ELECTIVE CRITERIA

Exhibit E CRITERL~ FOR

DISTINGUISHED

GOVERNOR

MANDATORY

CRITERIA

.1. Membership Growth - October

1

through September 30 net inc-rease in membership of

.1½%

based, on the .actual paid membership.

See.

Note

l.

2. New Clubs Chartered. -

A.

minimum of the·average· of new club building for the past

10

years in the district..

(In

the event a district organizes a Kiwanis club outside the district, equal new club building credit will be given to both . districts.) See Note

1.

3. Complete at least one official visit to each division in the district.

4 • .

All.required visits of Lieutenant Governors ,to club completed within the . administrative year.

· S. All the club officers in the district trained - either by attendance at the district convention or by follow-up by Lieutenant Governors - and properly reported.

6. At

least

80%

of the clubs participating in the current MajoT Emphasis Program.

7. 90% of

clubs . fili.ng Annual Club Report

by

December

31.

8. Maintain at least as the minimum the same combined number of Key Clubs and Circle K Clubs as on active status at the start of the Kiwanis administrative year.

· 9.

Within the administrative year, personally sponsor for membership at least

three

(3)

active Kiwanis members in clubs within the district.

REPORT OF SPECIAL BOARD COMMITTEE ON THE NEW INTERNATIONAL OFFICE BUILDING

TO THE MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES

MAY 1-4, 1981

Dates of Committee Meeting: April 30 ^& May 3, 1981 Place of Committee Meeting: General Office

Present: Members:

Chairman:

Staff:

Consultants:

t)o

E. B. "Mac" McKitrick (Ex-officio, part-time) Raymond W. Lansford (part-time)

Donald E. Williams John T. Roberts R. P. Merridew

L.A. Hapgood, C. Fuller, J. Gibson and M. Rogers

At the special Board meeting in Chicago on April 4, 1981, the Building Committee was instructed to develop complete plans and specifications and obtain competitive bids for tJie new International Office Building in Indianapolis, with the building to be 60,000 square feet and not higher than 3 stories. After informing all contending design-build teams of the Board's action rejecting their proposals, the Committee met by conference telephone and selected the firm of Bohlen, Meyer, Gibson and Associates as the architects for our building. The architects determined that a 3-story building would be the most cost effective design, and plans proceeded on that basis. A subcommittee (Donald E.

Williams, William A. Brown and R. P. Merridew) developed in detail the present and future space needs of each Department--the logical flow of work tasks, as well as the departmental interfaces--and the optimum location of functions within the building. This information was re- viewed in detail with the architects and was the basis of initial con- ceptual designs that they prepared. Our architects are with us today, and with your permission, Mr. President, we would introduce them and 'ask them to review with you the concept they have developed. I want you

to understand from the outset, however, that we may be revamping floor plans and some design features up until some cutoff date when the design·

will be frozen--the specifications completed--and the package submitted to contractors for bidding.

(Presentation by Architects)

The Committee believes that the design concept you have seen fills our needs admirably. We cannot tell you the cost until we have received and evaluated bids. However, our architects believe that bids will approach

- 2 -

$60 per square foot, gross, or about $3.6M. The architects have sub- mitted a contract at 6% for their basic fee (ca $216 k). It may be possible to complete the building by September, 1982, but to do so, cer- tain critical path items must be placed on order as soon as possible.

Therefore, the Committee recommends:

Recommendation #1:

We recommend that the concept referred to herein, as presented to the Board, be approved, that the Committee be empowered to finalize all designs and specifications in preparation for the soliciting of bids, that the President be empowered to enter into contracts as needed to advance the purchase of fabri- cated steel and elevator cab as specified and identified in the blueprints and such other long delivery items as may affect the building completion date, with such contracts to be assigned to the general contractor upon selection, and that the President be empowered to enter into a contract with the general contractor submitting the· over·all best bid, should any. acceptable bids be received.

I move that recommendation 1 be adopted.

(Adopted) Recommendation #2:

The Committee recommends that the President be authorized to execute a contract (such as the one shown as Exhibit A) with the firm of Bohlen, Meyer, Gibson and Associates of

Indianapolis, Indiana to provide the architectural services enumerated in Exhibit

A.

I move that recommendation 2 be adopted.

(Adopted) Recommendation #3:

The Committee recommends that L and·M Havgo0d ano

Associates, Inc. ('or such other name as

·the

o_r9anization may have of which L, A~ Ha_pgood is a part) be em}P'loyed to advise and assrs·t the Committee. in the progression of the new. International Office Builsing projectJ as noted in minutes of the April 4 meeting of the Board, under terms as contained in the agreement .attached as Exhibit B, and that

QU

the Committee and/or the Chairman of the Committee be empowered to approve disbursements to said corporation in accordance with said terms.

I move that reconnnendation 3 be adopted.

(Adopted)

Respectfully submitted,

RAYMOND W. LANSFORD DONALD E. WILLIAMS

JOHN T. ROBERTS, Chairman

EXHIBIT A