C. Description of The Research
2. Cycle II
Here is the step that writer can make in planning:
1) The writer prepares the lesson plan, the material and the song as media.
2) The writer prepares the source of learning.
3) The writer prepares observation sheet to know the problem in teaching learning auxiliary verb mastery.
b. Acting
Doing action is the second step in activity. It is the realization from the planning the writer has made. Without the action the planning just imagination that never can be real. There are many
steps that writer used in planning of strategy and scenario learning as follows:
1) Giving explanation about the material.
2) The writer gives explanation of the procedures of information song medium.
3) Then asked the students to complete the task while the teacher gave score of student’s auxiliary verb mastery personally and observe their problems. So, it could be references to improve the action in next meeting.
c. Observing
This stage, the researcher observing the student’s activity, their participations, class situation during teaching and learning process and teacher (writer) performance by using structured observation form and made note the overall activities. Furthermore, the writer also collected the data from the post test and the result of student’s activity.
d. Reflecting
In the fourth stage, the writer and the collaborator discussing the data collected from all activities. By reflection, the writer knew the strengths and weaknesses of action. At this stage, the writer used the data from the evaluation to make improvements, if the
problem is still found. The writer will do the next cycle and using the data collected in the first cycle as a reference by fixing all the problems or weaknesses in the previous cycle.
writer gives the treatment. It was done to determine the readiness for instructional program and to analyze the quality of the problem in ability of auxiliary verb.
b. Post-Test
After the treatments, the writer gives them the post-test.
It was done to find out the students’ result in learning auxiliary verb by using Song Medium.
3. Documentation
It is methods which used to get information from written sources or documents like books, magazines, regulation and notes of meeting and daily report.
The writer used this method to get the data about the history of the school, the sum of the teachers, official employed and the students at SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO. In addition, the documentation used to document classroom activity in the form of photos.
E. DataAnalysis Technique 1. Formula
In this research, the writer used very simple statistical formula for comparing the result of pre test and post test. To knows the increase of the average score. The result of individual subject is put in the table. The writer (teacher) analyzed the data and related
the result of the treatment. To find the average score of the pre-test and the post-test in the cycle 1 and cycle II. The formula to get average from pre-test and post test as follows:30
N X
XNotes: X = Mean
X = The total number of students’ scores N = Number of studentsAfter that, to know the result the writer compared the average scores between pre-test and post-test for each cycle. Then to know the percentage of increasing score in students learning activities, the writer used the percentage formula as follow:
%
100
N P X
Note:
P = Percentage
∑x = Total Score of the Students N = Total of Students.
30Donald Ary, et.al, Introduction to Research in Education,Eighth Edition, (USA:
Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010), Page. 108.
F. Indicator of Success
The indicators of success of this study are emphasized on the auxiliary verb process and the test result. The writer hoped after conducting this study, the students’ auxiliary verb mastery will enhance.
In pre survey, it can be seen from total 23 students at eight classes at SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO which reach KKM 74 ONLY 13%. The students are called success if from 87% students got to minimum standard criteria (KKM) 74. It meant that song as medium is success to be used as an activity in teaching and learning process, especially in auxiliary verb mastery.
1. Brief History about the established of SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO is one of the Junior High School in north metro, is built in 1982. It is located on Jl., Kartini-Purwosari, Districts Metro, Metro City Regency. it was built on the land area of ± 1.440 m2.
Now, SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO has three levels of graders.
Those are the seventh graders have 3 classes, the eighth graders have 3 classes, and the ninth have 3 classes.
Since SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO was established, this school has been led by the following principals:
a. Andi Rasyid Jalil BA (1982-1983) b. Azhari Mukhtar (1983-1984)
c. Anton Remndra.Ma,BA(1984-1985) d. Sunariyo.S. BA (1985-1986)
e. Kiyai Abrori Mawardi BA (1986-1987) f. Amat Subari,BA (1987-2014)
g. Muhaimin, M.Pd (2014-Now)
2. Vision, Mission and Goal of SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO a. Vision of SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO
"Being an educator of Islamic character of Ahlussunnah Wal Jama'ah an-Nahdliyyah who is faithful, devoted, qualified, and environmentally friendly."
b. Mission of SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO
1) Creating learning environment based on Islamic values so as to awaken the faithful, pious, intelligent, and noble man.
