Characteristics of the teethin tillodonts are briefly outlined, as de- finingthe family, inthe systematic portion ofthis paper.
The
follow- ing description is amore
detailed studyand
includes a discussion of the evolution of the teeth withinthe order.Both
lowerand
middleEocene forms
havetheir upper incisors re-duced
to two, with the loss, apparently, of P.The
second incisor isthe
most
strikinglymodifiedofany
of thetillodont teeth. InEsthonyx
(fig.2a) thistoothislarge,butlittle
more
sothanP.The
rootislong, only slightly curvedand
without enamel. Its cross section at about the alveolar openingis a distortedoval,withtheposteromedialexpan- sion effecting an approachtoward
triangular.The crown
portion isnearly triangular, scalpriformat the
apex and
apparentlycovered withenamel
in theunworn
state.The
posteromedialand
posteroexternal angles of thecrown
are compressedand
in earlywear
the posterior surfaceshows
a slight longitudinal bulge.With wear
the enamel is firstremoved from
thisbulgeand
later itis removed,rodentlike,from
the entire posterior surface.Enamel
is preservedaround
the medial surfaceand
higheron
the broader anterolateral surface, but in ad- vancedwear
itisremoved
partway up
the anterior angle, broadening, butsomewhat
blunting, the cutting edge.In
Trogosus P
hasbecome
relativelymuch
enlarged (see plates).It is long, sharply curved,
and
evidentlygrew from
persistent pulp.In cross section,
which
increasedmarkedly
in size withgrowth and
eruption duringearlier life, itwas more
decidedly triangular than the root portion inEsthonyx. Its anterolateral surfaceisbroadlyconvex and
theshortermedialoranteromedialsurfaceisnearlyfiatto slightly concave or broadly grooved.The
posterointernaland
posteroexternal angles arerounded and
the intervening posterior surface israther dis- tinctly concave,more
so than the medial surface.Enamel was
de- velopedaround
the anterior portion of the tooth, extendingmuch
farther posteriorly
on
the anterolateral surface thanon
the medial.As
in Esthonyx,wear
is rodentlikeon
the posterior surface with a transverselyconvex
cutting edge of enamel.The
third upper incisor has not been observed complete in a pre- maxilla of Esthonyx, unless the loose teethshown
in this position inNO. 10
TILLODONTIA — GAZIN 65
figure8
are actually incisorsand
notfrom
the canine alveoli, butbroken
portionsand
alveoli of other specimensshow P
tohave
been only alittle smallerthan P. Itis alittle shorterand more
nearly oval incross section atthe alveolarmargin.The
basal portion of thecrown shows
acompressed
anteromedialand
posterior longitudinalmargin
with a broadand
strong bulgebetween
themargins
posteromedially.In
Trogosus
also,P
is relatively large. In the skull of T. hyracoides(pis. 2
and
3) it is seen tobestrongly curvedand
probably rooted. It is nearly ovalin cross sectionand enamel
covers onlythe lateraland
anterior wall in the stage ofwear
observed.Wear
has truncatedthe tooth bluntlywiththe bevel risingforward, resultingfrom
articulationforward
withI2.The
canines inthe tillodonts, unlike the second incisors,show
pro- gressive reduction.The upper
canine inGray
BullEsthonyx
has a diameter not greatly different in sizefrom
that of I^ but is scarcely caniniform in the conventional senseand
has acrown
ratherlikethat of thesomewhat
smaller P^, single-cuspedand
posteriorly broad. It does,however,have
a singleheavy
root. In LostCabin Esthonyx
theupper
canineis still relatively large,much
larger than P^, but has lost in relative importance tothe incisors. InTrogosus
(pi. 3) the canine hasa simple, transverselycompressed
butblunt conicalcrown,scarcely greater in diameter than the root,and
nearly as small as P^.P-
inEsthonyx
(figs.7and
8) isa simple, single-cusped,two-rooted tooth, transverselycompressed
along the anterior margin, but less so posteriorly. InTrogosus
(pi. 3) the tooth is smalland
peglike with asomewhat
flattened, blunt conical crown, about thesame
diameter as its single root.Incontrastwith P-, the third
and
fourthupper premolarsare largeand
functional teeth in the tillodonts.Both
of thesehave prominent
talons,
which
in P^ inEsthonyx
(figs. 7and
8) is anteroposterior^narrow, but has a well-developed deuterocone. In
P*
the deuterocone extendsprominent
crests anteroexternallyand
posteroexternally to-ward
the external angles of the toothand may
insome
individuals, particularly in the LostCabin
stage, exhibit a small tetartocone orhypocone
at the internal extremity of the posterior cingulum.The
primary cuspof P^issingle, butin P*a separate tritoconeis exhibited.
