CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion
Based on the findings and discussion in the previous chapter, the students’ writing skill by using plan and write strategy of the SMP Negeri 34 Makassar was improved. It was proven by the significant difference between the score in experimental class after giving treatment. The post- test score in experimental class improved significantly compare to pre-test.
After writing analyzed the result of the research pan and write strategy is very good to be used in learning and teaching process to beloved students writing ability, especially of the students of SMP Negeri 35 Makassar, and plan and write strategy is an effective for teaching English in developing students writing ability, plan and write concise form of the essay is still showing elementary figure from the original so used plan and write strategy that is good and write.
B. Suggestions
Based on occuren that the writer found during research, the writer would like to put forward some suggestions to the researcher, the students’ and next writer as follows:
1. The english teacher of junior high school use plan and write strategy as material in teaching and learning process.
2. The english teacher should be more creative and to enrich their teaching strategy to improve eristing ability of students. One of the strategy is plan and write strategy.
3. The students must have self confidence in writing.
4. The next researcher are expected to implement with other form or other to develop students’ writing ability.
\
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bahar, Abdul Muadzdzinul Haq, 2017. Using Picture in Descriptive Text toward Writing Skill at the Second Year Students of SMPN 19 Moncongloe Maros. Skripsi. Unpublished.
Beker, Mark,2011.Three-Components-of-Writing-skill/http://everypage ispageone.com/2011/09/15l.Retrived on 9th March 2017.
Boardman.2002,&Meyers.2005.http://soaldankuncijawabanbloggerpekolin gan.blogspot.co.id/2012/11/definition-of-writing-general-
Concept.html. Retrived on 10th March 2017.
Fuji, Bang 2015.http://www.trigonalmedia.com/2015/11/process-Approach- of-writing.html.Retrived on 9th March 2017.
Gay, L. R. 2006. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. (2nd Edition). Columbus, Ohio.
Husna, Nurul, 2013. The Use of Story Picture in Narrative Essay to Increase the Writing Ability of the Seventh Grade Students at SMP Negeri 23 Makassar.Skripsi Unpublished..
Karolina, Intan, 2006. Teaching Narrative Text in Improving Writing to the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Petarukan, Pemalang.
Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Mangande, Herpin Paty, 2015. The Effect Of Jingsaw Technique on Students’ Narrative WritingAt SMP Negeri 1 Sangalla. Skripsi Unpublished
Munand, Aris. http://Guruberbagirasa.blogspot.com/2013/06/narrative-text- Definition-purposes.html. Retrivedon : 8 january 2017.
Nengsi, 2012.Improving the Students Ability to Write Narrative Text through Foxfire Method.( A Thesis UMM). Unpublished.
Prasetia, Eka Panca, 2012. Improving Students Writing Paragraphs through Funny Picture of SMP Negeri 35 Makassar. Skripsi Unpublished.
Rahmaeni J, 2012. Improving the Students’ Writing Proficiency through Collaborative Writing of SMP Negeri 1 Masamba. Skripsi Unpublished.
Rifa’i, Muhammad.2015.http://sangpemimpikehidupan.blogspot/2015/03/
narrative-text-definition-generic.html. Retrived on 16 March 2017.
Rukiya, 2014.Improving Students Ability in Writing Narrative Text through Imaginative Re-creation Met hod (IRC) Students of SMP Angkasa Maros. Skripsi Unpublished
Sather, Alwia, 2015. Improving Students Ability to Write Narrative Text by Using Foxfire Method at the Eight Grade Students of SMP Negeri 19 Makassar. Skripsi Unpublished
Sayekty, Annisa Purwaning, 2014.“Using Story Mapping to Teach Students’ Writing Ability of Narrative at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 90 Jakarta”. ( A skripsi University Islam Negeri Jakarta)
Umatenate, Ramida, 2013. Improving the Students’ Writing Ability through Writing Childhood Experience of the Third Grade Students of SMP Negeri 17 Makassar. Skripsi Unpublished
APPENDIX 1
Instrument Of the Research
Title : The Use of Plan and Write Strategies on students’ Narrative Text in Writing Ability at Third Grade of SMP Negeri 35 Makassar
Petunjuk :
1. Peneliti mengharapkan kiranya siswa menjawab soal di bawah ini.
2. Maksud pengisian tes ini adalah salah satu syarat untuk menyusun proposal/skripsi pada strata satu (S1) jurusan pendidikan bahasa ingrish fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan Universitas Bosowa Makassar. Oleh karena itu, atas pengisian tes ini kami ucapkan terima kasih.
