CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
A. Findings
The research finding is that the effect of using manga comics on students' reading comprehension in literal comprehension and interpretive comprehension.
In further interpretation of the data analysis is given below:
1. Students’ Literal Reading Comprehension Using Manga comic in Term of Main Idea
Students’ literal reading comprehension using Manga Comic have different in pre-test and post-test. In pre-test students still less understand about main idea but after gift treatment Applied using manga comics the students more understand about the main idea, it can be seen clearly in the following table:
Table 4.1 Students’ Literal Reading Comprehension Using Manga Comic.
Literal Reading Comprehension
The Students’ Score
Improvement (%) Pre-Test Post-Test
Main Idea 51.00 91.25 78.92
30
Based on the table 4.1 above, it shows that the score of literal 78.92% from of students in post-test improved after teaching reading comprehension in terms of main idea by using Manga Comic. The mean score of the students in pre-test were 51.00 and post-test which to be 91.25.
Graphic 4.1 The Mean Score and Increase of The Students’ Reading Comprehension in Term of Main Idea.
90 80 70 60 50
40 Literal 30
20 10 0
Pre-test Post-test
The graphic above that there was improvement of the students in the reading comprehension in term of literal comprehension from pre-test with the mean score was 51.00 to post-test with the mean score was 91.25 and the improvement of pre- test to post-test was 78.92%.
31
Table 4.2 Classification of the Students Score Reading Comprehension in Term of Main Idea (pre-test)
No Classification Score Frequency Percentage
1 Excellent 96-100 0 0%
2 Very Good 86-95 0 0%
3 Good 76-85 0 0%
4 Fairly Good 66-75 0 0%
5 Fair 56-65 9 45%
6 Poor 36-55 9 45%
7 Very Poor 0.0-35 2 10%
Total 20 100%
Based on the table 4.2 above, it shows that the classification of the students score reading comprehension in terms of main idea in pre-test there are , 9 (45%) students got fair, 9 (45%) students got poor and 2 (10%) student got very poor.
Table 4.3 Classification of the Students Score Reading Comprehension in Term of Main Idea (post-test)
No Classification Score Frequency Percentage
1 Excellent 96-100 13 65%
2 Very Good 86-95 0 0%
3 Good 76-85 3 15%
4 Fairly Good 66-75 2 10%
5 Fair 56-65 2 10%
6 Poor 36-55 0 0%
7 Very Poor 0.0-35 0 0%
Total 20 100%
32
Based on the table 4.2 above, it shows that the classification of the students score reading comprehension in term of main idea in post-test there are 13 (65%) students got excellent, , 3 (15%) students got good, 2 (10%) students got fairly good and 2 (10%) students got fair.
2. Students’ Interpretative Reading Comprepension Using Manga Comic In Terms of Conclusion
Students’ interpretative reading comprehension Manga Comic have different in pre-test and post-test. In pre-test students still less understand about conclusion but after gift treatment Applied using manga comics the students more understand about conclusion, it can be seen clearly in the following table:
Table 4.4 Students’ Interpretative Reading Comprehension Using Manga Comic.
Interpretative Reading Comprehension
The Students’ Score Improvement Pre-Test Post-Test (%)
Conclusion 36.50 60.00 64.38
Based on the table 4.4 above, it shows that the score of interpretative 64.38%
from of students in post-test improved after teaching reading comprehension in term of conclusion by using Manga Comic. The mean score of the students in pre-test were 36.50 and post-test which to be 60.00%.
33
Graphic 4.2 The Mean Score and Increase of The Students’ Reading Comprehension in Terms of Conclusion.
90 80 70 60 50
40 Interpretative 30
20 10 0
Pre-test Post-test
The graphic above that there was improvement of the students in the reading comprehension in term of interpretative comprehension from pre-test with the mean score was 36.50 to post-test with the mean score was 60.00 and the improvement of pre-test to post-test was 64.38%.