The
parastyleon
P^ is generally butweakly
developedand
not ex-panded
buccally as in P*; however, the metastyle is similarly devel-oped
in thetwo
teeth. P^ lacks a distinct externalcingulum on
theforward
part of the tooth. InTrogosus
(pi. 3) P^and
P* are sur- prisingly like those in Esthonyx, except for theirmuch
greater size;
however, the deuteroconeof both P^
and
P*may
be relatively longer66 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. 121 anteroposteriorlyand more
crested,and
in P*the tritoconeand
tetarto- cone perhaps relatively weaker, although the external styles appear tobemore
powerfullydeveloped.The
upper molars in tillodonts (figs. 7and
8; pis. 3, 7, 11,and
15) are characterizedby
widely sweeping hypoconalcrests,which
insome
material ofEsthonyx
(figs. loand
ii) appears to bemore
nearly a cusp. InTrogosus
thehypoconalcrestmay sweep
higherontheproto- cone.The
basinbetween
the three primary cusps inEsthonyx
isrelatively unadorned, but in
Trogosus
this basin is characterizedby
a distinctive enamel loop, having in theunworn
type tooth of T. lati-dens (fig. 16)
somewhat
theform
of a questionmark
with its lower point rising asalow
ridge mediallyon
the external wallof the proto- cone. In the external half of the molars the paraconeand metacone
in
Gray
BullEsthonyx
are moderately prominent, although they ap- pear to be transverselycompressed
insome
material,and
exhibit, lateral to each, awide
shelflikecingulum
rising to an outstanding style at the anteriorand
posterior angles of the tooth.The
parastyle, themore
prominent of the two, increasessomewhat from M^
toM^, whereas
the metastylecrest is, of course, together withthe hypocone, very greatly reducedon M^.
InTrogosus
theparaconeand metacone show
a rather heavier lateral buttress extending to the base at the expenseof thecingulum which
has lostits shelflikeappearance.The
anterointernal
cingulum
ofEsthonyx
is alsomuch
reduced or lost in Trogosus.The
metastyleand
particularly the parastyle are well de- veloped in Trogosus.In the lower
jaw
the incisors are three innumber,
except in Tillo- don,and
inEsthonyx
Ii is onlya little smaller than L.The
firsttwo
lowerincisors inEsthonyx
(fig. 2a,b) arelongand
butgently curved.Their root portion in cross section is nearly oval with the long axis fore
and
aft.The
posterior portion ismore
compressed transversely,and
enamel extends welldown on
the forward surface of the root.The crown
of Ii has not been observed, but that ofL
ismuch
like that of I^ except that it is smaller, narrower,and
the posterior partis compressed transversely
and
posteriorly extended.In
Trogosus
thediscrepancyin sizebetweenIiand L
istremendous.Ii is scarcely orbut little larger than in
Esthonyx
whereasL
has be-come
severaltimes largerthanintheearliergenus. Iihasbecome
very elongate, however, and, like I2,may
havehad
persistent growth. In cross section it appearstohave been atransverselyflattened oval with a possible increasein the anteroposteriordiameterindepth.The
cross section of I2 haschanged from
a near oval in Esthonyx, transversely attenuatedposteriorly, toan almostlemniscate outlineinsome
individ-NO. 10
TILLODONTIA — GAZIN
(^Jualsof Trogosxis,with the anterior lobe thelarger.
