CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION
A. Description of the Research
1. The Description of Research Location
a. The History of MTs Al Hikmah Balekencono Batanghari
MTs Al Hikmah Balekencono Batanghari is one of the school located on Balekencono, Batanghari, East Lampung. It was established on January 15th, 1989.
From 1989 up to now, MTs Al Hikmah Balekencono Batangharihad been lead by the following headmasters:
1) Period I (1989 – 1993) Drs. Ainan Damyati 2) Period II (1993 - 1995) Muryono, BA 3) Period III (1995 – 1997) Salamun, BA.
4) Period IV (1997 – 1998) Drs. M. Rojan 5) Period V (1998 – 2002) Suparno, A.Ma 6) Period VI (2002 – 2006) Nurkholis, S.Ag 7) Period VII (2006 – 2010) Wahidin, S.Pd.I 8) Period VIII (2010-2011) Nurkholis, M.Pd 9) Period IX (2011-Now) Suraji, S.Pd.
b. The Condition of Building
MTs Al Hikmah Balekencono Batanghari has infrastructure to support its teaching-learning process, including extracurricular activities. MTs Al Hikmah Balekencono Batanghari has following buildings:
Table 5
List of Buildings in MTs Al Hikmah Balekencono Batanghari
No Name of Building Total
1 Classroom 6 Local
2 Principal room 1 Local
3 Teacher room 1 Local
4 Staff room 1 Local
5 Guidance and Counseling room 1 Local
6 Mosque 1 Local
7 School Medical room 1 Local
8 Bathroom 3 Local
41
c. The Condition of Teachers and Official Employees
The numbers of teachers and official employees in MTs Al Hikmah Balekencono Batanghari can be identified as follows:
Table 6
The Data of the Teachers and Official Employees in MTs Al Hikmah Balekencono Batanghari
No Name of Teachers The Entrance Occupation
1 Suraji, S.Pd 1998 Headmaster
2 Wahidin, S.Pd.I 1994 Indonesia Language
3 Mustofa, S.Pd.I 2002 Art and Culture
4 Choerudin, S.Pd.I 2001 Sport Teacher
5 Ahmad Saikhu, S.Pd 2006 Mathematics
6 Muh, Nur Amin, S.Pd.I 2005 Computer Teacher 7 Ahmad Junaidi, S.Ag 1996 Science Teacher
8 Fuadin, S.Pd.I 2000 Social science
9 Rostalina, S.Pd.I 2004 English
10 Halimatus Sadiah, S.Pd.I 2007 Lampung Language
11 Syehudin, S.Pd.I 2011
English Teacher And Arabic Teacher
12 Muslihin, A.Ma 2011 Fiqih Teacher
13 Siti Khuzaimah 2014
Mathematics teacher
d. The Organization Structure of MTs Al Hikmah Balekencono Batanghari
The personnel of the organization in MTs Al Hikmah Balekencono Batanghari are:
Figure 2
Headmaster The chairman
Chief of Committee
Deputy head of school Vice of Administration
Vice of Curriculum Vice of Student’s
Class Proxy
VII Class Proxy VIII Class Proxy
IX Class Proxy Teacher
Student’s
43
e. The Sketch of the location of MTs Al Hikmah Balekencono 1). The sketch of Location
Sketch Location Of MTs AL- HIKMAH BatangHari
Note Note
1. Mosque 2. Teacher Room 3. Teacher Room MI 4. Classroom VII.2 5. Classroom VIII.1 6. Classroom VIII.2 7. Classroom VII.1 8. Classroom IX.1 9. Classroom IX.2 10. Classroom MI
11. Classroom MI 12. Classroom MI
13. Teachers’ Parking Area 14. Toilet
15. yard
16. Classroom MI 17. Classroom MI
18. Students’ Parking Area 19. Canteen
1
9 8
7 3
4
13
12 11
10
15
16 17
18
19
14 5
6
2
2. Description of Research Data a. The Result of Pre-Test Score
To measure the students’ vocabulary muslims’ daily activity the researcher used the pre-test before giving the treatment. The researcher conducted pre-test in the first meeting of this research in order to find out the initial different between the class who similar level. The form of pre-test that wasused in this research was written test.The result of pre-test can be identified as follows:
Table 7
The Result of Pre-Test in Vocabulary Muslims’ DailyActivities at the Eighth Grade of MTs Al Hikmah Balekencono
No Name of Student’s Score Explanation
1 AS 48 Poor
2 AIS 56 Poor
3 ASB S.P 52 Poor
4 DH 68 Fair
5 DI 44 Poor
6 DF 48 Poor
7 DL 68 Fair
8 DR 72 Good
9 EDY 48 Poor
10 FS 36 Poor
11 FI 64 Fair
12 FYI 44 Poor
13 IZ 56 Poor
14 IC 72 Good
15 JRS 48 Poor
16 LR 36 Poor
17 LRW 52 Poor
18 MMM 56 Poor
19 MAS 68 Fair
20 MA 72 Good
21 MSD 76 Good
22 MY 52 Poor
23 NN 56 Poor
24 RAP 48 Poor
25 RA 36 Poor
45
26 SNH 48 Poor
Total 1424
Average 54,8
Source: the result of pre-test of students’ vocabulary muslims’ daily activities
The test was followed by 26 students. The highest score was 76 and the lowest score was 36 with the total score 1424. Based on the data, the researcher measured the class interval:
R = the highest score – the lowest score = 76-36
= 40
K = 1 + 3.3 log n
= 1 + 3.3 log 26
= 1 + 3.3 x 1,4
= 5,62 = 6 I =R
K
=40 6
= 6,67 = 7 Note:
K : The number of interval class
