Discussion - FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION - I dedicated this thesis to education in Indonesia

CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

B. Discussion

Based on the results of the analysis of the guttman scale, the results related to the interpretation table on the "good enough" scale, meaning that the perception of students who use MALL in reading class is that students have positive perceptions. This means that according to students, the use of

applications on the MALL or MALL itself in the reading class is good enough or enough to help them in the learning process, both in receiving the material and in making assignments given to them through the application given on the advice of the lecturer and the atmosphere is quite interactive. and MALL flexibility for academic purposes.

another thing because the scale obtained by students' opinions about MALL in the reading class is that it is good enough, the meaning is quite easy to use because of its flexibility which can be used anytime and anywhere as long as it is reached by the internet. another thing because the scale obtained by students' opinions about MALL in the reading class is that it is good enough, the meaning is quite easy to use because of its flexibility which can be used anytime and anywhere as long as it is reached by the internet and also and MALL is also quite helpful for students for academic purposes such as studying independently they can use MALL to help them learn on their own, even though it's not optimal because there are many paid applications or websites.

with a good enough scale also indicates the learning environment created is good enough for students to receive or participate in the learning process and the interaction between lecturers and students or fellow students is quite fulfilled for a pleasant learning atmosphere or it can be said that even though they do not face to face directly MALL is quite able to live an interactive learning environment.

with a good enough scale also shows that the learning environment

created is good enough for students to receive or participate in the learning process and interactions between lecturers and students or fellow students are quite fulfilled for a pleasant learning atmosphere or it can be said that although not face to face MALL quite able to turn on an interactive learning atmosphere based on the results of a scale good enough. The results show that students have positive perceptions and attitudes towards MALL to support classroom activities.

In this research in line with Yudhiantara & Nasir (2017),stated Toward mobile- assisted language learning (MALL): Reaping mobile phone benefits in classroom activities. This study used questionnaire and observation. The results showed tha students had positive perceptions and attitudes towards cell phones to support class activities.

BAB V

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION A. Coclusion

based on the results of the analysis of the guttman scale, the results related to the interpretation table on the "good enough" scale, meaning that the perception of students who use MALL in reading class is that students have positive perceptions. This means that according to students, the use of applications on the MALL or MALL itself in the reading class is good enough or enough to help them in the learning process, both in receiving the material and in making assignments given to them through the application given on the advice of the lecturer and the atmosphere is quite interactive. and MALL flexibility for academic purposes.

B. Suggestion

Considering the result of this research, the researcher offer suggestion as follow : The lecture should be able to further optimize applications that are in accordance with the material being taught and not be monotonous using the same application in teaching or giving assignments in order to increase interest in learning, lecturers must also pay attention to the learning environment using MALL in order to produce an interactive learning environment between lecturers and students and fun so that students enjoy online learning. as good.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aebersold, J. A., & Field, M. L. (1998). From reader to reading teacher: Issues and strategies for second language classrooms. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Ally, M. (2008). Foundation for educational theory for online learning. In T.

Anderson (Ed.). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning, Second Edition (pp. 1-120). Edmonton, Canada: AU Press.

Alshumaimeri, Y. A., & Almasri, M. M. (2012). The effects of using WebQuests on reading comprehension performance of Saudi EFL students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(4), 295-306.

Baliu, M. I., & Machmud, K. (2017). The Use of Smartphone in Developing Students’ Reading Comprehension from Perspective of Gender Differences. English Language Teaching and Research, 1(1).

Bayani, M., Leiton, K., & Loaiza, M. (2017). Internet of things (IoT) advantages on e-learning in the smart cities. International Journal of Development Research, 7(12), 17747-17753.

Carrell, P. L., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. E. (Eds.). (1988). Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge University Press.

Darmawati, D. (2018). Improving Speaking Skill Through Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL). Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi dan Aplikasi, 1(1), 24-30.

Davie, N., & Hilber, T. (2015). Mobile-Assisted Language Learning: Student Attitudes to Using Smartphones to Learn English Vocabulary.

International Association for Development of the Information Society.

Dr.Yusrizal, M.Pd. (2015) Tanya Jawab Seputar Pengukuruan, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan: Syiah Kuala Uneversity Press

Erlidawati, E. (2016). Quantum Learning in Learning Reading Comprehension. ITQAN: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kependidikan, 7(1), 37-50

Eskey, D. E., & Grabe, W. (1988). 15 Interactive Models for Second Language Reading: Perspectives on Instruction. Interactive approaches to second language reading, 223.

