SQUALODONCALVERTENSIS, newspecies.
Type.—
'No. 10484, Division of Vertebrate Paleontology,United
States NationalMuseum.
This specimen consists of a nearlycom-
plete skull, including the greater portion of the rostrum; the palatal region isimperfect,
and
the jugals aremissing.One
periotiois pre- served.Four
molars, three premolars,and
fourincisorliketeethwere found associated withtheskull.A
mandible,two
dorsals,and
threelumbar
vertebrae,six isolatedepiphysesof vertebrae, tenribsand
one ulna also belong to this specimen.Type
locality.— The
occurrenceis as follows:Near
latitude 38° 40'and
longitude 76^^ 32'on
the western shore ofChesapeake Bay,
about2 milessouthofChesapeake
Beach,Calvert County, Maryland.Shown on Patuxent Quadrangle
orPatuxent
FolioNo.
152, United States Geological Survey.Horizon.
— The
specimenwas
discoveredand
excavatedby Norman
H.
Bosson
July8, 1921. Itwas dug from
the cliffs5feetabove
the beach.The
oyster shell stratum is not visible at this pointand
isprobably well
under
thebeach
level.The
specimen apparentlywas dug from
Shattuck'szone6ofthe CalvertMiocene formationofMary-
land.SKULL.
Dorsal view.
— The most
obvious peculiarityof thisskull (pi. 1) isthe apparent expansion of the rostrumatthe tip.
Some doubt may
exist
whether
this modificationwas
a natural one orwhether
itwas
the result of pressure exertedby
the overlying strata.The
separa- tion of the premaxillaemay have
occurred during the process of weathering subsequent to the animal's deathand
before itwas
cov- eredby
the sedimentswhich
insured its future preservation.The
imperfectstate of preservation of certain exposed parts of the skull lends
some
support tothe latterview. Otherwise, the long-tapering rostrum presents essentially thesame
features as other previously00466—23—Proc.N.M.vol.G2 39
46 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
NATIONAL,MUSEUM.
vol.62.described long-beaked sqiialodonts. It comprises
more
than two- thirds of the total length of the skulland was
originallystill longer.The
narrowest portion is slightly inadvance
of the middle.The
mesorostral gutter
was open
thefull length of therostrum,though
the premaxillaeapproximate
each other so closelyata point anterior to the middle that itmay have been
nearly closed at this point.Distally, this gutter is
formed
entirelyby
the premaxillae,which meet
mesallyand
ventrallyin alinearsuture infront of the alveolae or the firstmolars; proximally, thevomer and
the premaxillae con- tribute to its formation.The
dorsal margins of the mesorostral gutter areformed by
the overhanging edgesof the premaxillae.Inthe squalodonts, inconsequenceof theprolongationof the snout intoabeak, the
vomer
acquires a considerable lengthand
issoplaced as to afford supportfor the premaxillae as well as the maxillae,and on
the base of the skull extendsbackward
as far as the basisphenoid.The vomer
disappears in the floor of the mesorostral gutterslightly inadvance
of the narrowest portion of the rostrum orabove
the alveolaeforthesecond molars. Itincreasesinwidth
posteriorly,and
in the region just anterior to the alveolae for the fifth molars takes partin theformationof the lateral walls.
On
either sideit isincon- tact with the adjoining premaxilla, the surfaces beingsmoothly mor-
tised into one another. This contact
between
thevomer and
the premaxilla has its posterior limit atthe anteriormargin
of the pro- sphenoid.The
premaxillae arebowed, and approximate
each other closest, asremarked
above, at a point anterior to the middle of therostrum.Just anteriortothepremaxillary foraminathepremaxillae
commence
to
expand
horizontally,and
rapidly increase inwidth
to a point 20mm.
inadvance
of the mesethmoid.From
this point posteriorly, they diminish in width, the internal margins being deflected ven- trally as they approach the external nasal passages. Posterior to the anteriormarginsof the nasalstheysendback
splintlike ascending processes,which
are lodged in deep paired grooves inthefrontals on either side ofthe internal margins of the maxillae.The mesethmoid
does not rise to the level of the premaxillae. It forms a thick partition separating the nasal passages superiorly, fillsin the frontalfontanelle,provides support for the vertex of theskull,
and
underlies the nasals. Ventrally, themesethmoid
sheaths or forms a thin veneer ofbone around
the dorsaland
lateral faces of the presphenoid,thus lining the internal walls of the nasal passages superiorly.The
pterygoids, apparently, send thin laminae ofbone
dorsally to sheaththe external wallsof these passages.The
presence of asecond pair of passageswhich open
at the posteriorend
of themesethmoid
gutterand
lead intothe brain caseisamatterof unusual interest. These forminaowe
their distinctness to that portion ofAKT.16.
