have
beenmuch
larger,and
the general tendencyfor aU birchbark fragments to crumblemakes
itdifficultto arrive atan
accuratecount ofthenumber
of recovered specimens.
The
complete baskets are all of thesame
tj'^pe.
That
is, theyareallmade from
asinglepiece ofbarkfolded attwo
ends toform
abasketand
then stitched,usually withspruceroot.Even
thecompletebaskets arebadly twistedand
crushed,and
there- fore it is difficult to obtain accurate measurements. Perhaps it is sufficientto saythat there isa great variationin size.The
recovered fragment appears to represent about half a basket whichmust
have,when
complete,measured
atleast 18 cm. longand
30 cm. Avide.At
the other extreme, a complete specimen appears to
have
been about 7cm. square.Of
the 18 fragments ofworked
birchbark, at least 7 are definitely parts of baskets.The method
of sewing ismore
clearlyseen on the48
fragments thaninthe completebaskets.
As mentioned
previously, itwould seem
thatmost
baskets weresewn
with spruce root asshown
intheillustratedspecunen (pi. 11,6).
For
thistype ofsewing, widely spacedand
fairly sizableholes are required.However,
at least three fragmentshave
very closelyspacedand
smallsewingholes suggesting that afinermaterial, perhapsfinelybraidedgrass,was
used (pi. 11, c).Many
of the unidentifiedsewn
birchbark fragments probably are parts of baskets, but this cannotbe
determined withany
degree of certainty. All of thesefragmentshave
widelyspacedholesforspruce root stitching,and
anumber
ofthem have
fragments of root still in place(pi. 11,e).On
sixfragments,but on none
ofthecompletebaskets, are markings in red paint. In every case tliis consists of aband
of red next to therow
of stitchingholes (pi. 11, a). It should also be noted that birchbarkwas
used in themanufacture
of a snuft"box described previously.Before leaving the subject of birchbark baskets, it
might
be well tomention
that they were used for cookingand
were undoubtedly themost
important cooking vessels even though metal cookingware was known
to theEskimos and
occurs in the collection. In all the houses there were fire cracked beach pebbles of the kind thatwould have
been used for stone boiling,and
inH-3
acluster of these stoneswas
found near thefireplace.The
only otherbark
artifacts in the collections are net floatsmade
of
Cottonwood
bark.The
11 complete specimens rangeinlengthfrom
12 to 26 cm., although nearly all are closest to the former figure.In construction they resemble the previously described
wooden
net floats. In addition to the complete floats, there are 19 fragmentsand
5 sections of bark that are probably net float blanks.The
importance of spruceroot for stitching baskets, lashingkayak
frames,
and
other uses, already has been stressed. In the collection are several additionalexamplesoftheuseofspruceroot thatshouldbe mentioned.There
are three fragmentswhich show two
pieces ofwood bound
together with root lashing (pi. 11, d),and
the handle fragment ofan
unidentifiedwooden
object is A^Tapped with spruce root,presumably
toprovide a better grip (pi. 11,i).From H-3 was
recovered abundleof rootin preparedform
thatwould
be constantlyon hand
forusein a varietyofhousehold tasks (pi. 11, h).Metal
The
artifacts described thus far in this chapter are of indigenous manufacture.That
is,presumably
they weremade by Eskimos
at the site. Identifying such artifacts has given little difficulty since the materials are associated withtraditionalEskimo
material culture.However, when
itcomes
toa descriptionofmetalartifacts,theproblemvfin''ston°e1
CROW
VILLAGE,ALASKA 49
of identifyingindigenous objects is not so simple.
Some
itemsmade
of metal are readily recognized as complete artifacts brought to the site
and
used intactby
the Eskimos. Others are just as readily identifiableas attemptsby
theEskimos
to Avorkin anew medium and
adaptold formstoanew
material.But
inbetween
thesetwo
extremes areanumber
ofartifacts that couldbelong to eithercategory.Some
are crudely
made and
suggest local manufacture, while others are so poorly preserved that it is difficult to establish their provenience oneway
or the other. Therefore, the listing ofsome
artifacts as of local manufacture should be considered as tentative.By
farthelargestnumber
ofindigenouslymanufactm-ed
metal arti- factsaremade from tmned
steelplate ofthetypenormally usedinthe manufacture of tin cans.Used
cans definitely provided the greatestamount
ofraw
material for secondary reworking into artifacts. Al- though cast ironand
otherheavy
metals apparently were available in smallquantities, theEskimos
reliedon can metal evenwhen
itwas
not particidarly satisfactory forthepurposeintended.Thus many
ofthe metal artifactsseem
nonfunctional,and
one can imagine the disgust with which, for example, anEskimo woman
first used an ulu with a blademade
offlimsycanmetal.However,
canand
othermetal could becutand
reworkedmore
easilyand
rapidlythan stoneor otherindig- enous materials. It isnot surprising that itwas
eventually favored for a variety oftoolsand
household objects.A
single salmon dart head has been fashionedfrom
a piece of iron, possibly a stoveor castironkettlefragment. Ithasa pairofopposite barbs, anarrowed
areanear thebasefor attachment oftheline,and
a single spur (pi. 12, a).Six leadmusket balls of the type that
would have
beenmade
in the stonebuUetmold
previously described were found inH-3. The
ballshave
a burrrunning medially aroundthem
indicating the division of thetwo
halves of the mold.These
ballswould have
been used in a muzzle loadingweapon
with a barrel diameter of approximately 1.5cm.
