THE DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONALITY EDUCATION MODEL FOR CROSS-CULTURAL YOUTH
Picture 1. Model Score-A (source: conceptualized by authors, 2015)
F. FOLLOW UP OF TRAINING
1. Test of training
result 2. Assessment
management training
Participants were able to review the results of which have been discussed in training
Obtained ratings from participants on the effectiveness of the training
Assignments 60 minutes
F. FOLLOW UP OF TRAINING
Re-charge training
Establishing alumni association
Creating a
communication among alumni
of participation, teamwork, passion / enthusiasm Follow- up of the national educational training activities include the establishment of the Alumni Association and launching group of FB / WA as a medium of communication and information between members of alumni associations.
b. Materials
National education model of teaching materials Score-A mainly introduces the participants with the basic topics of the five core national awareness both in terms of knowledge, attitudes, and skills. These topics are expected to provide a framework on how generations of Indonesia in the
future will be developed, either individually, together, or in the training-level at the next level.
In the process of training and education model of Score-A main aim is the process of internalization or processing of inner attitudes, spirituality, and the mentality of the participants, so that after the training they feel ready physically-mind to play the role as the future of Indonesia. For the opportunity to reflect, personal processing, and sharing get a portion of adequate teaching materials and motode presented. Inputs delivered lighter role as the inner processing, not merely to increase knowledge and insight as in previous training.
Tabel 3. Teaching Material grating National Education Model Score-A
Aspect Description
Competency Understand, reflect and display the creative moment itself in accordance with the five core national vision of
"Score A"
Content 1. Insight Dynamics Nationality of Indonesia
2. Problem of Nationality and Conflict Management
3. Team Building 4. Social Development
5. Making Proposals Social Development Society
6. Workshop Nationality: Present Proposals Social Development Society
7. Pledge Nationality Approaching
paradigm
Constructivist-critical: building awareness of the importance of national values in an effort to strengthen the sovereignty of self, family, community and nation.
Method documentaries, games, meta cards, critical analysis, cross experience, case studies, the scriptorium, simulations, group work, plenary, and FGD. The approach relying on the resources-based learning, contextual learning, and work- based learning.
Ssources: Conceptualization by researcheri, 2015.
Systematization of teaching materials or training modules relies on the implementing of score-A. Applying is certainly rooted to the three basic principles, namely: First, the principle of ethical-spiritual. Second, the principle of nationality, namely: enforcement of the four pillars of nationality, which consists of Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, the Republic of Indonesia and Diversity. Point of nationality is becoming very important, because after this nation must necessarily exist in the middle of the association of nations. And third, the 1945 Constitution of the 1945 Constitution is the foundation of national operations can guarantee against political subdivision, nationality, politics and governance suitable for Indonesia. Typical of Indonesian Constitution should also be the basis for the implementation of state and government.
c. Model Evaluasi
To measure the success of the model score-A, then made the evaluation guidelines that have been reviewed and adapted to the conception of the model. The evaluation includes an evaluation of the process and results. Evaluation process to capture and measure the level, tolerance, the resulting work and leadership as measured through checklists / observation sheet and product ratings. Evaluation of the results to gauge their understanding and attitudes nationalities formed, as well as the responsibilities of nationhood, as measured by the test essay, case analysis, and self-projection.
Tabel 5. Example of model Score-A shape checklist/ sheet observation
No ASPECT MARK
1 2 3 4 1 The ability to look at things another
viewpoint
2 Sensitivity keen to see a form and spatial
detail
3 The ability to interpret what is implied behind pictures, paintings / photos and maps
4 The ability to re-create the visual aspect
of the experience.
5 The ability to transform and
modifications to the initial perception of what he saw
6 Engagement between cultures in order to achieve the best result of the fusion between cultures
7 Ability requires its own culture 8 Willingness to popularize the other
cultures
9 The ability to transfer experience from
one culture to another
10 The ability to build intercultural communication, which involves
communication activities and the time of the meeting between cultures
11 The ability to predict what will happen in the process of interaction, both of which will be others and how to behave himself
12 The ability to direct attention and behave
in cross-cultural situations 13 Courage to place ourselves in an action
against another culture, verbal and non- verbal
14 The ability to capture and handle everything thoroughly with attention to inter-relationships with one another
15 Ability to clarify personal vision in the association of fellow children of the nation
16 The ability to be objective in addressing the differences
17 Capabilities describe together about the
future to be achieved as a nation 17 The ability to combine and develop the
capacity of a society to achieve the desired ideals as a nation
18 Awareness of practicing religion The realization that every person has the right to practice his religion
19 Awareness of admitting the existence of
freedom in the exercise of religiosity 20 The practice of religion in daily life in
relation to others.
21 Ability to set an example in the practice
of religion in the midst of diversity.
22 Awareness of the diversity in religion 23 The realization that natural resources
must be used wisely
24 The realization that every person have the
right to obtain the same economic life better fairly.
