CHAPTER IV FINDINGS & DISCUSSION
A. Findings
The purpose of this research is to find out whether there are the significance differences of the students’ Accuracy (Pronunciation) and Fluency (Smoothness) in Speaking skill by using Self-Regulated Learning. This research is conducted at the XI MIA 1 students of SMAN 5 Barru in the academic year of 2019/2020 which consists of 33 students. The result of data findings find that teaching Speaking skill through Self-Regulated Learning can improve the students’ Accuracy (Pronunciation) and Fluency (Smoothness), XI MIA 1 students of SMAN 5 Barru. The result of data analysis can be seen as follow:
44
1. The Use of Self-Regulated Learning to improve Accuracy (Pronunciation) a. Pre-Test
Table 4.1 Students’ Score in Accuracy (Pronunciation) Pre-Test
Based on the data of Pre-Test, as clearly presented the mean of the total pre-test score is 70.15, the minimum is 40, maximum is 75 and standard deviation is 6.55.
Table 4.2 Frequency and Rate Percentage of the Students’ Accuracy (Pronunciation) in Pre-test
The table above shows the frequency and percentage of the students’
Accuracy (Pronunciation) pre-test from 33 students. As clearly presented, the highest percentage of the students’ (57.6%) and (33.3%) are in good classification. Meanwhile, one of the students’ get fair category and just
N Valid 33
Missing 0
Mean 70.1515
Std. Deviation 6.55325
Range 35.00
Minimum 40.00
Maximum 75.00
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid 40.00 1 3.0 3.0 3.0
60.00 2 6.1 6.1 9.1
70.00 19 57.6 57.6 66.7
75.00 11 33.3 33.3 100.0
Total 33 100.0 100.0
little percentage are fairly good. In addition there is no students’ get poor and excellent category.
In conclusion, before the treatment, the students’ at the Eleventh grade of SMAN 5 Barru have good ability in Speaking especially Accuracy (Pronunciation).
b. Post-Test
Table 4.3 Students’ Score in Accuracy (Pronunciation) Post-Test
Based on the data of post-test above, as clearly presented the mean of the total post-test score is 79.39, the minimum is 60, maximum is 90 and standard deviation is 6.092.
Table 4.4 Frequency and Rate Percentage of the Students’ Accuracy (Pronunciation) in Post-test
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid 60.00 1 3.0 3.0 3.0
70.00 3 9.1 9.1 12.1
75.00 6 18.2 18.2 30.3
80.00 12 36.4 36.4 66.7
85.00 10 30.3 30.3 97.0
90.00 1 3.0 3.0 100.0
Total 33 100.0 100.0
N Valid 33
Missing 0
Mean 79.3939
Std. Deviation 6.09272
Range 30.00
Minimum 60.00
Maximum 90.00
46
The table above shows the frequency and percentage of the students’
Speaking Accuracy (Pronunciation) in the post-test from 33 students, as presented in the table, almost all of the students are in good category with 21 students or 54.6%. Besides, there are very small percentages that get fairly good category, just 1 student or 3.0%. And there are 11 students or 33.3% that get excellent. There is no students are in fair and poor category.
It means that students’ Speaking Accuracy (Pronunciation) in that school significantly improve after treatment.
Based on the rate percentage on table 4.2 in pre-test it is found that there is not students get excellent, 1 (3%) students get fair, 2 (6.1%) get fairly good and 30 (90.6%) students get good. Then, in post-test on table 4.4 there is significant improvement of students’ Speaking Accuracy (Pronunciation). There are 11 (3.33%) students get excellent, 21 (54.6%) students get good, and 1 (3%) students get fairly good, there is not student get fair and poor.
Table 4.5 the Students’ Improvement in Speaking Accuracy (Pronunciation) Indicator Pre-test Post-test Improvement Speaking Accuracy
(Pronunciation)
70.15 79.39 13.17%
Based on table above shows that the mean score of pre-test is 70.15 and post-test is 79.39. The improvement of pre-test and post-test is 13.17%.
Based on the result, it concludes that the using of Self-Regulated Learning is able to give good contribution in teaching and learning Speaking especially to improve Accuracy (Pronunciation).
2. The Use of Self-Regulated Learning to improve Fluency (Smoothness) a. Pre-Test
Table 4.6 Students’ Score in Fluency (Smoothness) Pre-Test
Based on the data of Pre-Test, as clearly presented the mean of the total pre-test score is 71.66, the minimum is 50, maximum is 75 and standard deviation is 4.94.