Gay, L.R. 2012. Educational research: competencies for analysis and applications.United Status of America: Person Education.

Hafidz, M. (2018). Basic academic writing (Vol. 9). Duta Media Publishing.

Kim, H., Lee, M., & Kim, M. (2014). Effects of mobile instant messaging on collaborative learning processes and outcomes: The case of South Korea.

Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 31-42.

Kim, K. J., & Bonk, C. J. (2006). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education. Educause quarterly, 29(4), 22-30.

Kukulska‐Hulme, A. (2012). Mobile‐Assisted language learning. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 1-9.

Mambua, Y. (2020). The Effectiveness of Skimming and Scanning Techniques in Improving Student’s Reading Comprehension of Grade Eleven Students of SMA Negeri 1 Tana Toraja: Journal of Sosial Science, 1(3), 93-99.

Mihaylova, M., Gorin, S., Reber, T., & Rothen, N. (2020). A Meta-Analysis on Mobile Assisted Language Learning Applications Reveals Moderate Learning Benefit and Significant Publication Bias.

Moats, L. C. (2000). Whole language lives on: The illusion of" balanced" reading instruction. DIANE Publishing.

Moore, M.G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), hal.1-7.

Mustika, Y. (2020). Improving Reading Comprehension on Recount Text By Using Authentic Material: ELTR Journal, 4(2), 140-151.

Nayef, N., Patel, Y., Busta, M., Chowdhury, P. N., Karatzas, D., Khlif, W., ... &

Ogier, J. M. (2019, September). ICDAR2019 robust reading challenge on multi-lingual scene text detection and recognition—RRC-MLT-2019. In 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR) (pp. 1582-1587). IEEE.

Nuraeni, C., Carolina, I., Supriyatna, A., Widiati, W., & Bahri, S. (2020, November). Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL): Students’

Perception and Problems towards Mobile Learning in English Language.

In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1641, No. 1, p. 012027).

IOP Publishing.

Rachmitasari, A. (2020). Analisis Efektivitas Pembelajaranmelalui Whatsapp Group Sebagaimediabelajarsiswa (Survei padasiswakelasXI IPStahunangkatan 2019–2020di SMA PGRI Cicalengkapada matapelajaranekonomi) (Doctoral dissertation, FKIP UNPAS).

RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension.

Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Understanding and summarizing brief. Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension.

Sharples, M., & Domingue, J. (2016, September). The blockchain and kudos: A distributed system for educational record, reputation and reward. In European conference on technology enhanced learning (pp. 490-496).

Springer, Cham.

Shi, Z., Luo, G., & He, L. (2017). Mobile-assisted language learning using WeChat instant messaging. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 12(02), 16-26.

Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading research quarterly, 32-71.

Taylor, J. (2000). New millennium distance education. Dalam V. Reddy & S.

Manjulika (Eds). The world of open and distance learning. New Delhi:Viva. Diunduh dari

Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (2014). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. Routledge.

Wena, I. M. (2020). Perkuliahan Online dengan Aplikasi Zoom dalam Program Belajar dari Rumah Dimasa Pandemi Covid-19. Prosiding Webinar Nasional Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar 2020, 203-209.

www.usq.edu.au/users/taylorj/publications_ presentations/2000IGNOU.doc

Yudhiantara, R., & Nasir, I. A. (2017). Toward Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL): Reaping Mobile Phone Benefits in Classroom Activities: Register Journal, 10(1), 12-28.

Zhang,L. (2018).Metacognitive and Cognitive Strategy Use in Reading Comprehension. Singapore: Springer Nature SingaporePtc Ltd.

A

P

E

N

D

I

X

Research Instrument 1: Questionnaire Students’ Perception of Using Mobile Assisted Language Learning (Mall) in Reading Class.

Instructions for students in fill in the Instrument:

1. There are 20 statements in the instrument.

2. The researcher will explain the purpose of the research 3. Students read the statements

4. Students give their perspective by fill the instrument

5. The instruments consists of some points that are strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree

6. Students submit the instrument which has been fill by students itself.

7. The researcher will analyze the data

8. The researcher will make a conclusion after analyzing the data.

Instrument

No. Item Yes No

1 Mall in learning reading is easily to use by students 2 Assessment in Mall is effective

3 the use of mobile phones can create interactive learning environments

4 the multimedia used in mobile phones is useful for reading class

5 the use of mobile phones will facilitate the process of language learning 6 Mobile phones can be used to teach/learn reading skill effectively 7 Applications in Mall is helpful for learning reading skill

9 Mobile phones can be connected to the Internet at any time 10 Mobile phones provide learn ubiquitous

11 the small screen size of mobile phones disturbs learning process in reading class.

