Rubric for speaking test consist of:
- Grammar (1 – 5) - Vocabulary (1 – 5) - Comprehension (1 – 5) - Fluency (1 – 5)
- Pronunciation (1 – 5) Level:
1. = Bad 2. = Poor 3. = Fair 4. = Good 5. = Very Good
Students Mark = Achievement Score X 100 Maximum Score
107
Padang, 3 January 2012 Approved by:
The Principle of SMK Nusatama Padang, English Teacher,
Drs. Syamsir Iqbal Wijaya
Nip: 19660413 1990 03 1 007
108 Lesson Plan
Subject : English
School Level : SMK
Class/Semester : X Hotel Accomodation 1/2 Academic Year : 2011/2012
Skill : Speaking
Time Allocated : 4 (3 X 40)
Cycle : 2
A. Objectives:
1. Competence Standard
To express the meaning of role play in table manner with surroundings.
2. Based Competence
To express the meaning of role play by using oral language in accurate, fluent and acceptable to interact with surroundings indicator.
3. The students are able to present their role play in table manner in accurate grammar, vocabulary, comprehension, fluency and pronunciation.
B. Theme: Ala‘ carte Service C. Materials: Table Manner D. Steps:
Pre Activity:
1. In pre-activity the researcher will start with greeting and checking the roll of the students in his class.
109
2. Review the previous lesson, the second step the researcher try to make review the previous lesson for all students in his class to know about the student ability in speaking class.
3. Motivating the students to know about the student‘s motivation in learning English, the researcher create the test of English.
Main Activity:
1. The teacher begins the main activity by using appropriate questioning and conversational strategies by asking referential questions. Using appropriate questioning to calculate how far students‘ skill in speaking.
And using conversational strategies by asking referential questions the researcher know that how far the student‘s motivation in learning English language.
2. The teacher exploits Role Play in Table Manner by asking the questions based on the students‘ condition. The researcher uses exploits question in the Role Play of Table Manner, because he wants to know about the students‘ condition especially in classroom activity.
3. The teacher gives the instruction to the students.
4. Divide the students into some groups.
5. Make script based on the example given before.
6. Decide the role of dialogs based on the script.
7. Practice about table manner service dialogue.
8. Make a report
9. Discuss about the difficulties of the role play.
110 Post Activity:
1. The researcher reflects the process of teaching and learning to know about the students speaking skill.
2. The researcher emphasizes the learned materials in English conversation. In class the researcher hopes that he know about the students‘ misunderstanding in learning English.
3. In the last step of post activity, the researcher and his collaborator inform the next materials in English.
E. Evaluation:
Rubric for speaking test consist of:
- Grammar (1 – 5) - Vocabulary (1 – 5) - Comprehension (1 – 5) - Fluency (1 – 5)
- Pronunciation (1 – 5) Level:
1. = Bad 2. = Poor 3. = Fair 4. = Good 5. = Very Good
Students Mark = Achievement Score X 100 Maximum Score
111
Padang, 17 January 2012 Approved by:
The Principle of SMK Nusatama Padang, English Teacher,
Drs. Syamsir Iqbal Wijaya
Nip: 19660413 1990 03 1 007
112 Lesson Plan
Subject : English
School Level : SMK
Class/Semester : X Hotel Accomodation 1/2 Academic Year : 2011/2012
Skill : Speaking
Time Allocated : 4 (3 X 40)
Cycle : 3
A. Objectives:
1. Competence Standard
To express the meaning of role play in table manner with surroundings.
2. Based Competence
To express the meaning of role play by using oral language in accurate, fluent and acceptable to interact with surroundings indicator.
3. The students are able to present their role play in table manner in accurate grammar, vocabulary, comprehension, fluency and pronunciation.
B. Theme: Asian Service C. Materials: Table Manner D. Steps:
Pre Activity:
1. In pre-activity the researcher will start with greeting and checking the roll of the students in his class.
113
2. Review the previous lesson, the second step the researcher try to make review the previous lesson for all students in his class to know about the student ability in speaking class.
3. Motivating the students to know about the student‘s motivation in learning English, the researcher create the test of English.
Main Activity:
1. The teacher begins the main activity by using appropriate questioning and conversational strategies by asking referential questions. Using appr33opriate questioning to calculate how far students‘ skill in speaking. And using conversational strategies by asking referential questions the researcher know that how far the student‘s motivation in learning English language.
2. The teacher exploits Role Play in Table Manner by asking the questions based on the students‘ condition. The researcher uses exploits question in the Role Play of Table Manner, because he wants to know about the students‘ condition especially in classroom activity.