2) Develop the potential of students' intelligence by implementing active, creative, effective and enjoyable learning so that they can achieve according to the times.
3) Carry out learning that can form an honest person, responsibility, discipline, independent and caring.
c. Goal of SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO
1) Meet the complete and forward-looking curriculum tools 2) Meet the active, creative, effective and fun learning 3) Produce graduates smart, skilled, faithful, pious and noble 4) Meet the educational facilities and infrastructure adequate 5) Produce comparative academic skills
6) Produce competitive sporting ability 7) Produce competitive art skills
8) Produce the scouting of the role model 9) Produce the ability to read the Qur'an
10) Produce religious values in everyday life
3. List of Teachers and Staff in SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO
Total of teachers and staff in SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO are 19 that can be identified as follows:
Table 2
List of Teachers and Staff at SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO
No. Name Subject
1. Muhaimin, M.Pd.I PAI/Aswaja
2. Amat Subari, S.Pd.I PKN
3. Dra. Nurhayati Indonesian Language
4. Sigit Wahyudi, S.Ag IPS
5. Luthfah Rusyanti, S.Pd IPS
6. Puji Hastutik,S.Pd Math
7. Maryani, S.Pd English Language
8. Tutik Marsiati, S.Ag PAI/Aswaja
9. Asna Milati Dewi, S.Pd IPA
10. Imam Mualim, M.Ti Computer
11. Purnawirawaningsih, S.Pd.I Seni Budaya
12. Irwan Nurdianto, S.Pd Math/Penjas
13. Dellia Astuti, S.Pd English Language 14. Drs. Abdul Manaf, M.Pd Language Indonesian
15. Diky Arisanto, S.Pd BK
16. Dian Astuti, S.Pd Lampung Language
17. Ria Puspita Widya N, S.Pd IPA
18. Hendri Ardiansyah Staf
19. Hoyyu Setia Hutami, S.Pd Staf
Source: The Documentation of SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO
4. Building Condition of SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO
SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO has many buildings such as classroom, library, canteen and many others. The explanation of these building as follow:
Table 3
Building Condition of SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO
No Names of Building Total
1. Headmaster Room 1
2. Teacher Room 1
3. Class Room 9
4. Library 1
7. Canteen 1
8. Kitchen 1
9. Teachers’ Toilet 1
10. Students’ Toilet 1
11. Laboratory Science 1
12. Laboratory Language 1
13. Laboratory Computer 1
Source: Documentation of SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO
5. Total of The Students at SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO
The conditions of the students at SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO who registered the academic year 2016/2017.
Table 4
The Quantity of the Students at SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO Academic Year 2016/2017
No. Class Gender
Total Male Female
1. Class VII 60 27 87
2. Class VIII 41 28 69
3. Class IX 47 51 98
Total 148 106 254
Source: Documentation of SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO
aimed to know how far the students’ auxiliary verb mastery among the eighth graders class a before they were given the treatment. The students’
result of auxiliary verb mastery was gained through test which consisted of pre test and post-test in the beginning research and in the end of each cycle while the students’ activities were gained from observation during the learning process.