12 Slow Internet speed

13 Internet connectivity problems

14 The application of online class is complicated to use by students

15 Students do not have a good ICT literacy to use mobile phones for learning reading skill.

16 High cost of connectivity to the Internet

17 Students’ lack of skill/knowledge to use mobile phones for academic purposes

18 Incompatibility of the use of mobile phones with Learning reading skill

19 Students’ resistance to the use of mobile phones for academic purposes

20 Lack of language learning mobile- based software and activities

Student Work Results

Students’ perception of using Mobile Assisted Language Learning (Mall) in Reading Class.

Name : Class : BG2A

Nim : 105351100620

Instructions for students in fill in the Instrument: students read carefully the 20 instruments that have been provided and choose the appropriate answer according to the students

INSTRUMENTS

No. ITEM YES No

1. Mall in learning reading is easily to use by students

(Mall dalam pembelajaran membaca mudah digunakan oleh siswa)

Agree

2. Can the tasks given be easily understood?

( apakah tugas yang diberikan dapat dengan mudah dipahami)

Disagree

3. the use of mobile phones can create interactive learning environments

(penggunaan ponsel dapat membuat interaktif lingkungan belajar)

Agree

the multimedia used in mobile phones is useful for reading class

(multimedia yang digunakan di ponsel berguna untuk kelas membaca)

Agree

5. the use of mobile phones will facilitate the process of language learning

(penggunaan handphone akan mempermudah proses pembelajaran bahasa)

Disagree

6. Mobile phones can be used to teach/learn reading skill effectively

(Ponsel dapat digunakan untuk mengajar/mempelajari keterampilan membaca secara efektif)

Disagree

(Aplikasi di Mall sangat membantu untuk belajar keterampilan membaca)

8. the use of mobile phones for reading class/ leaning is time- efficient

(penggunaan ponsel untuk kelas membaca/belajar hemat waktu)

Agree

9. Mobile phones can be connected to the Internet at any time (Ponsel dapat terhubung ke Internet kapan saja)

Disagree

10. Mobile phones provide learners with ubiquitous learning reading opportunities

(Ponsel memberi pelajar kesempatan belajar membaca di mana-mana)

Agree

11. the small screen size of mobile phones disturbs learning process in reading class.

( kecilnya layar handphone mengganggu proses pembelajaran di kelas membaca.)

Agree

12. Slow Internet speed ( lalot)

Agree

13. Internet connectivity problems (Masalah konektivitas internet)

Agree

14. The application of online class is complicated to use by students

(Penerapan kelas online rumit untuk digunakan oleh siswa)

Disagree

15. Students do not have a good ICT literacy to use mobile phones for learning reading skill

(Siswa tidak memiliki literasi TIK yang baik untuk

menggunakan ponsel untuk belajar keterampilan membaca)

Disagree

16. High cost of connectivity to the Internet

(biaya tinggi untuk membeli kuota internet untuk konektivitas ke internet)

Agree

17. Students’ lack of skill/knowledge to use mobile phones for academic purposes

Disagree

telepon untuk tujuan akademis)

18. Incompatibility of the use of mobile phones with Learning reading skill

(Ketidak cocokan penggunaan ponsel ―dalam hal ini

aplikasi yang digunakan‖ dengan Mempelajari keterampilan membaca

Disagree

19. Students’ resistance to the use of mobile phones for academic purposes

(Penolakan mahasiswa terhadap penggunaan ponsel untuk tujuan akademik)

Agree

20. Lack of language learning mobile-based software and activities

(Kurangnya perangkat lunak pembelajaran bahasa berbasis seluler dan kegiatan)

Disagree

Students’ perception of using Mobile Assisted Language Learning (Mall) in Reading Class.