A
light piece of metal, probably a can fragment, has been folded double foradded
strengthand
then turnedup
at oneend
toform
a hook.Such
animplement might have
been used as a pothook {p\.12,d).End
hladedknife blades ofmetal aremuch
lesscommon
thanmight
beexpected, butthere is a single crude blade thatmight have
served such a purpose. It isheavily corroded,and
thusits identification as an indigenouslymanufactured
itemis questionable.There
is a short tang for insertion into thehandle (pi. 12, e).Two saw
bladefragments appear to benarrow
stripsfrom
canmetal that has been notchedby hand
(pi. 12, h).Such
asaw
blade pre-50
sumably would have
beenhafted intoawooden
handleand
couldhave
been used for only verylight work.A
badly corrodedimplement
with a long, slender tipand
a broad, flattenedand
notched basemay have
been hafted asan awl(pi. 12,/).There
are fiveulu blades, all ofwhich have
been cutfrom
the sides ofcans.They
varyinlengthfrom
10 cm. to 16.5cm.,and
allareflat across the topand have
a semilunarcutting edge (pi. 12, n).Two
skin scraper bladeshave
been cutfrom
the sides of cansand have
slightlyconvex workingedges.One
specimenisofparticularin- terest becauseit hasbeen strengthenedby
havingtheedges folded ontwo
sides (pi. 12, b).The
second is shorter, 6.8 cm. in length,and
taperstoward
the proxunal end.Among
themost
interesting of the indigenously constructed metal artifacts are crude dishes or small containers, ofwhich
there are nine completeornearlycompleteexamples.They
allaremade from
pieces of can siding that has been folded at the corners toform
a container(pi. 12, c). All are extremely shallow,
and most
are roughly rectan- gidarinshape,varyingfrom
5.2 to20.0cm. in length. Itislikelythat the larger specimens were used in connection with foodand
eating.The
smallestexample,however,isfoldedatoneend
onlyand may have
been a scoop orhad some
similar use (pi. 12, i).A
numiber of cut can fragments weremost
certainly used as re- inforcement pieces since theyhave
nail holes allaround
their sides (pi. 12,j).Four
fragments are identified ashaving been usedin thismanner, and
it ispossiblethatotherfragments ofmetalwere intended for a similar use.Such
reinforcement piecesmight
be used to strengthenthecrackedshaftofa lance or torepairwooden
artifacts in a variety of ways.Another
typeof reinforcement piece, the use ofwhich
ismore
diflScult todetermine, is astrip ofmetal approximately 5 cm. in widthand
32 cm. long bent in a compressed S-shapedform
at either end.These
strips, ofwhich
four were found inH-4,
arerounded
asthough
to fitaround
a log used in house construction.In fact, these strips werefound inassociation with the
bench
logs ofH-4
but in such away
that itwas
not possible to determine their exact function. Nevertheless, it seems likely that they were used either toreinforce houseconstructionlogs or to aid in fasteningbench
planks to floorlogs.Of
particular interest are the 26 cut can fragmentswhich form
theraw
material out ofwhich
metal artifacts probablywould have
been manufactured.These show
cuttingina varietyoflengthsand
shapes,but
onespecimen ismore
revealing than the others. This is a roll of can metaland
consists of threecans 8.4 cm. in heightrolled together.The bottoms and
tops of these canshave
been cut outand
the sides rolledup and
stored for later use in the manufacture of artifacts.vln''"toS
CROW
VILLAGE,ALASKA 51
In addition to the cut can fragments,two
sections of bucket handleshave
been cut for future use,and
a single piece of cut sheet copperwas
found.A
small coipT^er ferrule apparentlywas made
to fit over theend
of of a small shaft or stick. It is decorated with a series of engraved parallel lines horizontally encircling the specimen and another series of shortparallel linesengraved atright angles tothem
(pi, 12, k).Four
,22-caliber rifle cartridgeshave
been drUled at the proximal end for stringing as beads toform
a bracelet or necklace.Fragments
of the twisted grass
on which
these cartridges were strung still are visible in the drilled holes. All of the cartridges were found in thesame
houseand presumably
werestrungtogether.Another
cartridge of undetermined caliber is similarly drilled, has grass stringingma-
terialknotted