3. The teacher gives the instruction to the students.
4. Divide the students into some groups.
5. Make script based on the example given before.
6. Decide the role of dialogs based on the script.
7. Practice about table manner service dialogue.
8. Make a report
9. Discuss about the difficulties of the role play.
114 Post Activity:
1. The researcher reflects the process of teaching and learning to know about the students speaking skill.
2. The researcher emphasizes the learned materials in English conversation. In class the researcher hopes that he know about the students‘ misunderstanding in learning English.
3. In the last step of post activity, the researcher and his collaborator inform the next materials in English.
E. Evaluation:
Rubric for speaking test consist of:
- Grammar (1 – 5) - Vocabulary (1 – 5) - Comprehension (1 – 5) - Fluency (1 – 5)
- Pronunciation (1 – 5) Level:
1. = Bad 2. = Poor 3. = Fair 4. = Good 5. = Very Good
Students Mark = Achievement Score X 100 Maximum Score
115
Padang, 7 February 2012 Approved by:
The Principle of SMK Nusatama Padang, English Teacher,
Drs. Syamsir Iqbal Wijaya
Nip: 19660413 1990 03 1 007
116 Appendix 2
The Score Criteria of Speaking Test
No Grammar Vocabulary Comprehension Fluency Pronunciation I Errors in
grammar are frequent, but speaker can be
understood by a native speaker used to dealing with
foreigners attempting to speak his language.
Speaking vocabulary inadequate to express
anything but the most elementary needs.
Within the scope of his very limited language experience, can understand simple questions and statement if delivered with slowed speech, repetition, or paraphrase.
(No specific fluency
description.
Refer to other four language
areas for
implied level of fluency.
Errors in pronunciation frequent but
can be
understood by
a native
speaker used to dealing with foreigners attempting to speak his language.
II Can usually handle
elementary construction quite
accurately but does not have
thorough or confident control of grammar.
Has speaking vocabulary sufficient to express them self simply with some
circumlocutions.
Can get the gist
of most
conversation of non – technical subjects (i.e., topics that require no specialized knowledge.
Can handle with
confidence but not with facility most social situations, including introductions and casual conversation about current events, as well as work, family and autobio figureical information.
Accent is intelligible though often quite faulty.
III Control of grammar is good. Able to speak the language with sufficient structural accuracy to participate effectively in
Able to speak the language with sufficient vocabulary to participate effectively in most formal and informal
conversation on practical, social and professional
Comprehension is quite complete at a normal rate of speech.
Can discuss particular interests of competence with reasonable ease. Rarely has to grope for words.
Errors never interfere with understanding and rarely disturb the native speaker.
Accent may be obviously foreign.
117 most formal
and informal conversation on practical, social and professional topics.
topics.
Vocabulary is broad enough that he really has to grope for a word.
IV Able to use the language accurately on all levels normally pertinent to professional needs. Errors in grammar are quite rare.
Can understand and participate
in any
conversation within the range
of his
experience with a high degree of precision of vocabulary.
Can understand any conversation within the range
of his
experience.
Able to use the language fluently on all levels normally pertinent to professional needs. Can participate in any
conversation within the range of his experience with a high degree of fluency.
Able in
pronunciation are quite rare.
V Equivalent to that of an educated native speaker.
Speech on all levels is fully accepted by educated native speakers in all its features.
Including
breadth of vocabulary and idioms,
colloquialisms, and pertinent cultural
references.
Equivalent to that of an educated native speaker.
Has complete fluency in the language such that his speech
is fully
accepted by educated native speakers.
Equivalent to and fully accepted by educated native speakers.
(Taken from Brown, 2004:172 – 173)
118 Appendix 3
OBSERVATION CHECKLIST OF SPEAKING TEST Meeting /cycle: 1/1
Students Code
Indicator Score Mean
1 2 3 4 5
5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1
1 √ √ √ √ √ 11 44
2 √ √ √ √ √ 12 48
3 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
4 √ √ √ √ √ 19 72
5 √ √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 19 72
7 √ √ √ √ √ 12 48
8 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
9 √ √ √ √ √ 11 44
10 √ √ √ √ √ 16 64
11 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
12 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
13 √ √ √ √ √ 10 40
14 √ √ √ √ √ 11 44
15 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
16 √ √ √ √ √ 9 36
17 √ √ √ √ √ 11 44
18 √ √ √ √ √ 11 44
19 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
20 √ √ √ √ √ 9 36
21 √ √ √ √ √ 9 36
22 √ √ √ √ √ 11 44
23 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
24 √ √ √ √ √ 10 40
25 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
Percentage 0 0 20 44 36 0 16 20 44 20 0 16 8 48 28 0 20 12 48 20 0 24 40 16 20
Total Students
0 0 5 11 9 0 4 5 11 5 0 4 2 12 7 0 5 3 12 5 0 6 10 4 5
Average Mean
Score 36,8 46,4 42,4 46,4 53,6
44,64
Padang, 3 January 2012 Collaborator
Nurdewi Andriani, S.Pd.
