CHAPTER IV RESULT & DISCUSSION
2. Non-technical aspects
4.3 Comparative Evaluation of the Level of Suitability of TPS 3R Babakansari
After obtaining data on the existing condition of waste management in both 3R TPS, an evaluation of the suitability of the existing data was carried out referring to PerMen PUPR No.03/2013 and TPS 3R Technical Guidelines No.03/2020. The evaluation was carried out using a Likert scale withsimple scoring method, so that the percentage of compliance of waste management at the two 3R TPS with the referred regulations is obtained.
4.3.1 TPS 3R Babakansari
When compared with the reference measuring instrument of Per Men PUPR No.03/2013 and Juknis TPS 3R No.03/2020, the evaluation results are presented in Table 4.8 and Table 4.9 below.
Table 4.8 Technical Aspects of TPS 3R Babakansari
Based on Table 4.8, the collection indicator at TPS 3R Babakansari, collection is carried out only once a day, thus obtaining a value of 2 when compared to PerMen PUPR Number 03 of 2013, which states that collection should be carried out every day for 2 trips, however, the waste collected by officers is still mixed, thus obtaining a value of 1.
The waste sorting indicator gets a score of 2 because the sorting is only done on 2 types of waste, namely organic and inorganic waste, so it is not in accordance with the provisions of the PUPR Ministerial Regulation Number 03 of 2013 which should divide the sorting into 5 types of waste, namely B3, organic, inorganic, recyclable waste, and residue. This is not a problem because the TPS
3R currently processes and handles the two dominant types of waste, namely compostable organic waste and inorganic waste with economic value. However, waste sorting into 5 types of waste should be done to minimize residual waste transported to the landfill.
The processing indicator gets a value of 2 because the processing is carried out at the TPS 3R Babakansari only does composting, this is said to be inappropriate because waste processing at TPS 3R is one way to ensure that the volume of waste transported to the TPA is
not too large, so other alternatives are needed besides waste processing. The transportation indicator at TPS 3R Babakansari gets a score of 3 because transportation at TPS 3R Babakansari uses a transportation system with SCS with a transportation frequency of 3x a da
The percentage of technical aspect achievement in Table 4.8 at TPS 3R Babakansari is based on a Likert scale with a total of 5 components. The value that is in accordance with the regulatory criteria gets the highest value, which is 3, so that the 5 sub-components are multiplied by 3 so that the ideal value produced is 15, while for values that are quite in accordance with the regulatory criteria, they get a value of 2 and if they are not in accordance with the regulations, they get a value of 1.
TPS 3R Babakansari gets an actual score of 10. The score that meets the regulatory criteria gets the highest score, which is 3, so that the 5 sub -components are multiplied by 3 and produce an ideal score of 15, while for scores that are quite in accordance with the criteria, they get a score of 2 and if they are not in accordance, they get 1.
To get the percentage of the actual score with the following equation:
Based on the percentage of actual scores obtained for the technical aspect compliance at TPS 3R Babakansari, it is 67% and is included in the "Quite Good" category. Discussion of non-technical aspects is presented in Table 4.9
Based on Table 4.9, it explains the regulatory, institutional, financing and community participation aspects as follows:
Regulation: in the regulatory aspect based on the regulations that have been referred to, it is
reviewed based on the existence or absence of regulations governing waste management that contain the implementation of 3R. Based on the interview results, management at TPS 3R Babakansari refers to the Regulation of the Minister of PUPR No. 03/2013 concerning
"Implementation of Waste Infrastructure and Facilities in Handling Household Waste and Household-like Waste". In addition, another reference is the Bandung City waste management regulations regulated in Bandung City Regional Regulation Number 9 of 2018 so that it gets a value of 3.
Institutional: in the institutional aspect there are three indicators, namely organizational
structure, number of workers and the functioning of the organizational structure. For the organizational structure of TPS 3R Babakansari, it gets a score of 3 because the organizational structure is complete, but the functioning of the organizational structure does not run according
to its function so that it gets a score of 2, the organizational structure is said to not run according to its function because there is one section where the employee has retired, for the number of part-time workers at TPS 3R Babakansari as many as 4 HR, namely 3 permanent workers and 1 part-time worker, this does not meet the criteria based on the TPS Technical Instructions
3R because part-time human resources at each 3R TPS are more than 6, the lack of human resources at the Babakansari 3R TPS is due to the dismissal of several officers due to the pandemic in 2021.
Financing: in the financing aspect there are two indicators, namely routine contributions and
financial records. For routine contributions, it gets a value of 3 because the monthly contribution in the Babakansari area is IDR 15,000, which has met the criteria based on the 2020 TPS 3R Technical Instructions, the minimum routine contribution is IDR 10,000. While for the financial recording indicato
got a score of 2, which is not appropriate because when recording finances, sometimes officers record once every 3 days and do not record it every day, this can cause recording errors and expenses and income cannot be monitored properly.
Community participation: there are three indicators, namely the availability of people to pay
contributions, provide opinions and awareness of sorting at the source. The indicator of paying contributions gets a value of 1 because there are still people who do not pay contributions per month, namely in RT 4 and RT 7. This is when compared to the 2020 TPS 3R Technical Instructions, people must pay contributions every month. People in the TPS area
3R Babakansari is less active in providing suggestions or opinions regarding the progress of TPS 3R so that it gets a score of 1. The indicator of awareness of sorting waste at the source gets a score of 1 because there are still very few people who sort at the source so that it does not meet the criteria based on the 2020 TPS 3R Technical Instructions.
Based on Table 4.9, the criteria for the percentage of achievement of non-technical aspects at TPS 3R Babakansari are calculated based on a Likert scale with a total of 9 components. The value that is in accordance with the regulatory criteria gets the highest value, namely 3, so that the 9 sub-components are multiplied by 3 so that the ideal value produced is 27, while for values that are quite in accordance with the regulatory criteria, they get a value of 2 and if they are not in accordance with the regulations, they get a value of 0.
Based on the actual score percentage equation, the percentage of conformity achieved in non-technical aspects is 67% with the category "Quite Good".