Name : Class : BG2A

Nim : 105351102420

Instructions for students in fill in the Instrument: students read carefully the 20 instruments that have been provided and choose the appropriate answer according to the students

INSTRUMENTS

No. ITEM YES No

1. Mall in learning reading is easily to use by students

(Mall dalam pembelajaran membaca mudah digunakan oleh siswa)

Agree

2. Can the tasks given be easily understood?

( apakah tugas yang diberikan dapat dengan mudah dipahami)

Disagree

3. the use of mobile phones can create interactive learning environments

(penggunaan ponsel dapat membuat interaktif lingkungan

Disagree

the multimedia used in mobile phones is useful for reading class

(multimedia yang digunakan di ponsel berguna untuk kelas membaca)

5. the use of mobile phones will facilitate the process of language learning

(penggunaan handphone akan mempermudah proses pembelajaran bahasa)

Agree

6. Mobile phones can be used to teach/learn reading skill effectively

(Ponsel dapat digunakan untuk mengajar/mempelajari keterampilan membaca secara efektif)

Disagree

7. Applications in Mall is helpful for learning reading skill (Aplikasi di Mall sangat membantu untuk belajar keterampilan membaca)

Agree

8. the use of mobile phones for reading class/ leaning is time- efficient

(penggunaan ponsel untuk kelas membaca/belajar hemat waktu)

Agree

9. Mobile phones can be connected to the Internet at any time (Ponsel dapat terhubung ke Internet kapan saja)

Disagree

10. Mobile phones provide learners with ubiquitous learning reading opportunities

(Ponsel memberi pelajar kesempatan belajar membaca di mana-mana)

Agree

11. the small screen size of mobile phones disturbs learning process in reading class.

( kecilnya layar handphone mengganggu proses pembelajaran di kelas membaca.)

Agree

12. Slow Internet speed ( lalot)

Agree

14. The application of online class is complicated to use by students

(Penerapan kelas online rumit untuk digunakan oleh siswa)

Agree

15. Students do not have a good ICT literacy to use mobile phones for learning reading skill

(Siswa tidak memiliki literasi TIK yang baik untuk

menggunakan ponsel untuk belajar keterampilan membaca)

Disagree

16. High cost of connectivity to the Internet

(biaya tinggi untuk membeli kuota internet untuk konektivitas ke internet)

Agree

17. Students’ lack of skill/knowledge to use mobile phones for academic purposes

(Kurangnya keterampilan/pengetahuan siswa untuk menggunakan ponsel

telepon untuk tujuan akademis)

Disagree

18. Incompatibility of the use of mobile phones with Learning reading skill

(Ketidak cocokan penggunaan ponsel ―dalam hal ini

aplikasi yang digunakan‖ dengan Mempelajari keterampilan membaca

Disagree

19. Students’ resistance to the use of mobile phones for academic purposes

(Penolakan mahasiswa terhadap penggunaan ponsel untuk tujuan akademik)

Agree

20. Lack of language learning mobile-based software and activities

(Kurangnya perangkat lunak pembelajaran bahasa berbasis seluler dan kegiatan)

Disagree

Students’ perception of using Mobile Assisted Language Learning (Mall) in Reading Class.

Name : Class : BG2A

Nim : 105351102420

INSTRUMENTS

No. ITEM YES No

1. Mall in learning reading is easily to use by students

(Mall dalam pembelajaran membaca mudah digunakan oleh siswa)

Agree

2. Can the tasks given be easily understood?

( apakah tugas yang diberikan dapat dengan mudah dipahami)

Disagree

3. the use of mobile phones can create interactive learning environments

(penggunaan ponsel dapat membuat interaktif lingkungan belajar)

Disagree

the multimedia used in mobile phones is useful for reading class

(multimedia yang digunakan di ponsel berguna untuk kelas membaca)

Agree

5. the use of mobile phones will facilitate the process of language learning

(penggunaan handphone akan mempermudah proses pembelajaran bahasa)

Agree

6. Mobile phones can be used to teach/learn reading skill effectively

(Ponsel dapat digunakan untuk mengajar/mempelajari keterampilan membaca secara efektif)

Disagree

7. Applications in Mall is helpful for learning reading skill (Aplikasi di Mall sangat membantu untuk belajar keterampilan membaca)

Agree

8. the use of mobile phones for reading class/ leaning is time- efficient

(penggunaan ponsel untuk kelas membaca/belajar hemat

Agree

(Ponsel dapat terhubung ke Internet kapan saja)

10. Mobile phones provide learners with ubiquitous learning reading opportunities

(Ponsel memberi pelajar kesempatan belajar membaca di mana-mana)

Agree

11. the small screen size of mobile phones disturbs learning process in reading class.

