Discussion - FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION - THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ LEARNING STYLE AND ST

CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

B. Discussion

The researcher did the data after conducting all the source of data from the respondents, the data was taken from the questioner and the document which identified in previous term, this discussion discussed more about the clear explanation of the research question which referred to the students learning style, students learning outcomes and the correlation between them.

1. Students Learning style

Learning styles is the conditions that enables learners to percept, to process, to storage, and recall the learning contents. In the decades, there has been a surge of interest in the effects of learning styles in education what also resulted in various criteria and categorization of learning styles.

The most popular learning style are three; Visual learning style, Auditory learning style, and Kinesthetic learners. Visual learner learns by reading or seeing pictures. Understand and remember things by sight and then learn best by using methods that are primarily visual. You like to see what you are learning and may have difficulty with spoken directions and may be easily distracted by sounds. Auditory learner learns by hearing and listening.

Understand and remember things they have heard. They store information by the way it sounds, and you have an easier time understanding spoken instructions than writer ones. Kinesthetic learner, learn by touching and doing.

Understand and remember things trough physical movement.

Another influence of the students performing refers to the attitude, it is an internal symptom with an affective dimension in the form of a tendency to react or respond in a relatively constant way to objects of people, goods, etc.,

both positively and negatively. To anticipate students' negative attitudes, teachers are required to first show a positive attitude towards themselves towards the subjects they are assigned to. By believing in the benefits of a particular field of study, students will feel a need for it, and from that feeling of need it is hoped that a positive attitude will emerge towards that field of study as well as towards the teacher who teaches it.

The findings above also found very unique result which identify that visual style become the dominant style which encountered by the students, mostly they felt as visual characteristic at instrument result, another style followed auditory style which 8 students felt as auditory style at all and last style referred to the kinestatic style which identify 6 students there.

Students faced learning style in their classroom activities which really relevant to their learning habit, It stated that, students required learning style proportional from the students habit toward their activities which also influenced from their attitude.³⁸

It stated that students are more quickly digest when information is in the form of images, colors, and shapes other arts are captured with the senses and stored in the brain and will more often remembered. It caused very clearly that, mostly in this class, students most get visual learning style. It supported also that people are stylish Visual learning is closer to traits such as prefer to scribble when talk on the phone, talk quickly, and would rather see a map

38Baharom Mohammad & Ilyas Hashim, Gaya Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran (Kuala Lumpur:

PTS Profesional, 2010).

from on hearing explanations.³⁹ It proves that, students get close to learning style which refers to the visual style.

Learning styles can determine children's learning achievement. If given a strategy in accordance with their learning style, child can develop better. Automatic learning style depending on the person studying. That is, everyone have different learning styles.⁴⁰

All the statement from the expert above really support the result of the data which showed visual learning style become the dominant learning style among the students while also found in general quality of the students, learning style can determine the students achievement among the students at class.

2. Learning Outcomes

Learning outcomes seen as behavior obtained by students after experiencing learning activities, the objective of the learners is a description of the desired behavior change or description products that demonstrate that learning have occurred.

The role of instructional objectives that contain formula as the ability and behavior that the student wants to control becomes an element important as a basis and reference for assessment. Assessment of the learning process is an effort give value to teaching and learning activities carried out by students and teachers in achieving teaching goals. An assessment of the results and the

39Tutik Rahmawati, Daryanto, Teori Belajar dan Proses Pembelajaran Yang Mendidik,

(Yogyakarta: Gava Media, 2015), p. 18

40Aprilia Erawati, Skripsi Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Sejarah Kebudayaan Islam Pada Siswa Kelas X Man 1 Kabupaten Magelang Tahun Pelajaran ( 2017/2018) IAIN SALATIGA

learning process is related to each other because results are effects of the process.

Learning outcomes can be concluded that a change in the behavior of students after participating in activities learning that includes three domains (cognitive, affective, and psychomotor). In the cognitive realm, the process of memorizing and remembering is needed, the realm of affective and psychomotor are more difficult to monitor but have a very significant value for them student's life because it can directly affect their behavior.

Teaching methods and learning styles should be complement to make the learning process a quality, effective, objective achieving, and can attract students to learn more about a studies.⁴¹ That statement proved that, students learning outcomes and their learning style must be relevant to get achievement.

Learning outcomes also called as learning result which showed in learning score after conducting learning process, the researcher found the document which representative of students learning result of study, this kind of document should be very various and valid for being references for students learning outcomes.