Enamel
is limited tothe anterior portionin both Iiand
L,and
in I2it extendssomewhat
farther backon
the lateral thanon
the medial wall.The
diameter of the cross section of theTrogosns L
increased distinctly withgrowth and
eruption in earlier life, although this processseems
tohave
re- versed inmore aged
individuals withsome
shrinkage in diameter, amore rounded
lateral wall,and
disappearance of enamel, to judge by- isolated incisorsfrom Huerfano "B"
beds. Thismight
appear to discreditgrowth from
persistentpulp; however,thereisno
doubt but that theincisorwas
in a process ofgrowth
during earlier wear, prob- ably throughoutlife,and
thatatno
timewas
theincisor complete.I3 isvery small inboth
Esthonyx
(fig. 2a,b)and Trogosus
(pis. 2and
4),and
apparently lost in Tillodon (pi. 16). In the material ofEsthonyx
inwhich
this tooth is preserved, thecrown
ismuch
lesselongate longitudinally and, in the stage of
wear
presented,enamel
is
shown
only asa small patchon
the anterolateral wall,forming
the cutting edge. InTrogosus
thistoothhasbecome
peglikewitha slightly oblong cross section. In the particular specimen inwhich
this tooth isobserved,enamel was
preservedaround
thelateraland
anterior sur- face, apparently inastage ofwear
inwhich
onlythe basal portion of thecrown
remains.The
lower canine in EstJionyx (fig. 2a) is even largerand would
appear tobe functionallymore
important than I2.The crown
portion of thistoothis strikinglylike that ofL
in form, butthe root portion is notcompressed
posteriorly. It is rather distinctly procumbent, al-most
asmuch
so as the incisors,and
closely follows the reduced I3.Its functional significance is almost lost in
Trogosus
(pis. 2and
4)and
it hasbecome
almost peglike, little larger than I3, towhich
it isclosely appressed,
and
with itdecidedly procumbent. In the specimen inwhich
this tooth is preserved,wear
has reduced thecrown
so that theenamel
isnotcompletearound
themedialand
posterior surface.P2 is simple, but
more
nearly oval in outline in EstJionyx,and
in allinstances observedthe tooth is set withits anterior root noticeably external tothe posterior,with its long diameter oftenabout 45°from
the alignment of the cheek-tooth series.The
second lower premolarisnotinplacein
any
of theTrogosus jaws
athand and
ithas not been recognized in loose teeth; however, it is clearly single-rootedand
of relatively small size, asshown by
its alveolus.Pa
isrelativelysimpleinEsthonyx
(figs,i,2a,and
5) with amoder-
ately high single-cusped anterior portion, but with a basined talonid.
No
evidence of a paraconid or metaconidwas
observedinany
of the68
SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. 121 materialat hand,and
in thetalonid,which
is variable insize, onlythe externally placed hypoconid is distincton
the crestwhich bounds
it.P4
(figs. 2a, 3, 5,and
9), however, is almost completely molariform.Its distinction
from
the molars lies in the relatively longer trigonid, with the paraconid widely separatedfrom
the metaconid,and
the smaller talonid. It also lacks the metastylid characteristic of the molars. InTrogosus
(pis. 2, 4, 6,and
8) thesetwo
premolars havebe-come more
globularin appearance,and
inboth the talonidis relativelymuch
reduced.The
trigonid ofP3
insome
of the middleEocene
specimensmay show
evidence ofaweak
paraconidand
metaconid,or, rather,somewhat compressed
lingualridgeson
theprotoconidinthese positions,and
inP4 theparaconidis relativelynot sowidelyseparatedfrom
the metaconid.Characteristic of the tillodont lower molars (figs. 1-5, 9, 12, 14, 17-19; pis. 4, 7,
and
16) is theU-shaped
crested trigonidand
talonid, inwhich
the trigonidismore
elevated,and
inEsthonyx
anteroposteri- orlymore
compressed.The
paraconid is lingual in positionand
the anteriorand
posterior transverse crests of the trigonid are nearly parallel.The
metastylid partway down
the posteriormargin
of the metaconidseems
invariably present.The
crest of the talonid is not joined directly with the metastylid inEsthonyx
but originates below the posteriorcrestof the trigonid aboutmidway on
the posterior sur- face.The
crest is continuous to the entoconid,with
the hypoconid, hypoconulid,and
entoconid distinct, but is separatedby
a deep notchfrom
the metastylid posteriorly. InTrogosus
the crestforward from
the hypoconid originates closer to the metastylidand may
appear to joinitdirectlyinsome
teethwithonlyaslightgroove between, which, of course,would
be obliteratedby
wear.Although most
of the Tro- gosus teethexamined
are rather worn, the individual cuspsforming
thecrest of the talonidwould
appear tohave lostmuch
of their iden- tity, except inM3.
In the last lowermolar
of bothEsthonyx and Trogosus
the talonidis distinctly bilobed, but thedevelopment of the last lobe orhypoconulid portionappearsrather variable both asto itsposterior extent
and
width.A
peculiarity noted in the systematic de- scription of theHuerfano "B"
materials ofTrogosus
is themore
complete division of the talonid basin ofM3
in specimensfrom
that horizon.A
featurealsonotedinaforegoingsection,butcharacterizing thetillodonts asan order,isthe discrepancyintheheight of innerand
outer walls of the lower molars,and
perhaps to a lesser extent the upper molars.Viewed from
the lingual side the lower molarsand
posterior lower premolars appear brachydont as well as cuspate, but externally they are strikingly hypsodontand
columnar. This is leastI
NO. 10