Summary Emission:
Emmission per product tCO2e/tProduct
CPO 10.92 PK 10.92 Extraction %
OER 17.71
Grid electricity 0.00 0.00 Credits
Export of grid electricity 0.00 0.00
Sales of POM 0.00 0.00
Sales of EFB 0.00 0.00
Total 68344.26 0.20
Emissions from Palm Kernel Crusher Emission Source tCO2e PK from own mill 0.00 PK from other source 0.00 Fuel Consumption 0.00 Total Crusher
Emissions 0.00
Palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment Diverted to compost 0%
Diverted to anaerobic digestion 100%
POME diverted to anaerobic digestion.
Diverted to anaerobic pond 100 % Diverted to methane capture
(flaring) 0 %
Diverted to methane capture
(electricity generation) 0 %
GHG calculation on January to December 2022 period shown net emission of GHG are Increasing compared to 2021 net GHG is 5.91 tCO2e/t product meanwhile for year 2022 period shown net emission GHG is 10.92 tCO2e/t product.
7.10.2
Based on document verification and interview with management, there are no new developments in the operational area of PT SIP after 2014.
7.10.3
Identification of environmental aspects and impacts is carried out annually for sources of pollution and emissions at the Palm Oil Mill as stated in the identification and evaluation form of environmental aspects F/SRUM/LEMS-EHSD/SADV/001/001.
Environmental aspects are identified in each palm oil mill activity, namely: entrance gate, weighbridge, parking lot, grading, loading ramp, sterilizer, thresher, press, but and kernel, clarification, storage tank, CPO dispatch, engine room, boiler, water Treatment Plants, chemical warehouses, temporary storage for hazardous waste, diesel fuel stations, vehicle washing offices, housing, and warehouses for lubricants or fuel oil.
The company has identified significant GHG emissions and pollutants from plantation and mill operations. Identification of sources of GHG emissions, among others:
Fuel for electricity
Operational vehicle fuel
Use of CaCO3
Use of HCl and NaOH
Use of Al2(SO4)3
Process at WWTP
Mitigation programs (reduce and minimize) that have been implemented by the company include:
Substituting diesel fuel with renewable energy (shells and fiber) in the CPO production process
Maintenance and repair of generators and turbines on a regular basis
Reducing electricity consumption and the use of air conditioning
Periodic maintenance and repairs to operational vehicles
Supervise the use of CaCO3
Monitor the use of chemicals
Wastewater application
Company has RKL-RPL Implementation Report every semester. For example, report for the period 2022 semester 2 which contains the results of air emissions and ambient tests and has been reported to the relevant agencies. Emission and ambient air testing were carried out and the results of measuring the emission air quality of boilers and generators that met the quality standards stipulated in the Minister of Environment Regulation No. 07 of 2007, and the ambient air quality in factories and plantations has met the quality standards set out in Government Regulation No. 22 of 2021.
The mitigation program is effectively reduce the GHG emission and can be proven by GHG calculation for period 2022 compared to 2021 as mentioned in 7.10.1.
GHG calculation on January to December 2022 period shown net emission of GHG are Increasing compared to 2021 net GHG is 5.91 tCO2e/t product meanwhile for year 2022 period shown net emission GHG is 10.92 tCO2e/t product.
Status: Comply 7.11
Fire is not used for preparing land and is prevented in the managed area.
7.11.1
At the time the RSPO ASA 1.4 audit was carried out, there were no land clearing and planting activities carried out by the company.
In the Long-Term Plan document, it is known that replanting is in 2020 and 2022 for SBYE and was Planned on 2024 for GABA. PT Sumber Indah Perkasa has plantations with planting years 1991 – 2000 and 2018 - 2019 which are divided into 2 estates, namely SMRE and GABA.
Based on observation in estate operational areas and information from village representatives, as well as representatives from Environmental Agency and Agriculture/Plantation Agency of Tulang Bawang and Mesuji Regency, it was known that there is no use fire for land preparation and replanting activities.
7.11.2.
The company has an SOP for Emergency Preparedness and Response with the document number SOP/SMART/UMUM/SADV/I/005 ratified by the Head of Upstream on 01 July 2014. Broadly speaking, the SOP contains the definition of an emergency and the emergency response team, the flow of reporting if it occurs emergencies, the duties and responsibilities of the emergency response team, planning and handling actions in the event of an emergency, and recovery as a result of an emergency. As for emergency response situations identified such as fire/explosion, pollution, natural disasters, riots, demonstrations and work accidents.