Note:
1. Grammar 2. Vocabulary 3. Comprehension 4. Fluency
5. Pronunciation
√ = Yes
119
OBSERVATION CHECKLIST OF SPEAKING TEST Meeting /cycle: 2/1
Students Code
Indicator Score Mean
1 2 3 4 5
5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1
1 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
2 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
3 √ √ √ √ √ 9 36
4 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
5 √ √ √ √ √ √ 10 40
6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
7 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
8 √ √ √ √ √ 8 32
9 √ √ √ √ √ 12 48
10 √ √ √ √ √ 14 56
11 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
12 0 0
13 √ √ √ √ √ 9 36
14 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
15 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
16 √ √ √ √ √ 12 48
17 √ √ √ √ √ 12 48
18 √ √ √ √ √ 12 48
19 √ √ √ √ √ 14 56
20 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
21 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
22 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
23 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
24 √ √ √ √ √ 14 56
25 √ √ √ √ √ 8 32
Percentage 0 8 8 52 28 0 12 28 52 4 0 12 56 24 4 0 12 40 40 4 0 12 56 24 4
Total Students
0 2 2 13 7 0 3 7 13 1 0 3 14 6 1 0 3 10 10 1 0 3 14 6 1
Average Mean
Score 38,3 50,0 55,8 53,3 55,0
48,16
Padang, 5 January 2012 Collaborator
Nurdewi Andriani, S.Pd.
Note:
1. Grammar 2. Vocabulary 3. Comprehension 4. Fluency
5. Pronunciation
√ = Yes
120
OBSERVATION CHECKLIST OF SPEAKING TEST Meeting /cycle: 3/1
Students Code
Indicator Score Mean
1 2 3 4 5
5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1
1 √ √ √ √ √ 11 44
2 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
3 √ √ √ √ √ 9 32
4 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
5 √ √ √ √ √ √ 14 56
6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
7 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
8 √ √ √ √ √ 10 40
9 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
10 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
11 √ √ √ √ √ 14 56
12 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
13 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
14 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
15 √ √ √ √ √ 7 28
16 √ √ √ √ √ 12 48
17 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
18 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
19 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
20 √ √ √ √ √ 9 36
21 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
22 √ √ √ √ √ 18 72
23 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
24 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
25 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
Percentage 0 4 44 20 20 0 20 44 28 8 0 28 44 20 8 0 28 48 20 4 0 32 48 16 4
Total Students
0 1 11 5 5 0 5 11 7 2 0 7 11 5 2 0 7 12 5 1 0 8 12 4 1
Average Mean
Score 50,8 55,2 60,0 60,0 61,6
58,08
Padang, 10 January 2012 Collaborator
Nurdewi Andriani, S.Pd.
Note:
1. Grammar 2. Vocabulary 3. Comprehension 4. Fluency
5. Pronunciation
√ = Yes
121
OBSERVATION CHECKLIST OF SPEAKING TEST Meeting /cycle : 4/1
Students Code
Indicator Score Mean
1 2 3 4 5
5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1
1 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
2 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
3 √ √ √ √ √ 8 32
4 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
5 √ √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
6 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
7 √ √ √ √ √ 8 32
8 √ √ √ √ √ 8 32
9 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
10 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
11 √ √ √ √ √ 7 28
12 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
13 √ √ √ √ √ 18 72
14 √ √ √ √ √ 11 44
15 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
16 √ √ √ √ √ 10 40
17 √ √ √ √ √ 11 44
18 √ √ √ √ √ 10 40
19 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
20 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
21 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
22 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
23 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
24 √ √ √ √ √ 14 56
25 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
Percentage 0 28 12 44 16 0 32 16 36 16 0 40 24 24 12 0 36 28 28 8 0 36 24 32 8
Total Students
0 7 3 11 4 0 8 4 9 4 0 10 6 6 3 0 9 7 7 2 0 9 6 8 2
Average Mean
Score 51,2 52,8 58,4 58,4 57,6 54,56
Padang, 12 January 2012 Collaborator
Nurdewi Andriani, S.Pd.
