Masks
were originally clan property, were later acquiredby
the medicine society,and
finallycame
to be individual possessionswhich
werehanded down
within families.Exchange
in ownershipwas
a ritual rather thanan
economic transactionand was
effectedby
thenew owner
addinghisbag
oftobacco to thosealready attached tothemask
(Keppler, 1941, p. 17).There
is notenough
historical data to permit anaccurateaccountoftheeconomicsignificance ofthe carvings in the aboriginal culture.However,
since they were ceremonial objects,masks
probablyhad
little ifany
commercial value within the society, an assumptionwhich
explainswhy
theEuropeans
were able to purchasethem
at a verylow
price during the 18 thand
19 th centuries(Beauchamp,
1905 a, p. 191). Later,when
the IndiansAnthrop. Pap.
No. 74] IROQUOIS
MASKS AT ONONDAGA — HENDRY 381
C3O
1^
wgo 11
w M m O
"^» o -g
a ag
j>iM
Mo 2 -
t;t;dC3
C3X1O—
'
^~^^
cqa^
Si,9a,
5)5gj* Q ^
OT'-' '^
O 3 '"'
§ fl
'"'O •o
S'^§'-'Ci
^t^a .o o^j—"2 -w
-m1=103a
aS
&a
S o O03 ocnQ.2 ^
0.2S3 -o
o
.«'^03 ..
5^W •^0)o
3OJ^03°03a
"S2 «
a
03o03
,-rt 'd"^ 'O
*^-^Sfl^(=1"t^f^
c3c3fl3©c3^c3
»^ o
<D CDri®tt^®fl® -S03
[in
3S3 o £ -"03^ca
S o
73 "O Cl'
isSF -Sw O O Q Qo a
t3^
O^
CO3Omr1
63" g
•j3«C:
a o o
o
60 M J3
^ >>
•"S
;^s
h^r-*3 tiS a
ap
o«3o
3 g
a^
gft
CIt3
P o
"iJa>T3
Oi^ ®
<uo «
.2'^
:ao3
> > I
o o §
5^
^ I o ^
o d I « «
realized that the carvings
had
amonetary
value for the Whites, their attitudebegan
to shift in the direction of greater conformity to western standards. This changemay
be responsible for the fact thatmasks
arenow
privaterather thancommunity
property.Today
atOnondaga
the economic aspects ofmaskmaking
are stillminimized
by
thosewho
identify with the traditional Iroquois pat- terns. In this respect the art differsfrom
thebeadwork and
basket-weaving
of thewomen, which
are openlyacknowledged
tobe
commercial enterprises, as well asfrom
carvingon some
other reser- vationswhere masks
aremade
specifically for the tourist tradeand
it is possible to order "a genuineIroquois false face"
by
mail.Some Onondagas
maintain that masks, being ceremonial properties, should never be sold, although themore
prevalent opinion holds that it isuse
which makes
the carvings sacredand
that theymay
be sold ifthey
have
never been "doctored" orworn
in a ceremony.The
chiefs
have
forbidden sales at the State Fairand from
the roadside standson
thereservationand do
all they cantoprevent the oldmasks from
falling into thehands
of the Whites.The
positionwhich
the carvers themselveshave
takentoward
selling theirwork
issomewhat
inconsistent.
They
assert quite positively that although it is per- missible to selland
trademasks among
themembers
of the FalseFace
Societyand
theother CouncilHouse
people, it iswrong
to deal with outsiders, particularly as PeteHest
has toldthem
to keep allthe carvings they
make.
Actually, however,most
ofthem have on
occasiondone
business with the T\Tiites or with those Indianswho have no
scruples aboutselling to the Whites;some have
even parted with their "doctored"masks when
they were in need ofmoney.
How
this contradictionbetween
their statementsand
their actions is rationalized, I do notknow. When
questioned individually, each carverintimated that althoughhehad
never sold a "doctored"mask,
heknew
of otherswho had done
so, but that these were cases inwhich
therewere
extenuating circumstances, usually of a financial nature. Itmay
be that they regard the traditional prohibitions as ideal standards of conductwhich
they feel obliged to follow onlywhen
theydo notconflictwitheconomic
necessity. It isalsopossible that the leniencywhich
the individual carver displays,toward
thosewho
accept thenorms
but occasionally fail to observe them,may
serve to assuage his
own
feelings of guiltwhen
he finds himself in a similar position.The
attitude of themore
acculturatedOnondagas
is farmore
ex- plicit.The
Christiansand
otherswho have no
respect for the in- junctions of the CouncilHouse
lookupon
the false faces as Indian curioswhich may have
amonetary
value.Of
these people, however, onlyAndrew
Pierce has openly attempted to commercialize the art'^°No.°74f*^' IROQUOIS
MASKS AT ONONDAGA — ^HENDRY 383
by
setting himselfup
as a dealer in masks.Along
with thebows and
arrows,snow
snakes,and
a group of miscellaneous itemswhich
he calls Indian relics, he has a collection of carvingswhich
he lends tothemembers
of the FalseFace
Society,but will also sell toanyone
willing to purchase.