3. Peneliti mengharapkan agar kemampuan berpikir siswa dapat meningkatkan dari sebelumnya.
4. Atas kerja sama dari siswa penelitian ucapkan terima kasih.
APPEDIX 2
RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN (RPP)
Sekolah : SMP Negeri 35 Makassar Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggrish
Aspek/Skill : Writing (menulis) Kelas/Semester :IX/Ganjil
Alokasi Waktu : 4x40 (2x pertemuan) A. Standar Kompetensi
Mengungkapkan dalam text tulis fungsional dan essei pendek dan sederhana berbentuk Narrative text untuk berintreaksi dalam lingkungan sekitar.
B. Kompetensi Dasar
Mengungkapkan makna dalam bentuk text tulis fungsional pendek sederhana dengan menggunakan ragam bahasa tulis secara akurat, lancar dan berterima untuk berinteraksi dengan lingkungan sekitar.
C. Tujuan Pembelajaran
Pada akhirnya siswa dapat memahami isi keseluruhan teks tulisan yang berupa essei.
D. Indikator
1. Memahami dan memaknai text berupa essei
2. Mensyukuri kesempatan dapat mempelajari bahasa ingris sebagai bahasa pengantar komunikasi international yang diwujudkan dalam semangat belajar.
E. Materi Ajar
1. Write about pleasurable experience and write about childhood experience
F. Metode Pembelajaran
Tanya jawab berbagai hal terkait tema atau topik teks fungsional yang akan dibahas.
G. Kegiatan Pembelajaran a. Pendahuluan
1. Memberikan salam/menyapa siswa pada awal masuk kelas.
2. Mengecek kehadiran siswa.
3. Mengendusifkan kelas untuk mengikuti proses pembelajaran.
4. Guru memberikan motivasi sesuai kondisi yang ada di kelas.
5. Menjelaskan pentingnya materi ini.
6. Bertanya mengenai materi.
b. Kegiatan inti
1. Guru menjelaskan dan memberikan contoh tentang materi Narrative text.
2. Membaca nyaring teks Narrative
3. Menjawab pertanyaan tentang isi teks.
4. Mengidentifikasikan kesulitan-kesulitan siswa.
5. Mengidentifikasi tugas siswa.
c. Penutup
1. Memberi motivasi.
2. Menanyakan kesulitan siswa dalam memahami teks.
3. Menyimpulkan materi dan hal-hal yang telah dihapus.
4. Guru menutup kegiatan pembelajaran dengan ucapan salam.
H. Sumber Ajar/bahan/alat 1. Sumber/bahan
Internet, kamus, buku yang relevan dll 2. Alat
Write board, eraser, dan spidol
Makassar,...
Peneliti
Marlina
NIM.4512101186
APPENDIX 3 Pre-test
1. Write down the Narrative text about “Pleasure Experiences”
approximately 100-120 words.
Answer :
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
NAMA :
KELAS :
NIM :
APPENDIX 4 Post-test
1. Write down the Narrative text about “pleasurable Experinces”
approximately 100-150 words.
Answer :
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
NAMA :
KELAS :
NIM :
NIM :
APPENDIX 5
The students’ score and classification in pre-test
NO Initial Name
Score
Total Classification Gra. Mec. Lang. Voc. Org.
