Student’s Reading Score
Test 1 Improving Category
3. Cycle II
Cycle II were similar with cycle I, it was divided planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. There were explain more clearly as below:
a. Planning
In the planning at Cycle II, the writer and collaborator (Mr.
Hairul Syahri, S.Pd) were going to make and discuss about the lesson plan. Before the writer and collaborator made a lesson plan, they wanted to identify the problem in the classroom. Based on the students’ result in cycle I, the writer concluded the problem that the students’ had difficulties to comprehend the content of text, So when they were asked to deliver it one by one they were confused and were not confident. From the problem, the writter gave the solution to the students. The researcher prepared the materials and motivate them in reading.
b. Acting
The implementation of cycle II was conducted in two meetings. In this meeting, the writer was being a teacher. Here the activities of cycle II, as follows:
1) The First Meeting
The meeting was done on Friday, November, 25th, 2017. In this meeting the writer was being a teacher. The teacher entered the classroom. The teacher said opening and asked the condition of students. The teacher was remembering the previous materials. The teacher continued the material. Then the asked the students about the material to checked their
understanding. The students gave example by their own language.
2) The Second Meeting
The meeting was done on Saturday, December, 2th, 2017. In this meeting was started by pray together, and then the teacher checked the students’ attendance and asked the condition of students. After that, the teacher gave the task about descriptive text to students and they were asked to read a text one by one.
The teacher closed the meeting.
c. Observing
1) The Success of The Product
In observation of teacher’s action the researcher presented two meetings in cycle II. In the first meeting, the researcher gave treatment. The students were more active and interested in learning process. They could speak better than before. In the second meeting, the writer gave post-test to knew the improvement at the cycle II. The table below showed the result of students’ at the post-test cycle II as follows:
Table 14
The Students’ Score of Post-Test 2
No Nama Score
1 AR 60
2 AOZ 95
3 AL 60
4 ASR 80
5 CNN 80
6 CS 70
7 DA 80
8 DNP 75
9 IPGD 90
10 ISM 80
11 KAL 60
12 MRV 70
13 NMM 65
14 NWV 60
15 NM 90
16 SW 75
17 SHS 75
18 SS 75
19 VK 80
20 YBEK 95
21 YH 70
22 YS 85
Total 1650
Average 75
The highest score 95
The lowest score 60
Source: The result of post-test cycle II Table 15
The Frequency Distribution of Students’ Score of Post-Test 2 Score Frequency Precentace (%) Criteria
65 18 81.8% Complete
65 4 18.2% Incomplete
22 100%
Based on the table 14 and 15 above, there was an improvement.
It could be seen that 18 (81.8%) students from 22 students got score 65 and 4 (18.2%) students got score 65. The the highest score was 95 and the lowest was 60. The success students were those who got the minimum mastery criteria (MMC) at the tenth grade of SMAN 1 Raman Utara. That was 65, but the result of the students’ test was better than the students’ test before giving treatment and from post-test in cycle I.
2) The Success of The Process
Based on the result of the observation sheet in cycle II, the writer indicated that learning process in cycle II was successful. The result score of students’ learning activities observation, as follow:
Table 16
The Result of the Students’ Activity in Learning Process of Cycle II
No Students’ Activity Frequency Percentage 1 The students were fluency
in reading text.
20 90.90%
2 Ask/answers the question from the teacher.
19 86.36%
3 The students were control their speed.
17 77.27%
4 Read and comprehend the text.
19 86.36%
The table above showed that the students’ activity in cycle II was increased. The students’ activity that had high percentage were fluency in reading text (90.90%) and the students ask/answer the question from the teacher (86.36%), the students were control their speed (77.27%). Then, the students read and comprehend the (86.36%). Based on the result above, the writer indicated that learning process in cycle II was successful because the fifth students’ activity got percentage ≥80%.
Based on the result of the research in cycle II, it could be concluded that cycle II was successful. The writer felt satisfied about the result of the research. There were ≥80% of students passed the examination. It means the students’ reading skill had improved. From the result above, the writer concluded that this research was successful and would be not continued in the next cycle.
The table below showed the recapitulation of the students’
inproving speaking performance in pre-test, post-test I, and post- test II.
.Table 17
The Result Score of Students’ Pre-Test, Post-test 1 and Post-Test 2
No Nama
Students' Result
Category Pre-
Test
Post-Test 1
Post-Test 2
1 AH 40 55 60 Improve
2 AOZ 70 75 95 Improve
3 AL 40 55 60 Improve
4 ASR 60 65 80 Improve
5 CNN 60 60 80 Improve
6 CS 50 55 70 Improve
7 DA 60 65 80 Improve
8 DNP 60 65 75 Improve
9 IPGD 75 75 90 Improve
10 ISM 50 70 80 Improve
11 KAL 50 60 60 Constant
12 MRV 50 60 70 Improve
13 NMM 60 60 60 Constant
14 NWV 50 55 60 Improve
15 NM 70 70 90 Improve
16 SW 55 65 75 Improve
17 SHS 60 60 75 Improve
18 SS 60 65 75 Improve
19 VK 65 70 80 Improve
20 YBEK 70 75 95 Improve
21 YH 55 60 65 Improve
22 YS 65 65 85 Improve
Total 1295 1405 1650
Average 53,86 63,86 75
The Highest
Score 75 75 95
The Lowest
Score 40 55 60