The writer conducted pre-test on Tuesday, November 14th 2017 at 09.00 – 10.30 a.m. was done to know the students auxiliary verb mastery before the treatment. The result of pre-test can be identified as follow:
Table 5
The Students’ Score of Pre-test
No. Students Name Score
1. Adelia Novita Sari 40
2. Ahmad Rifai 40
3. Ahmad Zul Fadli 40
4. Alif Fiaturahma 40
5. Asifa Mitha Purnama Sari 45
6. Bayu Ardiansyah 50
7. Bima Fahrezi 35
8. Bintang Akbar Al Aqsol 50
9. Charisca Agustin 50
10. Devi Mutia Indah 65
11. Diva Ardiansyah 40
12. Karen Danuarta 50
13. M. Al Rasid Dimas P 45
14. M. danuri 40
15. M. Nur Huda 35
16. Marshanda Diana S 70
17. Mela Sari Anggraini 25
18. Nur Tri Wadini 35
19. Nurul Soleha 40
20. Retno Ayu Ningsih 55
21. Sendi Arlin Wardana 50
22. Shandi Setiawan 35
23. Shyma Asmarani W 25
Total 1.005
Average 43,69
Lowest Score 35
Highest Score 70
Based on the results of the pre test table above, it can be concluded that from 23 students, the writer found only 1 student who passed the minimum mastery criteria that is 74. In pre test the writer concluded that the student is still low in auxiliary verb mastery. Furthermore, there are only 22 students who scored less than the minimum mastery criteria of 74.
Table 6
Frequency of Students’ Score at Pre-test
Students’ Score Frequency Percentage (%) Category
25 – 33 2 9 % Low
34 – 42 13 57 % Low
43 – 51 5 22 % Average
52 – 60 1 4 % Average
61 – 69 1 4 % Average
70 – 78 1 4 % High
Total 23 100%
Figure 1
Graph of the Result of Pre-test on Tuesday, November 14th 2017
Based on the results of data pre test students above, writer found problems auxiliary verb mastery students are still lacking. This problem can be seen with the task given by the writer. Many students get low scores in this test.
C. Description of The Research
with the title Skyscraper by Demi Lovato. Then, the song as medium can be used with “Audio Speaker”. Moreover, the writer made an observation sheet that consists of list of students’ name and list of the students’ activities that would be observed during teaching learning process.
b. Acting
Acting is the second step in this research. The writer conducted this cycle in two meetings. The schedule of action in this cycle is as follows:
1) The First Meeting
The first meeting was done on Saturday, November 18th 2017 at 09.00 – 10.30 a.m. At the beginning of teaching learning process, the writer started by praying and greeting, and checking the attendance list.
Before giving the material, the writer gave stimulus like give some questions, for example “what do you know about auxiliary verb students?”. Some students could answer it but they used Indonesian language or English language. The writer explained the material about auxiliary verb to the students. Then the writer tasks by completing the task of a personalized song text song provided by the researcher. The writer observes the problems that students experience. So, this problem can be used
as a reference to improve the action at the next meeting. Then, the writer guide students in the learning process based on learning planning.
2) The Second Meeting
The second meeting was done on Tuesday, November 21th 2017 at 09.00 – 10.30 a.m. At the beginning of teaching learning process, the writerstarted by praying and greeting, and checking the attendance list. Before doing post test students were given little material about auxiliary verb. Then students were given post test question in cycle I to know students auxiliary verb mastery.The result of post test can be identified as follow:
Table 7
The Students’ Score of Post-test Cycle I
No. Students Name Score
1. Adelia Novita Sari 70
2. Ahmad Rifai 70
3. Ahmad Zul Fadli 50
4. Alif Fiaturahma 55
5. Asifa Mitha Purnama Sari 80
6. Bayu Ardiansyah 75
7. Bima Fahrezi 50
8. Bintang Akbar Al Aqsol 55
9. Charisca Agustin 70
10. Devi Mutia Indah 70
11. Diva Ardiansyah 50
12. Karen Danuarta 55
13. M. Al Rasid Dimas P 55
14. M. danuri 65
15. M. Nur Huda 65
16. Marshanda Diana S 80
17. Mela Sari Anggraini 45
18. Nur Tri Wadini 50
19. Nurul Soleha 60
20. Retno Ayu Ningsih 60
21. Sendi Arlin Wardana 60
22. Shandi Setiawan 65
23. Shyma Asmarani W 50
Total 1.405
Average 61,08
Lowest Score 45
Highest Score 80
Table 8
Frequency of Students’ Score at Post-test Cycle I Students’ Score Frequency Percentage (%) Category
45 – 51 6 26% Low
52 – 58 4 17 % Low
59 – 65 6 26 % Average
66 – 72 4 17 % Average
73 – 79 1 4 % Average
80 – 86 2 9 % High
Total 23 100%
Figure 2
Graph of the Result of Post-test on Tuesday, November 21th 2017
Based on the results of the pre test table above, it can be concluded that from 23 students, the writer found improvement from pre test to post test, with the minimum mastery criteria 74. Thus, it can be seen the comparison value of pre test get the average value of 43,69 and the value of post test scored an average of 61,08. This value indicated that improvement can do to the next stage of the cycle II.