TWO SQUALODONTS FROM MARYLAND — KELLOGG. 47
the
mesethmoid which
incompletelyfillsinthelarge frontalfontanelleand
supports the nasals, leaving a small pair of passageson
either side.They
are here interpreted as transmitting the nasal branches of the ophthalmic (V) nerve.The
dorsal surface of the skull is constituted largelyby
the maxillaeand
the premaxillae,and
to a less extentby
the frontals.The
maxillaemake up
the greater part of the dorsal surface.They expand
suddenly just posterior to the maxillary notches, formingwhat may
be called the frontal plates.These
partiallyroofover the temporal fossae.Each
maxilla terminates slightly inadvance
of the supraoccipital posteriorly.The
internalmargin
of the maxillais in contact with the premaxilla for practically the entire length.
The
surfaceofthemaxillaisslightlydepressedopposite thenasals,but
plane elsewhere.The
free or externalmargin
is thinner than the internal.The
orbital plate of the maxilla doesnot completely cover the thick apophysis of the supraorbital process of the frontalbut
leaves a considerable portion of the latter exposed in frontand
at the side.The broad
base of the rostrum isformed
largelyby
the lateral expansion of the maxillae.The
cranial region of the skull is quadrilateral in outline.As remarked
above, the frontal plates of the maxillae constitute the greater part of the dorsal surface, the lateral extensions of the frontals beingconcealed for themost
partby
thesebones.The
nasal bonesdo
not overhang the nasal openingsand
are considerably shortened. Posteriorly, they are suturally united with the frontals.The
nasals present aquadrangular outline, truncated anteriorly,and
emarginate posteriorly.The
rostral or anteriorwallof the brain cavityiscomposed
largely ofa vertical sheet ofbone formed by
the paired frontals.Between
these is alargefrontal fontanellewhich
as it closes isfilled inby
the mesethmoid. Support to thisviewislentby
thefigures ofSqualodon zitelliPThe
fontanelle is stillopen
in Zittel's specimen.The
element labeled pa.[=
parietal] in his figureis really the supra- occipital.The Maryland
squalodontand
Zittel'sspecimen admirably supplement each otherand
thereis little chance for error in defining therelations of the various bones.Each
frontal sendsback
a thin isthmuswhich
uniteby
suture along themedian
lineand form
the vertex of the skull. Posteriorly, they arein contactwith the supra- occipitaland
antei-iorlyaresynostosedwiththenasals. Laterallyand
at alower level than the vertex thefrontals
widen
out, support the maxillae,and
give rise anteriorly to the supraorbital processes.The
apophyses of the supraorbital processes are rather pointed, the"Zittel,K.von,Palaeontographica, Stuttgart,vol. 24, pi. 35,figs. 1and3,187C-77.
48 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
NATIONAL.MUSEUM.
vol.62.internal
margin
sloping obliquelytoward
the cranium, the externalmore rounded and
less declivent.The
maxillary notchformed by
the anglebetween
the apophysis or preorbital portion of the supraorbital processof the frontaland
the adjoining portion of themaxilla is deepand
acute.The
maxil- lary foramina are situated 30mm.
inadvance
of the maxillary notches.Posterior view.
— As
seenfrom
the occipital view (pi. 4) the supra-occipital takes the
form
of awedge-shaped
bone, widerabove
than below.The
conspicuousdevelopment
of thelambdoidal crestis the characteristicfeatureoftheback
oftheskull. Superiorly,thecrestisformed by
themargin
of the supraoccipitalwhich
abuts against the frontals.On
the innersides of the temporal fossae the crest curves ventrallyand
laterally, followingthecontour of the posteriormargins of thefossae.The
exoccipitals are ratherlarge,coalesced with the supraoccipitalabove and
projectingoutward and backward
like wingsoftheformer.The
externalmarginsare rounded. Laterallyand
anteriorlytheyare incontact with the squamosals,whilebelow
they are fused internally with thebasioccipital.The
sharp-edged lambdoidalcrestoverhangs the exoccipitalson
either side.The
openingfor theforamen magnum was
originally circular.The
occipital condyles are semielliptical in outline v/ith their long axes directed dorso-ventrally.