Students learning outcomes showed very great score, students mostly got very high score in their learning process; the data was taken valid from the teacher at school. The score was in category very good score.

41Baharom Mohammad & Ilyas Hashim, Gaya Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran (Kuala Lumpur: PTS Profesional, 2010).

Based on the explanation regarding the characteristics of learning outcomes, it can be concluded when students do the learning process there are characteristics that need to be considered if students have experienced the learning process that will change their behavior, namely from who doesn't know becomes to know. Students who have carried out the learning process marked by the characteristics of learning, namely the necessary changes realized, change is permanent, change is positive and active, and changes in purposeful or directed learning.⁴²

Basically, Learning outcomes include: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor abilities. After doing the process learning learners are expected to have the ability to channel and direct their own cognitive activity like rules of solving problem. Affective abilities such as acceptance, response, value, organization and characteristics. While psychomotor abilities such as the ability to carry out a series of physical movements in affairs and coordination, social and intellectual.⁴³ It really related to the data which become the result of the research conducted from three aspect of the learning achievement get from the class.

The explanation above is the prove of the data which really valid to be gotten in this research result. The researcher identified the students learning outcomes by identifying all the aspect which regarding in theory above.

42Tutik Rahmawati, Daryanto, Teori Belajar dan Proses Pembelajaran Yang Mendidik,

(Yogyakarta: Gava Media, 2015), p. 18

43Rahayu, Mita Dwi Putri, Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII Pada Mata Pelajaran Ski Di Mts Sunan Giri Kabupaten Kediri Tahun Ajaran 2018/2019. Undergraduate (S1) thesis, IAIN Kediri.

3.

Correlation between Learning Style and Learning Outcomes

This section explained the correlation between learning style and learning outcomes. In this case the researcher used questioner and document for instrument of research.

This explanation answered the research question about the correlation of learning style and learning outcomes, the researcher conducted several tests before knowing whether there was a positive either negative correlation between learning style and learning outcomes, the researcher first carried out a regression test to determine whether there was a relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable.

Furthermore, the researchers carried out the normality test where the normality test aims to determine whether the data is normally distributed or in other words the normality test was a test to determine whether the data obtained from the field or in accordance with a certain theoretical distribution.

Learning style which conditions that enables learners to percept, to process, to storage and recalls the learning contents. Learning style is the way an individual’s learn a lesson by his own impulse. This research identified the students learning style while correlate it to the learning outcomes of the students. Learning outcomes in change in behavior obtained by students after experiencing learning activities. Learning outcomes include: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor abilities.

The researcher tried to test whether the data that the researchers get in the field really has a normal distribution. From the results of the normality test it was found that learning style score which (sig = 0.176> 0.05) and learning outcomes get score which (sig = 0.164> 0.05) can be said that the data normally distributed.

After the researcher tested the data normally status, Furthermore, the researcher conducted a hypothesis test either to identify the correlation of the variable.

The final result of analysis refereed to the correlation significant of person correlation which sum that, there is positive correlation between learning style and learning outcomes as categorized as strong correlation which conducted by inferential analysis.

46 A. Conclusion

Based on the findings and the result of the data analysis in the previous chapter, the conclusion can be drawn as follows:

1. Students Learning style

The most popular learning style are three; Visual learning style, Auditory learning style, and Kinesthetic learners. Visual learner learns by reading or seeing pictures. Understand and remember things by sight and then learn best by using methods that are primarily visual, auditory learner learns by hearing and listening. Understand and remember things they have heard. Kinesthetic learner, learn by touching and doing.

Understand and remember things trough physical movement

Researcher sum that visual style become the dominant style which encountered by 16 students, mostly they felt as visual characteristic at instrument result, another style followed auditory style which 8 students felt as auditory style at all and last style referred to the kinestatic style which identify 6 students there.

2. Students Learning Outcomes

3. Correlation Students Learning style and students learning outcomes The researcher sum that researchers get in the field really has a normal distribution. From the results of the normality test it was found that learning style score which (sig = 0.176> 0.05) and learning outcomes get score which (sig = 0.164> 0.05) can be said that the data normally distributed.

B. Suggestion

Based on the research and discussion, researcher offer two points of ideas aimed to the teacher and researchers. These points were described as follow:

1. The teachers are person who can influence the students in design learning style as effective as possible, so the teacher should provide more great media in teaching process, it cause of balancing between the students learning style and outcomes

2. The result of this research can be used for the research to identifying the student’s learning style and also for the next researcher who wants to doing

an experimental class, by reading and understand the result of this research, they can done better research than this research.