( kecilnya layar handphone mengganggu proses pembelajaran di kelas membaca.)

Agree

12. Slow Internet speed ( lalot)

Agree

13. Internet connectivity problems (Masalah konektivitas internet)

Agree

14. The application of online class is complicated to use by students

(Penerapan kelas online rumit untuk digunakan oleh siswa)

Agree

15. Students do not have a good ICT literacy to use mobile phones for learning reading skill

(Siswa tidak memiliki literasi TIK yang baik untuk

menggunakan ponsel untuk belajar keterampilan membaca)

Disagree

16. High cost of connectivity to the Internet

(biaya tinggi untuk membeli kuota internet untuk konektivitas ke internet)

Agree

17. Students’ lack of skill/knowledge to use mobile phones for academic purposes

(Kurangnya keterampilan/pengetahuan siswa untuk menggunakan ponsel

telepon untuk tujuan akademis)

Disagree

18. Incompatibility of the use of mobile phones with Learning reading skill

(Ketidak cocokan penggunaan ponsel ―dalam hal ini

aplikasi yang digunakan‖ dengan Mempelajari keterampilan

Disagree

academic purposes

(Penolakan mahasiswa terhadap penggunaan ponsel untuk tujuan akademik)

20. Lack of language learning mobile-based software and activities

(Kurangnya perangkat lunak pembelajaran bahasa berbasis seluler dan kegiatan)

Disagree

Result Data Collection

From the questionnaire data collection instrument, the following results were obtained : No P

1 P 2

P 3

P 4

P 5

P 6

P 7

P 8

P 9

P 10

P 11

P 1 2

P 1 3

P 1 4

P 1 5

P 1 6

P 17

P 18

P 19

P 20

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1

2 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0

3 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

5 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

6 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0

7 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0

8 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1

9 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1

10 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1

11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1

12 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1

13 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1

14 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1

15 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1

16 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1

17 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1

18 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1

19 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1

20 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0

total ¹⁹ ⁷ ¹¹ ¹⁹ ¹⁷ ¹⁵ ¹⁴ ¹¹ ¹¹ ²⁰ ²¹ ⁹ 17 19 14 13 12 4 15 14

information: p1 is the first question p2 is the third question and so on while being No. is a student Guttman scale research is research that wants to get a firm answer to a problem for assessing

100% = 0%

the results of the questionnaire results are transferred to the frequency distribution table:

question items answer Yes% answer No%

P1 19 1

P2 7 13

P3 11 9

P4 19 1

P5 17 3

P6 15 5

P7 14 6

P8 11 9

P9 11 9

P10 20 0

P11 9 11

P12 17 3

P13 19 1

P14 14 6

P15 13 7

P16 12 8

P17 4 16

P18 15 5

P19 13 7

P20 14 6

Average 12,4 2,6

KEMENTERIAN AGAMA

INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (IAIN) PALOPO FAKULTAS TARBIYAH DAN ILMU KEGURUAN

PROGRAM STUDI TADRIS BAHASA INGGRIS JURNAL IDEAS

Jl. Agatis, Balandai, Telp. 0471-22076 Fax. 0471-325195 Kota Palopo

No : 11/In.19/IDEAS/XII/2021 Palopo, 26 Oktober 2021

Hal : Penerimaan Artikel

Kepada Yth.

Andi Mohammad Hardyansyah, Ummi Khaerati Syam & Muhammad Arief Muhsin Di

Tempat

Assalamu‘alaikum Warahmatullaahi Wabarakaatuh

Dengan hormat kami sampaikan bahwa tim redaktur telah menerima email artikel yang berjudul ―Analysis Students’ Perception of Using Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) in Reading Class‖ dengan ini kami sampaikan bahwa tim telah menyatakan menerima dan akan diterbitkan pada edisi Desember 2021 Volume 9 No.2.

Demikian penyampaian ini, atas perhatiannya kami ucapkan terima terima kasih.

Wassalamu‘alaikum Warahmatullaahi Wabarakaatuh

Tim Redaksi

Dr. Masruddin., SS., M.Hum.

NIP. 19800613 200501 1 005

Appendix I

DOCUMENTATION

Dalam dokumen I dedicated this thesis to education in Indonesia (Halaman 59-62)