CHAPTER IV RESULT OF THE RESEARCH
A. Result of The research
1. The History of SMP Wiratama Kotagajah
SMP Wiratama Kotagajah Central Lampung established in 1985. The school is located at the Jendral Sudirman street No. 17, Kotagajah Central Lampung. Since inception, SMP Wiratama Kotagajah undergone several changes in principle are:
a. Noeryanto, BA (1985-1987) b. Drs. Usa Heriyanto (1987-1989) c. Dra. Hj. Neti Latuni (1989-2001) d. Drs. Hi. Sumadi (2001-2008) e. Agus Junaidi (2008)
f. Dra. Lis Setiarsih (2008-2016) g. Oke Erawati, S.Pd (2017-now)
2. The condition of the Teacher and Staff in SMP Wiratama Kotagajah The number of teachers and staff names in academic year of 2017/2018 are 23 consists of 20 teachers and 3 staff adminitration of the school. It can be identified as follows:
Table 3
The Condition of the Teachers and Staff in SMP Wiratama Kotagajah
NO NAME EDUCATION SUBJECT PROFESSIO
N
1. OKE ERAWATI, S.Pd S1 Economy Headmaster
2. F. SETYANINGSIH, S.Pd S1 English Teacher
3. Dra. LIS SETIARSIH S1 Indonesia Teacher
4. Drs. Hi. SUMADI S1 Social Teacher
5. Dra. LILI LIYANTI S1 Indonesia Teacher
6. SUBANDRIO, S.Pd S1 Health Teacher
7. Hi. SUDIHARTONO, S.Pd S1 Lampung Teacher
8. SOFYAN SUDARJO D1 Art Teacher
9. SARNI, S.Pd S1 Social Teacher
10. ERNING SUTANTI P, S.Pd S1 PKN Teacher
11. ERMA YETININGSIH, S.Pd
S1 English Teacher
12. KARTINI, S.Si S1 Science Teacher
13. TRISAPONO AN, S.Kom S1 Computer Teacher
14. HESTI PERWITA SARI S1 Math Teacher
15. KHUSNUL KOMARIAH, S.Pd
S1 Math Teacher
16. MONAJI D1 Science Teacher
17. DWI RUDIYANTO, S. Pd.I S1 Islamic Teacher 18.
YULIANTI
Officer Head of Administration
19. WAHIDIN, S.Pd S1 Economic Teacher
20 AGUSTIN
PERDANIWATI, S.Pd.
S1 Guidance
counseling
Teacher
21 SUWARDI, S.Pd S1 Islamic Teacher
22
SUPRI HENDRIYANTO
SMA Officer Staff of
administration 23
SUGENG PRACOYO
SMA Officer Staff of
administration
24 HERI SETIAWAN, S.Pd S1 Health Teacher
25 YUNI ISTIAWATI, AMd D1 Computer Teacher
26 TUTI MARDIYANI D1 Social Teacher
27 TRI ARYADI, S.Pd S1 Economic Teacher
28 A. ADITYA RINALDI S1 Indonesia Teacher
29
RISAPONO ASEV
Senior High Schoolhhhh
Officer Staff of administration Source: Observation Result at SMP Wiratama Kotagajah Central Lampung
3. The Quantity of the Students at SMP Wiratama Kotagajah The conditions of the students at SMP Wiratama Kotagajah who registered the academic year 2017/2018.
Table 4
The Quantity of the Students at SMP Wiratama Kotagajah In the Academic Year of 2017/2018
No Gender VII VII IX
1 Male 11 12 21
2 Female 15 14 10
Total 26 26 31
Source: Observation Result at SMP Wiratama Kotagajah Central lampung
4. Organization Structure Of SMP Wiratama Kotagajah
The Organization SMP Wiratama Kotagajah Central Lampung in Academic Year 2017/2018
Headmaster OKE ERAWATI, S.Pd Chairman of the Committee
Dr. Hi EDI SUSANTO
Head of Administration YULIANTI
Deputy chief of students AGUSTIN PERDANIWATI,
S.Pd Deputy Chief of Public
Relation
SUBANDRIO, S.Pd Deputy chief of Curriculum
F. SETYANINGSIH, S.Pd
The Head of Library
Dr. Hi SUMADI
TEACHERS
STUDENTS TEACHERS CLASS
Ket :
= Garis Komando
= Garis Koordinator
B. Descriptions of The Research Result
This research was done in two cycles, since the research indicator had been reached at the cycle II. Cycle I was done in October 31-7th , 2017 and the cycle II was done in November 14th-16th, 2017. Each cycle consist of planning, acting, observing and reflecting.
