CHAPTHER IV FINDING AND DISCUSSION
C. Discussion
Vocabulary 3.881 2.0452
Table 4.6 shows that t=test value higher than the t-test table value (3.881>2.0452). It means that there was improvement of the students‟
vocabulary mastery before and after use Picture word inductive model (pwim) to the students‟ vocabulary mastery of the Eight Grade SMP Tridharma makassar.
Based on elaboration above, it could be concluded that the null hypothesis was rejected. Otherwise, the alternative hypothesis (H1) was accepted. In other words, using picture word inductive model (pwim) improves students‟ vocabulary mastery of the Eight Grade of SMP Tridharma Makassar in academic year 2019/2020.
In his research, Amir Hamzah explained During the experimentation, students were shown a picture and were asked to identify items in the picture, eliciting words from the children‟s listening and speaking vocabularies. This process essentially created a picture-word dictionary which the students could employ to connect words with corresponding pictures. The experimental group of 14 second graders participated in the 4-week intervention, while the control group, consisting of students from the two other second grade classes, did not receive this intervention. The PWIM intervention was analyzed through nonparametric statistics by examining the vocabulary gains that students made from the pre- assessment to the post-assessment. Additionally, gains of English language learners (ELL) and native-English speakers were compared. Further, gains of the experimental group participants and the control group participants were compared. Results indicated that statistically significant differences were achieved between the control and experimental group participants on the final assessment.
Herlinawati and Hidayati research in 2013 “Picture word inductive model (pwim)”. Improving Students’ ability in Writing a Descriptive Paragraph” The focus on this research was to find out the effect of using Picture Word Inductive Model (PWIM) in writing a descriptive paragraph. This quasi experimental research focuses on writing ability. The population was the eighth students with the total students were 282 students. The sample was students in class VIII.1 consisted of 29 students as experiment class and VIII.2 with 28 students as control class. The instrument of data collecting was test. The test was used to get the data of students‟ writing ability. The technique of data analysis uses T-test which was
analyzed by using SPSS 17.0 for windows. Based on the data analysis, the researcher found that there was significant effect between students‟ writing ability taught by using Picture Word Inductive Model (PWIM) and with the students who were taught using conventional way, with t-test calculation was 3.518 and t-table in significant level 5% = 2.00 and significant level 1%=2.65. It shows the t-test is higher than Sig. point 5% and 1%. 2.00<3.518>2.65. As well, in Levenes‟ test analysis, the Sig.(2-tailed) was 0.01. This significant point was 0.001 lower than 0.005. It means Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted. As the conclusion, the Picture Word Inductive Model (PWIM) gave low effectiveness of students‟
writing ability for the eight grade students at SMPN 06 Pekanbaru.
Marsika Sepyanda, Mukhaiyar, Kusni in 2013 with the “tittle The effect of picture word inductive model (pwim) and students’ self-efficacy toward their writing skill of descriptive texts at grade X of SMA Negeri 1 IX koto sungai lasi “ This research is a quasi experiment with factorial design. The research data was taken from the results of student writing skills tests and self-efficacy questionnaires. Then, the data were analyzed using the t-test and two-way Anova through the Minitab 14 application. The results of this study indicate the PWIM strategy has a significant effect on students' writing skills when compared to the list of strategies commonly used by teachers in writing research. These results add to the t-count of 1,900 which is greater than t-table which is worth 1,684. Then, students who have high self-efficacy who support the PWIM strategy have better abilities in writing texts compared to students who support with a list of strategies, where the t-count is 3.160 which is greater than the t-table which is valued at
1,812. However, students who have low self-efficacy required with PWIM strategies do not have better abilities in writing texts compared to students who support with a list of strategies where a t-count of 1,730 is smaller than a t-table of 1,812. Furthermore, the results of the study also found that there was no interaction between teaching strategies and self-efficacy of students' writing skills in which the F-count was 0.08 which was higher than the F-table which was 2.58.
Devi Suraya, Dewi Novita, Ana Fergina in 2017 with the tittle ”The effect of using picture word inductive model on teaching descriptive text writing “The use of PWIM emphasized more on how students recognized the words by looking at the pictures teacher provided. The purpose of this research was to know the effect of using Picture Word Inductive Model on teaching descriptive text writing on the tenth- grade students of SMA Negeri 2 Sungai Raya, Kubu Raya. This research used quasi- experimental research pretest-posttest non-equivalent group design. The samples of this research were 20 students for experimental group and 20 students for control group. The use of Picture Word Inductive Model had an effect on teaching descriptive text writing. The effect size for the treatment was considered as strong, under the t- test the difference of the interval was significant. It is suggested that teacher uses PWIM as the alternative technique in teaching descriptive text.