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
1 AF 13 10 11 13 10 57 Fair
2 ARD 10 11 11 16 11 59 Fair
3 AR 12 11 11 10 12 56 Fair
4 CA 11 11 11 10 12 55 Fair
5 DN 13 11 12 13 13 62 Fair
6 DP 16 12 12 16 11 67 Fair
7 ESA 10 10 10 10 10 50 Fair
8 FT 11 11 12 11 12 57 Fair
9 FIT 13 13 13 12 14 65 Fair
10 FF 15 14 15 16 18 78 Good
11 IP 16 11 13 11 1O 61 Fair
12 IKA 13 11 12 13 13 62 Fair
13 MSS 10 13 13 11 11 58 Fair
14 MFR 18 13 11 16 12 70 Good
15 MF 10 10 10 10 10 50 Poor
16 MFN 13 11 12 11 16 63 Fair
17 NHR 18 16 13 18 13 78 Good
18 PI 11 13 18 16 13 71 Good
19 PAS 18 13 12 14 14 71 Good
20 SA 12 12 12 11 15 62 Fair
21 SNA 17 16 17 17 20 87 Good
22 SMT 13 13 14 12 16 68 Fair
23 TK 9 9 8 9 10 45 Poor
24 ZDH 12 12 13 11 16 64 Fair
25 YS 10 10 10 10 10 50 Fair
TOTAL 324 297 306 317 322 1.566
Mean Score 12.96 11.88 12.24 12.68 12.88 62.64 Fair Source: The third grade students’ of SMP Negeri 35 Makassar Note: Gra. stands for grammar
Mec. stands for mechanic Lang. stands for language use Voc stands for vocabulary Org. stands for organization
APPENDIX 6
The students’ score and classification in post-test NO Initial
Name
Score
Total Classification Gra. Mec. Lan. Voc. Org.
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
1 AF 17 17 17 16 17 84 Good
2 ARD 16 16 17 16 17 82 Good
3 AR 12 16 16 11 17 72 Good
4 CA 17 17 17 16 19 86 Good
5 DN 10 10 10 10 10 50 Fair
6 DP 18 17 17 18 19 89 Good
7 ESA 18 14 15 16 18 81 Good
8 FT 17 17 17 17 17 85 Good
9 FIT 16 17 18 17 20 88 Good
10 FF 18 18 19 18 20 93 Excellent
11 IP 11 11 11 11 12 56 Fair
12 IKA 18 18 19 17 20 92 Excellent
13 MSS 17 17 17 16 19 86 Good
14 MFR 12 11 10 11 11 55 Fair
15 MF 17 17 18 16 20 88 Good
16 MFN 16 17 18 17 20 88 Good
17 NHR 16 18 18 17 20 89 Good
18 PI 18 19 18 18 20 93 Excellent
19 PAS 16 17 17 15 20 85 Good
20 SA 18 18 18 17 20 91 Excellent
21 SNA 18 18 18 17 20 91 Excellent
22 SMT 17 17 17 15 18 84 Good
23 TK 12 11 11 11 12 57 Fair
24 ZDH 16 18 18 17 20 89 Good
25 YS 16 17 17 15 20 8 5 Good
TOTAL 397 403 408 385 446 2.039
Mean Score 15.88 16.12 16.32 15.4 17.84 81.56 Good Source: The third grade students’ of SMP Negeri 35 Makassar
APPENDIX 7
Students’ score and Classified in score
Experimet Class X2-x1
(D)
D2
No Stb Pre-test Post-test
X1 X12 X2 X22
1 AF 57 3249 84 7056 27 729
2 ARD 59 3481 82 6724 23 529
3 AR 56 3136 72 5184 16 256
4 CA 55 3025 86 7396 31 961
5 DN 62 3844 50 2500 12 144
6 DP 67 4489 89 7921 22 484
7 ESA 50 2500 81 6561 31 961
8 FT 57 3249 85 7225 28 784
9 FIT 65 4225 88 7744 23 529
10 FF 78 6084 93 8649 15 225
11 IP 61 3721 56 3136 5 25
12 IKA 62 3844 92 8464 30 900