c. Observing
While the treatment was given, observation is also conducted. Here, the writer is as teacher and the English teacher is as a collaborator who observes the students’ activities during teaching learning process.
0,00%
5,00%
10,00%
15,00%
20,00%
25,00%
30,00%
45 - 51 52 – 58
59 – 65 66 – 72 73 – 79 80 – 86
After doing the treatment and observation, the writer got the result of the students’ learning activities from the collaborator as follows:
Table 9
The Result of Observation of the Students’ Activity in Cycle 1 No
.
The Students’
Activity
Meeting Increase the Percentage
s
Average
1 2
1. Response to the teacher question
57% 78% 21% 68%
2. Answer the
question 48% 57% 9% 52%
3. Giving an attention to the teachers explanation
60% 78% 18% 69%
4. Students perform learning activities with joy and fun.
52% 74% 22% 63%
5. Making notes from the material
61% 74% 13% 68%
6. Do the task 48% 61% 13% 55%
7. Appreciate the opinions of others
48% 52% 13% 56%
Average 53% 68% 16% 62%
Furthermore, to see the comparison of the students’
activities in cycle I:
Figure 3
Graph of the Result of the students Activity in the teaching and learning process in Cycle I
Based on the table and the chart above in cycle 1, it is revealed that 68% “Response to the teacher question”, 52% answer the question, 69% Giving an attention to the teachers explanation, 63% Students perform learning activities with joy and fun, 68%
Making notes from the material, 55% Do the task, 56% Appreciate the opinions of others. The average of the students activity was 62%, it can be concluded that the students’ activity are always increase by the use of song as medium.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
1st Meeting 2nd Meeting
d. Reflecting
From the result observation in learning process in cycle 1, it can be concluded that in the learning auxiliary verb mastery processed by using song as medium, the students still known the new technique in their learning. In giving subject material the teacher is not maximum in giving explain the material. Only 62% the average of observation the students’ activity in cycle 1. So, we have to continue cycle 2.
2. Cycle II a. Planning
Based on observation and reflection in cycle 1, it showed failure. So, we try to revise and to arrange the planning for cycle 2.
The researcher and the collaborator/English Teacher (Dellia Astuti, S.Pd) prepared some plans to conduct the classroom, prepared the lesson plan, material and song as medium that would be implemented in teaching learning process. The material is a song with the title “Let It Go” by OST. Frozen. Then, the song as medium can be used with “Audio Speaker”. Moreover, the researcher made an observation sheet that consist the list of students’ name and list of the students’ activities that would be observed during teaching learning process.
b. Acting
Acting is the second step in this research. The writer conducted this cycle in two meetings. The schedule of action in this cycle is as follows:
1) The First Meeting
The first meeting was done on Saturday, November 25th 2017 at 09.00 – 10.30 a.m. At the beginning of teaching learning process, the writerstarted by praying and greeting, and checking the attendance list.
Before giving the material, the writer gave stimulus like give some questions, for example “what do you know about auxiliary verb students?”. Some students could answer it but they used Indonesian language or English language.
The writer explained the material about auxiliary verb to the students. Then, the writer tasks by completing the task of a personalized song text song provided by the writer. The writer observed the problems that students experience. So, this problem can be used as a reference to improve the action at the next meeting. Then, the writer guide students in the learning process based on learning planning.