They
arestronglyconvex from
side to side.The
internal margins are concaveand
sharply defined, converging inferiorly.The
externalmargins of the condyles arenotsetofffrom
the exoccipitalsby
shallowconcavities,but
graduallymerge
into the exoccipitals. Ventral to thecondylesand
internaltotheexoccipitals are the descending free plates of the basioccipital. Ventral to the temporal fossaeand
external to the exoccipitals are the large squa- mosalsand
their zygomaticprocesses.Lateral
mew. — The
lateral aspect (pi. 3) of the rostrum isformed
almost entirely
by
the maxilla,though
the tipwas presumably made up by
the premaxillae alone.The
thickness of thebroken
anterior edge of the maxillaindicates that it extendedsome
distance farther forward,how
far, can only be surmisedby
comparison with other described forms. Thisviewbestillustratestheupturningofthe ante- riorhalf of the rostrumwhich
imparts a peculiarbowed
appearance to the superior outline of theskull.The
skull as awhole
is ratherslender,and
the heightat the vertexisproportionately
low
incomparison with that of the baseof theros- trum.A
large alveolar gutter, with the septabetween
the alveolaeformed
of porous bone, terminates 62mm.
inadvance
of the maxil- lary notch.The
supraorbital process of the frontalis concaveabove
and
below.The
preorbitalprocess orapophysisisrounded; the post- orbital process is abruptly truncatedand
sharp edged.AKT.16.
TWO SQUALODONTS FROM MARYLAND — KELLOGG. 49
The
zygomatic process of tliesquamosal
is slender, curved,and
tapering anteriorly.The
postglenoid process is thin, directedmore downward
thanbackward. The
temporalfossaisquitelarge,with the superiormargin formed by
thefrontaland
the overlying maxilla.In
either temporal fossa the parietal is suturally united inferiorly with the squamosal, anteriorly with the frontal,
and
superiorly is synos- tosed to the thick lateral margins of the supraoccipital, formingan
apparently continuous surface.The
parietals are thus excludedfrom
the dorsal surfaceand from
the vertex ofthe skull.A
close examination of the surface of thecranium
in the left tem- poral fossashows
a fissure infront of thesquamosal and
atits ante- riormost point ofcontact with the parietal. Thisfissure ispartially filled inby
a triangular wedgelikebone which
is interpreted to rep- resent the ala temporalis or alisphenoid.The
position of thisbone and
its relations to thesurrounding elements correspond in allessen-tial details with the
same
element in the skull of a foetal Balaenop- tera in theUnited
States NationalMuseum.
Unfortunately, thecra-nium on
the right side is so badlybroken
in the region of the tem- poral fossa thatno
additional informationcan be obtainedfrom
that sideof theskullregarding therelations of the alisphenoidtotheother bones. Infront oftheparietaland
abovetheaforementionedfissure, the frontal takes part in the formation of the lateral wall of the cranium.Viewed from
the side the condyles projectbeyond
the plane of theexoccipitals.The
skullhas notbeen
restoredinthe palatalregion.The
palatinesand
pterygoids,if present,would
impart aslightlydif- ferent appearance to this part of theskull.Ventral view.
— The
basioccipital is a relativelynarrow bone
with ventral surfaceconcavefrom
side toside,and
terminatedposteriorlyby
the paired condyles. Anteriorly, it is synostosedwith the basi- sphenoid.The
sides ofthebasioccipitalareprolongeddownward
into free plates,which
are characterizedby convex
swellingson
internaland
external sides. In this feature this skull (pi. 2) differsfrom
the type of Squalodon hariensis.''^ In the latter, the descending plates arereducedinextentand
aremuch
longeranteriorlythanposteriorly.These plates inSqualodon hariensis also join the pterygoids in front,
which
are hollowed outinferiorly toform
the palatine vacuities.A
close examination of the skull of the squalodont
from Maryland
reveals featureswhich might
suggest a diflferent type of architecture in the palatine region. Since the palatinesand
the pterygoids are completely missingfrom
tliis specimen there isno
opportunity for further comparisons.The
descending plates of the basioccipital serve as the internal walls for the scaphoid fossa, the anteriorand
outer boundaries of"Lortot, L.,Archiv.Mus.d'Hist.Nat.deLyon,vol.4,pi.256w,1887.
50 PROCEEDINGS
OFTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM.
vol.62.which
are furnishedby
the descending lateral wings of the basi- sphenoid,and
thesquamosal.A
largeand
well-marked groovewhich
originates within the cranial cavity follows
down
the external faceof the descending plate of the basioccipital along itsline of union with the exoccipital. This is interpreted to be the posterior lacerated foramen.Condylar
foramina are presenton
either side of the basi- occipital.The
basisphenoid is flatin comparison to the basioccipitaland
the anteriormargin was
concealed tosome
extentby
thevomer and
the vaginal plates of the internal pterygoids. If the sutureshave been
correctly ascertained the basisphenoid does not enter into the for-mation
of thelateral descending plates of the basioccipital except at the baseand
then onlyin front of the line of contactbetween
thesetwo
elements.The
presphenoid ispermanently
separatedfrom
the basisphenoidby an open
transverse suture,apparently paralleling in this respect Squalodon zittelV* This region in the skull of Squalodon hariensisisconcealed
by
thevomer and
the adjoining vaginal processes of the internal pterygoids.The
posteriorend
of thevomer
as preserved in theMaryland
squalodontcommences
112mm.
