• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION IN INDONESIA

8. Conclusions

Schools and professional learning communities work best when they not only process knowledge and learning effectively, but also attend to social and emotional aspects of teaching, learning, caring, and strengthening relationship, community and cosmopolitan identity (Hargreaves, 2003, p. 162). The road from poverty is paved through education. Shortage of teachers, quantitatively as well as qualitatively, status quo of traditional teaching styles are no longer relevant to the learning needs of all students. Traditional schooling is experiencing a credibility crisis as students are dropping out in record numbers and juvenile delinquency is on the rise. To bring fundamental changes in the current practice of education and in the thinking of the practitioners, action is needed at primary, secondary and tertiary

level of education. Since teachers are the most valuable resource available to schools investment in teacher professionalism is vital to ensure that they are equipped with an evidence-based repertoire of pedagogical skills that are demonstrably effective in meeting the developmental and learning needs of all students. Students who are taught by well- trained, energetic and enthusiastic teachers are fortunate indeed. Teachers who teach in very difficult physical and social situations need impetus and encouragement from principals and supervisors. Professional development and on-job training in the best practices of teaching at primary and secondary levels has to be a coordinated effort by supervisors, principals and experienced teachers.

Role of our institutions of higher education should be to continually review the pedagogical practices, and train the pre-service teachers who would ignite the passion and zeal for teaching in order to create intrinsic as well as extrinsic interest in learning.

There is quite a lot to be done at tertiary level to produce quality educational administrators, educational leaders and teachers.

New curriculum in Indonesia will succeed if teachers are trained adequately to comprehend its basic rationale and equipped with necessary resources. Those teachers who are already in the workforce need intensive professional development sessions led by the experts. Teacher training institutes must equip the trainees to handle the new challenges. Opportunity is already knocking at the door and time is ticking away. Some of the ASEAN countries (e.g. Singapore) have demonstrated how to do it. Malaysia is on the way. Indonesia has made impressive progress in the past decade but the task ahead is still enormous. If we think that the cost is unaffordable, then think of the cost of ignoring the most crucial issue the nation faces today: providing the skills to handle the challenges of 21st century.

“Knowledge society belongs to everyone.

All our children should have an opportunity to reach the highest and most creative levels of it. We cannot afford to risk a future in which teachers have prepared pupils neither for the knowledge economy nor for social and moral challenges that lay beyond it (Hargreaves, 1998, p.161).

REFERENCES

Anyon, J. (1981). Schools as agencies of social legitimation. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing. 3(2), 86-103.

Ashton P. (1985). “Motivation and Teachers‟ Sense of Efficacy.” In C. Ames and R. Ames (eds.)

Research on Motivation in Education. Vol.2.

The Classroom Milieu. Orlando, Fla.:

Academic Press.

Ashton P. and Crocker, L. (1986). “Does Teacher Certification Make a Difference?” Florida Journal of Teacher Education.3, 73-83.

Ball, D.L. and Cohen, D.K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice based theory of professional education.

In L. Darling-Hammond and G. Sykes (eds.), Teaching as the learning profession:

Handbook of policy and practice. (3-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Barber, M. and Mourshed, M. (2007). How the World’s best-performing school systems come out on top. London: McKinsey and Company.

Berliner, D.C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463-483.

Biggs, j. (2003). Teaching for Quality at University (2nd. Ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Bowden, J. and F. Martin (2000). The University of Learning: beyond quality and competence.

New York.

Brophy, J.E. and Good, T.L. (1974).Teacher student relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Bransford (eds.), Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and beAble to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Carter, K. (1990). Teachers‟ knowledge and learning to teach. In W.R. Houston, M.

Haberman, J.P. Sikula (eds.) Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 291-310).

New York: Collier Macmillan.

Central Board of Statistics. 2001-2009. Survei of National Labour Force 2001-2009. Jakarta.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful Teacher Education. Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.

Darling-Hammond, L. and Bransford (2005) (eds.).

Preparing Teachers for a Changing World.

Jossey-Bass A wiley Imprint.

Educational Development in Indonesia 2009/2010.

Ministry of National Education Office of Research and Development Center for Educational Statistics 2010. Jakarta.

Evertson, C., Hawley, W. and Zlotnik, M.(1985).

“Making a Difference in Educatinal Quality Through Teacher Education.” Journal of Teacher Education, 36 (3), 2-12.

Ferguson, R.F. (1991a). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why

money matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation. 28(2), 465-498.

Gaffar, Mohammad F. (2012). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Press.

Grossman, P. and Schoenfeld, A. (2005). “Teaching Subject Matter.” In Darling-Hammond . Powerful Teacher Education. Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.

Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teacher work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.

Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers Make a Difference:

What is the research evidence? Australian Council for Educational Research. October, 2003.

Indonesia Educational Statistics in Brief (2008-09).

Ministry of National Education, Jakarta.

Kennedy, M. (1999). “The Role of Pre-service Teacher Education.” In L. Darling-Hammond and G. Sykes (eds.), Teaching as the Learning Profession: Handbook of Policy and Practice.

San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Masters, G. (October, 2012). Enhancing the Quality of Teaching and Learning in Australian Schools. Paper submitted to the Senate Inquiry on Teaching and Learning.

Munby, H., Russell,T., and Martin, A.K. (2001).

“Teachers‟ Knowledge and How it Develops.”

In V. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (4th.ed.). Washington D.C.:

American Educational Research Association.

Ministry of Education, The Singapore Education System, Journal of SEA Education, Volume 1, Number 1, 2000, pp. 185-201.

Ministry of National Education. Act of the Republic of Indonesia, Number 20, Year 2003 on National Education Systems, Jakarta.

McDonald, J.P.(1992). Teaching: Making Sense of Uncertain Craft. New York: Teachers College Press.

Press Release, March 7, 2011. New Teaching Framework to enhance the Quality of the Teaching force. Singapore.

Press Release September 17, 2009. Teachers the heart of quality Education: Singapore. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rowe, K. (2007). Educational Effectiveness in Standards in Education (eds.) Dennis M.

McInerney et al., Information Age Publication.

Charlotte.

Sammons, P. Hillman, J. Mortimore, P. (1995).

Key Characteristics of Effective Schools.

International School Effectiveness and Improvement Centre: Institute of Education University of London.

SEAMEO Secretariat, Workshop on SEAMEO‟s Role in the 21st Century. Mallaca, Malaysia, 2001.

SEAMEO Library (2004). Challenges in Education

in Southeast Asia.

http://www.seameo.org/v1/library/d1w elcome/publications/paper/india04.htm

Sander, W.L. and Horn, S. (1994). The Tennessee value-added assessment system: Mixed model Methodology in educational assessment.

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8, 299-311.

Shulman, L.S. (1998). “Theory, Practice, and the Education of Professionals”. Elementary School Journal, 98(5), 511-526.

Slavin, R.E. (1990). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Suryadarma, D. Suryahadi, A. Sumarto, S. and Rogers, F.H. “Improving Student Performance in Public Primary Schools in Developing Countries: Evidence from Indonesia”.

Education Economics 14 (4) 2006.

UNESCO Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau of Education, Synthesis of Country Case Studies, South East Asian ICT Advocacy and Planning Workshop for Policy Makers, Bangkok, 2003.

Wiggins, G.P. and McTighe (1998). Understanding by design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

SOME NOTES ON CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT FOR PRIMARY