1. Pre-Test
a. Pre-test Activity
The pre-test was done on Wednesday, October 31th, 2017. In this meeting, to knew the students’ reading comprehension ability, the researcher gave pre-test which consist of 5 essay and 10 fill in the blanks tasks. After they finished and submitted the answer sheet, the researcher and students discussed about some questions. Most of them had difficulties in reading, especially to comprehend.
b. The Students’ Pre-test Result
The frequency of students’ score at pre-test could be seen in the following table:
Table 5
The Students’ Score at Pre-Test
No Name Students’ Score
1. ANQS 70
2. AF 65
3. BF 70
4. CVN 60
5. CWN 50
6. DE 60
7. DDA 70
8. ES 55
9. EF 80
10. FRA 75
11. FAW 70
12. HKW 60
13. IA 65
14. LA 60
15. M 50
16. MVA 70
17. MHW 55
18. PE 65
19. RVR 65
20. RDL 80
21. RR 40
22. SDW 65
23. SYL 65
24. SS 60
25. TP 60
26. TISL 65
Total 1650
Average 63,46
Highest Score 80
Low Score 40
Source: The result of pre-test in Tuesday, October 31
The table above was the result of pre-test, it could be seen that the score of the students’ reading comprehension ability were
various. From the table above, the researcher measured the frequency of students’ score at the pre-test could be seen as follows:
Table 6
Frequency Distribution of Students’ Score in Pre-Test
No Score Categories Frequency Percentages %
1. 70-100 High 8 30,77%
2. 51-69 Fair 15 57,69%
3. 0-50 Low 3 11,54%
Total 26 100%
Based on the table above, it could be seen that highest score is 80, and the lowest is 40. The number of students who go to 65 is 4 , and lower than 65 is 16.
The result from the table students’ reading score only 8 students passed the MCC (Minimum Completeness Criteria). In pre-test, the researcher found the students problems such as the students difficult to comprehend a text English. It showed that the result of the students reading comprehension ability in pre-test was not satisfactory. It was the reason why the researcher used the Cloze Procedure strategy to improved students’ reading comprehension ability.
2. Cycle I
Cycle I divided planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. There were explain more clearly as below:
a. Planning
In the cycle I, the researcher and the collaborator (Mrs. F.
Setyaningsih, S.Pd) would make and discuss about lesson plan. Before the researcher and collaborator made a lesson plan, they wanted to identify the problems and found the problem solving in the classroom.
After that, the researcher prepared the material, media, strategy, observation and evaluation sheet.
b. Acting
The implementation of this cycle was conducted in two meetings.
In this meeting, the researcher was being a teacher. Here the activities of this cycle:
1) The First Meeting
The meeting was done on Tuesday, October 31th, 2017. In the first meeting, the researcher gave pre-test consist of 5 essay and 10 fill in the blanks questions. The researcher gave pre-test to knew the students’ reading comprehension ability. From the pre-test, the researcher prepared the material.
2) The Second Meeting
The meeting was done on Thursday, November 2nd, 2017. In the second meeting, the researcher was being a teacher. The teacher explained about narrative text. The teacher gave examples of narrative text. The teacher taught the students’ to comprehend the text suitable with Cloze Procedure Strategy. The teacher invited the students’ to comprehend the example of narrative text.
The teacher closed the meeting with motivated to learn and practice more in reading.
3) The Third Meeting
The third meeting was conducted on Tuesday, November 7th, 2017. In this meeting was started by pray together, and then the teacher checked the students’ attendance and askedthe condition of students. After that, the teacher gave tasks related to the narrative text consist of 5 essay and 10 fill in the blanks questions.