49 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abdul Mujib, Nuansa-nuansa Psikologi Islam .Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada 2002.

Abu ahmadi dan Widodo Supriyono, Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta 2013 Aprilia Erawati, Skripsi Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Sejarah

Kebudayaan Islam. 2017/2018.

Aunurrahman. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung : Alfabeta 2009

Baharom Mohammad & Ilyas Hashim, Gaya Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran (Kuala Lumpur: PTS Profesional. 2010.

Battroff, S.M, The Impact of Group Versus Individualized Classroom Activities onThe Levels of Achievement of Student. In a Tenth-Grade Religion Corse Group Activities Individualized Activities, Learning Style, Dissertation absctract EDD, La Siera University. 1993

Daryanto, Teori Belajar dan Proses Pembelajaran Yang Mendidik (Yogyakarta: Gava Media. 2015

Dave Meier, terjemahan Rahmani Astuti, The Accelerated Learning Handbook(Bandung: Kaifa. 2002.

Djamarah Syaiful Bahri. Psikologi Belajar .Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.2011.

Dorris B. Matthews. An Investigation of learning and Perceived Academic Achievement for High School Students .Taylor and Francis Group,69. 1996 Erawati, Aprilia . Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Pada Siswa

Kelas X MAN 1 Kabupaten Magelang Tahun Pelajaran 2017/2018. Other thesis, IAIN SALATIGA. 2018.

Hariyanto dan Suyono, Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

2012

Imam Gunawan, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori & Praktik. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara. 2014

James, W. B., And Gardner, D. L. Learning Styles: Implications for Distance Learning . New Directions for Adult Continuing Education.1995

Jeremi Harmer, The Practice Of Language Teaching .

Kimbe and Garmezy, Principles of Language Learning and Teaching

L. R. Gay, Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis & Application. USA:

Charles E Merill Publishing Company.1997

Lou Russel, The Accelerated Learning Field book: Panduan Belajar Cepat untukPelajar dan Umum (Bandung: Nusa Media,)

Malihah, Umi,. Correlation Between Students’ Learning Style And Achievement In Critical Reading Class Of English Teacher Education Department At Sunan Ampel StateIslamic University Surabaya (Undergraduate Thesis, Uin Sunan Ampel Surabaya. 2015

Mubashira Khalid*,Mumtaz Akhter and Aroona Hashmi,. Teaching Styles of Secondary School English Teacher and Learning Styles of their Students and Relationship of Teaching Learning Style Match with Students’ Achievement Bulletin of Education and Research,39,December 2017

Mulyono Abdurrahman,.Pendidikan Bagi Anak Kesulitan Belajar (Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta. 1999

Noorhasliza Binti Mohd Nordin, 2015. Rangsangan dan Gaya Pembelajaran Sejarah Pelajar Cemerlang (Latihan Ilmiah Sarjana. Bangi : UKM.

Orhun, N. An Investigation Into The Mathematics Achievement and Attitude Toward Mathematics With Respect Toleaning Style According To Gender (InternasionalJournal of Mathematics Esucation In Science And Techology.

Oxford R.L. & Ehman, M.E., dan Lavine, R. Stylewars Teacher-Student Style ConflictIn The Language Classromm (Foreign Language Journal. 28 (1).

1998.

Purwa Atmaja Prawira,. Psikologi Pendidikan Dalam Perspektif Baru (Jogjakarta:

Ar-Ruzz Media. 2013

Rahayu, Mita Dwi Putri. Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII Pada Mata Pelajaran Ski Di Mts Sunan Giri Kabupaten Kediri Tahun Ajaran 2018/2019. Undergraduate (S1) thesis, IAIN Kediri.

Rahmani, Jahanbakhsh. Learning styles and academic achievement: a case study of Iranian high school girls’ students . Procedia-Social and Behavioral sciences 51 2012

Rifa’i, A dan Anni, C.T. Psikologi Pendidikan. .Semarang: UPT UNNES 2012.

Robiah Sidin,. Kualiti Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Universiti Tempatan. Jurnal Akademik. 57(7). 1993

S. Nasution,. Metode ResearchPenelitian Ilmiah . Jakarta: Bumi Aksara,. 2009

Selmes, L.P, Improving Study Skill . Charging Perspective in Education .Great Britain: Hodder and Staughton Ltd. 1987.