inadvance
of theforamen magnum. As remarked
above, the imperfect stateofpreser- vation of this portion of the skull prevents accurate description.However,
the free ends of the palatine plates of the maxillaeshow
that the palatines
were
suturallyunited to the former,and
that they didnotextendasfarforward as themaxillarynotches.On
the otherhand
Lortet'sfigure of Squalodonhariensissuggeststhat the palatinesmay have
terminated infront of the maxillarynotches.The vomer
firstmakes
its appearanceon
theventral surface of the skull as asplintlikebone
insertedbetween
the palatine plates of the maxillae,commencing
near the alveolae for the second molarsand
disappearingon
a line with the seventh as in Squalodonzitteli. It againmakes
its appearance posterior to the internal openings of the nasal passages. In order to insureacorrect contactbetween
thetwo major
portions of the matrix duringthe preparationof thisspecimenit
was
necessarytofill in thisportionof the skullwithplaster of Paris,and no
attemptwas
afterwardsmade
to restore these passages to their natural appearance.The vomer
is characterizedby
a well- developed carina,though
this, presumably,is merely a posterior con- tinuation of the ascendingplates that sheaththe internal wallsof the nasal passages inferiorly.The
squamosalsareproduced outward and
thezygomaticprocesses thusformed
do not closelyapproach
the posterior part of the supra- orbital processes of the frontals as in Squalodon hariensis,but
are^iZittel,K.von,Palaeontographica, Stuttgart,vol. 24, pi. 35,fig.3,1876-77.
ABT.16.
TWO SQUALODONTS FROM MARYLAND — KELLOGG. 51
separated
by
a wideinterval.The squamosal
isfirmly fixed to the side of theskulland
internally formspart ofthe wall forthe cranial cavity.The
petrous portion of thesquamosal
fills inmost
ofthe tympano-perioticrecessand
internally issuturallyunitedto alateralwing
of the basisphenoid.The
posteriorand
outer partof the squa-mosal
isproduceddownward
into athin lamina or postglenoid proc- ess.The
glenoid surface of thesquamosal
is ratherwide and
con- cavefrom
side to side.Behind
the glenoid processis abluntknob-
like tuberosity,
between which and
thepostglenoid process isabroad
channel while behind thisknob
or ratherbetween
itand
the exoc- cipital, there is anarrowerand
deeper groove or suture.The
chan- nelon
thesquamosal
posterior to the postglenoid process is the groove for the external auditorymeatus,which
continues its courseupward
in a deep depressionon
the posterior faceof the postglenoid process of thatbone,and
terminatingsome
70mm. above
the tip of that process.In Squalodoniariensisthe jugalextends
from
themaxillarynotchto theantero-inferiormargin
of thezygomaticprocess of thesquamosal.The broken
edgesand
the roughlysculptured surface ofthe posterior margins of the lachrymals oftheMaryland
squalodontindicatesthat the jugal occupied a similarposition.The
horizontal ventral plates of the maxillae contribute largelyto the formation of the roof for the oral cavity.They
are separatedfrom
each other formost
of their lengthby
thesplintlike strip of vomer,and
are in contact only posterior to the alveolae for thelast molars. Their surfaces are stronglyconvex
posteriorly,and
taper rapidly anteriorly.The
maxillae are not prolonged over the ven-tral faces of the supraorbital processes ofthefrontals.
The
presence of the lachrymalmakes
suchan
extension impossible.In the zeuglodonts" thelachrymal occupies a position at the base oftherostrum
and on
the externalmargin
ofthesupraorbital process;it is
bounded
posteriorlyand
internallyby
that process,and
anteri- orlyby
the maxilla.A
changein the architecture of the skullfrom
the zeuglodont to the squalodont type, particularly in the rostral region,and
theresulting constriction of thebase of the rostrumand
formation of the maxillary notches,would
result in the shifting of the lachrymal to amore
internal position. If the sutureswhich bound
a small areaon
the right maxilla are realand
not appar- ent,then the positionof thelachryma] in theMaryland
squalodontis in accordance with
what would
be expected in such a modifi- cationand
its relation to the adjoining bones remains unchanged.Some
squalodont skull in a better state ofpreservationmay show
that the above interpretation is incorrect, for in the Iniidae the
'6Andrews,C.W.,AdescriptivecatalogueoftheTertiaryvertebrataoftheFayflm,Egypt. London,
textfig.80,p. 244, 1906.