Mersty R Rindengan
Lecturer at PGSD Departement, FIP Unima Manado Manado, Indonesia
Email : [email protected]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to improve the results of Indonesian students learning in elementary school through the use of roll playing learning models. This research was carried out using Action Research which consists of four stages: Planning, action, observation and reflection, with two cycles. Data collection techniques are obtained through observation, documentation and test of learning outcomes. Data analysis techniques using the formula KB
= T / Tt x 100%. From the results of the research data showed that different results were obtained where the first cycle of student learning outcomes only reached 66.6%, while in the second cycle student learning outcomes reached 85.7%. The results of this study can be concluded that by applying the Roll Playing learning model can improve the learning outcomes of Indonesian students especially in the material writing text dialogue. From these conclusions it is recommended to use the Roll Playing Learning model, especially in the material of writing dialogue texts because this learning model is quite effective and can arouse interest in learning and student cooperation in learning.
Keywords : Indonesian Language, Learning Outcomes, Roll Playing Learning Models
INTRODUCTION
Education in Indonesia is closely related to learning Indonesian because learning Indonesian gets an important role for education in Indonesia, which is the official language in all fields. Indonesian Language Learning is directed at improving the ability of students to communicate in Indonesian well and correctly.
Indonesian language competency standards are the minimum qualifications of students who describe mastery of knowledge, language skills, and positive attitudes towards Indonesian language and satra.
Indonesian Language Learning can be carried out well in the learning process because it is supported by 4 language skills, others
include writing skills. By writing someone can express feelings, ideas and ideas. Writing is a medium for someone to others. Suparno (Slamet 2012: 96), Writing as an activity of delivering messages (communication) by using written language as a media tool. Basically writing, not only giving birth to thoughts or feelings, but also an idea, knowledge, knowledge, and life experience of someone with written language. Therefore writing is not a simple activity that does not need to be studied, but rather must be mastered. A writing or essay can be seen in terms of the language used, the contents of the writing / essay, and the form or manner of presentation. The contents of the writing / essay must be relevant to the title of the essay, or the title of the essay can be
184 skills will encourage students to be more active in learning. But now the weak level of writing ability of elementary school students is a challenge for the teaching and learning process.
Learning outcomes achieved by students are very dependent on the teaching and learning process.
Based on observations made by researchers in Class IV SD Inpres 2 Airmadidi Atas, in general students have not been able to write essays well, especially the type of narrative essay, this is evident when the learning process is only focused on the teacher, meaning that this learning uses one direction students just sit down and listen to the explanation from the teacher, so that students experience boredom and do not understand about the material presented which also makes students lazy to do the task. This results in the lack of success of students in writing essays, especially in determining the main ideas of the essay. This can be seen from the data taken by researchers where the number of students in Class IV SD Inpres 2 Airmadidi Atas, amounting to 16 people and only 2 people who received complete grades (12.5%) while 14 people were not completed (87.5%). In other words the value obtained has not reached the standard, this is a problem in learning.
Therefore efforts to overcome them need to conduct research in obtaining good learning outcomes. The investigation group learning model is a suitable learning model because this learning model is a combination of learning while playing so that students are more active, and in learning situations that are relaxed but have important meanings for students' progress.
METHOD
The design used in this study is Class Action Research (CAR) which refers to the research model proposed by Kemmis and Mc Taggart, (Zainal Aqib, 2006: 31) with stages 1)
is grade IV SD Inpres 2 Airmadidi Atas with a total of 16 students, including 11 women and 5 men. Data obtained from the teaching-learning process is calculated using the KKM formula (Teaching Completion Criteria).
After calculating the percentage of completeness of learning outcomes achieved by students then it is further seen if the completeness of learning is classical ≥ 75%
then, a class can be said to be thoroughly studied.
RESULT
The results of the study were taken from the application of the Group Investigation learning model to improve the learning outcomes of writing essays for fourth grade students of SD Inpres 2 Airmadidi Atas. The discussion of the results of this study is based on collecting data through actions taken in the first cycle and second cycle.