R : a distance from score maximum and score minimum I : The length of interval class (total of class interval) n : Total of students
The total of class interval of this result pre-test was 7. After knowing the class interval, the data was put on the table of frequency distribution as follows:
Table 8
The Table of Frequency Distribution of Pre-Test Score No Interval Frequency Percentage
1 71-77 4 15,4%
2 64-70 4 15,4%
3 57-63 0 0%
4 50-56 7 26,9%
5 43-49 8 30,8%
6 36-42 3 11,5%
Total 26 100%
If the data was put into graphic, it can be seen as follow:
Graph 1
Furthermore, based on the table of frequency distribution above, it could be inferred that from 26 students as the sample of the research, just 1 student who got the higher score, which is 76. The data revealed that 3 students got the score between 36-42 or as
11,5%
30,8%
26,9%
0
15,4% 15,4%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
36-42 43-49 50-56 57-63 64-70 71-77
Students
Score
Frequency Distribution of Pre-test Score
frequency
47
many as 11,5%. Next, there were 8 students got the score between 43-49 or as many as 30,8%. There were 7 students who got the score between 50 - 56 or in the other words, as many as 26,9%, meanwhile, there was no students who got the score between 57 - 63. Besides, there were 4 students who got the score between 64 - 70 or as many as 15,4%. The last, there were 4 students who got the score between 71 - 77 or as many as 15,4%.
b. The result of post-test score
After analyzing the weakness and understanding of students vocabulary muslims’ daily activities, the researcher conducted the treatment to help the students in memorizing of vocabulary muslims’ daily activities.
After the students has been given the treatment the researcher gave the post-test to measure their knowing of vocabulary muslims’ daily activities with different questions and vocabulary. The post-test was carried out in order to intend the students’ vocabulary muslims’ daily activities after treatment.
The result of post-test can be identified as follows:
Table 9
Post-Test in Vocabulary Muslims’ Daily Activities With Quantum Learning Method
at the Eighth Grade of MTs Al Hikmah Balekencono No Name of Student Post Test
Score
Explanation
1 AS 72 Good
2 AIS 68 Fair
3 ASB SP 76 Good
4 DH 72 Good
5 DI 68 Fair
6 DF 76 Good
7 DL 80 Good
8 DR 48 Poor
9 EDY 44 Poor
10 FS 64 Fair
11 FI 52 Poor
12 FYI 56 Poor
13 IZ 76 Good
14 IC 72 Good
15 JRS 72 Good
16 LR 48 Poor
17 LRW 76 Good
18 MMM 84 Good
19 MAS 80 Good
20 MA 84 Good
21 MSD 80 Good
22 MY 76 Good
23 NN 68 Fair
24 RAP 52 Poor
25 RA 56 Poor
26 SNH 72 Good
Total 1772
Average 68,2
Source: the result of post-test of students’ vocabulary
The test was followed by 26 students. The highest score was 84 and the lowest score was 44 with total score 1772. Based on the table above, the researcher measured by class interval follow:
R = the highest score – the lowest score = 84 - 44
= 40
K = 1 + 3.3 log n
= 1 + 3.3 log 26
= 1 + 3.3 x 1,4
= 5,62 = 6
49
I =R K
=
406= 6,67 = 7
Note:
K : The number of interval class
R : a distance from score maximum and score minimum I : The length of interval class (total of class interval) n : Total ofstudents
The total of class interval of this result post-test researcher was 7. After knowing the class interval, the data was put on the table of frequency distribution as follows:
Table 10
The Table of Frequency Distribution of Post-Test Score No Interval Frequency Percentage
1 79-85 5 19,2 %
2 72-78 10 38,5 %
3 65-71 3 11,5 %
4 58-64 1 3,8 %
5 51-57 4 15,5 %
6 44-56 3 11,5 %
Total 26 100 %
The data put on the graph was:
Graph 2
Furthermore, based on the table of frequency distribution above, it could be inferred that from 26 students as the sample of this research, there were 2 students got the higher score which is 84. To be known, there were 3 students who got the score between 44-50 or as many as 11,5%, and there were 4 students who got the score between 51-57 or as many as 15,5% and there were 1 students who got the score between 58-64 or as many as 3,8%. In addition, there were 3 students who got the score between 65-71 or as many as 11,5%. Moreover, there were 10 students who got the score between 72-78 or as many as 38,5% . The last, there were 5 students who got the score between 79-85 or as many as 19,2%.
11,5%
15,4%
3,8%
11,5%
38,5%
19,2%
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
44-50 51-57 58-64 65-71 72-78 79-85
Students
Score
Frequency Distribution of Post-Test Score
Frequency
51