25 The ability to pour fresh ideas for building an economy that can fulfill the lives of many people in social justice
IV. CONCLUSION
Model-A national education score represents five cores of intelligence to deliver to the understanding and awareness of nationality. Through the curriculum, teaching materials, and evaluation model presented by systemic, integrated and contextual, we delivered on alternative methods of implementing the national vision. From here, is expected to be growing up ideals of nationalism, patriotism, grounded attitude of defending the country and root among the younger generation of cross-cultural. Governmental institutions, civil society, and especially educational institutions is an important engine that can disseminate and implement these national education model.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ahmed, Shabir dan Abid Karim. 1997. Akar Nasionalisme di
Dunia Islam, Bangil: Al-Izzah Press.
Anonim. 2013. Civic Education for Future Indonesian Leaders (CEFIL).
Yogyakarta: Satu Nama dan Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
Ang, Soon., and Dyne, Linn Van., “Conceptualization of Cultural Intelligence: Definition, Distinctiveness and Nomological Network, in Soon Ang, Linn Van Dyne, M.E (Edited). 2008. 2008.
Handbook of Cultural Intelligence: Theory, Measurement and Applications. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Inc.
Asriati, Nuraini. 2013. “Pengembangan Model Pendidikan Menengah
“Sekolah Kebangsaan” di Daerah Terpencil, Tertinggal, Terluar dan Perbatasan Kalimantan Barat-Serawak Malaysia”, dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional 2013 Menuju Masyarakat Madani dan Lestari.
Booth, William James “On the Idea of the Moral Economy, in The American Political Science Review, Vol. 88, No. 3 (Sep., 1994), pp. 653-667.
Chamami, M. Rikza. 2015. “Pesantren Berwawasan Kebangsaan”, dalam Jateng Pos, edisi Kamis, 27 Maret 2015.
Farid, Hilmar. 2014. Arus Balik Kebudayaan: Sejarah sebagai Kritik. Pidato Budayaan di Dewan Kesenian Jakarta, dalam http://hilmarfarid.com/wp/arus-balik-kebudayaan-sejarah-sebagai- kritik/.
Gardner, Howard. 2003. Multiple Intelligences: Kecerdasan Majemuk Teori dalam Praktek. Batam: Inter Aksara.
Giaquinto. 2007. Visual Thinking in Mathematics An epistemological study.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Grunig, Larissa A. and David M. Dozier. 2002. Excellent Public Relations and Effective Organizations: A Study of Communication Management in Three Countries, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
Kemendagri. 2012. “Peraturan Menteri dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 71 Tahun 2012 tentang Pedoman Pendidikan Wawasan
Kebangsaan” dalam
http://www.unipdu.ac.id/index.php/artikel/download_item/62- permen_no.71-2012.doc.
Komarudin. 2007. “Ikatan Kebangsaan dan Pembinaannya: Studi di Kalangan Masyarakat Umum di DKI Jakarta”. Laporan Penelitian. Jakarta:
Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
_____________ 2008. “Ikatan Kebangsaan dan Pembinaannya: Studi Di Kalangan Masyarakat Umum di DKI Jakarta”, Laporan Penelitian.
Jakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Kompas. Konflik di Bima Pecah. September, 2013.
Mufid, Ahmad Syafii. 2001. Dialog Agama dan Kebangsaan. Jakarta: Zikrul hakim.
Moehtadi, Fathoni. “Konflik Poso: Suatu Anatomi”, dalam Jurnal Dinamika Masyarakat, Vol. 1 No. 1 Juli 2002.
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1997. Politik Antar Bangsa, terjemahan. Jakarta: Bina Cipta.
Sanit, Arby. “Konstruksi Kebangsaan Indonesia Rapuh” dalam Media Indonesia, edisi 31 Desember 2004.
Setara Institute. 2008. Kebebasan Beragama di Indonesia. Laporan Penelitian. Jakarta: Wahid Institute, Setara Institute, dan CRSC- UGM.
Shearer, C.B. 2004. Multiple Intelligences After 20 Years. Teachers College Record, 106 (1), 2 -16.
Sindo. 2.883 Konflik Terjadi di Indonesia Tahun 2012. September 2013.
Smith, Anthony D. 2003. Nasionalisme, Teori, Ideologi, Sejarah, Jakarta:
Erlangga.
Soekarno. 2014. Panca Azimat Jilid 1. Jakarta: Pustaka Populer Gramedia.
Sternberg, R.J. 1996. Successful Intelegence, How Practical and Creative Intelligence Determine Success in Life. New York: Plume Book.
Sugiyono. (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kauntitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Bandung: Penerbit Kerjasama PPs UPI dan Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sutrisno, Mudji. (2004). Ide – Ide Pencerahan. Jakarta: Obor.
Tomagola, Tamrin Amal. “Bencana Sampit”, dalam Jurnal Dinamika Masyarakat, Vol. 1 No. 1 Juli 2002.
Trijono, Lambang. “Prospek Perdamaian di Ambon”, dalam Jurnal Dinamika Masyarakat, Vol. 1 No. 1 Juli 2002.
Triyanto, Kharis Ragil. 2015. Merancang Pelatihan Pengembangan Wawasan Kebangsaan Berbasis Partisipasif di Daerah Perbatasan.
Denpasar: UPT-P Balatrans.
Zielniec, Andrezej. 2007. Space and Social Theory. London: Sage Publication.
Zohar, Danah dan Ian Marshall. 2000. Spiritual Intellegence the Ultimate Intelligence. London: Bloomsbury Publising Plc.