The teacher gave 60 minutes to finished the questions. The teacher closed the meeting.
c. Observing
1) The Success of The Product
In observation of teacher’s action the researcher presented two meetings in cycle 1. In the first meeting, the researcher gave treatment. The students were more active and interested in learning process. They could read better than before. In the last
meeting, the researcher gave post test to knew the improved at the cycle I. The table below showed the result of students’ at the post test cycle I as follows:
Table 7
The Result of The Post-Test of Cycle I
No Name Students’ Score
1. ANQS 80
2. AF 65
3. BF 80
4. CVN 55
5. CWN 60
6. DE 55
7. DDA 65
8. ES 55
9. EF 70
10. FRA 80
11. FAW 80
12. HKW 65
13. IA 70
14. LA 65
15. M 80
16. MVA 70
17. MHW 60
18. PE 65
19. RVR 70
20. RDL 80
21. RR 65
22. SDW 70
23. SYL 65
24. SS 50
25. TP 60
26. TISL 70
Total 1750
Average 67,30
Highest Score 80
Low Score 50
Source: The result of post-test cycle I
The table above showed that the result of students’ reading comprehension ability in post test cycle I was not satisfactory. The criteria of students’ successful in mastering the material was students who got minimum score that was 70 and the class could be said success in achieving the material if 70% of the students get score at least 70. The frequency distribution of the improving students’ score at post test of cycle I could be seen at the table belows:
Table 8
Frequency Distribution of Students’ Score in Post-Test 1 No Score Categories Frequency Percentages %
1. 70-100 High 12 46,15%
2. 56-69 Fair 10 38,46%
3. 0-55 Low 4 15,39%
Total 26 100%
Based on the table above, the researcher concluded that the result of post-test can fulfill minimum standard (MS) at SMP Wiratama Kotagajah, where 46,15% (12 students) who got score more than 70. The average of post-test score was 71,53. It was higher than the result of pre test. But learning process was said success when 70% got score at least 70. The improving could be seen as bellow:
Table 9
The Students’ Score at Pre-Test and Post-Test Cycle I
No Name
Students’ Result
Pre-Test Post-Test 1 Improving Category 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
ANQS AF BF CVN CWN DE DDA ES EF FRA FAW HKW
70 65 70 60 50 60 70 55 80 75 70 60
80 65 80 55 60 55 65 55 70 80 80 65
10 0 10
-5 10 -5 -5 0 -10
5 10
5
Improved Constant Improved Down Improved Down Down Constant Down Improved Improved Improved
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
IA LA M MVA MHW PE RVR RDL RR SDW SYL SS TP TISL
65 60 50 70 55 65 65 80 40 65 65 60 60 65
70 65 80 70 60 65 70 80 65 70 65 50 60 70
5 5 30
0 5 0 5 0 25
5 0 -10
0 5
Improved Improved Improved Constant Improved Constant Improved Constant Improved Improved Constant Down Constant Improved
Total 1650 1750 100 Improved
Average 63,46 67,30 3,84 Improved
Based on the score table pre-test and post-test cycle I above, the researcher concluded that the result of students’ improved, the average was 63,46 and the post-test I 67,30. The average improved 3,84 point.
2) The Succes of The Process
The researcher used the observation sheet and table of students’ observation sheet at the cycle I. The students’ activities in cycle I could be seen on the table below:
Table 10
The Students’ Activities Result in Cycle I No Indicator of Process Success
in English Learning Frequency Percentage 1. Pay attention of teacher’s
explanation
15 57,69%
2. Understanding the material 17 65,38%
3. The students able do the task 18 69,23%
4. Read and comprehend the story
15 57,69%
Source: The result of observation sheet
Based on the table in the previous page, it could be seen that the highest activity was the students able do the task and the lowest activity was read and comprehend the story.
d. Reflecting
Based on the result of the post-test cycle I, it could be seen that the students’ score average in pre-test 63,46 and in post-test I 71,53.
The average improved 3,84 point but it was not fulfill the completeness standard (minimum standard criteria) at least 70%
students must get ≥ 70. Based on the analyzing of learning process,
the researcher concluded that this research should be continued in cycle II.
3. Cycle II
Cycle II were similar with cycle I, it divided planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. There were explain more clearly as below:
a. Planning
In the planning at Cycle II, the researcher and collaborator (Mrs.
F. Setyaningsih, S.Pd) would like to make and discuss about the lesson plan. Before the researcher and collaborator made a lesson plan, they wanted to identify the problem in the classroom. Based on the students’ result in cycle I, the researcher prepared the lesson plan, material, media, answer sheet observation sheet and the test for pre- test and post-test II.
b. Acting
The implementation of cycle II was conducted in two meetings.
In this meeting, the researcher was being a teacher. Here the activities of cycle II, as follows:
1) The First Meeting
The meeting was done on Tuesday, November 14th, 2017. In this meeting the researcher was being a teacher. The teacher entered the classroom. The teacher said opening and asked the condition of students. The teacher was remembering the previous
materials. The teacher continued the material. Then the asked the students about the material to checked their understanding.