Table 4.7 Frequency and Rate Percentage of the Students’ Fluency (Smoothness) in Pre-test
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid 50.00 1 3.0 3.0 3.0
65.00 2 6.1 6.1 9.1
70.00 13 39.4 39.4 48.5
75.00 17 51.5 51.5 100.0
Total 33 100.0 100.0
The table above shows the frequency and percentage of the students’
Fluency (Smoothness) pre-test from 33 students. As clearly presented, the highest percentage of the students’ (51.5%) is in Good classification.
Meanwhile, one of the students’ gets fairly good. In addition there is no students’ get poor, fair and excellent category.
N Valid 33
Missing 0
Mean 71.6667
Std. Deviation 4.94764
Range 25.00
Minimum 50.00
Maximum 75.00
48
In conclusion, before the treatment, the students’ at the Eleventh grade of SMAN 5 Barru has good ability in Speaking especially Fluency (Smoothness).
b. Post-Test
Table 4.8 Students’ Score in Fluency (Smoothness) Post-Test
N Valid 33
Missing 0
Mean 81.0606
Std. Deviation 5.83063
Range 30.00
Minimum 60.00
Maximum 90.00
Based on the data of post-test above, as clearly presented the mean of the total post-test score is 81.06, the minimum is 60, maximum is 90 and standard deviation is 5.830.
Table 4.9 Frequency and Rate Percentage of the Students’ Fluency (Smoothness) in Post-test
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid 60.00 1 3.0 3.0 3.0
70.00 1 3.0 3.0 6.1
75.00 4 12.1 12.1 18.2
80.00 12 36.4 36.4 54.5
85.00 13 39.4 39.4 93.9
90.00 2 6.1 6.1 100.0
Total 33 100.0 100.0
The table above shows the frequency and percentage of the students’
Speaking Fluency (Smoothness) in the post-test from 33 students, as
presented in the table, almost all of the students are in good category with 17 students or 48.5%. Besides, there are very small percentages that get fairly good category, just 1 student or 3.0%. And there are 15 students or 45.5% that get excellent category. There is no students are in fair and poor category. It means that students’ Speaking Fluency (Smoothness) in that school significantly improve after treatment.
Based on the rate percentage on table 4.8 in pre-test it is found that there is not student get excellent, 1 (3%) students get fairly good and 32 (97%) students get good. Then, in post-test on table 4.10 there is significant improvement of students’ Speaking Fluency (Smoothness). There are 15 (45.5%) students get excellent, 17 (48.5%) students get good, and 1 (3%) student gets fairly good, there is not student get fair and poor.
Table 4.10 the Students’ Improvement in Speaking Fluency (Smoothness) Indicator Pre-test Post-test Improvement Speaking Accuracy
(Pronunciation)
71.66 81.06 13.11%
Based on table above shows that the mean score of pre-test is 71.66 and post-test is 81.06. The improvement of pre-test and post-test is 13.11%.
Based on the result, it concludes that the using of Self-Regulated Learning is able to give good contribution in teaching and learning Speaking especially to improve Fluency (Smoothness).
50
3. Hypothesis Testing (t-test of Significant)
To know the level of significance of the pre-test and post-test from Accuracy (Pronunciation) and Fluency (Smoothness), the researcher uses program SPSS 22 to analyze the T-test and T-table.
Table 4.11 T-test Calculation/Value
Paired Samples Test Paired Differences
t df
Sig. (2- tailed) Mean
Std.
Deviation
Std. Error Mean
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference Lower Upper Pair 1 pretestA -
posttestA -9.242 5.172 .900 -11.076 -7.408 -10.265 32 .000 Pair 2 pretestF -
posttestF -9.394 4.286 .746 -10.914 -7.874 -12.590 32 .000
Note: PretestA = Pre-test of Accuracy (Pronunciation) PosttestA = Post-test of Accuracy (Pronunciation) PretestF = Pre-test of Fluency (Smoothness) PretestF = Post-test of Fluency (Smoothness)
The result of t-test for speaking ability focus on Accuracy (Pronunciation) and Fluency (Smoothness) can be seen below:
Table 4.12 the T-test Value of Students’ Speaking Ability
Variable T-test T-table Comparison Classification
Speaking Accuracy (Pronunciation)
10.265 1.693 t-test > t-table
Significantly Different
Speaking Fluency
12.590 1.693 t-test > t-table Significantly
(Smoothness) Different
Table above shows that t-test value for speaking ability focus on Accuracy (Pronunciation) is 10.265 > 1.693 and Fluency (Smoothness) is 12.590 > 1.693. It indicates that the result of t-test value in all of variable and indicator is higher than t-table value. It means that there are significant different between the result of pre- test and post-test in speaking ability especially Accuracy (Pronunciation) and Fluency (Smoothness).
Based on the result, it concludes that there is improvement of the students’
Speaking ability deal with Accuracy (Pronunciation) and Fluency (Smoothness) by using Self-Regulated Learning.