Note:
1. Grammar 2. Vocabulary 3. Comprehension 4. Fluency
5. Pronunciation
√ = Yes
122
OBSERVATION CHECKLIST OF SPEAKING TEST Meeting /cycle: 1/2
Students Code
Indicator Score Mean
1 2 3 4 5
5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1
1 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
2 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
3 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
4 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
5 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
6 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
7 √ √ √ √ √ 10 40
8 √ √ √ √ √ 10 40
9 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
10 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
11 √ √ √ √ √ 6 24
12 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
13 √ √ √ √ √ 14 56
14 √ √ √ √ √ 8 32
15 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
16 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
17 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
18 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
19 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
20 √ √ √ √ √ 8 32
21 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
22 √ √ √ √ √ 6 24
23 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
24 √ √ √ √ √ 14 52
25 √ √ √ √ √ 14 52
Percentage 0 0 32 36 32 0 32 12 28 32 0 32 20 16 32 0 32 20 16 32 0 32 20 24 24
Total Students
0 0 8 9 8 0 8 3 7 8 0 8 5 4 8 0 8 5 4 8 0 8 5 6 6
Average Mean
Score 40,0 48,8 50,4 50,4 52,0
46,88
Padang, 17 January 2012 Collaborator
Nurdewi Andriani, S.Pd.
Note:
1. Grammar 2. Vocabulary 3. Comprehension 4. Fluency
5. Pronunciation
√ = Yes
123
OBSERVATION CHECKLIST OF SPEAKING TEST Meeting /cycle : 2/2
Students Code
Indicator Score Mean
1 2 3 4 5
5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1
1 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
2 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
3 √ √ √ √ √ 9 36
4 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
5 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
6 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
7 √ √ √ √ √ 11 44
8 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
9 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
10 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
11 √ √ √ √ √ 9 36
12 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
13 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
14 √ √ √ √ √ 9 36
15 √ √ √ √ √ 6 24
16 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
17 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
18 √ √ √ √ √ 7 28
19 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
20 √ √ √ √ √ 11 44
21 √ √ √ √ √ 9 36
22 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
23 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
24 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
25 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
Percentage 0 4 28 40 28 0 24 16 36 16 0 32 28 28 12 0 32 28 28 12 0 48 24 16 8
Total Students
0 1 7 10 7 0 8 4 9 4 0 8 7 7 3 0 8 7 7 3 0 12 6 4 2
Average Mean
Score 41,6 53,6 56,8 56,8 62,4
53,6
Padang, 19 January 2012 Collaborator
Nurdewi Andriani, S.Pd.
Note:
1. Grammar 2. Vocabulary 3. Comprehension 4. Fluency
5. Pronunciation
√ = Yes
124
OBSERVATION CHECKLIST OF SPEAKING TEST Meeting /cycle : 3/2
Students Code
Indicator Score Mean
1 2 3 4 5
5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1
1 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
2 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
3 √ √ √ √ √ 9 36
4 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
5 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
6 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
7 √ √ √ √ √ 18 72
8 √ √ √ √ √ 14 56
9 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
10 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
11 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
12 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
13 √ √ √ √ √ 16 64
14 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
15 √ √ √ √ √ 10 40
16 √ √ √ √ √ 16 64
17 √ √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
18 √ √ √ √ √ 17 68
19 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
20 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
21 √ √ √ √ √ 13 52
22 √ √ √ √ √ 18 72
23 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
24 √ √ √ √ √ 14 52
25 √ √ √ √ √ 17 64
Percentage 0 16 44 28 12 0 44 40 12 4 0 56 32 8 4 0 56 32 8 4 0 72 16 8 8
Total Students
0 4 11 7 3 0 11 10 3 1 0 14 8 2 1 0 14 8 2 1 0 18 4 2 2
Average Mean
Score 52,8 64,8 68,0 68,0 71,2
64,64
Padang, 24 January 2012 Collaborator
Nurdewi Andriani, S.Pd.
Note:
1. Grammar 2. Vocabulary 3. Comprehension 4. Fluency
5. Pronunciation
√ = Yes
125
OBSERVATION CHECKLIST OF SPEAKING TEST Meeting /cycle : 4/2
Students Code
Indicator Score Mean
1 2 3 4 5
5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1
1 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
2 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
3 √ √ √ √ √ 10 40
4 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
5 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
6 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
7 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
8 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
9 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
10 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
11 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
12 √ √ √ √ √ 5 20
13 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
14 √ √ √ √ √ 19 76
15 √ √ √ √ √ 12 48
16 √ √ √ √ √ 17 68
17 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
18 √ √ √ √ √ 17 68
19 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
20 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
21 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
22 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
23 √ √ √ √ √ 20 80
24 √ √ √ √ √ 15 60
25 √ √ √ √ √ 17 68
Percentage 0 24 36 32 8 0 36 52 8 4 0 52 40 4 4 0 44 44 8 4 0 64 24 4 4
Total Students
0 6 9 8 2 0 9 13 2 1 0 13 10 1 1 0 11 11 2 1 0 16 6 1 1
Average Mean
Score 57,6 64,8 68,8 66,4 70,4
65,28
Padang, 26 January 2012 Collaborator
Nurdewi Andriani, S.Pd.
Note:
1. Grammar 2. Vocabulary 3. Comprehension 4. Fluency
5. Pronunciation
√ = Yes