Cycle I
The implementation of the action is carried out in the form of stages, namely stages of planning, implementation, observation and reflection. The results of Indonesian language learning, especially narrative essay writing material, were developed from the results of discussions given at the time the implementation of the investigation group learning model appeared to be less than optimal because of 16 people there were only 8 people who were finished studying and 8 others had not. From student learning outcomes can be seen the percentage of achievement is 54.69%.
Then it can be seen that the learning outcomes in the first cycle have not reached the minimum completeness criteria. This unsuccessful happened because the teacher had not been able to implement the steps of the cooperative Group Investigation model that was designed, because the teacher had not been able to guide the
Proceeding of International Conference: Primary Education Pivotal Literature and Research UNNES 2018 ISBN 978-602-0747-08-8
185 students, amounting to 16 people who had different characteristics.
Cycle II
The implementation of the action is carried out in the stages of the activity, namely the stages of planning, implementation, observation, reflection. Through observations made by researchers with classroom teachers it turned out that the actions taken in the second cycle had increased learning outcomes. This is caused by researchers who have corrected deficiencies that occurred in cycle I.
Based on the results of the cycle II table, it can be seen that the actions carried out in the second cycle reached students' mastery of 75%
and reached 85.00% so that they can be called satisfactory results so that the actions carried out in the second cycle were declared successful and did not need to proceed next.
DISCUSSION
From the data analysis of the above test results, it can be seen in the first cycle the comprehension of student learning absorption in classical 54.69%, which means that it has not achieved 75% classical learning completeness because there are still 8 people who have not reached the standard, so this research is continued on cycle action II. In the second cycle, although there were some people who got good grades, the individual absorption capacity had increased to reach the completion score of 85.00%. This means that it has achieved an increase in student learning outcomes in a classical manner, so this research has been successful and satisfying. so this research did not proceed to the next cycle. With the results of this study, the benefits obtained from the application of the Group Investigation learning model are:
a. Increase student motivation and students' attention to learn through interesting picture media;
b. Students more easily understand the material given by the teacher;
c. Students are more active in learning;
d. Students are more responsible through cooperation between fellow group members;
Based on the description above, it can be concluded that the Group Investigation learning model on Indonesian language learning especially essay writing material can improve the learning outcomes of writing more effective essays.
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of the research and discussion, the researcher can conclude that:
The application of the Group Investigation learning model can improve the learning outcomes of Indonesian Language in essay writing material in class IV of SD Inpres 2 Airmadidi Atas. This can be seen in the learning outcomes of the first cycle (54.69%) and the second cycle (85.00%).
Suggestions researchers, as teachers, are suggested that the application of the investigation group learning model on
Indonesian language material can be done in a directed, planned and continuous manner to improve student learning outcomes and also expected that the application of investigation group learning models can help students to be more motivated, especially in understanding subject matter given by the teacher.
REFERENCES
Aqib Zainal, 2006. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas.
Bandung. Yrama Widya
Aqib Zainal, 2009. Menjadi Guru Profesional Berstandar Nasional. Bandung. Yrama Widya
Aqib Zainal, 2013. Model-model, Media, dan Strategi Pembelajaran Kontekstual
(Inovatif). Bandung. Yrama Widya
186 : Refika Aditama
Agus Suwanto.dkk.2004.Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia.Yogyakarta : Citra Aji Jiparama
Djumingin, 2011:174. Strategi dan Aplikasi Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Bahasa dan Sastra. Makassar: Badan Penerbit UNM.
https://pojokpakdani.wordpress.com/201 5/07/07/role-playing-sebagai-salah-satu- model-pembelajaran-inovatif-bahasa- dan-sastra/
Khundharu Saddhono St.Y.Slamet. 2012.
meningkatakan ketrampilan berbahasa Indonesia. Bandung :Karya Putra Darmawati
Supriana Agus, 2003. Sastra dan Bahasa Indonesia di Kelas Tinggi. Jakarta : Puskur Depdiknas
Proceeding of International Conference: Primary Education Pivotal Literature and Research UNNES 2018 ISBN 978-602-0747-08-8
187