13 MSS 58 3364 86 7396 28 784
14 MFR 70 4900 55 3025 15 225
15 MF 50 2500 88 7744 38 1444
16 MFN 63 3969 88 7744 25 625
17 NHR 78 6084 89 7921 11 121
18 PI 71 5041 93 8649 22 484
19 PAS 71 5041 85 7225 14 196
20 SA 62 3844 91 8281 29 841
21 SNA 87 7569 91 8281 4 16
22 SMT 68 4624 84 7056 16 256
23 TK 45 2025 57 3249 12 144
24 ZDH 64 4096 89 7921 25 625
25 YS 50 2500 85 7225 35 1225
Sum 1.566 100.404 2.039 170.277 537 13.073
APPENDIX 8
Distributor of t-table
Df
Level of significance
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.001
1 3.078 6.314 12.706 31.821 63.656 636.619
2 1.889 2.920 4.303 6.965 9.925 31.598
3 1.638 2.353 3.182 4.541 5.841 12.924
4 1.533 2.132 2.776 3.747 4.604 8.610
5 1.476 2.015 2.571 3.365 4.032 6.869
6 1.440 1.945 2.447 3.143 3.707 5.959
7 1.415 1.895 2.375 2.908 3.499 5.408
8 1.397 1.860 2.306 2.896 3.355 5.041
9 1.383 1.833 2.262 2.821 3.250 4.781
10 1.372 1.812 2.228 2.764 3.169 4.587
11 1.363 1.796 2.201 2.718 3.106 4.437
12 1.356 1.782 2.179 2.681 3.055 4.318
13 1.350 1.771 2.160 2.650 3.012 4.221
14 1.340 1.761 2.145 2.624 2.977 4.140
15 1.341 1.753 2.131 2.604 2.947 4.073
16 1.337 1.746 2.120 2.583 2.921 4.015
17 1.333 1.740 2.110 2.567 2.898 3.965
18 1.330 1.734 2.101 2.552 2.878 3.922
19 1.328 1.729 2.093 2.539 2.861 3.883
20 1.325 1.725 2.086 2.528 2.845 3.850
21 1.323 1.721 2.080 2.518 2.831 3.819
22 1.321 1.717 2.074 2.505 2.819 3.792
23 1.319 1.714 2.069 2.500 2.807 3.767
24 1.318 1.711 2.064 2.492 2.797 3.745
25 1.316 1.708 2.060 2.485 2.787 3.725
26 1.315 1.706 2.056 2.479 2.779 3.707
27 1.314 1.703 2.050 2.473 2.771 3.690
28 1.313 1.701 2.048 2.467 2.763 3.674
29 1.311 1.699 2.045 2.462 2.756 3.659
30 1.310 1.697 2.042 2.457 2.750 3.646
40 1.399 1.671 2.021 2.423 2.704 3.551
60 1.296 1.671 2.000 2.390 2.660 3.460
120 1.286 1.658 1.980 2.358 2.617 3.373
Source: http://www.statisticsmentor.com/tables/table_t.ht
APPENDIX 9
Mean score of students in pre-test and post-test c. Pre-test :
x=
X =
X = 62.64
d. Post-test :
x=
X =
X = 81.56
APPENDIX 10
Standard Deviation of the students in pre-test and post-test a. Pre-test
Sd =
Sd =
Sd =
Sd =
Sd =
Sd = Sd= 2.011 b. Post-test
Sd =
Sd =
Sd =
Sd =
Sd =
Sd = Sd= 12.87
APPENDIX 11
T-test Analysis
t =
t =
t =
t =
t =
t =
t =
t =
90.632APPENDIX 12
APPENDIX 13 Picture of the Research
Picture 1. The writer was giving opening speech in pre-test.
Picture 2. The student were doing the pre-test
Picture 3. The researcher was givinga treatment.
Picture 4. Students were doing the treatment
Picture 5. The researcher repeating explain the treatment
Picture 6. The students were doing post-test