2) The Second Meeting
The meeting was done on Thursday, November 16th, 2017.
In this meeting was started by pray together, and then the teacher checked the students’ attendance and asked the condition of students. After that, the teacher gave tasks related to the narrative text consist of 5 essay and 10 fill in the blanks questions. The teacher gave 60 minutes to finished the questions. In the end of meeting, the teacher closed the meeting and gave motivation to the students to study hard and try to read more in order to their got good scores especially in English subject.
c. Observing
1) The Success of The Product
In observation of teacher’s action the researcher presented two meetings in cycle II. In the first meeting, the researcher gave treatment. The students were more active and interested in learning process. They could read better than before. In the second meeting, the researcher gave post test to knew the improve at the cycle II. The table below showed the result of students’ at the post test cycle I as follows:
Table 11
The Result of The Post-Test of Cycle II
No Name Students’ Score
1. ANQS 70
2. AF 75
3. BF 90
4. CVN 75
5. CWN 60
6. DE 85
7. DDA 70
8. ES 70
9. EF 70
10. FRA 85
11. FAW 80
12. HKW 65
13. IA 70
14. LA 60
15. M 90
16. MVA 70
17. MHW 70
18. PE 75
19. RVR 75
20. RDL 80
21. RR 65
22. SDW 75
23. SYL 75
24. SS 50
25. TP 65
26. TISL 70
Total 1885
Average 72,50
Highest Score 90
Low Score 50
Source: The result of post-test cycle II
Based on the table above, the result of post-test cycle II that 20 students from 26 students got score more than minimum standard in SMP Wiratama Kotagajah (70). It means that only 6 students failed. The result of post-test showed that lowest score was 50 and the highest score was 90. The average score of post- test was 72,50. The frequency distribution of the improving students’ score at post test of cycle II could be seen at the table above belows:
Table 12
Frequency Distribution of Students’ Score in Post-Test 1I No Score Categories Frequency Percentages %
1. 70-100 High 20 76,92%
2. 51-69 Fair 5 19,23%
3. 0-50 Low 1 3,85%
Total 26 100%
The table 11 showed that 76,92% students in high category, 19,23% students in fair category, and 3,85% students in low category. The minimum standard (KKM) at SMP Wiratama Kotagajah is 70. It means that more than 70% students passed.
The result of post-test cycle I and cycle II could be seen on the table below:
Table 13
The Students’ Score at Pos-Test Cycle I and Post-Test Cycle II
No Name
Students’ Result Post-Test
Cycle I
Post-Test Cycle II
Improving Category 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
ANQS AF BF CVN CWN DE DDA ES EF FRA FAW HKW IA LA M MVA MHW PE RVR RDL RR SDW
80 65 80 55 60 55 65 55 70 80 80 65 70 65 80 70 60 65 70 80 65 70
70 75 90 75 60 85 70 70 70 85 80 65 70 60 90 70 70 75 75 80 65 75
-10 10 10 20 0 30
5 15
0 5 0 0 0 -5 10 0 10 10 5 0 0 5
Improved Improved Improved Improved Constant Improved Improved Improved Constant Improved Constant Constant Constant Down Improved Constant Improved Improved Improved Constant Constant Improved
23.
24.
25.
26.
SYL SS TP TISL
65 50 60 70
75 70 65 70
10 20 5 0
Improved Improved Improved Constant
Total 1750 1885 175 Improved
Average 67,30 72,50 6,73 Improved
Based on the result table at post-test cycle I and post-test cycle II above, the researcher concluded that the average in post- test cycle I was 67,30 and in post-test cycle II was 72,50. The average score improved 6,73 point. This test could be said success because more than 70% students were success to achieved the minimum standard 70.
2) The Success of The Process
The researcher used the observation sheet and the table of students’ obseravtion about at the cycle II. The result could be seen the table below:
Table 14
The Students’ Activities Result in Cycle II
No
Indicator of Process Success in English Learning
Frequency Percentage 1. Pay attention of teacher’s
explanation
19 73,07%
2. Understanding the material 22 84,61%
3. The students able do the task 20 76,92%
4. Read and comprehend the story
18 69,23%
Source: The observation sheet in cycle II
Based on the table above, it could be seen that the students’
activity was higher than before. The students were more active.