Aulia Haning Setyorini in 2016 with tittle “The effectiveness of the word inductive model (picture word inductive) in learning to write poetry in class VII students in SMP Negeri 1 Sentolo,kulon progo”. This research is a quasi- experimental study. Research design used is the pretest-posttes control group design. Inside population this research is VII grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Sentolo, Kulon Progo. The sample technique in this study uses simple random
technique sampling, obtained class VII C as an experimental group and class VII D as a control group. Data collected by pretest and posttest conducted to the experimental class and the control class. Analysis technique the data used is the t- test with a significance level of 5%. The results of the study can be concluded as follows. First, there is significant differences in the ability to write poetry between students who are got learning using the picture word inductive model students who learn without using word inductive models pictured in VII grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Sentolo, Kulon Progo. Pg This can be proven from the results of the experimental posttest t-test the control class and the experimental class obtained thitung 3.703 with db = 62 and p of 0,000. Second, the inductive model of picture words (picture word inductive model) proved effective in learning to write poetry on VII grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Sentolo, Kulon Progo. That can be evidenced from the results of the t-test pretest and posttest experimental class obtained tcount 9.908 with db = 31 and p of 0.000. Class gain score the experiment was 14.84 and the control class was 9.53.
So the conclusion was that using the picture word inductive model in the development of English learning was very important and effective, not only using the picture word inductive model (pwim), but using other model could be used, the core could increase or improve student vocabulary with new innovations.
In this study, several things have been inferred logically. First, for all of the class VIII, they were inclined to have similar problem, when they were conducting a pre-test, in the first meeting, the pre-test was distributed. It seems that most of students did not know how to differentiate which on is adjective and
verb, students did not know how the spelling of the word. Most of them were difficult to answer the test and they just talked to each while they were doing the test. The results of the pre-test were much poor than the post-test because most of them just blank their sheets and did not care with what they wrote in their test.
Second, subjects in pre-experimental class were passive and did not want to answer if they were asked. The cause might be they were lack of vocabularies and lack of enthusiasm for learning. Third, after applying the picture word inductive model (pwim), students in pre-experimental class showed their improvement in vocabularies. Most of them were more interested, active, motivated in learning.
The description of the students‟ vocabulary with the result of data that was explained previously in findings and the description of the students‟ vocabulary between pre-test and post-test. Here were description:
1. The students‟ vocabulary achievement.
Students‟ vocabulary was supported by the mean score of students in post-test higher than the pre-test. Before applying picture word inductive model (pwim) as an English teaching medium, the students could not answer the test vocabulary with false and did not know the meaning of the word. But after applying picture word inductive model (pwim) the students could answer the test vocabulary with true and know the meaning of the word as well. The improvement of students‟ vocabulary could be seen between pre-test and post-test. The students‟ result was significantly different before and after applied PWIM in teaching
vocabulary material. The students‟ text in the pre-test content provisions showed that the students were very lacking in vocabulary mastery, students also do not know the meaning of the word and it turns out there were still many students did not know the spelling of the word.
The students lack in vocabulary and did not care about it. Even though fries (1982) said learning and remember a set of words is prerequisite in learning a particular language. The essential area of language learning was the lexicon or vocabulary had to be taught absolutely when one learned a language, if not, he did not learn language at all.
On the other hand, the students‟ vocabulary text in post-test was better than pre-test. Students‟ vocabulary was supported by the mean score of students on pre-test and post-test in content was 76.53 (Good category) and 8.33 (Very good category). In the treatment for four meetings with the picture word inductive model (pwim) that the first meeting discussed about the English vocabulary material in the classroom used the picture and videos, the second discussed about the vocabulary in classroom with connected the material “Asking and giving Opinion”, the third discussed about the picture again in the classroom, the fourth discusses about the vocabulary with connected the material “agreement and disagreement” and made their creativities about the funny pictures. After treatment for four meetings with the picture word inductive model (pwim) as an English teaching medium, understanding of students vocabulary has improved and
the activity of students in learning and answering vocabulary has increased.
Therefore it means that the picture word inductive model in treatment of students‟ SMP Tridharma Makassar was success to made the Students know the meaning the spelling of the word, also that the students more interested in learning process because the students could make their creativities. The students could memorize the words because every words related with some pictures and some object that was repeat several times.
As a result, the students enjoy, not feeling bored and more excited in learning process.