Most
of themasks
Pierce has at the present timehave
been obtainedfrom
carverswho have pawned them
tohim
for afew
dollars.When
they attempt tobuy them
back,he
refuses to sell at the
same
price, holdingthem
instead forwhat
he can getfrom White
collectors. In the past hehad
several steady customers in Syracuse,among them
awealthy brewerwho bought
the carvingsnow owned by
the city's Historical Society. Since Pierce does business publiclyfrom
a small craft shop, he has incurred theenmity
of the CouncilHouse
for defying the ruling of the chiefs.By
the carvers he is regarded as amiddleman who buys
cheapand
sellshigh,
making
aprofiton
other people's work.^°There
seems to beno
standard priceon
masks.The
cost of a particular carving dependson how
valuable it is to the individualwho
is selling it,how much
he is in need ofmoney
at the time,and
"what
he thinks the traffic will bear." Pierce values hismasks
atanywhere from
$5up
to $300, although doubtless the latteramount
is the asking price
and
hewould
accept less.He
puts the highest figureson
carvingswhich
appear to be oldand
thosewhich
he con- siders to be traditional Iroquois types, becauseWhite
customerswill
pay more
formasks
that "look Indian."To
achieve this effecthe sometimes adds teeth or tusks to those
masks which
he believes arenot "fierceenough,"and
substitutes clamshellsforthetinaround
the eyes."When masks have
tinon
them, people think they aremade by Whites
instead of Indians."As
the CouncilHouse
people refuse to discuss price, at leaston
an abstract level, Ihave no
infor-mation
as towhat monetary
valuetheyplaceon
falsefaces. Pierce's criteria—
antiquityand
conformity to tradition—
are probably always important determinantsboth
within thecommunity and
outside ofit, while other factors, such as technical excellence
and
the time spenton
the carving,may
also enter in.In contrast to the large masks, the small ones
have
lost their religious associations formost
peopleand
aremade
specifically for sale.They
canbe bought
at the State Fair, at the roadside stands,and
at thecommunity
center for one ortwo
dollars.Most
of the younger carversmake some
of this sizewhich
they seUwhenever
theyhave
the opportunity.Lee Thomas
formerlydidabrisk business20Thismaybethereasonbehindthe carvers' assertion that Pierceisnotamaskcarver. However,I
wasunabletoobtaintheinformation thatwouldresolvethediscrepancybetweenhisstatementsandthose ofothers.
with the girls at Syracuse University,
who bought them
towear
as lapel pins.It has been pointed out that
none
of the crafts isan
important source ofincome
to theOnondaga. The volume
of businesswhich
isdone
inbeadwork and
basketworkis small,and
in the case ofmasks
almostnonexistent; evenAndrew
Pierce,who comes
closest to openly advertisinghiswares, probably sellsno more
than three or fourmasks
in the course of a year.
The
lackof explicit commercializationisnot, I think,due
primarily to the traditionally sacred character of the carvings, sincethereligiousprohibitionsagainstsellingputno
restraintupon
the Christiansand
can,when
necessary, be circumventedby
theCouncU House
people.Rather
it is the economic situationwhich
prevents the carversand
thecommunity
as a wholefrom
regardingmaskmaking
aseconomicallyprofitable.Within
the reservation thereisverylimited
demand
forfalsefaces.The
groupwhich
has a useforthem
isa small proportionof thepopulation,and most
oftheseIndians alreadyown
carvingswhich
theyhave
inheritedfrom
their families.Nor
is there a largemarket
outsidewhich
can be exploited.The Whites
in Syracuseand
the surrounding areashave come
to lookupon
theOnondaga
as a minoritygi-oupwhich
lacks the qualities of strangenessand
savagerythat are usually attributedtonative peoples.Since these particular Indians do not fit the conventional stereotype,
itfollowsthattheyarenotquite authentic
and
that thearticleswhich theymake
arenot "genuineIndian"handicrafts.Few
tourists, there- fore, visit the reservation with the intention of buying souvenirs, while thosewho do
aremore
apt to purchase the smallerand
cheaper items—
the baskets, maskettes,bead
beltsand
bracelets—
than they are the largerand more
expensivemasks
forwhich
theyhave no
practical use.
The
geographical situation of the reservation affects not only the expectations of theWhites
but also the attitude of the Indians.Living asthey
do
almost in the suburbs ofSyracuse,most Onondagas
find thatit is easier
and more
profitable to hold ajob in the citythan toattemptto createamarket
for theirnative products. Itseemsthatit is expediency