The highest activity was pay attention of teacher’s explanation. It showed that the used Cloze Procedure strategy could improved the students’ reading comprehension ability.
d. Reflecting
Based on the result of observation learning process in cycle II, it could be inferred that the result of cycle II is success. This successful was caused the researcher has revised and improved the instructional process in cycle II. In the cycle II, the students were also active to answered the questions based on the story. They could improved their reading comprehension ability. Based on the result above, the researcher concluded that this research was success and would be not continued to the next cycle.
C. Interpretation
1. Improving The Students’ Reading Comprehension Ability of Narrative Text by Using Cloze Procedure Strategy at SMP Wiratama Kotagajah Central Lampung
There were differences between result of pre-test and post-test at the seventh grade of SMP Wiratama Kotagajah. There was some improving could be seen on the table above:
Table 15
The Improving of Students’ Scores at Cycle I and Cycle II
No Name
Students’ Result Pre-Test
Cycle I
Post-Test Cycle I
Improving Post-Test Cycle II
Improving 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
ANQS AF BF CVN CWN DE DDA ES EF FRA FAW HKW IA LA M
70 65 70 60 50 60 70 55 80 75 70 60 65 60 50
80 65 80 55 60 55 65 55 70 80 80 65 70 65 80
10 0 10 -5 10 -5 -5 0 -10
5 10
5 5 5 30
70 75 90 75 60 85 70 70 70 85 80 65 70 60 90
10 10 10 20 0 30
5 15
0 5 0 0 0 -5 10
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
MVA MHW PE RVR RDL RR SDW SYL SS TP TISL
70 55 65 65 80 40 65 65 60 60 65
70 60 65 70 80 65 70 65 50 60 70
0 5 0 5 0 25
5 0 -10
0 5
70 70 75 75 80 65 75 75 50 65 70
0 10 10 5 0 0 5 10
0 5 0
Total 1650 1750 100 1885 175
Average 63,46 67,30 3,84 72,50 6,73
Highest Score 80 80 90
Lowest Score 40 50 50
Based on the table in the previous page, it could be seen there was improving between pre-test, post-test I and post-test II. Almost all of the students got score more than 70. We could be seen the average in pre- test=63,46, in post-test I=67,30. It improves 3,84 point. The average score in post-test II=72,50. It improved 6,73 point. It means that more than 70%
students passed. So, the research stopped in cycle II. The following chart was to described the analysis data result:
Figure 1. Improving of Students Average Score Cycle 1 and Cycle II
2. Improving The Students’ Reading Comprehension Ability of Narrative Text by Using Cloze Procedure Strategy in English Reading Process
There was any improving activity of the seventh grade of SMP Wiratama Kotagajah in cycle I and cycle II. The improvement could be seen on table below:
Pre-Test Post-Test I Post-Test II
63,46
67,3
72,5
average
Table 16
The Improving of Students’ Activities in Cycle I and Cycle II
No
Indicator of Process Succes in Reading Comprehension
Percentages
Improving Cycle I Cycle II
1 Pay attention of teacher’s explanation
57,69% 73,07% 15,38%
2 Understanding the material 65,38% 84,61% 19,23%
3 The students able do task 69,23% 76,92% 7,69%
4 Read and comprehend the story 57,69% 69,23% 11,54%
Source: Teacher observation sheet
Based on the table of students’ observation in cycle I and cycle II, it could be seen that the students’activities were improved. So, the used Cloze Procedure strategy could improved the students’ reading comprehension ability.
67 CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
Considering from all data gathered in the Classroom Action Research, the researcher got some conclusions of the research and some suggestions that support the research result.
A. Conclusion
Based on the result of the analysis of chapter IV, it can be seen that in the cycle I the average score of pre-test cycle I was 63,46 and the average of post-test in cycle I was 67,30. In the post-test in cycle II the average score was 72,50. There are some progresses after being given treatment by using Cloze Procedure strategy. It means that the use of the Cloze Procedure strategy can improve the students’ reading comprehension ability. By using Cloze Procedure strategy in teaching reading, especially reading comprehension ability, it can improve the students’ reading comprehension ability at the eleventh graders of SMP Wiratama Kotagajah Central Lampung.
The students are more enjoyed in english learning process because Cloze Procedure strategy can help them to read the text. So, Cloze Procedure strategy can improve students’ reading comprehension ability.
B. Suggestion
The researcher proposes some suggestions as follows:
1. The students should be more active and interested in learning process, especially in English program. Because, English is very important in globalization.
2. The teacher should choose suitable strategy in learning process that can improve the students’ ability in English especially reading comprehension.
3. The headmaster should be more care to the teacher and to the students in learning process, especially English.