Table 4.5 Classification of the Students Score Reading Comprehension in Terms of Conclusion (pre-test)
No Classification Score Frequency Percentage
1 Excellent 96-100 0 0%
2 Very Good 86-95 0 0%
3 Good 76-85 0 0%
4 Fairly Good 66-75 1 5%
5 Fair 56-65 2 10%
34
6 Poor 36-55 4 20%
7 Very Poor 0.0-35 13 65%
Total 20 100%
Based on the table 4.2 above, it shows that the classification of the students score reading comprehension in terms of main idea in pre-test there are , 1 (5%) students got fairly good, 2 (10%) students got fair, 4 (20%) students got poor and 13 (65%) student got very poor.
Table 4.6 Classification of the Students Score Reading Comprehension in Term of Conclusion (post-test)
No Classification Score Frequency Percentage
1 Excellent 96-100 3 15%
2 Very Good 86-95 0 0%
3 Good 76-85 0 0%
4 Fairly Good 66-75 2 10%
5 Fair 56-65 2 10%
6 Poor 36-55 12 60%
7 Very Poor 0.0-35 1 5%
Total 20 100%
Based on the table 4.2 above, it shows that the classification of the students score reading comprehension in term of main idea in post-test there are 3 (15%) students got excellent, 2 (10%) students got fairly good and 2 (10%) students got fair, 12 (60%) students got poor and 1 (5%) student got very poor.
35 3. Hypothesis Testing
The hypothesis was tested by using inferential analysis. In this case, the researcher used t-test (test of significance) for independent sample test, that was a test to know the significance difference between the results of students’ mean score in pre-test and post-test the researcher used t-test analysis on the level of significance (a) = 0.05 with the degree of freedom (df) = N – 1, where N = Number of subject (20 students) then the value of t-table was 2.03 t-test statistical, analysis for independent sample is applied.
The result of the data analysis t-test of the students’ reading comprehension through Manga Comic table below:
Table 4.7 the Comparison of T-Test and T-Table Score of the Students’ Reading Comprehension (Pre-Test)
Variables T-Test T-Table Description Literal Reading Comprehension 19,77 2,11 Significance
Interpretative Reading Comprehension
10, 84 2,11 Significance
X 30,61 2,11 Significance
The table above shows that the value of the t-test is higher than the value of t-table. The t-test value of main idea is greater than t-table (19,77 > 2 and t-test value of conclusion are greater than t-table (10,84 > 2,11). The result of calculating t-test of the indicators in the students t-test in literal and interpretative reading comprehension is greater than t-table (30,61 > 2,11).
The value of the t-test is greater than t-table. The score in variable of reading comprehension is (17,74 > 2,03). It is said that the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected and the alternative hypothesis (HI) is accepted. It means that, there is a significance
36
difference between the result of the students’ literal and interpretative reading comprehension in reading through Manga Comic after treatment.
If the t-test value is higher than t-table at the level of significance 0,05 and degree freedom (df) 20 (N-I=20-1), thus the alternative hypothesis (HI) is accepted and null hypothesis (HO) is rejected. In country, if the value is lower than t-table at the level of significance 0,05 and the degree freedom 19, thus the alternative hypothesis is rejected and null hypothesis is accepted.
Table 4.8 the Comparison of T-Test and T-Table Score of the Students’ Reading Comprehension (Post-Test)
Variables T-Test T-Table Description Literal Reading Comprehension 29.67 2.11 Significance
Interpretative Reading Comprehension
13.37 2.11 Significance
X 43.04 2.11 Significance
The table above shows that the value of the t-test is higher than the value of t-table. The t-test value of main idea is greater than t-table (29.67 > 2,11 and t-test value of conclusion are greater than t-table (13.37 > 2,11). The result of calculating t-test of the indicators in the students t-test in literal and interpretative reading comprehension is greater than t-table (43.04> 2.03).
The value of the t-test is greater than t-table. The score in variable of reading comprehension is (43.04 > 2.11). It is said that the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected and the alternative hypothesis (HI) is accepted. It means that, there is a significance difference between the result of the students’ literal and interpretative reading comprehension in reading through Manga Comic after treatment.
37
If the t-test value is higher than t-table at the level of significance 0,05 and degree freedom (df) 20 (N-I=20-1), thus the alternative hypothesis (HI) is accepted and null hypothesis (HO) is rejected. In country, if the value is lower than t-table at the level of significance 0,05 and the degree freedom 19, thus the alternative hypothesis is rejected and null hypothesis is accepted.