Moreover, another finding in this research t-test value were higher than t-table value (3.881>2.045) in which to reject the null hypothesis (ho) was rejected otherwise the alternative hypothesis (hi) was accepted. Thus from the discussed above, the students achieve a higher score after giving the treatment.
This technique made the students to be motivated to developed imagination, observation, thoughts ideas in accordance based on the material and situation by the students in vocabulary mastery. It made the students not only learning but also playing, the student saw the situations that exist, full observation and students feel challenged to made the picture with the creativities their caption. Through picture word inductive model (pwim) students could learn without feeling bored, depressed or sleepy in
the classroom because of the picture word inductive model (pwim) tend made students more active.
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion
Based on the research findings and discussion, then it could be concluded that using picture word inductive model (pwim) on students‟ vocabulary mastery at the eighth grade students of SMP Tridharma makassar. It was proved by the students mean score improves from pre-test to post-test. The students mean score of pre-test was 76.53 which classified as good classification and post-test higher than mean score of pre-test that 82.33 which classified as Very good classification. The t=test value higher than the t= table value (3.881>2.045). It means that there was improvement of the students‟ vocabulary mastery before and after used picture word inductive model (pwim) to the students‟ vocabulary mastery of the eighth SMP Tridharma Makassar.
B. Suggestion
Considering the conclusion above, the researcher would like to suggest:
1. For the school
The school is suggested to improve the system and facilities for a better condition in teaching and learning process.
2. For the English teacher
The English teacher should be creative to choose the best technique to apply in learning process in order to make the class alive; the teacher should present the language in an enjoyable,
51
relaxed and understandable; the teacher is not only as an information giver but also as facilitator; the teacher should teach using appropriate technique to teach the students and make variation of technique in every meeting.
3. For the Students
The students are hoped to be active in learning process; the students should know that improving vocabulary is not always difficult because improving vocabulary can `be enjoyable and easy.
REFERENCES
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.
Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Alwi, H. d. 2000. Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Balai Pustaka: Jakarta.
Bromley, K. 2004. Rethinking Vocabulary Instruction. The Learning and Literacy Spectrum, Vol 14 Spring, 3-4.
Brown, H. Douglas. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. 4th
Edition. New York: The Free Press.
Cameron, Lyne. 2005. Teaching language to Young Learners. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Calhoun, E. F. 1999. Teaching Beginning Reading and Writing with the Picture Word Inductive Model. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Douglas, Brown. 2007. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Longman.
Danim, Sudarwan. 2009. Metode Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Angkasa
David, Crystal. 2003. English as a Global Language United Kingdom: University Press, Cambridge.
Jeremy, Harmer. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching (3rd Ed.) London: Longman.
David, Nunan. 1991. Language Teaching Methodology. Sydney: Prentice Hall.
Evelyne, Hatch and Chery L. Brown. 1995. Vocabulary, Semantics and Language Education. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Emily F. Calhoun. 1999. Teaching Beginning Reading and Writing with the Picture Word Inductive Model (PWIM) (United States of America:
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Elfrieda H. Hiebert and Michael L. Kamil, Teaching and Learning Vocabulary:
Bringing Research to Practice (London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2005), 3.
Evelyne, Hatch and Chery, L. Brown. 1995. Vocabulary, Semantics and Language Education. Melbourne: Chambridge University Press.
Gay, L. R. 1981. Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application. London: Publishing Company.
Gay, L.R. Geofry e.mills. peter airasian. 2006. Eight edition: Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application. Ohio: Pearson Handoko Pudjobroto, Improving Students’ Vocabulary Mastery Through the Use
Of Wall Charts in Elementary Students (English Education Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty Sebelas Maret University:
Surakarta), 6.
Huyen, Thanh., and dan Nga, Khuat Thi Thu. 2003. Learning Vocabulary Through Games. (http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?
Accessed on 12 June 2017)
Jacobs, G, Power, M, and Loh, W. 2002. The Teacher’s Sourcebook for Cooperative Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Jeremy, Harmer. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching (3rd Ed.) London: Longman
Jiang, Xuan. 2014. Vocabulary Learning through Use of the Picture-Word Inductive Model for Young English Learners in China: A Mixed Methods Examination Using Cognitive Load Theory, (FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
Jiang, Xuan and Perkins, K. 2013. A Conceptual Paper on the Application of the Picture Word Inductive Model Using Bruner’s Constructivist View of Learning and the Cognitive Load Theory. Interdisciplinary Journal of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 3. No.1,9.
Kweldju, S. 2005. Lexically-based Language Teaching: Metaphor for Enhancing Learning. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(2):164- 177.
Keraf, G. 1980. Komposisi. Flores: Nusa Indah.