Unit of certification has established the preventive and control fire cases in the year of 2022 with several activities, such as:
socialization of forest fire prevention to employees on check roll; therefore to the surrounding village, installing the signboard for prohibits of burning on the strategic places, basic training to the all of staff, adding firefighting tools, hotspot and fire spot monitoring from towers and patrols, giving permission to several cow breeders to take grass as partners in case of an incident fires, daily monitoring of forest fire by public metrology center (satellite). Based on the results of monitoring in 2022, it was known that there have never been any fire cases. It was also strengthened by interview result from related agencies in Tulang Bawang Regency and Mesuji Regency.
Based on the field observation in GABA, it is known that the Company already has fire equipment storage which from the observation results known that the fire control was in good condition and still function well when were used to have simulation during Audit Asa- 1.4 Assessment. Those fire equipment such as nozle, and water tank which still function well and monitored regularly every week during training ctivities and simulation for fire fifghter team as mentioned in indicator 7.11.3. Based on interview results, with pne of firefighter team member, it is known that the worker already aware about first hands handling if there was to be any fire case occur aroun company’s operational area and surroundings.
7.11.3.
The company shows evidence of recorded socialization of forest and land fire prevention which is carried out routinely in the plantation area of PT Sumber Indah Perkasa, both to employees and to the surrounding community. Socialization activities to employees are carried out during the morning check roll in each division delivered by the Assistant of each Division. Meanwhile, socialization to the community is carried out by coordinating with stakeholders.
The company also showed evidence of recorded training activities and simulations for members of the Emergency Response Team which were held jointly at SBYE Estate on 27 March 2022 which was attended by PT SIP employees where the employees participating in the training are representatives from the Emergency Response Team and employee representatives from each village around PT SIP's plantations.
During Audit ASA 1.4, it is known that company has demonstrated fire emergency response simulation to team auditor on SMRE and GABA. Based on the simulation, it can conclude that the company already has qualified fire fighter team, and all the tools were used are functioned properly. Based on interview with the firefighter team, it is known that they are routinely once a month monitored all the fire fighter equipment readiness.
Status: Comply 7.12
Land clearing does not cause deforestation or damage any area required to protect or enhance High Conservation Values (HCVs) or High Carbon Stock (HCS) forest. HCVs and HCS forests in the managed area are
identified and protected or enhanced.
7.12.1
There is no new planting after November 2005 and 01 January 2010. Reporting of zero liability (disclosure) or submission to RSPO has conducted on 29 August 2014.
7.12.2
HCV assessment of PT SIP is carried out by Environment Department Staff of PT SMART from 08 June 2010 to 10 November 2011, with report finalisation in December 2011. There is four Assessors which all were RSPO-Approval HCV Assessor, lead by ALS Licensed Assessor No. ALS140217NM). Peer review of report is conducted by Resit Sözer, an independent consultant in December 2010, while public consultation had been carried out in 10 November 2011, attended by 51 stakeholders. Based on report study it was informed that HCV area is presented as follows:
SMRE Type
of HCV Identification Results Location Hectarage (ha)
1.2
Protected Fauna:
Ictinaetus malayensis (Elang Hitam)
Elanus caeruleus (Elang Tikus)
Ardea sumatrana (Cangak Abu)
Halcyon smyrnensis (Cekakak Dada Putih)
Bubulus ibis (Kuntul Kerbau)
Crocodilus porosus (Buaya Muara)
Division 6 Pidada River -
Total -
GABA Type
of HCV Identification Results Location Hectarage (ha) 1.1
4.1 Riparian zone Putuk River 17.42
Camp River 10.06
1.2
Protected Fauna:
Ardeola speciosa (Blekok Sawah)
Bubulus ibis (Kuntul Kerbau)
Ardea purpurea (Cangak Laut)
Ardea sumatrana (Cangak Merah)
Alcedinidae spp.
Felis bengalensis (Macan Akar)
Division 6 Pidada River -
6
Cemetery of elders:
Mbah Mul
Mbah Setajim
Public Cemetery Sidodadi
Block D04 Block C07 Block B 20
-
Total 27.48