2) The Second Meeting
The second meeting is done on Tuesday, November 28th 2017 at 09.00 – 10.30 a.m. At the beginning of teaching learning process, the writerstarted by praying and greeting, and checking the attendance list. Before doing post test students are given little material about auxiliary verb. Then students were given post test questions to know the students auxiliary verb mastery. The result of post test cycle II can be identified as follow:
Table 10
The Students’ Score at Post-test Cycle II
No. Students Name Score
1. Adelia Novita Sari 80
2. Ahmad Rifai 90
3. Ahmad Zul Fadli 85
4. Alif Fiaturahma 70
5. Asifa Mitha Purnama Sari 85
6. Bayu Ardiansyah 80
7. Bima Fahrezi 75
8. Bintang Akbar Al Aqsol 85
9. Charisca Agustin 85
10. Devi Mutia Indah 75
11. Diva Ardiansyah 85
12. Karen Danuarta 65
13. M. Al Rasid Dimas P 90
14. M. danuri 75
15. M. Nur Huda 75
16. Marshanda Diana S 85
17. Mela Sari Anggraini 75
18. Nur Tri Wadini 80
19. Nurul Soleha 80
20. Retno Ayu Ningsih 85
21. Sendi Arlin Wardana 80
22. Shandi Setiawan 70
23. Shyma Asmarani W 80
Total 1.835
Average 79,78
Lowest Score 65
Highest Score 90
Table 11
Frequency of Students’ Score at Post-test Cycle II Students’ Score Frequency Percentage
(%)
Category
65 – 69 1 4 % Low
70 – 74 2 9 % Average
75 – 79 5 22 % Average
80 – 84 6 26 % High
85 – 89 7 30 % High
90 – 94 2 9 % High
Total 23 100%
Figure 4
Graph of the Result of Post-test Cycle II on Tuesday, November 28th 2017
Based on the results of post test table above, it can be concluded that from 23 students, the writer found an increase with the minimum mastery criteria 74. With the average value of post test II was 79,78. This value indicated that there is improvement and success conduct in cycle II.
c. Observing
While the treatment is given, observation is also conducted.
Here, the writer is as teacher and the English teacher is as a collaborator who observes the students’ activities during teaching learning process.
0%
10%
20%
30%
65 – 69 70 – 74 75 – 79 80 – 84 85 – 89 90 – 94
After doing the treatment and observation, the writer got the result of the students’ learning activities from the collaborator as follows:
Table 12
The Result of Observation of the Students’ Activity in Cycle II No. The Students’
Activity
Meeting Increase the Percentages
Average
1 2
1. Response to the
teacher question 61% 82% 21% 71%
2. Answer the
question 61% 87% 26% 74%
3. Giving an attention to the teachers explanation
82% 91% 9% 87%
4. Students perform learning activities with joy and fun.
65% 82% 17% 74%
5. Making notes
from the material 82% 91% 9% 87%
6. Do the task 74% 91% 17% 83%
7. Appreciate the
opinions of others 78% 96% 18% 87%
Average 72% 89% 17% 80%
Furthermore, to see the comparison of the students’
activities in cycle II:
Figure 5
Graph of the Result of the students Activity in the teaching and learning process in Cycle II
Fromobservation in cycle II, it is revealed that 80% of students are active in the teaching and learning process. it can be seen that the teacher’s activities during learning process achieved 72% in the first meeting, 89% in the second meeting, in Cycle II.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
1st Meeting 2nd Meeting
d. Reflecting
From the result observation in learning process in cycle II, it can be concluded that in the learning auxiliary verb mastery processed by using song as mediumwas succesfull. The students auxiliary verb mastery score in the pre test is 43,69, the post test I is 61,08 while in the post test II is 79,78. Not only auxiliary verb mastery score but also the students activity in the class, on cycle 1 meeting 1 (67%), meeting 2 (80%). cycle II meeting 1 (72%), meeting 2 (89%).
Therefore, it showed improvement so that the use of songs as a medium to improve the students auxiliary verb mastery among the eighth grade of the SMP MA’ARIF 1 METRO.