Kasihani K.E. Suyanto. 2008. English for Young Learner (Jakarta: Bumi Aksara).
Lynne, Cameron. 2001. Teaching Languages to Young Learners (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Marfuah, Siti. 2014. The use of picture word inductive model to enhance vocabulary mastery of the second Grade student of vocational school of alfalah salagi.
Napa, Pieter A. 2005. Vocabulary Development Skill. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Nation, I.S.P. 2011. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Nita Alfi N. R. 2014. The effectiveness of picture media toward vocabulary mastery to the eight Grade students of MTS-Alzhar sampung.
Oxford Learners Pocket Dictionary. 2008. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 271.
Patel M.F and Praveen M. Jain. 2008. English Language Teaching (Jaipur:
Sunrise Publishers & Distributors.
Penny, U. 1996. A Course in Language Teaching (Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Richard, C. Jack. 2002. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. United States of America: Cambridge University Press.
Roestiyah. 2008. Strategi Belajar Mengajar, Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Safirah, Zeni. 2016. Improving Vocabulary Mastery Through Vocabulary Cards of Grade VII Students at SMP Institut Indonesia Yogyakarta
Shofa, A. 2013. The Effectiveness of Intuitive-Imitative Approach in Teaching Pronunciation. Thesis. Makassar: Unismuh.
Thornbury, Scott. 2002. How to Teach Voacabulary UK: Bluestone Press.
Tricia, Hedge. 2001. Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. New York: Oxford University Press.
Virginia, French Allen. 1983. Techniques in Teaching Vocabulary (Testing Techniques in English as a Second or Foreign Language). Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Wirajosoedarmo. 1985. Definisi Pronomina.
A P E N D
I C
E
S
APPENDIX A
RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN (RPP)
Satuan Pendidikan : SMP Tridarma makassar Materi Pembelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Kelas/Semester : VIII/1
Materi Pokok : Teks lisan dan tulis untuk menyatakan pendapat dan pikiran serta responnya.
Alokasi Waktu : 8 x 45 menit
A. KOMPETENSI INTI (KI)
KI 1 :Menghayati dan mengamalkan ajaran agama yang dianutnya
KI 2 :Menghayati dan mengamalkan perilaku jujur, disiplin, tanggung jawab, peduli (gotong royong, kerjasama, toleran, damai), santun, responsif dan pro-aktif dan menunjukkan sikap sebagai bagian dari solusi atas berbagai permasalahan dalam berinteraksi secara efektif dengan lingkungan sosial dan alam serta dalam menempatkan diri sebagai cerminan bangsa dalam pergaulan dunia.
KI 3 :Memahami, menerapkan, menganalisis pengetahuan faktual, konseptual, prosedural berdasarkan rasa ingin tahunya tentang ilmu pengetahuan, teknologi, seni, budaya, dan humaniora dengan wawasan kemanusiaan, kebangsaan, kenegaraan, dan peradaban terkait penyebab fenomena dan kejadian, serta menerapkan pengetahuan prosedural pada bidang kajian yang spesifik sesuai dengan bakat dan minatnya untuk memecahkan masalah
KI 4 :Mengolah, menalar, dan menyaji dalam ranah konkret dan ranah abstrak terkait dengan pengembangan dari yang dipelajari di sekolah
secara mandiri, dan mampu menggunakan metoda sesuai kaidah keilmuan.
B. KOMPETENSI DASAR DAN INDIKATOR
KOMPETENSI DASAR INDIKATOR
1.1 mensyukuri kesempatan dapat mempelajari bahasa inggris sebagai bahasa pengantar komunikasi internasional yang diwujudkan dalam semangat belajar.
1.1.1 mengungkapkan rasa syukur setiap saat mendapat kesempatan belajar bahasa inggris.
1.2 mewujudkan perilaku santun dan peduli dalam melaksanakan komunikasi interpersonal dengan guru dan teman
1.2.1 menyapa guru dan teman dengan santun.
4.2 menyusun lisan untuk menyatakan dan merespon ungkapan menyatakan pendapat dan pikiran dengan memperhatikan fungsi sosial, struktur teks, dan unsure kebahasan yang sesuai dengan konteks.
4.2.1 mengucapkan tindak tutur menyampaikan pendapat dan meminta pendapat, agreement dan disagreement disertai responnya secara lisan
4.2.2 mengucapkan tindak tutur menyampaikan pendapat dan meminta pendapat, agreement dan disagreement disertai responnya secara lisan sesuai konteks.
4.2.3 menyatakan pendapat dan pikirannya yang sesuai secara tertulis kemudian dibacakan dalam kelas.