Shofia Nur Widayah . Skripsi Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Siswa Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pendidikan.2006

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta. 2016

Sumadi Suryabrata,.Psikologi Pendidikan .Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada,.2017 Susanto, Ahmad. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta:

Kencana.

Tutik Rahmawati, Daryanto. Teori Belajar dan Proses Pembelajaran Yang Mendidik Yogyakarta: Gava Media. 2015

Zul Astri. Correlation between learning styles and students” academic achievement in speaking skill in English Department at Hasanuddin University (Jurnal Ilmu Budaya and v.2. 2005.

APPENDICES

Appendix 01: Questioner Form

No Nama FINAL SCORE

1 Muh.khutba 90

2 Azzahra zatil aqmar 80

3 TITIN SAFITRI 82

4 Naila Idrus 90

5 Naila Idrus 92

6 Naila Idrus 94

7 ARISTA FIRANI 78

8 ANDI ALISSIA SAFITRI 90

9 Naila Idrus 79

10 Tryanjani 80

MUHAMAD ADIANDRA RAHMAN

12 MELISAH 90

13 Nama Muhammad Alif satria 65

14 Dwi Mutia syahrani 80

15 ASPIANA PUTRI 87

16 FARAHDIBA RAMADHANI 82

17 Reifan Prasaja 80

18 Rasyaad Andika Darmanto 84

19 Muhammad Herik 74

20 Muhammad Herik 90

21 MUHAMMAD YASSER JUANDA 80

22 Arga Anugrah Pernanda 82

23 Muh ammar hidayatullah 90

24 MERY 92

25 Anisa Rustam 69

26 ANDI MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ 94

27 Muhammad Fakhri Kurniawan 90

28 Adnan mulki 82

29 Muhammad Alief Bani 80

30 Muhammad Syahrul abdillah 82

AVERAGE 84.00

MAX 94

MIN 65

No Nama 1 2 3 4 5 11 12 13 14 15 21 22 23 24 TOTAL 1 Muh.khutba 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 87 2 Azzahra zatil 4 4 4 5 5 3 3 5 3 4 3 3 4 4 91 3

TITIN

SAFITRI 4 4 5 4 5 3 3 4 4 4 3 2 4 3 90 4 Naila Idrus 5 3 5 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 5 94 5 Naila Idrus 5 3 5 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 5 94 6 Naila Idrus 5 3 5 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 5 94 7

ARISTA

FIRANI 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 106 8

ANDI

ALISSIA 3 4 4 5 5 5 3 4 3 4 3 3 5 4 96 9 Naila Idrus 4 3 5 4 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 5 5 93 10 Tryanjani 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 2 4 4 4 3 92 11 MUHAMAD 3 5 3 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 92 12 MELISAH 5 4 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 83

13 Nama 2 4 4 1 4 2 3 4 4 2 2 2 4 2 72

14 Dwi Mutia 4 3 4 3 5 4 5 3 2 2 4 3 3 4 84 15 ASPIANA 3 5 4 4 2 5 5 3 2 1 3 2 4 4 90 16 FARAHDIBA 5 3 4 4 5 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 94 17 Reifan Prasaja 4 2 4 2 4 2 2 4 4 3 2 3 4 4 78 18 Rasyaad 4 2 4 2 4 4 3 5 4 4 3 2 4 3 87 19 Herik 4 5 3 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 3 3 4 4 100 20 Muhammad 4 5 3 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 3 3 4 4 100 21 MUHAMMAD 4 5 4 2 4 5 4 4 5 2 4 2 4 5 96 22 Arga Anugrah 3 2 4 4 2 3 1 5 2 3 2 3 4 4 77 23 Muh ammar 5 2 5 3 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 5 101

24 MERY 4 4 5 4 5 2 3 4 4 3 3 2 3 3 84

25 Anisa Rustam 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 2 4 4 86

26 ANDI 5 4 4 4 5 2 2 2 4 3 3 2 4 4 85

27 Muhammad 4 4 4 4 5 2 3 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 92 28 Adnan mulki 3 4 3 2 1 3 3 4 5 5 2 3 3 3 81 29 Muhammad 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 2 2 3 4 82 30 Muhammad 4 4 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 3 100

Appendix 02 : Document Form

Appendix 03 : Administration Letter

Dalam dokumen THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ LEARNING STYLE AND STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES (Halaman 55-63)